Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Scientometrica » Maintenance readiness and interface management in major oil and gas projects: A three-decade longitudinal evaluation of project delivery and operational transition

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (51)
  • SCI (51)

SCI Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 3 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (21)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(172)
Supply chain management(169)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(114)
Artificial intelligence(103)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(99)
SMEs(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Sustainability(93)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(85)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Job satisfaction(81)
Organizational performance(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Knowledge Management(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(69)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(42)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Scientometrica
ISSN 3115-8455 (Online) - ISSN 3115-8447 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 3 Issue 2 pp. 71-88, 2027

Maintenance readiness and interface management in major oil and gas projects: A three-decade longitudinal evaluation of project delivery and operational transition Pages 71-88 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Olaoluwa Aaron Fapohunda, Christopher I. Ajuwa, Olusegun D. Samuel

📋 Author Affiliations:
Olaoluwa Aaron Fapohunda ORCID 1, Christopher I. Ajuwa2, Olusegun D. Samuel2
1 Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Limited, Lagos Nigeria, Nigeria
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Petroleum Resources, Effurun, Delta State, Nigeria
doi 10.5267/j.ijdns.2026.30
✏️ Editor: EditorMarcelo Seido Nagano ORCID
Crossref 1 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Maintenance readiness, Interface management, Oil and gas capital projects, Operational transition, Front-End Engineering Design, Project governance, Asset information management, Predictive analytics, Risk mitigation, Lifecycle asset management

Abstract: Up to 78% of oil and gas megaprojects fail to deliver on initial commitments, yet maintenance readiness is routinely deferred until after construction decisions are already irreversible. This study investigates the previously unexamined link between maintenance readiness and interface management across the capital-project life cycle through a systematic literature review combined with a 30-year longitudinal analysis of 941 anonymised interface lessons-learned records spanning 21 countries. Root causes were classified using ISO 14224 of 2016, and predictive models were validated through stratified coding (Cohen's κ = 0.81) and five-fold cross-validation. The analysis revealed that five root causes drove 81.2% of all failures, including slow interface identification (18.5%), uncertain technical definitions (17.4%), weak governance (17.4%), unclear scope and ownership (16.3%), and cross-discipline communication breakdowns (11.6%), with key effects being performance impact (41.8%) and schedule delay (25.7%), while 33.0% of records were classified as high or critical risk and approximately 40.3% originated in Front-End Engineering Design. The Interface Criticality Index (ICI) correlated strongly with high-risk classification (r = 0.83), and the Random Forest classifier achieved ROC-AUC = 0.848 and PR-AUC = 0.850 respectively. The findings conclude that maintenance readiness should be established as a distinct, front-end-loaded discipline rather than a post-handover activity, as embedding readiness controls upstream converts lessons-learned records from retrospective artefacts into proactive design constraints, enabling early intervention before costly lock-in.

How to cite this paper
APA: Fapohunda, O., Ajuwa, C & Samuel, O. (2027). Maintenance readiness and interface management in major oil and gas projects: A three-decade longitudinal evaluation of project delivery and operational transition. Scientometrica, 3(2), 71-88.
Chicago/Turabian: Fapohunda, O., Ajuwa, C & Samuel, O. 2027. "Maintenance readiness and interface management in major oil and gas projects: A three-decade longitudinal evaluation of project delivery and operational transition." Scientometrica 3, no. 2 (2027): 71-88.
AMA: Fapohunda, O., Ajuwa, C & Samuel, O. Maintenance readiness and interface management in major oil and gas projects: A three-decade longitudinal evaluation of project delivery and operational transition. Scientometrica. 2027;3(2):71-88.

