The role of supply chain integration, management commitment and supply chain challenges on supply chain performance and MSMEs performance

Ralahallo, F.; Wijaya, F.; Latuconsina, Z.; Firman, F.; Titioka, B.

Growing Science » Uncertain Supply Chain Management » The role of supply chain integration, management commitment and supply chain challenges on supply chain performance and MSMEs performance

Journals

USCM Volumes

Volume 1 (22)
- Issue 1 (4)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (6)
- Issue 4 (6)

Volume 2 (32)
- Issue 1 (7)
- Issue 2 (5)
- Issue 3 (10)
- Issue 4 (10)

Volume 3 (39)
- Issue 1 (9)
- Issue 2 (13)
- Issue 3 (10)
- Issue 4 (7)

Volume 4 (31)
- Issue 1 (10)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (6)
- Issue 4 (9)

Volume 5 (26)
- Issue 1 (6)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (8)
- Issue 4 (6)

Volume 6 (25)
- Issue 1 (7)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (6)
- Issue 4 (6)

Volume 7 (57)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (19)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (16)

Volume 8 (82)
- Issue 1 (20)
- Issue 2 (15)
- Issue 3 (17)
- Issue 4 (30)

Volume 9 (117)
- Issue 1 (25)
- Issue 2 (26)
- Issue 3 (32)
- Issue 4 (34)

Volume 10 (150)
- Issue 1 (28)
- Issue 2 (32)
- Issue 3 (44)
- Issue 4 (46)

Volume 11 (190)
- Issue 1 (42)
- Issue 2 (45)
- Issue 3 (50)
- Issue 4 (53)

Volume 12 (244)
- Issue 1 (55)
- Issue 2 (59)
- Issue 3 (63)
- Issue 4 (67)

Volume 13 (30)
- Issue 1 (15)
- Issue 2 (15)

Countries

Uncertain Supply Chain Management

ISSN 2291-6830 (Online) - ISSN 2291-6822 (Print) Quarterly Publication Volume 12 Issue 3 pp. 1833-1840 , 2024

The role of supply chain integration, management commitment and supply chain challenges on supply chain performance and MSMEs performance Pages 1833-1840 Download PDF

Authors: Fransiska Natalia Ralahallo, Febiyola Wijaya, Zainuddin Latuconsina, Firman Firman, Baretha Meisar Titioka

DOI: 10.5267/j.uscm.2024.2.019

Keywords: MSMEs, Supply chain integration, Management commitment, Supply chain performance, Supply chain challenges, MSMEs performance

Abstract: The aim of writing this research article is to determine the influence of supply chain challenges on MSMEs performance, Supply chain integration on Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) performance, Management commitment to MSMEs performance, Supply chain integration on Supply chain performance. This research method is a quantitative survey, research data was obtained by distributing online questionnaires via social media. 700 questionnaires were distributed to MSMEs owners and of the 700 questionnaires distributed, 350 respondents or 50% responded as determined by the simple random sampling method. This research adopted a quantitative method with data analysis using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Partial Least Square (PLS) with SmertPLS software data processing tools. The questionnaire was designed using a Likert scale of 1 to 7. The stages of data analysis were validity, reliability and hypothesis testing. or significance. The results of data analysis show that supply chain challenges have a positive and significant influence on MSMEs performance, Supply chain integration has a positive and significant influence on MSMEs performance, Management commitment has a positive and significant influence on MSMEs performance, Supply chain integration has a positive influence and significant to supply chain performance. The novelty of this research is the creation of a relationship model of supply chain integration, management commitment, supply chain performance, supply chain challenges and MSMEs performance. The implication of this research is to encourage improvements in MSMEs performance, MSMEs managers must encourage improvements or implement challenges in the supply chain. Supply chain integration and management commitment. Supply chain management is not just about managing the flow of goods, but also a holistic business strategy that can create a competitive advantage. With a deep understanding of supply chain components, challenges and strategies, companies can ensure smooth operations and meet customer expectations in a dynamic and global business environment. Implementing best practices in supply chain management is the key to building a strong foundation for business success in an era of ever-growing globalization.

