Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Uncertain Supply Chain Management » Supply chain ambidexterity and performance under uncertainty: The case of inter-island logistics in Indonesia

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

USCM Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (5)
      • Issue 1 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (62)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (15)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (244)
      • Issue 1 (55)
      • Issue 2 (59)
      • Issue 3 (63)
      • Issue 4 (67)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (190)
      • Issue 1 (42)
      • Issue 2 (45)
      • Issue 3 (50)
      • Issue 4 (53)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (150)
      • Issue 1 (28)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (44)
      • Issue 4 (46)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (117)
      • Issue 1 (25)
      • Issue 2 (26)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (34)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (82)
      • Issue 1 (20)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (17)
      • Issue 4 (30)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (57)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (19)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (26)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (31)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (39)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (13)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (22)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Uncertain Supply Chain Management
ISSN 2291-6830 (Online) - ISSN 2291-6822 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 10 Issue 3 pp. 759-770, 2022

Supply chain ambidexterity and performance under uncertainty: The case of inter-island logistics in Indonesia Pages 759-770 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Firdaus Alamsjah, Muhammad Asrol

📋 Author Affiliations:
F. Alamsjah ORCID , M. Asrol ORCID
¹ Industrial Engineering Department, BINUS Graduate Program—Master of Industrial Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia
doi 10.5267/j.uscm.2022.4.006
Crossref 5 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Agile, Ambidexterity, Lean, Supply chain performance, Inter-Island, Uncertainty

Abstract: This study investigated the impact of supply chain ambidexterity on supply chain performance (SCP) under uncertainties. The dynamic capability theory of firms was adopted in the supply chain to design a research framework that recommends a supply chain strategy under uncertainties pertaining to inter-island logistics in Indonesia. This study involved the survey of 140 large-scale companies delivering products across the Indonesian islands to identify the supply chain uncertainties by analyzing data using SmartPLS. The supply chain ambidexterity (SAM) was identified to exhibit no direct correlation with SCP; however, agile supply chain (ASC) and lean supply chain (LSC) could indirectly relate the SAM and SCP. For supply chain professionals, the results indicated that SCP cannot be achieved solely through SAM, thereby necessitating the development of LSCs and/or ASCs, driven from SAM, to achieve SCP. Thus, this study empirically confirmed ASC and LSC to be effective practices for mitigating supply chain uncertainties by mediating supply chain ambidexterity on SCP.

How to cite this paper
APA: Alamsjah, F & Asrol, M. (2022). Supply chain ambidexterity and performance under uncertainty: The case of inter-island logistics in Indonesia. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(3), 759-770.
Chicago/Turabian: Alamsjah, F & Asrol, M. 2022. "Supply chain ambidexterity and performance under uncertainty: The case of inter-island logistics in Indonesia." Uncertain Supply Chain Management 10, no. 3 (2022): 759-770.
AMA: Alamsjah, F & Asrol, M. Supply chain ambidexterity and performance under uncertainty: The case of inter-island logistics in Indonesia. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. 2022;10(3):759-770.

