Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Uncertain Supply Chain Management » A new model for planning the distributed facilities locations under emergency conditions and uncertainty space in relief logistics

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (805)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (562)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2648)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (44)
  • SCI (48)

USCM Volumes

    • Volume 15 (5)
      • Issue 1 (5)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 13 (62)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (15)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 12 (244)
      • Issue 1 (55)
      • Issue 2 (59)
      • Issue 3 (63)
      • Issue 4 (67)
    • Volume 11 (190)
      • Issue 1 (42)
      • Issue 2 (45)
      • Issue 3 (50)
      • Issue 4 (53)
    • Volume 10 (150)
      • Issue 1 (28)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (44)
      • Issue 4 (46)
    • Volume 9 (117)
      • Issue 1 (25)
      • Issue 2 (26)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (34)
    • Volume 8 (82)
      • Issue 1 (20)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (17)
      • Issue 4 (30)
    • Volume 7 (57)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (19)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • Volume 6 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 5 (26)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 4 (31)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 3 (39)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (13)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 1 (22)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Knowledge Management(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (1)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (57)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (39)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Uncertain Supply Chain Management
ISSN 2291-6830 (Online) - ISSN 2291-6822 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 5 Issue 2 pp. 105-125, 2017

A new model for planning the distributed facilities locations under emergency conditions and uncertainty space in relief logistics Pages 105-125 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Ardavan Babaei, Kamran Shahanaghi

📋 Author Affiliations:
A. Babaei, K. Shahanaghi (Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran)
doi 10.5267/j.uscm.2016.10.004
Crossmark
Crossref 9 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Relief logistics, Uncertainty space, NSGA-II, ε-Constraint, Emergency conditions

Abstract: The life of many people across the world can face various dangers with incurrence of incidents and unpredictable diseases. Incidents often require quick relief as they directly affect human lives. The process of planning, management and monitoring the flow of relief sources to injured and sick individuals is called relief logistics. When best relief services are provided through available sources, relief logistics appear. In this article, a multi-objective model for relief resources distribution facilities under an uncertain condition is investigated in two ways of demand satisfaction by considering the relief resources accessibility and demand satisfaction in a fuzzy logic. In the presented model, the concepts of cost, chance of demand satisfaction, elevation of response capability of system, discount levels for relief commodities, late satisfaction of demand, hub for accumulation of late and returned orders and special route for time significance in distribution of relief commodities are considered. For the first problem, the chance of relief resources accessibility and for the second problem, demands were investigated using fuzzy logic. Considering the conducted analysis, the demand amount is taken more in the second problem than the first one, which has led to an increase in the cost of the second problem. On one hand, the chance of demand satisfaction with no late orders is higher than the second problem. Satisfaction of demand occurs more in the second problem as well. Thus, these problems should be utilized in a way that suits the space of this problem. To solve the problem and to do the sensitivity analysis, we present a NSGA-II algorithm to deal with multi-objectiveness of the problem. A ε-Constraint method is also proposed to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm.



How to cite this paper
APA: Babaei, A & Shahanaghi, K. (2017). A new model for planning the distributed facilities locations under emergency conditions and uncertainty space in relief logistics. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 5(2), 105-125.
Chicago/Turabian: Babaei, A & Shahanaghi, K. 2017. "A new model for planning the distributed facilities locations under emergency conditions and uncertainty space in relief logistics." Uncertain Supply Chain Management 5, no. 2 (2017): 105-125.
AMA: Babaei, A & Shahanaghi, K. A new model for planning the distributed facilities locations under emergency conditions and uncertainty space in relief logistics. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. 2017;5(2):105-125.