How to cite this paper

 Ralahallo, F., Wijaya, F., Latuconsina, Z., Firman, F & Titioka, B. (2024). The role of supply chain integration, management commitment and supply chain challenges on supply chain performance and MSMEs performance.Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(3), 1833-1840.

Refrences

Ahmed, R. R., Akbar, W., Aijaz, M., Channar, Z. A., Ahmed, F., & Parmar, V. (2023). The role of green innovation on environmental and organizational performance: Moderation of human resource practices and management commitment. Heliyon, 9(1), 34-36
Arijanto, R. (2022). The Role of Supply Chain Management on Competitive Advantage and SMEs Operational Performance During Post Pandemic and Digital Era. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 3(6), 128 - 137. https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar.v3i6.410
Beth, S., Burt, D. N., Copacino, W., Gopal, C., Lee, H. L., Lynch, R. P., & Morris, S. (2003). Supply chain challenges. building relationships. Harvard business review, 81(7), 64-73.
Deshpande, A. (2012). Supply chain management dimensions, supply chain performance and organizational performance: An integrated framework. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(8), 2.
Fabbes, N., & Jahre, M. (2008). Supply chain integration and performance: a review of the evidence. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(2), 130-154.
Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58-71.
Garg, N., Anand, P., & Vakeel, K. A. (2023). Prioritizing personality diversity: a commitment and performance based perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(5), 1005-1023.
Gohil, D., & Thakker, S. V. (2021). Blockchain-integrated technologies for solving supply chain challenges. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 3(2), 78-97.
Khan, A., Li, C., Shahzad, M., & Sampene, A. K. (2023). Green effectual orientations to shape environmental performance through green innovation and environmental management initiatives under the influence of CSR commitment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(1), 2205-2217.
Kim, D. Y. (2013). Relationship between supply chain integration and performance. Operations Management Research, 6, 74-90.
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Arrfelt, M. (2007). Strategic supply chain management: Improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development. Strategic management journal, 28(10), 1035-1052.
Permana , A. I., & Soediantono, D. (2022). The Role of Eco Supply Chain on Environment and Operational Performance of Indonesian Defense Industry. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 3(3), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar.v3i3.284
Prajogo, D., & Olhager, J. (2012). Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 514-522.
Purwanto, A., & Juliana, J. (2022). The effect of supplier performance and transformational supply chain leadership style on supply chain performance in manufacturing companies. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(2), 511-516.
Rudyanto, R., Soemarni, L., Pramono, R., & Purwanto, A. (2020). The influence of antecedents of supply chain integration on company performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(4), 865-874.
Ruzo-Sanmartín, E., Abousamra, A. A., Otero-Neira, C., & Svensson, G. (2023). The impact of the relationship commitment and customer integration on supply chain performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(4), 943-957.
Sanders, N. R., & Wagner, S. M. (2011). Multidisciplinary and multimethod research for addressing contemporary supply chain challenges. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(4), 317-323.
Tan, K. C., Kannan, V. R., & Handfield, R. B. (1998). Supply chain management: supplier performance and firm performance. International Journal of Purchasing & Materials Management, 34(3).
Tarifa, J., & De Burgos-Jiménez, J. (2017). Supply chain integration and performance relationship: a moderating effects review. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(4), 1243-1271.
Yadav, V. S., Singh, A. R., Gunasekaran, A., Raut, R. D., & Narkhede, B. E. (2022). A systematic literature review of the agro-food supply chain: Challenges, network design, and performance measurement perspectives. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 685-704.
Yadav, G., Luthra, S., Jakhar, S. K., Mangla, S. K., & Rai, D. P. (2020). A framework to overcome sustainable supply chain challenges through solution measures of industry 4.0 and circular economy: An automotive case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120112.
Vanichchinchai, A. (2014). Supply chain management, supply performance and total quality management: An organizational characteristic analysis. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 22(2), 126-148.
Wei, F., Abbas, J., Alarifi, G., Zhang, Z., Adam, N. A., & de Queiroz, M. J. (2023). Role of green intellectual capital and top management commitment in organizational environmental performance and reputation: Moderating role of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 405, 136847.
Zailani, S., & Rajagopal, P. (2005). Supply chain integration and performance: US versus East Asian companies. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(5), 379-393.