References
Abbass, A. (2024). Successful planning for oil and gas maintenance with application of key factors for technical & commercial successful execution. Journal of Engineering, Management and Information Technology, 2(2), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.61552/JEMIT.2024.02.001
Ahn, S., Shokri, S., Lee, S. H., Haas, C. T., & Haas, R. C. G. (2017). Exploratory study on the effectiveness of interface-management practices in dealing with project complexity in large-scale engineering and construction projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(2), 04016039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000488
Al-Mazrouie, J. R., Ojiako, U., Williams, T., Chipulu, M., & Marshall, A. (2021). An operations readiness typology for mitigating against transitional ‘disastrous openings’ of airport infrastructure projects. Production Planning & Control, 32(4), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1730997
Alsyouf, I., Alsuwaidi, M., Hamdan, S., & Shamsuzzaman, M. (2021). Impact of ISO 55000 on organisational performance: evidence from certified UAE firms. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(1-2), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1537750
Ayres, J. R., May, I., & Brinton, M. C. (2026). The commissioning paradox: Why critical infrastructure work stays invisible until it fails. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18173009
Carydias, P., & Kennedy, R. (2025). Tackling the 65% megaproject failure epidemic: six key levers amplified by digital and AI. Australian Energy Producers Journal, 65(2), EP24270. https://doi.org/10.1071/EP24270
Chen, I. Y., Pierson, E., Rose, S., Joshi, S., Ferryman, K., & Ghassemi, M. (2021). Ethical machine learning in healthcare. Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science, 4(1), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-092820-114757
Chime, K. C. (2024). Advancing portfolio project delivery and operation handover assurance through digitalization in the oil and gas. https://doi.org/10.2118/222654-ms
Curran, P. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2020). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. https://doi.org/10.17615/kbwt-7k77
Dacrema, M. F., Boglio, S., Cremonesi, P., & Jannach, D. (2021). A troubling analysis of reproducibility and progress in recommender systems research. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434185
Dahlen, A., Deng, Y., & Charu, V. (2025). Evaluating the generalizability of commercial healthcare claims data. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf142
Doslu, M., & Bingol, H. O. (2016). Context sensitive article ranking with citation context analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1982-6
Driessen, M., Arts, J., Houtum, G. van, Rustenburg, J. W., & Huisman, B. (2014). Maintenance spare parts planning and control: a framework for control and agenda for future research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2014.907586
Fang, C., Marle, F., Zio, E., & Bocquet, J. (2012). Network theory-based analysis of risk interactions in large engineering projects. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.005
Fargie, D., Walker, K., Poore, W., Norton, S., Husain, I., Decarli, L., & Clover, C. (2024). Insights and learning from IOGP global upstream process safety event data. https://doi.org/10.2118/220324-ms
Godager, B., Mohn, K., Merschbrock, C., Klakegg, O. J., & Huang, L. (2022). Towards an improved framework for enterprise BIM: the role of ISO 19650. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 27, 863–882. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2022.053
Heim, E., Wright, O., & Shriver, D. (2025). A guide to failure in machine learning: Reliability and robustness from foundations to practice. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2503.00563
Jaskula, K., Papadonikolaki, E., & Rovas, D. (2022). Conceptual framework for decentralised information management along the entire lifecycle of a built asset. Proceedings of the 2022 European Conference on Computing in Construction, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.35490/ec3.2022.168
Kim, M.-H., Lee, E., & Choi, H.-S. (2018). Detail engineering completion rating index system (DECRIS) for optimal initiation of construction works to improve contractors’ schedule-cost performance for offshore oil and gas EPC projects. Sustainability, 10(7), 2469. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072469
Kim, S. J., Poirier, É., & Staub-French, S. (2020). Information commissioning: bridging the gap between digital and physical built assets. Journal of Facilities Management, 18(5), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfm-04-2020-0024
Merrow, E. W. (2012). Oil and gas industry megaprojects: Our recent track record. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 64(9), 44–47. https://doi.org/10.2118/153695-pa
Naqbi, S. A., Shokri, S., & Maloney, K. (2016). Asset interface management system. https://doi.org/10.2118/183127-ms
Natarajan, A. (2022). Reference class forecasting and machine learning for improved offshore oil and gas megaproject planning: Methods and application. Project Management Journal, 53(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211045889
Nossair, A., Tamimi, A. A., Amri, A. A., Katheeri, K. A., Hann, T., & Finigan, T. (2012). Mega projects integrated readiness assurance process. https://doi.org/10.2118/159116-ms