References
Aly, A. A., & White, J. A. (1978). Probabilistic formulation of the emergency service location problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society,29(12), 1167-1179.
Ben-Tal, A., Do Chung, B., Mandala, S. R., & Yao, T. (2011). Robust optimization for emergency logistics planning: Risk mitigation in humanitarian relief supply chains. Transportation research part B: methodological, 45(8), 1177-1189. ‏
Balcik, B., & Beamon, B. M. (2008). Facility location in humanitarian relief.International Journal of Logistics, 11(2), 101-121.
Berlin, G. N., & Liebman, J. C. (1974). Mathematical analysis of emergency ambulance location. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 8(6), 323-328.
Ball, M. O., & Lin, F. L. (1993). A reliability model applied to emergency service vehicle location. Operations research, 41(1), 18-36.
Berman, O., Drezner, Z., & Wesolowsky, G. O. (2007). The transfer point location problem. European journal of operational research, 179(3), 978-989.
Balcik, B., Beamon, B. M., & Smilowitz, K. (2008). Last mile distribution in humanitarian relief. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(2), 51-63.
Campos, V., Bandeira, R., & Bandeira, A. (2012). A method for evacuation route planning in disaster situations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 503-512.
Campbell, A. M., Vandenbussche, D., & Hermann, W. (2008). Routing for relief efforts. Transportation Science, 42(2), 127-145. ‏
Liou, C. D. (2015). Markovian queue optimisation analysis with an unreliable server subject to working breakdowns and impatient customers. International Journal of Systems Science, 46(12), 2165-2182.
Daskin, M. S. (1983). A maximum expected covering location model: formulation, properties and heuristic solution. Transportation Science, 17(1), 48-70.
Davis, L. B., Samanlioglu, F., Qu, X., & Root, S. (2013). Inventory planning and coordination in disaster relief efforts. International Journal of Production Economics, 141(2), 561-573.
Doerner, K. F., Gutjahr, W. J., & Nolz, P. C. (2009). Multi-criteria location planning for public facilities in tsunami-prone coastal areas. Or Spectrum,31(3), 651-678.
Drezner, T. (2007). Casualty collection points: number and population covered. In Proceedings of the southwest Decision Sciences Institute 38th annual meeting (pp. 426-433).
Edrissi, A., Poorzahedy, H., Nassiri, H., & Nourinejad, M. (2013). A multi-agent optimization formulation of earthquake disaster prevention and management. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(1), 261-275.
Erkut, E., Ingolfsson, A., & Budge, S. (2007). Maximum availability models for selecting ambulance station and vehicle locations. Technical report.
Erkut, E., Ingolfsson, A., Sim, T., & Erdoğan, G. (2009). Computational comparison of five maximal covering models for locating ambulances.Geographical Analysis, 41(1), 43-65.
Fiacco, A. V., & McCormick, G. P. (1990). Nonlinear programming: sequential unconstrained minimization techniques (Vol. 4). Siam.
Guha-Sapir, D., Vos, F., Below, R., & Penserre, S. (2012). Annual disaster statistical review 2011: the numbers and trends (No. CRED/IRSS). UCL.
Hogan, K., & ReVelle, C. (1986). Concepts and applications of backup coverage. Management Science, 32(11), 1434-1444.
Hashzemi, S., Shokri, A., Amin Naseri, M. R., & Akbaripour, H. (2014). Designing an expert system for management of crowding and overcrowding in emergency departments. Journal of Industrial Engineering. 48(2) 281-292.
Hale, T., & Moberg, C. R. (2005). Improving supply chain disaster preparedness: A decision process for secure site location. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(3), 195-207.
Jotshi, A., Gong, Q., & Batta, R. (2009). Dispatching and routing of emergency vehicles in disaster mitigation using data fusion. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 43(1), 1-24.‏
Karasakal, O., & Karasakal, E. K. (2004). A maximal covering location model in the presence of partial coverage. Computers & Operations Research, 31(9), 1515-1526.
Liberatore, F., Ortuño, M. T., Tirado, G., Vitoriano, B., & Scaparra, M. P. (2014). A hierarchical compromise model for the joint optimization of recovery operations and distribution of emergency goods in Humanitarian Logistics. Computers & Operations Research, 42, 3-13. ‏
Lin, Y. H., Batta, R., Rogerson, P. A., Blatt, A., & Flanigan, M. (2009). A logistics model for delivery of critical items in a disaster relief operation: heuristic approaches. Recuperado em, 14.
Matsutomi, T., & Ishii, H. (1992, March). An emergency service facility location problem with fuzzy objective and constraint. In Fuzzy Systems, 1992., IEEE International Conference on (pp. 315-322). IEEE.
