Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Uncertain Supply Chain Management » Risk management in the adoption of smart farming technologies by rural farmers

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (96)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

USCM Volumes

    • Volume 1 (22)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 3 (39)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (13)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 4 (31)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 5 (26)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 6 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 7 (57)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (19)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • Volume 8 (82)
      • Issue 1 (20)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (17)
      • Issue 4 (30)
    • Volume 9 (117)
      • Issue 1 (25)
      • Issue 2 (26)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (34)
    • Volume 10 (150)
      • Issue 1 (28)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (44)
      • Issue 4 (46)
    • Volume 11 (190)
      • Issue 1 (42)
      • Issue 2 (45)
      • Issue 3 (50)
      • Issue 4 (53)
    • Volume 12 (244)
      • Issue 1 (55)
      • Issue 2 (59)
      • Issue 3 (63)
      • Issue 4 (67)
    • Volume 13 (62)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (15)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 14 (15)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(111)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Financial performance(83)
Sustainability(82)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Artificial intelligence(77)
Knowledge Management(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2184)
Indonesia(1290)
India(788)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Uncertain Supply Chain Management

ISSN 2291-6830 (Online) - ISSN 2291-6822 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 11 Issue 2 pp. 533-546 , 2023

Risk management in the adoption of smart farming technologies by rural farmers Pages 533-546 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Pensri Jaroenwanit, Pongsutti Phuensane, Aicha Sekhari, Claudine Gay

DOI: 10.5267/j.uscm.2023.2.011

Keywords: Adaptable, Adaptation, Agriculture, Sustainable agriculture, Smart farming, Risk reduction strategy, Technology, Technological capabilities, Rural

Abstract: Smart farming is a feasible solution to help farmers effectively and sustainably manage the potential threats and risks those traditional farmers face, such as product quality, increased production costs, the environment, climate change, natural catastrophes, pests, and inferior goods. Using a survey research design, this research examined smart farming adoption and risk management models by combining the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT). The research sampled 400 farmers who are members of community enterprises in the northeastern region of Thailand. Data was collected using a questionnaire and analyzed using a statistical package program in four steps: confirmatory factor analysis, path analysis, structural equation model analysis (SEM), and Sobel's test. The findings revealed that government support variables had the most significant influence by adopting smart farming to risk management. Based on the research results, the government can apply this model to create strategies to encourage farmers to adopt smart farming and increase the production efficiency of agricultural products. The farmer can manage the risks of smart farming, which leads to sustainable smart farming and is useful for further academic acceptance and risk management studies. Furthermore, this study contributes to the existing literature on combining TAM and IDT in model adoption and risk management. The limitations include the small sample size adopted and the limited coverage area for the study, which restricts the generalization of the findings. However, the findings offer a glimpse into the benefits of smart farming.

How to cite this paper
Jaroenwanit, P., Phuensane, P., Sekhari, A & Gay, C. (2023). Risk management in the adoption of smart farming technologies by rural farmers.Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(2), 533-546.