References
Ahmed, W., & Huma, S. (2018). Impact of lean and agile strategies on supply chain risk management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(1–2), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1529558
Al-Shboul, M. A. (2017). Infrastructure framework and manufacturing supply chain agility: The role of delivery dependability and time to market. Supply Chain Management, 22(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2016-0335/FULL/XML
Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2018). Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: A dynamic capability view. Production Planning and Control, 29(14), 1158–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1542174
Aslam, H., Blome, C., Roscoe, S., & Azhar, T. M. (2018). Dynamic supply chain capabilities. Undefined, 38(12), 2266–2285. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2017-0555
Aslam, H., Khan, A. Q., Rashid, K., & Rehman, S. (2020). Achieving supply chain resilience: The role of supply chain ambidexterity and supply chain agility. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(6), 1185–1204. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-07-2019-0263
Benitez, J., Castillo, A., Llorens, J., & Braojos, J. (2018). IT-enabled knowledge ambidexterity and innovation performance in small U.S. firms: The moderator role of social media capability. Information & Management, 55(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2017.09.004
Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Kaesser, M. (2013). Ambidextrous governance in supply chains: The impact on innovation and cost performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(4), 59–80. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jscm.12033
Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2003). How the resource-based and the dynamic capability views of the firm inform corporate-level strategy. British Journal of Management, 14(4), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8551.2003.00380.X
Bui, T. D., Tsai, F. M., Tseng, M. L., Tan, R. R., Yu, K. D. S., & Lim, M. K. (2021). Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: A data driven analysis. Sustainable production and consumption, 26, 373-410.
Burin, A. R. G., Perez-Arostegui, M. N., & Llorens-Montes, J. (2020). Ambidexterity and IT competence can improve supply chain flexibility? A resource orchestration approach. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(2), 100610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100610
Cao, Q., Simsek, Z., & Zhang, H. (2010). Modelling the joint impact of the CEO and the TMT on organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1272–1296. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-6486.2009.00877.X
Cheung, W., Chiang, A.-H., Sambamurthy, V., & Setia, P. (2018). Lean vs. agile supply chain: The effect of IT architectures on supply chain capabilities and performance. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.17705/1pais.10103
Christopher, M., & Towill, D. (2001). An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030110394914/FULL/XML
Deakins, D., & Bensemann, J. O. (2019). Achieving innovation in a lean environment: how innovative small firms overcome resource constraints. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(4), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500373
Degroote, S. E., & Marx, T. G. (2013). The impact of IT on supply chain agility and firm performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 33(6), 909–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2013.09.001
Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Rozhkov, M. (2019). Does the ripple effect influence the bullwhip effect? An integrated analysis of structural and operational dynamics in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1627438
Dranev, Y., Izosimova, A., & Meissner, D. (2020). Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: Assessment Approaches and Empirical Evidence. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(2), 676–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13132-018-0560-Y/TABLES/4
Drnevich, P. L., & Kriauciunas, A. P. (2011). Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 32(3), 254–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.882
Eisenhardt, K. M., Santos, F. M., Pettigrew, I. A., Thomas, H., & Whittington, R. (2000). Knowledge-Based View: A New Theory of Strategy? Handbook of strategy and management, 1(1), 139–164.
Fisher, M. L. (1997). What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product? Harvard Business Review, 75, 105–117.
Flöthmann, C., Hoberg, K., & Gammelgaard, B. (2018). Disentangling supply chain management competencies and their impact on performance: A knowledge-based view. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 48(6), 630–655. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2017-0120/FULL/PDF
Flynn, B. B., Koufteros, X., & Lu, G. (2016). On theory in supply chain uncertainty and its implications for supply chain integration. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(3), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/JSCM.12106
Ghobakhloo, M., & Hong, T. S. (2014). IT investments and business performance improvement: the mediating role of lean manufacturing implementation. International Journal of Production Research, 52(18), 5367–5384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.906761
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573
Gokarn, S., & Kuthambalayan, T. S. (2019). Creating sustainable fresh produce supply chains by managing uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 908–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.10.072
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1287/ORSC.1040.0078
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.332
