Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Uncertain Supply Chain Management » An integrated approach to evaluate suppliers in a sustainable supply chain

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

USCM Volumes

    • Volume 1 (22)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 3 (39)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (13)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 4 (31)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 5 (26)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 6 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 7 (57)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (19)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • Volume 8 (82)
      • Issue 1 (20)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (17)
      • Issue 4 (30)
    • Volume 9 (117)
      • Issue 1 (25)
      • Issue 2 (26)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (34)
    • Volume 10 (150)
      • Issue 1 (28)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (44)
      • Issue 4 (46)
    • Volume 11 (190)
      • Issue 1 (42)
      • Issue 2 (45)
      • Issue 3 (50)
      • Issue 4 (53)
    • Volume 12 (244)
      • Issue 1 (55)
      • Issue 2 (59)
      • Issue 3 (63)
      • Issue 4 (67)
    • Volume 13 (62)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (15)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 14 (15)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(110)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Sustainability(81)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Artificial intelligence(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2183)
Indonesia(1290)
India(787)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Uncertain Supply Chain Management

ISSN 2291-6830 (Online) - ISSN 2291-6822 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 6 Issue 4 pp. 423-444 , 2018

An integrated approach to evaluate suppliers in a sustainable supply chain Pages 423-444 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Seyed Hamid Hashemi Petrudi, Mehdi Abdi, Mark Goh

DOI: 10.5267/j.uscm.2017.12.003

Keywords: Supply chain management Sustainable supplier selection, Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM), Fuzzy theory, ANP, TOPSIS

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to propose an integrated multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approach to analyze interrelationships among sustainability criteria, weight them, and then evaluate suppliers according to these criteria. Data were collected through interviewing with seven experts who are involved in the procurement department of the case. Interpretive structural modelling (ISM), and pairwise comparison questionnaire are used to elicit the existence, strength of relationships among criteria and then weight them by using Fuzzy (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (FDEMATEL), Fuzzy Preference Programming (FPP), and Analytical Network Process (ANP). Then, Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS) is employed to evaluate suppliers based on identified and analyzed sustainability criteria. This study provides several implications for practitioners and scholars. First, the results show the efficiency of the proposed approach in practice. Second, respondents state that the proposed approach was very useful in decision making based on interrelationships among criteria, alternatives and policies. Third, findings validate the significant difference in rankings with or without considering interdependencies among criteria.

How to cite this paper
Petrudi, S., Abdi, M & Goh, M. (2018). An integrated approach to evaluate suppliers in a sustainable supply chain.Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 6(4), 423-444.

