Al-Muftah, H., Weerakkody, V., Rana, N. P., Sivarajah, U., & Irani, Z. (2018). Factors influencing e-diplomacy implementation: Exploring causal relationships using interpretive structural modelling. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 502–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.002
APEC, & Digital Economy Steering Committee. (2022). Policy Recommendations: Digital Permitting and E-Government Measures to Advance the Post-COVID-19 Economic Recovery.
Aranyossy, M. (2022). User adoption and value of e-government services (Citizen-centric empirical study from Hungary). Acta Oeconomica, 72(4), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2022.00032
Ashaye, O. R., & Irani, Z. (2019). The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.016
Bai, W. (2013). A Public Value Based Framework for Evaluating the Performance of e-Government in China. IBusiness, 05(03), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.4236/ib.2013.53B006
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2012). Integrating trust and personal values into the technology acceptance model: The case of e-government services adoption. Cuadernos de Economia y Direccion de La Empresa, 15(4), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2012.04.004
Bühler, M. M., Nübel, K., Jelinek, T., Riechert, D., Bauer, T., Schmid, T., & Schneider, M. (2023). Data Cooperatives as a Catalyst for Collaboration, Data Sharing and the Digital Transformation of the Construction Sector. Buildings, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020442
Burmeister, F., Drews, P., & Schirmer, I. (2019). Leveraging Architectural Thinking for Large-Scale E-Government Projects. Researchgate.
Chen, S. C., Liu, M. L., & Lin, C. P. (2013). Integrating technology readiness into the expectation-confirmation model: An empirical study of mobile services. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(8), 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0606
Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2023). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
Chomistriana, D., & Simanjuntak, M. R. A. (2022). Architectural Framework Factor for E-Government in Indonesian Construction Services Sector. 2022 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS). https://doi.org/10.1109/iciss55894.2022.9915056
Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004
Cordella, A., & Paletti, A. (2019). Government as a platform, orchestration, and public value creation: The Italian case. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101409
Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178
Curry, E., Tuikka, T., Metzger, A., Zillner, S., Bertels, N., Dalle Carbonare, D., Gusmeroli, S., Scerri, S., López de Vallejo, I., & Garcia Robles, A. (2022). Designing Data Spaces : The BDVA Perspetive. In Designing Data Spaces. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93975-5
Elnaghi, M., Alshawi, S. N., Kamal, M. M., Weerakkody, V., & Irani, Z. (2019). Exploring the role of a government authority in managing transformation in service re-engineering – Experiences from Dubai police. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.011
Fischer, C., Heuberger, M., & Heine, M. (2021). The impact of digitalization in the public sector: a systematic literature review. Der Moderne Staat – Zeitschrift Für Public Policy, Recht Und Management, 14(1–2021), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v14i1.13
Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Flores-Zúñiga, M. (2020). Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital government success: Integrating implementation and adoption factors. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101518
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J. F., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Factors versus Composites: Guidelines for Choosing the Right Structural Equation Modeling Method. Project Management Journal, 50(6), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819882132
Hair, J. F., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). Explanation Plus Prediction—The Logical Focus of Project Management Research. Project Management Journal, 52(4), 319–322. https://doi.org/DOI: 10. 1177/ 8756 9728 21999945
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Past Practices and Recommendations for Future Applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008
Hapsara, M., Imran, A., & Turner, T. (2017). Beyond Organizational Motives of e-Government Adoption: The Case of e-Voting Initiative in Indonesian Villages. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.166
Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2023). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917
He, Y., Chen, Q., & Kitkuakul, S. (2018). Regulatory focus and technology acceptance: Perceived ease of use and usefulness as efficacy. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1459006. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1459006
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Huang, Y., Shi, Q., Zuo, J., Pena-Mora, F., & Chen, J. (2021). Research Status and Challenges of Data-Driven Construction Project Management in the Big Data Context. In Advances in Civil Engineering (Vol. 2021). Hindawi Limited. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6674980
Ibem, E. O., & Laryea, S. (2014). Survey of digital technologies in procurement of construction projects. Automation in Construction, 46, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.07.003
Kuldosheva, G. (2021). ADBI Working Paper Series CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR IN TRANSITION ECONOMIES: EXAMINATION OF THE CASE OF UZBEKISTAN Asian Development Bank Institute. https://www.adb.org/publications/challenges-opportunities-digital-transformation-uzbekistan
Lai, Y. L., & Lee, J. (2020). Integration of Technology Readiness Index (TRI) Into the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for Explaining Behavior in Adoption of BIM. Asian Education Studies, 5(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.20849/aes.v5i2.816
Lembaga Pengembangan Jasa Konstruksi, K. P. (2023). Sistem Informasi Konstruksi Indonesia. Progres Input Data SIJKT. https://siki.pu.go.id/
Lim, E. T. K., Tan, C.-W., Cyr, D., Pan, S. L., & Xiao, B. (2012). Advancing Public Trust Relationships in Electronic Government: The Singapore E-Filing Journey. Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1110–1130. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0386
Lin, C. H., Shih, H. Y., & Sher, P. J. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model. Psychology and Marketing, 24(7), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20177
Ma, Y. J., Gam, H. J., & Banning, J. (2017). Perceived ease of use and usefulness of sustainability labels on apparel products: application of the technology acceptance model. Fashion and Textiles, 4(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-017-0093-1
Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2021). Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102
Manurung, L. (2017). Development of E-government through Public-Private Partnerships in Indonesia.