Refrences
Aamer, A. M., Al-Awlaqi, M. A., Affia, I., Arumsari, S., & Mandahawi, N. (2021). The internet of things in the food supply chain: adoption challenges. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(8), 2521-2541.
Abd-Elaty, I., Kushwaha, N. L., Grismer, M. E., Elbeltagi, A., & Kuriqi, A. (2022). Cost-effective management measures for coastal aquifers affected by saltwater intrusion and climate change. Science of The Total Environment, 836, 155656.
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption. Decision support systems, 22(1), 15-29.
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information systems research, 9(2), 204-215.
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?. Decision sciences, 30(2), 361-391.
Allen, A. W., Cochran, F. L., Goldenbaum, G. C., & Liewer, P. C. (1977). Experimental and Numerical Studies of Magnetohydrodynamic Stability Properties of a Rectangular-Cross-Section Finite-β Toroidal Plasma. Physical Review Letters, 39(7), 404.
Amade, N., Oliveira, T., & Painho, M. (2020). Understanding the determinants of GIT post-adoption: perspectives from Mozambican institutions. Heliyon, 6(5), e03879.
Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Salam, A. F. (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & management, 41(6), 731-745.
Amondo, E., & Simtowe, F. (2018). Technology Innovations, Productivity and Production Risk Effects of Adopting Drought Tolerant Maize varieties in Rural Zambia (No. 2058-2018-5357).
Aryal, J. P., Jat, M. L., Sapkota, T. B., Khatri-Chhetri, A., Kassie, M., & Maharjan, S. (2018). Adoption of multiple climate-smart agricultural practices in the Gangetic plains of Bihar, India. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 10(3).
Asfaw, D., Black, E., Brown, M., Nicklin, K. J., Otu-Larbi, F., Pinnington, E., ... & Quaife, T. (2018). TAMSAT-ALERT v1: A new framework for agricultural decision support. Geoscientific Model Development, 11(6), 2353-2371.
Azam, M. S., & Shaheen, M. (2018). Decisional factors driving farmers to adopt organic farming in India: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Social Economics, 46(4), 562-580.
Balafoutis, A. T., Evert, F. K. V., & Fountas, S. (2020). Smart farming technology trends: economic and environmental effects, labor impact, and adoption readiness. Agronomy, 10(5), 743.
Briggs, R. O., De Vreede, G. J., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2003). Collaboration engineering with ThinkLets to pursue sustained success with group support systems. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 31-64.
Caffaro, F., & Cavallo, E. (2019). The effects of individual variables, farming system characteristics and perceived barriers on actual use of smart farming technologies: Evidence from the Piedmont region, northwestern Italy. Agriculture, 9(5), 111.
Chau, P. Y. (1996). An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of management information systems, 13(2), 185-204.
Chau, P. Y. (1996). An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by systems developers. Information & Management, 30(6), 269-280.
Chau, P. Y., & Hu, P. J. H. (2002). Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Information & management, 39(4), 297-311.
Chin, W. W., & Gopal, A. (1995). Adoption intention in GSS: Relative importance of beliefs. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 26(2-3), 42-64.
Clark, B., Panzone, L. A., Stewart, G. B., Kyriazakis, I., Niemi, J. K., Latvala, T., & Frewer, L. J. (2019). Consumer attitudes towards production diseases in intensive production systems. PloS one, 14(1), e0210432.
Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Deng, X., Doll, W. J., Hendrickson, A. R., & Scazzero, J. A. (2005). A multi-group analysis of structural invariance: an illustration using the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(5), 745-759.
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs. Information & management, 36(1), 9-21.
Eweoya, I., Okuboyejo, S. R., Odetunmibi, O. A., & Odusote, B. O. (2021). An empirical investigation of acceptance, adoption and the use of E-agriculture in Nigeria. Heliyon, 7(7), e07588.
Filippini, R., Marescotti, M. E., Demartini, E., & Gaviglio, A. (2020). Social networks as drivers for technology adoption: a study from a rural mountain area in Italy. Sustainability, 12(22), 9392.
Gillenson, M. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (2002). Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & management, 39(8), 705-719.
Godoe, P., & Johansen, T. (2012). Understanding adoption of new technologies: Technology readiness and technology acceptance as an integrated concept. Journal of European psychology students, 3(1).
Goodhue, D. L. (1995). Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management science, 41(12), 1827-1844.
Goodhue, D. L. (1998). Development and measurement validity of a task‐technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information system. Decision sciences, 29(1), 105-138.
