Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Uncertain Supply Chain Management » Enhanced decision-making in uncertain environments: A Fermatean fuzzy approach for heterogeneous group dynamics

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

USCM Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (5)
      • Issue 1 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (62)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (15)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (244)
      • Issue 1 (55)
      • Issue 2 (59)
      • Issue 3 (63)
      • Issue 4 (67)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (190)
      • Issue 1 (42)
      • Issue 2 (45)
      • Issue 3 (50)
      • Issue 4 (53)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (150)
      • Issue 1 (28)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (44)
      • Issue 4 (46)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (117)
      • Issue 1 (25)
      • Issue 2 (26)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (34)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (82)
      • Issue 1 (20)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (17)
      • Issue 4 (30)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (57)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (19)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (26)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (31)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (39)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (13)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (22)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Uncertain Supply Chain Management
ISSN 2291-6830 (Online) - ISSN 2291-6822 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 14 Issue 2 pp. 113-146, 2026

Enhanced decision-making in uncertain environments: A Fermatean fuzzy approach for heterogeneous group dynamics Pages 113-146 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Bipradas Bairagi, Bijan Sarkar

📋 Author Affiliations:
Bipradas Bairagi ORCID 1, Bijan Sarkar2
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia, India
2 Department of Production Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
doi 10.5267/j.uscm.2025.2.002
Crossref Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Fermatean fuzzy modeling, Group decision-making, Warehouse location selection, FMCDM

Abstract: In today's dynamic and uncertain environments, effective decision-making processes are essential for navigating complex challenges. This paper proposes an innovative approach utilizing Fermatean fuzzy sets to enhance decision-making within heterogeneous group dynamics. Through a systematic mathematical framework, our method integrates expert preferences to find out the comparative weight of decision attribue, leveraging both Fermatean fuzzy sets and entropy calculations. Furthermore, we introduce a novel technique to assess the significance of individual experts' opinions, accounting for specific contextual factors. By synthesizing performance ratings, criteria weights, and expert inputs, our approach offers a comprehensive decision-making model. We introduce the concept of the proximity coefficient to address existing methodological limitations, enhancing the accuracy of decision outcomes. To validate our methodology, we apply it to a practical scenario involving warehouse location selection. Additionally, analysis of sensitivity is conducted to evaluate the robustness of our method across diverse scenarios, demonstrating its efficacy in uncertain environments. This research contributes to advancing decision-making practices in complex and uncertain contexts, offering a valuable tool for addressing real-world challenges.

How to cite this paper
APA: Bairagi, B & Sarkar, B. (2026). Enhanced decision-making in uncertain environments: A Fermatean fuzzy approach for heterogeneous group dynamics. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 14(2), 113-146.
Chicago/Turabian: Bairagi, B & Sarkar, B. 2026. "Enhanced decision-making in uncertain environments: A Fermatean fuzzy approach for heterogeneous group dynamics." Uncertain Supply Chain Management 14, no. 2 (2026): 113-146.
AMA: Bairagi, B & Sarkar, B. Enhanced decision-making in uncertain environments: A Fermatean fuzzy approach for heterogeneous group dynamics. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. 2026;14(2):113-146.