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.3.50.18024
Nezami, M. R., Bruijne, M. L. C. De, Hertogh, M. J. C. M., & Bakker, H. L. M. (2022). Collaboration and Data Sharing in Inter-Organizational Infrastructure Construction Projects. 1–19.
Nezami, M. R., de Bruijne, M. L. C., Hertogh, M. J. C. M., & Bakker, H. L. M. (2022). Collaboration and Data Sharing in Inter-Organizational Infrastructure Construction Projects. Sustainability, 14(24), 16835. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416835
Nnaji, C., Okpala, I., Awolusi, I., & Gambatese, J. (2023). A systematic review of technology acceptance models and theories in construction research. In Journal of Information Technology in Construction (Vol. 28, pp. 39–69). International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2023.003
Nugroho, M. A., & Fajar, M. A. (2017). Effects of Technology Readiness Towards Acceptance of Mandatory Web-Based Attendance System. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.161
Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (Tri). Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001
Project Management Institute. (2021). The standard for project management and a guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). (7th ed.).
Rabaa, A., Rabaa’, A. A., Zogheib, B., Alshatti, A., & Al Jamal, E. (2016). Adoption of e-Government in Developing Countries: The Case of the State of Kuwait 1 Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences Adoption of e-Government in Developing Countries: The Case of the State of Kuwait 1. 7(2). http://www.cisjournal.org
Rajendra, Rajendra, K., Lamari, &, & Fiona. (2015). The technological readiness of construction contractors. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/87945/
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9613-y
Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations. Marketing ZFP, 39(3), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-4
Rinjany, D. K. (2020). Does Technology Readiness and Acceptance Induce more Adoption of E-Government? 68 Does Technology Readiness and Acceptance Induce more Adoption of E-Government? Applying the UTAUT and TRI on an Indonesian Complaint-Based Application. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr
Rosacker, K. M., & Olson, D. L. (2008). Public sector information system critical success factors. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506160810862955
Sam, K. M., & Chatwin, C. R. (2019). UNDERSTANDING ADOPTION OF BIG DATA ANALYTICS IN CHINA: FROM ORGANIZATIONAL USERS PERSPECTIVE.
Sandoval-Almazán, R., Luna-Reyes, L. F., Luna Reyes, D. E., Gil García, J. R., Purón Cid, G., & Picazo-Vela, S. (2017). Building digital government strategies : principles and practices. Springer.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In Handbook of Market Research (pp. 1–40). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Velasquez Estrada, J. M., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4552–4564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Alfabeta.
Susha, I., Rukanova, B., Zuiderwijk, A., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Gasco Hernandez, M. (2023). Achieving voluntary data sharing in cross sector partnerships: Three partnership models. Information and Organization, 33(1), 100448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2023.100448
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. In Government Information Quarterly (Vol. 36, Issue 2, pp. 167–178). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
UNDESA. (2020). United Nations e-government survey 2020 : digital government in the decade of action for... sustainable development. United Nations.
United Nation. (2022). United Nation, E-Government Survey 2022 The Future of Digital Government. https://publicadministration.un.org/en/ publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/
United Nations. (2014). UNITED NATIONS E-GOVERNMENT SURVEY 2014 E-GOVERNMENT FOR THE FUTURE WE WANT. http://www.un.org/desa
Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004
Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428
Venkatesh, V., Walton, S. M., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. In MIS Quarterly (Vol. 36, Issue 1). http://ssrn.com/abstract=2002388
Wang, G., Wang, P., Cao, D., & Luo, X. (2020). Predicting behavioural resistance to BIM implementation in construction projects: An empirical study integrating technology acceptance model and equity theory. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 26(7), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12325
Wilson, C., & Mergel, I. (2022). Overcoming barriers to digital government: mapping the strategies of digital champions. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101681
Xiong, B., Skitmore, M., & Xia, B. (2015). A critical review of structural equation modeling applications in construction research. Automation in Construction, 49, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.09.006
Zhang, N., Lu, Z., & Shou, Y. (2017). The dominant role of governing structure in cross-sector collaboration in developing China: two case studies of information integration in local government one-stop services. Information Technology for Development, 23(3), 554–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1363030