Refrences
Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329-341.
Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghafinia, A., & Bahreininejad, A. (2012). Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Applied Soft Computing, 12(6), 1668-1677.
Asadi, E., & Sadjadi, S. (2017). Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 5(1), 1-26.
Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., & Goyal, S. K. (2010). A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(2), 370-378.
Azadi, M., Jafarian, M., Saen, R. F., & Mirhedayatian, S. M. (2015). A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context. Computers & Operations Research, 54, 274-285.
Azadnia, A. H., Saman, M. Z. M., & Wong, K. Y. (2015). Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: an integrated multi-objective decision-making process. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 383-408.
Badri Ahmadi, H., Hashemi Petrudi, S. H., & Wang, X. (2017). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with analytical hierarchy process and improved grey relational analysis: a case of telecom industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 90(9), 2413-2427. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-9518-z
Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 252-264.
Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2014). Determining and applying sustainable supplier key performance indicators. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 275-291.
Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000-3011.
Chai, J., Liu, J. N., & Ngai, E. W. (2013). Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3872-3885.
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2007). Supply chain management. Strategy, planning & operation. Das summa summarum des management, 265-275.
Ciliberti, F., De Haan, J., De Groot, G., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2011). CSR codes and the principal-agent problem in supply chains: four case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(8), 885-894.
Ciliberti, F., Pontrandolfo, P., & Scozzi, B. (2008). Logistics social responsibility: Standard adoption and practices in Italian companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(1), 88-106.
Dao, V., Langella, I., & Carbo, J. (2011). From green to sustainability: Information Technology and an integrated sustainability framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 63-79.
Dou, Y., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2014). Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey-analytical network process-based methodology. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 420-431.
El Mokadem, M., & El Mokadem, M. (2017). The classification of supplier selection criteria with respect to lean or agile manufacturing strategies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(2), 232-249.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century.
Erol, I., Sencer, S., & Sari, R. (2011). A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain. Ecological Economics, 70(6), 1088-1100.
Fallahpour, A., Udoncy Olugu, E., Nurmaya Musa, S., Yew Wong, K., & Noori, S. (2017). A decision support model for sustainable supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105(Supplement C), 391-410.
Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345-354.
Gupta, P., Govindan, K., Mehlawat, M. K., & Kumar, S. (2016). A weighted possibilistic programming approach for sustainable vendor selection and order allocation in fuzzy environment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 86(5-8), 1785-1804.
Hashemi, S. H., Karimi, A., & Tavana, M. (2015). An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 178-191.
Hassini, E., Surti, C., & Searcy, C. (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 69-82.
Joung, C. B., Carrell, J., Sarkar, P., & Feng, S. C. (2013). Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecological Indicators, 24, 148-157.
Kausar, K., Garg, D., & Luthra, S. (2017). Key enablers to implement sustainable supply chain management practices: An Indian insight. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 5(2), 89-104.
Kannan, D., Govindan, K., & Rajendran, S. (2015). Fuzzy Axiomatic Design approach based green supplier selection: a case study from Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 194-208.
Kannan, D., Khodaverdi, R., Olfat, L., Jafarian, A., & Diabat, A. (2013). Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 355-367.
Kannan, G., Pokharel, S., & Kumar, P. S. (2009). A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(1), 28-36.
Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2011). Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 6577-6585.
Kuo, R. J., Wang, Y. C., & Tien, F. C. (2010). Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12), 1161-1170.
Lee, A. H., Kang, H.-Y., Hsu, C.-F., & Hung, H.-C. (2009). A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7917-7927.
Leung, L. C., & Cao, D. (2000). On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 124(1), 102-113.
Lin, C.-J., & Wu, W.-W. (2008). A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 205-213.
Lin, K.-m., & Lin, C.-w. (2008). Cognition map of experiential marketing strategy for hot spring hotels in Taiwan using the DEMATEL method. Paper presented at the Natural Computation, 2008. ICNC'08. Fourth International Conference on.
Lin, R.-H. (2012). An integrated model for supplier selection under a fuzzy situation. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(1), 55-61.
Lin, Y.-H., & Tseng, M.-L. (2016). Assessing the competitive priorities within sustainable supply chain management under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2133-2144.
Mefford, R. N. (2011). The Economic Value of a Sustainable Supply Chain. Business and Society Review, 116(1), 109-143.
Mehregan, M. R., Hashemi, S. H., Karimi, A., & Merikhi, B. (2014). Analysis of interactions among sustainability supplier selection criteria using ISM and fuzzy DEMATEL. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 7(3), 270-294.
Mikhailov, L. (2003). Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 134(3), 365-385.
Nishat Faisal, M., Banwet, D. K., & Shankar, R. (2006). Supply chain risk mitigation: modeling the enablers. Business Process Management Journal, 12(4), 535-552.
Olugu, E. U., & Wong, K. Y. (2012). An expert fuzzy rule-based system for closed-loop supply chain performance assessment in the automotive industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 375-384.
Punniyamoorthy, M., Mathiyalagan, P., & Parthiban, P. (2011). A strategic model using structural equation modeling and fuzzy logic in supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 458-474.
Rezaei, J., Ortt, R., & Scholten, V. (2013). An improved fuzzy preference programming to evaluate entrepreneurship orientation. Applied Soft Computing, 13(5), 2749-2758.
Rabbani, M., Navazi, F., Farrokhi-Asl, H., & Balali, M. (2018). A sustainable transportation-location-routing problem with soft time windows for distribution systems. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 6(3), 229-254.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26.
Saaty, T. L., & Takizawa, M. (1986). Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 26(2), 229-237.
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710.
Seuring, S., Sarkis, J., Müller, M., & Rao, P. (2008). Sustainability and supply chain management–an introduction to the special issue. In: Elsevier.
Shaw, K., Shankar, R., Yadav, S. S., & Thakur, L. S. (2012). Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8182-8192.
Shen, L., Olfat, L., Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Diabat, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier's performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 74, 170-179.
Siegel, D. S. (2009). Green management matters only if it yields more green: An economic/strategic perspective. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 5-16.
Tang, C. S., & Zhou, S. (2012). Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(3), 585-594.
Tsai, W.-H., Chou, W.-C., & Hsu, W. (2009). The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for selecting socially responsible investment: an effective MCDM model. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(10), 1396-1410.
Tseng, M.-L., & Chiu, A. S. (2013). Evaluating firm's green supply chain management in linguistic preferences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 22-31.
Tuzkaya, G., Ozgen, A., Ozgen, D., & Tuzkaya, U. R. (2009). Environmental performance evaluation of suppliers: A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 6(3), 477-490.
Van Laarhoven, P., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 11(1-3), 229-241.
Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361-385.
Warfield, J. N. (1974). Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,1, 81-87.
Wu, Z., & Pagell, M. (2011). Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of operations management, 29(6), 577-590.
Yang, C.-C., & Chen, B.-S. (2006). Supplier selection using combined analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(7), 926-941.
Yeh, W.-C., & Chuang, M.-C. (2011). Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner selection in green supply chain problems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 4244-4253.
Yoon, K., & Hwang, C.-L. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN AN.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338-353.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Uncertain Supply Chain Management | Year: 2018 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 4 | Views: 3330 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for integrated suppliers selection an ...
  • Evaluation and measurement of performance, practice and pressure of green s ...
  • Vendor selection and order allocation using an integrated fuzzy mathematica ...
  • Ranking green electronic supplier in auto industry using fuzzy Delphi
  • A methodology for outsourcing resources in reverse logistics using fuzzy TO ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com