Growing Science » Uncertain Supply Chain Management » A new integrated generalized multi-criteria group decision making approach for green supplier selection

Journals


USCM Volumes


Uncertain Supply Chain Management

ISSN 2291-6830 (Online) - ISSN 2291-6822 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 8 Issue 4 pp. 813-820 , 2020

A new integrated generalized multi-criteria group decision making approach for green supplier selection Pages 813-820 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Anh Duc Do, Van Loi Ta, Chi Dung Canh, Quang Tuan Ta, Huu Van Luu

DOI: 10.5267/j.uscm.2020.6.005

Keywords: Green supplier selection, Quality function deployment, TOPSIS, MCDM, Generalized fuzzy numbers

Abstract: Green supplier selection is an important group decision making problem that includes not only economic criteria, but also environment and society criteria incorporating vagueness and imprecision. This paper proposes a new integrated quality function deployment (QFD) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) using generalized fuzzy numbers. The proposed approach initially identifies the features that the purchased product should possess in order to satisfy the company’s needs (“WHATs”), and then it seeks to establish the relevant supplier assessment criteria (“HOWs”). Then, the importance of the ‘‘WHATs’’, ‘‘HOWs’’, ‘‘HOWs’’-‘‘WHATs’’ correlation scores, and the impact of each potential green suppliers are determined based on generalized fuzzy numbers. The study applies the TOPSIS approach to rank the green suppliers. A numerical example is used to illustrate the advantages and applicability of the proposed approach.

How to cite this paper
Do, A., Ta, V., Canh, C., Ta, Q & Luu, H. (2020). A new integrated generalized multi-criteria group decision making approach for green supplier selection.Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(4), 813-820.

Refrences
Bhattacharya, A., Geraghty, J., & Young, P. (2010). Supplier selection paradigm: An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment. Applied Soft Computing, 10, 1013-1027.
Chen, S.H. (1985). Operations on fuzzy numbers with function principal. Tamkang Journal Management Science, 6, 13-25.
Do, A.D., & Luu, H.V. (2019). Developing a quality function deployment method for selecting and evaluating suppliers. Journal of Economics and Development, 262(4), 80-88.
Do, A.D.; Phan, H.D.; Ha, D.L.; Trinh, D.U.; Le, T.N., & Nguyen, T.K. (2019). Quality Function Deployment Method under Interval Neutrosophic Environment for Sustainable Supplier Selection. Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 2(3) , 352-360.
Dursun, M., & Karsak, E. (2013). A QFD-based fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier selection. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 5864-5875.
Gao, H., Ju, Y., Gonzalez, E.D.R.S., & Zhang, W. (2020). Green supplier selection in electronics manufacturing: An approach based on consensus decision making. Journal of Cleaner Production 245, 118781.
Gupta, S., Soni, U., & Kumar, G. (2019). Green supplier selection using multi-criterion decision making under fuzzy environment: A case study in automotive industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, 663-680.
Haeri, S.A.S., & Rezaei, J. (2019). A grey-based green supplier selection model for uncertain environments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 221, 768-784.
Hamdan, S., & Cheaitou, A. (2017). Dynamic green supplier selection and order allocation with quantity discounts and varying supplier availability. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 110, 573-589.
Hashemi, S. H., Karimi, A., & Tavana, M. (2015). An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 178-191.
Hsieh, C.H., & Chen, S.H. (1999). Similarity of generalized fuzzy numbers with graded mean integration representation. Proc 8th International fuzzy System Association World Congress, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China, 2, 551-555.
Javad, M.O.M., Darvishi, M., & Javad, A.O.M. (2020). Green supplier selection for the steel industry using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS: A case study of Khouzestan steel company. Sustainable Futures, 2, 100012.
Karsak, E.E., & Dursun, M. (2014). An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 6995-7004.
Lo, H.W., J.H. Liou, J.J.H., Wang, H.S., & Tsai, Y.S. (2018). An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 339-352.
Qin, J., Liu, X., & Pedrycz, W. (2017). An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 258, 626-638.
Sadjadi, S., & Karimi, M. (2018). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: A robust approach. Decision Science Letters, 7(4), 323-340.
Van, L.H., Yu, V.F., Dat, L.Q., Dung, C.C., Chou, S.Y., & Loc, N.V. (2018). New Integrated Quality Function Deployment Approach Based on Interval Neutrosophic Set for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection. Sustainability, 10, 838, doi:10.3390/su10030838
Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E.K., & Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. (2017). Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3728–3740.
Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information Contract, 8, 338–356

Journal: Uncertain Supply Chain Management | Year: 2020 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4 | Views: 999 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
Security Code: *

® 2010-2024 GrowingScience.Com