References
Abyazi-Sani, R., & Ghanbari, R. (2016). An efficient tabu search for solving the uncapacitated single allocation hub location problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 93, 99–109.
Akram, M., Shahzadi, G., & Ahmadini, A. A. H. (2020). Decision-making method for an effective sanitizer to reduce COVID-19 under Fermatean fuzzy sets. Journal of Mathematics, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3263407
Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96.
Aydoğan, H., & Ozkir, V. (2024). A Fermatean fuzzy MCDM method for selection and ranking problems: Case studies. Expert Systems with Applications, 237, 121628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121628
Bairagi, B., Dey, B., Sarkar, B., & Sanyal, S. K. (2015). A De Novo multi-approaches multi-criteria decision making technique with an application in performance evaluation of material handling devices. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 87, 267–282.
Biswas, A., & Deb, N. (2021). Pythagorean fuzzy Schweizer and Sklar power aggregation operators for solving multi-attribute decision-making problems. Granular Computing, 6(4), 991–1007.
Bose, U., Davey, A. M., & Olson, D. L. (1997). Multi-attribute utility methods in group decision making: Past applications and potential for inclusion in GDSS. Omega, 25, 691–706.
Brown, A., & Green, B. (2022). Advancements in Fermatean fuzzy logic for decision-making under uncertainty. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 15(2), 123-136.
Chen, X., Zhang, H., & Dong, Y. (2015). The fusion process with heterogeneous preference structures in group decision making. Information Fusion, 24, 72–83.
Chou, Y. C., Yao, H. C., & Chun, Y. S. (2008). A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes. European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 132–145.
Dey, B., Bairagi, B., Sarkar, B., & Sanyal, S. K. (2017). Group heterogeneity in multi-member decision-making model with an application to warehouse location selection in a supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 101–122.
Dey, B., Bairagi, B., Sarkar, B., & Sanyal, S. K. (2013). A hybrid fuzzy technique for the selection of warehouse location in a supply chain under a utopian environment. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management. 8(4), 250-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2013.825075
Fan, Z. P., Xiao, S. H., & Hu, G. F. (2004). An optimization method for integrating two kinds of preference information in group decision-making. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 46(20), 329–335.
Garcia, D., & Martinez, M. (2019). Managing heterogeneous group dynamics in organizational decision-making. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(3), 321–335.
Garg, H., Shahzadi, G., & Akram, M. (2020). Decision-making analysis based on Fermatean fuzzy Yager operators with application in COVID-19 testing facility. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7279027
Hadi, A., Khan, W., & Khan, A. (2021). A novel approach to MADM problems using Fermatean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(7), 3464–3499.
Hedi-Venchech, A., & Mirjaberi, M. (2014). Fuzzy inferior ratio method for multiple attribute decision-making problem. Information Sciences, 277, 263–272.
Ibrahim, H. A., Qahtan, S., Zaidan, A. A., Deveci, M., Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., Mohammed, R. T., & Alamoodi, A. H. (2024). Sustainability in mobility for autonomous vehicles over smart city evaluation: Using interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy rough set-based decision-making model. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 129, 107609.
Jones, E., & Smith, K. (2019). Challenges and limitations of traditional decision-making methods in uncertain environments. Journal of Decision Making, 18(3), 211–225.
Kose, Y., Ayyildiz, E., & Cevikcan, E. (2024). Evaluation of disassembly line layouts using an integrated Fermatean fuzzy decision-making methodology: An application for refrigerator disassembly line. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 190, 110090.
Kose, Y., Cevikcan, E., Ertemel, S., & Murat, M. (2023). Game theory-oriented approach for disassembly line worker assignment and balancing problem with multi-manned workstations. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIE.2023.109294
Kose, Y., Civan, H. N., Ayyildiz, E., & Cevikcan, E. (2022). An interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS integrated model for ergonomic assessment of setup process under SMED. Sustainability, 14(21), 13804. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU142113804
Kirişci, M., Demir, I., & Şimşek, N. (2022). Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE multi-criteria group decision-making and most suitable biomedical material selection. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102278
Mishra, A. R., & Rani, P. (2021). Multi-criteria healthcare waste disposal location selection based on Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS method. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(5), 2469–2484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00407-9
Perez, I. J., Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Lu, J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2011). Modeling. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, LNAI, 6820, 55–61.
Seikh, M., & Mandal, R. U. (2021). Intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision-making. Granular Computing, 6(3), 473–488.
Sen, S., Patra, K., & Mondal, S. K. (2021). A new approach to similarity measure for generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and its application to fuzzy risk analysis. Granular Computing, 6(3), 705–718.
Senapati, T., & Yager, R. R. (2019a). Fermatean fuzzy weighted operators and its application in multi-attribute decision-making models. Engineering Applications in Artificial Intelligence, 85, 112–121.
Senapati, T., & Yager, R. R. (2019b). Some new operations over Fermatean fuzzy numbers and application of Fermatean fuzzy WPM in multiple criteria decision making. Informatica, 30(2), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2019.211
Senapati, T., & Yager, R. R. (2020). Fermatean fuzzy sets. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(2), 663–674.
Smith, J. (2018). Introduction to decision-making in uncertain environments. International Journal of Decision Making, 25(1), 45–58.
Torra, V. (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(6), 529–539.
Verma, R., & Mittal, A. (2022). Multiple attribute group decision-making based on novel probabilistic ordered weighted cosine similarity operators with Pythagorean fuzzy information. Granular Computing, 8, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-022-00318-1
Yager, R. R. (2014). Pythagorean membership values in multi-attribute decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), 958–965.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
Zhang, X., Xu, Z., & Wang, H. (2015). Heterogeneous multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete weight information: A deviation modeling approach. Information Fusion, 25, 49–62.
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Uncertain Supply Chain Management | 📅 Year: 2026 | 📖 Volume: 14 | 📄 Issue: 2 | 👁️ Views: 588 | 📊 Crossref:

Related Articles:
  • A novel multi-criteria group decision-making approach using aggregation operators and weight determination method for supplier selection problem in hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy environment
  • Similarity measures for Fermatean fuzzy sets and its applications in group decision-making
  • A TOPSIS method based on intuitionistic fuzzy values: a case study of North African airports
  • An IF-DEMATEL-AHP based on Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers (TIFNs)
  • A multiple criteria decision making for raking alternatives using preference relation matrix based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets

📝 Ready to share your research?

Uncertain Supply Chain Management is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com