Mete, H. O., & Zabinsky, Z. B. (2007). Preparing for disasters: medical supply location and distribution. In Proceedings of the INFORMS conference, Seattle, WA.
Ke, H., & Liu, B. (2007). Project scheduling problem with mixed uncertainty of randomness and fuzziness. European Journal of Operational Research,183(1), 135-147.
Moeini, M., Jemai, Z., & Sahin, E. (2015). Location and relocation problems in the context of the emergency medical service systems: a case study.Central European Journal of Operations Research, 23(3), 641-658. ‏
Mulvey, J. M., Vanderbei, R. J., & Zenios, S. A. (1995). Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Operations research, 43(2), 264-281.
Overstreet, R. E., Hall, D., Hanna, J. B., & Kelly Rainer Jr, R. (2011). Research in humanitarian logistics. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 1(2), 114-131.
Özdamar, L., Ekinci, E., & Küçükyazici, B. (2004). Emergency logistics planning in natural disasters. Annals of operations research, 129(1-4), 217-245. ‏
Pirkul, H., & Schilling, D. A. (1988). The siting of emergency service facilities with workload capacities and backup service. Management Science, 34(7), 896-908.
Paul, J. A., & Batta, R. (2008). Models for hospital location and capacity allocation for an area prone to natural disasters. International Journal of Operational Research, 3(5), 473-496. ‏
ReVelle, C. (1989). Review, extension and prediction in emergency service siting models. European Journal of Operational Research, 40(1), 58-69.
Ratick, S., Meacham, B., & Aoyama, Y. (2008). Locating backup facilities to enhance supply chain disaster resilience. Growth and Change, 39(4), 642-666. ‏
Rawls, C. G., & Turnquist, M. A. (2010). Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response. Transportation research part B: Methodological, 44(4), 521-534. ‏
Rajagopalan, H. K., Vergara, F. E., Saydam, C., & Xiao, J. (2007). Developing effective meta-heuristics for a probabilistic location model via experimental design. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(1), 83-101.
Rahmaniani, R., & Shafia, M. A. (2013). A study on maximum covering transportation network design with facility location under uncertainty. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 30(2), 78-93.
Swiss, R. (2015). Natural catastrophes and man-made disasters in 2014: convective and winter storms generate most losses. Sigma, (2). ‏
Ukkusuri, S., & Yushimito, W. (2008). Location routing approach for the humanitarian prepositioning problem. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2089), 18-25. ‏
Schilling, D., Elzinga, D. J., Cohon, J., Church, R., & ReVelle, C. (1979). The TEAM/FLEET models for simultaneous facility and equipment siting.Transportation Science, 13(2), 163-175.
Sheu, J. B. (2007). An emergency logistics distribution approach for quick response to urgent relief demand in disasters. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(6), 687-709.
Swoveland, C., Uyeno, D., Vertinsky, I., & Vickson, R. (1973). Ambulance location: a probabilistic enumeration approach. Management Science, 20(4-part-ii), 686-698.
Serra, D., & Marianov, V. (1996). The location of emergency services in changing network: the case of Barcelona. In Seventh International Symposium on Locational Decisions, Edmonton, Canada.
Shen, Z. J. M., Pannala, J., Rai, R., & Tsoi, T. S. (2008). Modeling transportation networks during disruptions and emergency evacuations. University of California Transportation Center.‏
Vitoriano, B., Ortuño, M. T., Tirado, G., & Montero, J. (2011). A multi-criteria optimization model for humanitarian aid distribution. Journal of Global Optimization, 51(2), 189-208.
Zitzler, E., Deb, K., & Thiele, L. (2000). Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results. Evolutionary computation, 8(2), 173-195.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Uncertain Supply Chain Management | Year: 2017 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 2 | Views: 2825 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • A robust optimization model for logistics planning in the earthquake response phase
  • A location-routing model on relief distribution centers
  • Proactive and reactive inventory policies in humanitarian operations
  • Disaster relief routing by considering heterogeneous vehicles and reliability of routes using an MADM approach
  • Integrated decision making model for urban disaster management: A multi-objective genetic algorithm approach

📝 Ready to share your research?

Uncertain Supply Chain Management is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines


Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com