Supply chain ambidexterity, business performance and mediating role of lean and agile supply chain strategies

Suharto, S.

Growing Science » Uncertain Supply Chain Management » Supply chain ambidexterity, business performance and mediating role of lean and agile supply chain strategies

Journals

USCM Volumes

Volume 1 (22)
- Issue 1 (4)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (6)
- Issue 4 (6)

Volume 2 (32)
- Issue 1 (7)
- Issue 2 (5)
- Issue 3 (10)
- Issue 4 (10)

Volume 3 (39)
- Issue 1 (9)
- Issue 2 (13)
- Issue 3 (10)
- Issue 4 (7)

Volume 4 (31)
- Issue 1 (10)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (6)
- Issue 4 (9)

Volume 5 (26)
- Issue 1 (6)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (8)
- Issue 4 (6)

Volume 6 (25)
- Issue 1 (7)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (6)
- Issue 4 (6)

Volume 7 (57)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (19)
- Issue 3 (14)
- Issue 4 (16)

Volume 8 (82)
- Issue 1 (20)
- Issue 2 (15)
- Issue 3 (17)
- Issue 4 (30)

Volume 9 (117)
- Issue 1 (25)
- Issue 2 (26)
- Issue 3 (32)
- Issue 4 (34)

Volume 10 (150)
- Issue 1 (28)
- Issue 2 (32)
- Issue 3 (44)
- Issue 4 (46)

Volume 11 (190)
- Issue 1 (42)
- Issue 2 (45)
- Issue 3 (50)
- Issue 4 (53)

Volume 12 (244)
- Issue 1 (55)
- Issue 2 (59)
- Issue 3 (63)
- Issue 4 (67)

Volume 13 (45)
- Issue 1 (15)
- Issue 2 (15)
- Issue 3 (15)

Countries

Uncertain Supply Chain Management

ISSN 2291-6830 (Online) - ISSN 2291-6822 (Print) Quarterly Publication Volume 11 Issue 2 pp. 557-564 , 2023

Supply chain ambidexterity, business performance and mediating role of lean and agile supply chain strategies Pages 557-564 Download PDF

Authors: Suharto Suharto

DOI: 10.5267/j.uscm.2023.2.009

Keywords: Supply Chain Ambidexterity, Lean Supply Chain, Agile Supply Chain, Supply Chain Performance

Abstract: Ambidexterity is a company's capability to manage operations and strategy simultaneously and effectively, facilitating innovation and adaptation to market changes. Companies must be able to maintain operational efficiency and stability while also innovating and adapting to market dynamics. Ambidexterity enables companies to manage operations and strategy effectively and efficiently while at the same time, facilitating innovation and adaptation to market changes. This leads to an increase in company performance, such as increased revenue, increased market, and increased operating efficiency. It is also necessary that there are several mediating variables, such as effective supply chain collaboration, supply chain management, and innovation capability, which influence the relationship between supply chain ambidexterity and firm performance. This study aims to determine the extent to which ambidexterity can influence supply chain performance and how the role of lean and agile supply chains mediates the relationship between these variables. The research method used in this study is a quantitative approach. The number of samples analyzed in this study was 225. The results of the study concluded that ambidexterity helps companies to overcome pressure to optimize short- and long-term performance, maintain agility and flexibility in adapting to changes in the business environment. Studies on ambidexterity and supply chain performance have shown that ambidexterity can help directly optimize supply chain performance but can also amplify the positive impact of practices such as lean supply chain and agile supply chain. The implications obtained from the findings are that companies are expected to improve operational efficiency and effectiveness and have the ability to adapt to environmental changes and market demands.

How to cite this paper

 Suharto, S. (2023). Supply chain ambidexterity, business performance and mediating role of lean and agile supply chain strategies.Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(2), 557-564.