Hofer, C., Eroglu, C., & Rossiter Hofer, A. (2012). The effect of lean production on financial performance: The mediating role of inventory leanness. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.025
Huang, S. H., Uppal, M., & Shi, J. (2002). A product driven approach to manufacturing supply chain selection. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(4), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540210438935/FULL/XML
Im, G., & Rai, A. (2008). Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Science, 54(7), 1281–1296. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.1080.0902
Iqbal, M., & Waseem, M. A. (2012). Impact of job stress on job satisfaction among air traffic controllers of Civil Aviation Authority: An empirical study from Pakistan. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 2(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v2i2.1854
Ismail, H. S., & Sharifi, H. (2006). A balanced approach to building agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 36(6), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030610677384/FULL/PDF
Kale, E., Aknar, A., & Başar, Ö. (2019). Absorptive capacity and firm performance: The mediating role of strategic agility. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78(January), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.09.010
Kristal, M. M., Huang, X., & Roth, A. V. (2010). The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.12.002
Kusumastuti, R. D., Viverita, Husodo, Z. A., Suardi, L., & Danarsari, D. N. (2014). Developing a resilience index towards natural disasters in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10(PA), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJDRR.2014.10.007
Lee, H. L. (2002). Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. California CMR, 44(3).
Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (2004). Comments on “information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect.” Management Science, 50(12 SUPPL.), 1887–1893. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.1040.0305
Lee, S. M., & Rha, J. S. (2016). Ambidextrous supply chain as a dynamic capability: building a resilient supply chain. Management Decision, 54(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2014-0674
Li, Y., Wei, Z., Zhao, J., Zhang, C., & Liu, Y. (2013). Ambidextrous organizational learning, environmental munificence and new product performance: Moderating effect of managerial ties in China. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2012.11.008
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
Magni, M., & Razdan, R. (2015, September). Understanding Indonesia’s consumer-goods market | McKinsey. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/understanding-indonesias-consumer-goods-market
Malhottra, N., & Dash, S. (2010). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, 6th Edition. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/program/Malhotra-Marketing-Research-An-Applied-Orientation-6th-Edition/PGM201157.html
Manuj, I., Mentzer, J. T., Manuj, L., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(3), 192–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810866986
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
March, J. G. (2005). Understanding organisational adaptation. Society and Economy, 25(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1556/SOCEC.25.2003.1.1
Martinez-Sanchez, A., & Lahoz-Leo, F. (2018). Supply chain agility: a mediator for absorptive capacity. Baltic Journal of Management, 13(2), 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-10-2017-0304/FULL/PDF
Mehdi, M., & Ahmed, S. (2019). Exploration factors affecting an ambidextrous supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 32(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2019.097584
Merkuryeva, G., Valberga, A., & Smirnov, A. (2019). Demand forecasting in pharmaceutical supply chains: A case study. Procedia Computer Science, 149, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.100
O’Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator’s Dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
Ojha, D., Acharya, C., & Cooper, D. (2018). Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity: Mediating role of supply chain organizational learning and moderating role of uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.001
Partanen, J., Kohtamäki, M., Patel, P. C., & Parida, V. (2020). Supply chain ambidexterity and manufacturing SME performance: The moderating roles of network capability and strategic information flow. International Journal of Production Economics, 221, 107470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.08.005
Prater, E., Biehl, M., & Smith, M. A. (2001). International supply chain agility tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(5–6), 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110390507/FULL/XML
Qrunfleh, S., & Tarafdar, M. (2013). Lean and agile supply chain strategies and supply chain responsiveness: The role of strategic supplier partnership and postponement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(6), 571–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2013-0015
Rodrigues, A. M., Stank, T. P., & Lynch, D. F. (2004). Linking strategy, structure, process, and performance in integrated logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(2), 65–94.
Rojo, A., Llorens-Montes, J., & Perez-Arostegui, M. N. (2016). The impact of ambidexterity on supply chain flexibility fit. Supply Chain Management, 21(4), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2015-0328
Sandee, H. (2017). Behind the border logistics challenges and measures in Indonesia. In Asia-Pasicif Trade Facilitation Forum 2017.
Sangari, M., & Razmi, J. (2018). Business intelligence competence, agile capabilities, and agile performance in supply chain: An empirical study. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2013-0012