Gurkan, H., Shelia, V., Bayraktar, N., Yildirim, Y. E., Yesilekin, N., Gunduz, A., ... & Hoogenboom, G. (2020). Estimating the potential impact of climate change on sunflower yield in the Konya province of Turkey. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 158(10), 806-818.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multirative data analysis: A global perspective.
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). sage.
Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of management information systems, 16(2), 91-112.
Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., & Davis, G. B. (1995). Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of management information systems, 11(4), 87-114.
Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Baroudi, J. J. (1996). A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of management information systems, 13(1), 127-143.
Joa, C. Y., & Magsamen-Conrad, K. (2022). Social influence and UTAUT in predicting digital immigrants’ technology use. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(8), 1620-1638.
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183–213.
Kernecker, M., Knierim, A., Wurbs, A., Kraus, T., & Borges, F. (2020). Experience versus expectation: Farmers’ perceptions of smart farming technologies for cropping systems across Europe. Precision Agriculture, 21(1), 34-50.
Khandker, V., & Thakurata, I. (2018). Factors encouraging complete adoption of agricultural technologies: the case of hybrid rice cultivation in India. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 8(2), 270-287.
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & management, 43(6), 740-755.
Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019). A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90, 100315.
Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information systems research, 13(2), 205-223.
Koutsos, T., & Menexes, G. (2019). Economic, agronomic, and environmental benefits from the adoption of precision agriculture technologies: a systematic review. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems (IJAEIS), 10(1), 40-56.
Lee, J., Hong, N. L., & Ling, N. L. (2001). An analysis of students' preparation for the virtual learning environment. The internet and higher education, 4(3-4), 231-242.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & management, 40(3), 191-204.
Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2003). Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS quarterly, 27(4), 657-678.
Lippert, S. K., & Michael Swiercz, P. (2005). Human resource information systems (HRIS) and technology trust. Journal of information science, 31(5), 340-353.
Mango, N., Makate, C., Tamene, L., Mponela, P., & Ndengu, G. (2018). Adoption of small-scale irrigation farming as a climate-smart agriculture practice and its influence on household income in the Chinyanja Triangle, Southern Africa. Land, 7(2), 49.
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information systems research, 2(3), 173-191.
Michels, M., von Hobe, C. F., Weller von Ahlefeld, P. J., & Musshoff, O. (2021). The adoption of drones in German agriculture: a structural equation model. Precision Agriculture, 22(6), 1728-1748.
Molina-Maturano, J., Verhulst, N., Tur-Cardona, J., Güereña, D. T., Gardeazábal-Monsalve, A., Govaerts, B., & Speelman, S. (2021). Understanding smallholder farmers’ intention to adopt agricultural apps: the role of mastery approach and innovation hubs in Mexico. Agronomy, 11(2), 194.
Montes de Oca Munguia, O., Pannell, D. J., & Llewellyn, R. (2021). Understanding the adoption of innovations in agriculture: A review of selected conceptual models. Agronomy, 11(1), 139.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research, 2(3), 192-222.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1996). Integrating diffusion of innovations and theory of reasoned action models to predict utilization of information technology by end-users. In Diffusion and adoption of information technology (pp. 132-146). Springer, Boston, MA.
Mutambara, A. G. (1998). Decentralized estimation and control for multisensor systems. CRC press.
Ndinojuo, B. C. E. (2020). Framing biodegradable issues in selected online Nigerian newspapers: An environmental communication study. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Communicatio, 14(1).
Ngai, E. W., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers & education, 48(2), 250-267.
Cakirli Akyüz, N., & Theuvsen, L. (2020). The impact of behavioral drivers on adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: the case of organic farming in Turkey. Sustainability, 12(17), 6875.
Nyang'au, J. O., Mohamed, J. H., Mango, N., Makate, C., & Wangeci, A. N. (2021). Smallholder farmers’ perception of climate change and adoption of climate smart agriculture practices in Masaba South Sub-county, Kisii, Kenya. Heliyon, 7(4), e06789.
Nyasimi, M., Kimeli, P., Sayula, G., Radeny, M., Kinyangi, J., & Mungai, C. (2017). Adoption and dissemination pathways for climate-smart agriculture technologies and practices for climate-resilient livelihoods in Lushoto, Northeast Tanzania. Climate, 5(3), 63.
Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of service research, 2(4), 307-320.
Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0. Journal of service research, 18(1), 59-74.
Parthasarathy, M., & Bhattacherjee, A. (1998). Understanding post-adoption behavior in the context of online services. Information systems research, 9(4), 362-379.
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American journal of community psychology, 41(1), 127-150.
Pivoto, D., Barham, B., Waquil, P. D., Foguesatto, C. R., Corte, V. F. D., Zhang, D., & Talamini, E. (2019). Factors influencing the adoption of smart farming by Brazilian grain farmers. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 22(4), 571-588.
Prayukvong, W. (2003). The Technical Coefficient of Reused Inputs in Alternative Agriculture System: A Case Study from Khon Kaen Province, Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 24(1), 64-71.
Rajakumar, G., Sankari, M. S., Shunmugapriya, D., & Maheswari, S. U. (2018). IoT based smart agricultural monitoring system. Asian Journal of Applied Science Technology, 2, 474-480.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations: modifications of a model for telecommunications. In Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation (pp. 25-38). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Rogers, E. M. (2004). A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model. Journal of health communication, 9(S1), 13-19.
Rogers, E. M., Medina, U. E., Rivera, M. A., & Wiley, C. J. (2005). Complex adaptive systems and the diffusion of innovations. The innovation journal: the public sector innovation journal, 10(3), 1-26.
Ronaghi, M. H., & Forouharfar, A. (2020). A contextualized study of the usage of the Internet of things (IoTs) in smart farming in a typical Middle Eastern country within the context of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model (UTAUT). Technology in Society, 63, 101415.
Saengavut, V., & Jirasatthumb, N. (2021). Smallholder decision-making process in technology adoption intention: implications for Dipterocarpus alatus in Northeastern Thailand. Heliyon, 7(4), e06633.
Schimmelpfennig, D. (2016). Farm profits and adoption of precision agriculture (No. 1477-2016-121190).
Sharifuddin, J., Mohammed, Z., & Terano, R. (2019). Paddy farmer’s perception and factors influencing attitude and intention on adoption of organic rice farming. International Food Research Journal, 26(1).
Sutthichaimethee, P., Dockthaisong, B., Permtanjit, G., Khemrat, C., & Phuangpeth, W. (2019). THE IMPACT OF CAUSAL FACTORS RELATIONSHIP RELATED TO GOVERNMENT'S SUSTAINABILITY POLICY IMPLEMENTATION IN THAILAND UNDER NATIONAL STRATEGY THAILAND 4.0. Journal of Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology (Humanities and Social Sciences), 5(2), 114-134.
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5, pp. 481-498). Boston, MA: pearson.
Takagi, C., Purnomo, S. H., & Kim, M. K. (2021). Adopting Smart Agriculture among organic farmers in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 29(2), 180-195.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6(2), 144-176.
Thong, J. Y. (1999). An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of management information systems, 15(4), 187-214.
Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 1, 28-45.
Townsend, A. M., Demarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (2001). Desktop video conferencing in virtual workgroups: anticipation, system evaluation and performance. Information Systems Journal, 11(3), 213-227.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research, 11(4), 342-365.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Walczuch, R., Lemmink, J., & Streukens, S. (2007). The effect of service employees’ technology readiness on technology acceptance. Information & management, 44(2), 206-215.
Watson, M. J., George, A. K., Maruf, M., Frye, T. P., Muthigi, A., Kongnyuy, M., ... & Pinto, P. A. (2016). Risk stratification of prostate cancer: integrating multiparametric MRI, nomograms and biomarkers. Future Oncology, 12(21), 2417-2430.
Wichaiyo, W., Parnsila, W., Chaveepojnkamjorn, W., & Sripa, B. (2019). Predictive risk factors towards liver fluke infection among the people in Kamalasai District, Kalasin Province, Thailand. SAGE Open Medicine, 7, 2050312119840201.
Wu, J. H., & Wang, S. C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & management, 42(5), 719-729.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Uncertain Supply Chain Management | Year: 2023 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 2 | Views: 1414 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Investigating personal characteristics on e-banking adoption
  • The role of personal and social characteristics on acceptance of new teleph ...
  • Assessing psychometric reliability and validity of Technology Acceptance Mo ...
  • An empirical study on different factors influencing information technology ...
  • Identifying factors affecting acceptance of new technology in the industry ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com