Refrences

Adnani, L., Jusuf, E., Alamsyah, K., & Jamaludin, M. (2023). The role of innovation and information sharing in supply chain management and business performance of halal products in tourism destinations. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(1), 195-202.
Alamsjah, F., & Asrol, M. (2022). Supply chain ambidexterity and performance under uncertainty: The case of inter-island logistics in Indonesia. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(3), 759-770.
Alkurdi, M. H., & Vázquez-Bustelo, D. (2022). A Systematic Literature Review Protocol for the analysis of practices, measurement instruments and contextual factors inherent to Supply Chain Agility. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 13(1), 1-34.
Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2018). Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: a dynamic capability view. Production Planning & Control, 29(14), 1158-1174.
Alzoubi, H. M., & Yanamandra, R. (2020). Investigating the mediating role of information sharing strategy on agile supply chain. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 273-284.
Aslam, H., Khan, A. Q., Rashid, K., & Rehman, S. U. (2020). Achieving supply chain resilience: the role of supply chain ambidexterity and supply chain agility. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(6), 1185-1204.
Carvalho, H., Azevedo, S. G., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2010). Supply chain performance management: lean and green paradigms. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 2(3-4), 304-333.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.
Jamaludin, M., Busthomi, H., Gantika, S., Rosid, A., Sunarya, E., & Nur, T. (2022). Market orientation and SCM strategy on SME organizational performances: the mediating effect of market performance. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2157117.
Jermsittiparsert, K., Sutduean, J., Sriyakul, T., & Khumboon, R. (2019). The role of customer responsiveness in improving the external performance of an agile supply chain. Polish journal of management studies, 19(2), 206-217.
Kristal, M. M., Huang, X., & Roth, A. V. (2010). The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 415-429.
Magni, M., Poh, F., & Razdan, R. (2015). Winning in Indonesia’s consumer-goods market. Mc Kinsey and Nielsen Report, 8.
Malhotra, N. K., & Dash, S. J. M. R. (2010). An applied orientation. Marketing Research, 2.
O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in organizational behavior, 28, 185-206.
Oliveira-Dias, D., Moyano-Fuentes, J., & Maqueira-Marín, J. M. (2022). Understanding the relationships between information technology and lean and agile supply chain strategies: A systematic literature review. Annals of Operations Research, 312(2), 973-1005.
Partanen, J., Kohtamäki, M., Patel, P. C., & Parida, V. (2020). Supply chain ambidexterity and manufacturing SME performance: The moderating roles of network capability and strategic information flow. International Journal of Production Economics, 221, 107470.
Qrunfleh, S., & Tarafdar, M. (2014). Supply chain information systems strategy: Impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance. International journal of production economics, 147, 340-350.
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of management, 34(3), 375-409.
Sengupta, K., Heiser, D. R., & Cook, L. S. (2006). Manufacturing and service supply chain performance: a comparative analysis. Journal of supply chain management, 42(4), 4-15.
Shukor, A. A. A., Newaz, M. S., Rahman, M. K., & Taha, A. Z. (2021). Supply chain integration and its impact on supply chain agility and organizational flexibility in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(8), 1721-1744.
Sreedevi, R., & Saranga, H. (2017). Uncertainty and supply chain risk: The moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 332-342.
Tarafdar, M., & Qrunfleh, S. (2017). Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility. International Journal of Production Research, 55(4), 925-938.
Tarafdar, M., & Qrunfleh, S. (2017). Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility. International Journal of Production Research, 55(4), 925-938.
Tortorella, G. L., Miorando, R., & Marodin, G. (2017). Lean supply chain management: Empirical research on practices, contexts and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 98-112.
Tuan, L. T. (2016). Organisational ambidexterity and supply chain agility: the mediating role of external knowledge sharing and moderating role of competitive intelligence. International journal of logistics research and applications, 19(6), 583-603.
Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California management review, 38(4), 8-29.
Venkatraman, N., Lee, C. H., & Iyer, B. (2007, February). Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the software sector. In Unpublished Manuscript (earlier version presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, 2005).
Wamba, S. F., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Akter, S. (2020). The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, 107498.