Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • ๐Ÿ”™ Back
  • ๐Ÿ“š Journals
    • โš™๏ธ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • ๐ŸŒ IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • ๐Ÿงช CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • ๐Ÿ’น AC - Accounting
    • ๐ŸŽฏ DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • ๐Ÿš› USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • ๐Ÿ—๏ธ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • ๐Ÿฅ HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • ๐Ÿ“ˆ SCI - Scientometrica
    • ๐Ÿ”ฉ ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • ๐ŸŒฟ JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • ๐Ÿ’ผ MSL - Management Science Letters
  • ๐Ÿ“ Submit Article
  • ๐Ÿ“Š Statistics
  • ๐Ÿ“‹ About
    • ๐Ÿ“„ About Us
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Blog
    • ๐Ÿ“ข News
    • ๐Ÿ“ง Contact
  • ๐Ÿ“บ Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Tags cloud » Multi-Label Classification

โญ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

โœ๏ธ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

๐ŸŒ Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Sort articles by: ๐Ÿ“– Volume | ๐Ÿ“… Date | โญ Most Rates | ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ Most Views | ๐Ÿš€ Rising Stars | ๐Ÿ”— Citations (Scopus) | ๐Ÿ”ฅ Hot Papers
1.

Multi-label classification analysis with modified C-Tran on SCIN dataset Pages 957-966 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Hasih Pratiwi, Fauzi Nafiudin, Sri Sulistijowati Handajani, Respatiwulan Respatiwulan, Yuliana Susanti, Muhammad Bayu Nirwana

doi 10.5267/j.ijdns.2024.11.003

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords: Multi-label classification, C-Tran, Skin condition, SCIN dataset, Metadata

Abstract:
Skin conditions affect millions of people globally, with symptoms appearing in different body areas. Technological advancements have brought diverse data types, including situations where an image depicting a skin condition can be assigned multiple labels. The Classification Transformer (C-Tran) method, which utilizes transfer learning and transformers, was developed for multi-label classification. Recently, Google introduced a new dataset called SCIN (Skin Condition Image Network), which aims to provide diverse data on skin conditions. This research aimed to use the C-Tran method for the multi-label classification of skin conditions with the SCIN dataset while incorporating additional metadata inputs to improve the metric results. The results show that the multi-label classification process using metadata is far superior to the model without metadata. For example, In the mAP metric, models that utilized metadata scored 82.37, whereas models without metadata only scored 47.02. Similarly, models with metadata achieved 70.83% in the accuracy metric, while models without metadata achieved only 34.72%. Out of the 10,379 data points available with metadata in the SCIN dataset, only 718 were actually utilized for the classification task. It is thought that the inaccurate prediction outcomes are due to unreliable data, even with a confidence level of 4. In this analysis, two metadata categories stood out the most in terms of different measurements: the body part and symptoms metadata categories from the SCIN dataset. With just the body part and symptoms metadata groups, the mAP results achieved a 74.23%, accuracy at 63.89%, CF1 at 68.79%, and OF1 at 73.13%.
Details
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: IJDS | Year: 2025 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 4 | Views: 559

 
2.

Multi-label clinical procedure prediction from electronic medical record using ensemble method Pages 71-82 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Mutiara Auliya Khadija, Ery Permana Yudha, Wahyu Nurharjadmo, Mila Rosyida Uswatunnisa

doi 10.5267/j.ijdns.2026.20

๐Ÿ”‘ Keywords: Multi-Label Classification, Clinical Procedure Prediction, Electronic Medical Records, Ensemble Learning, Healthcare Data

Abstract:
The rapid growth of healthcare information systems has led to an increase in the volume of clinical data stored in electronic medical record systems. This data contains valuable information such as patient demographics, vital signs, diagnoses, and medical procedures, which can be used to support clinical decision-making. Determining the appropriate clinical procedure remains a challenge due to the complexity of patient conditions and the potential need for multiple procedures simultaneously. This study aims to develop a robust model for predicting clinical procedures using a multi-label classification approach based on electronic medical record data. The proposed methodology integrates data preprocessing, feature engineering, followed by the implementation of several Machine Learning methods such as LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost, Deep Learning Models and combined using an Ensemble Learning method. Various Ensemble Learning techniques, including Simple Average, Machine Learning Average, and Optimized Weight-based combinations, are applied to improve predictive performance. Evaluation is performed using the Micro F1 score and Macro F1 score to assess overall performance. Experimental results show that individual models achieve competitive performance, with LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost outperforming the deep learning approach on tabular clinical data. The Ensemble Learning approach further improved performance, with the Optimized Weight with Grid Search Optimization ensemble achieving the highest Micro F1 score of 0.7788 and Macro F1 score of 0.7674. These results also demonstrate that combining multiple models effectively reduces bias and variance while improving generalization. The small difference between Micro and Macro F1 scores indicates balanced performance across labels. In conclusion, the proposed Ensemble Learning-based multi-label prediction model demonstrates robust capabilities in handling complex clinical data and improving prediction accuracy. This study highlights the importance of model combination strategies rather than increasing model complexity. These findings have practical implications for supporting clinical decision-making systems in healthcare settings.
Details
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: HE | Year: 2027 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 2 | Views: 131

 

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com