Simangunsong, E., Hendry, L. C., & Stevenson, M. (2012). Supply-chain uncertainty: a review and theoretical foundation for future research. International Journal of Production Research, 50(16), 4493–4523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.613864
Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-6486.2009.00828.X
Solís-Molina, M., Hernández-Espallardo, M., & Rodríguez-Orejuela, A. (2018). Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 91, 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2018.06.001
Sreedevi, R., & Saranga, H. (2017). Uncertainty and supply chain risk: The moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2017.07.024
Srinivasan, M., Srivastava, P., & Iyer, K. N. S. (2020). Response strategy to environment context factors using a lean and agile approach: Implications for firm performance. European Management Journal, 38(6), 900–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EMJ.2020.04.003
Starr, M. K., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2014). Introduction to the Special Issue on Humanitarian Operations and Crisis Management. Production and Operations Management, 23(6), 925–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/POMS.12227
Statista. (2021, August 23). Natural disasters in Indonesia - statistics & facts | Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/8305/natural-disasters-in-indonesia/#dossierKeyfigures
Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. N. (2006). A framework for assessing value chain agility. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26(2), 118–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610641639/FULL/XML
Tabaklar, T. (2017). Scalability and Resilience in Humanitarian Supply Chains. https://helda.helsinki.fi/dhanken/handle/123456789/172374
Tarafdar, M., & Qrunfleh, S. (2017). Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility. International Journal of Production Research, 55(4), 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1203079
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 8–37. https://doi.org/10.1057/JIBS.2013.54
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7
Tortorella, G. L., Miorando, R., & Marodin, G. (2017). Lean supply chain management: Empirical research on practices, contexts and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.006
Tuan, L. T. (2016). Organisational ambidexterity and supply chain agility: the mediating role of external knowledge sharing and moderating role of competitive intelligence. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19(6), 583–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2015.1137278
Uddin, S. M. F., & Khan, M. N. (2016). Exploring green purchasing behaviour of young urban consumers. South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 5(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/sajgbr-12-2014-0083
Van Donk, D. P., & Van Der Vaart, T. (2005). A case of shared resources, uncertainty and supply chain integration in the process industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2004.03.002
Venkatraman, N., Lee, C.-H., & Iyer, B. (2007). Strategic Ambidexterity and Sales Growth: A Longitudinal Test in the Software Sector.
Vrijhoef, R., & Koskela, L. (2000). The four roles of supply chain management in construction. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 6(3–4), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00013-7
Wamba, S. F., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Akter, S. (2020). The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, 107498. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2019.09.019
Wang, S. L., Luo, Y., Maksimov, V., Sun, J., & Celly, N. (2019). Achieving Temporal Ambidexterity in New Ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 56(4), 788–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOMS.12431
Wickramasinghe, V., & Wickramasinghe, G. L. D. (2017). Effects of HRM practices, lean production practices and lean duration on performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(11), 1467–1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1407954
Wieland, A., & Marcus Wallenburg, C. (2012). Dealing with supply chain risks: Linking risk management practices and strategies to performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(10), 887–905. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211281411/FULL/XML
Wilhelm, H., Schlömer, M., & Maurer, I. (2015). How dynamic capabilities affect the effectiveness and efficiency of operating routines under high and low levels of environmental dynamism. British Journal of Management, 26(2), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12085
Zimmermann, R., Ferreira, L. M. D. F., & Moreira, A. C. (2020). An empirical analysis of the relationship between supply chain strategies, product characteristics, environmental uncertainty and performance. Supply Chain Management, 25(3), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2019-0049/FULL/XML
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Uncertain Supply Chain Management | 📅 Year: 2022 | 📖 Volume: 10 | 📄 Issue: 3 | 👁️ Views: 2545 | 📊 Crossref: 5

Related Articles:
  • The mediation role of supply chain agility on supply chain orientation-supply chain performance link
  • The effect of supply chain management on multi-channel retailing and business performance
  • The effects of strategic planning, purchasing strategy and strategic partnership on operational performance
  • Ambidexterity and agility in achieving dry port effectiveness in the greater Jakarta
  • The mediating effect of big data analysis on the process orientation and information system software to improve supply chain process in Saudi Arabian industrial organizations

📝 Ready to share your research?

Uncertain Supply Chain Management is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com