Odili, P. O., Daudu, C. D., Adefemi, A., Ekemezie, I. O., & Usiagu, G. S. (2024). Operational readiness and assurance (OR&A) in asset integrity: Strategies for excellence in facility management. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(2), 834–850. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i2.834
Olaniran, O. J., Love, P. E. D., Edwards, D. J., Olatunji, O. A., & Matthews, J. (2015). Cost overruns in hydrocarbon megaprojects: A critical review and implications for research. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21556
Østebø, R., Selvik, J. T., Naegeli, G. S., & Ciliberti, T. (2018). ISO standards to enable reliable, safe and cost-effective technology development, project execution and operational excellence. https://doi.org/10.4043/28705-ms
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pais, E., Raposo, H., Meireles, A. J. de A., & Farinha, J. T. (2019). ISO 55001 – A strategic tool for the circular economy – Diagnosis of the organization's state. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.13052/jiems2446-1822.2018.005
Parraguez, P., Eppinger, S. D., & Maier, A. (2016). Characterizing design process interfaces as organization networks: Insights for engineering systems management. Systems Engineering, 19(4), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21345
Paton, S., & Andrew, B. (2018). The role of the Project Management Office (PMO) in product lifecycle management: A case study in the defence industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.002
Pérez, J., Díaz, J., Garcia-Martin, J., & Tabuenca, B. (2020). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - enhancement of the study selection process using Cohen’s Kappa statistic. Journal of Systems and Software, 168, 110657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110657
Pieterse, B., Agyekum, K., Manu, P., Mohandes, S. R., Cheung, C., & Yunusa-Kaltungo, A. (2022). Examining critical project management skills for successful delivery of major maintenance projects: insights from the United Kingdom energy sector. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(7), 2882–2905. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-07-2022-0658
Polenghi, A., Roda, I., Macchi, M., & Pozzetti, A. (2021). A methodology to boost data-driven decision-making process for a modern maintenance practice. Production Planning & Control, 33(6-7), 559–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.2010823
Prudnikov, V. A. (2020). Modern development prospects of programs in engineering education inside national university that use information and communication technologies. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 10(3), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i3.12619
Rachman, A., & Ratnayake, R. M. C. (2019). Machine learning approach for risk-based inspection screening assessment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 185, 518–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.008
Rashdan, A. A., Browning, J. M., & Ritter, C. (2019). Data Integration Aggregated Model and Ontology for Nuclear Deployment (DIAMOND): Preliminary Model and Ontology. https://doi.org/10.2172/2439922
Section, A., Fadzil, M. M., Asshaari, I., Shaharugi, M. C. A., Samad, A. G. A., & Wardiah, P. N. S. (2023). An exploratory study on causes and effects of miscommunication error among maintenance crew. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 35(6), 1421–1430. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkukm-2023-si6(2)-13
Sharam, A., McNelis, S., Cho, H., Logan, C., Burke, T., & Rossini, P. (2021). Towards an Australian social housing best practice asset management framework. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.18408/ahuri5324001
Shokri, S. (2014). Interface Management for Complex Capital Projects [Doctoral dissertation, University of Water-loo]. http://hdl.handle.net/10012/8463
Shokri, S., Ahn, S., Lee, S. H., Haas, C. T., & Haas, R. C. G. (2015). Current status of interface management in construction: Drivers and effects of systematic interface management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(2), 04014068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001035
Shokri, S., Safa, M., Haas, C. T., Haas, R. C. G., Maloney, K., & MacGillivray, S. (2012). Interface Management Model for Mega Capital Projects. Construction Research Congress 2012, 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412329.045
Silva, R. F. da, & Souza, G. F. M. de. (2020). Asset management system (ISO 55001) and Total Productive Maintenance (TPM): a discussion of interfaces for maintenance management. GEPROS: Gestão da Produção, Operações e Sistemas, 15(2), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.15675/gepros.v15i2.2528
Thanassoulis, E. (2000). The use of data envelopment analysis in the regulation of UK water utilities: Water distribution. European Journal of Operational Research, 126(2), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00303-3
Utgard, M., Thomas, H., Singh, A., & Narozny, J. (2013). The Atomic Model approach to operational assurance. The APPEA Journal, 53(2), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1071/aj12060
Zaman, U., Flórez, L., Anjam, M., Khwaja, M. G., & Ul-Huda, N. (2022). At the end of the world, turn left: examining toxic leadership, team silence and success in mega construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(8), 3337–3358. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-08-2021-0755
Zhu, L., Shan, M., & Xu, Z. (2019). Critical review of building handover-related research in construction and facility management journals. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(7), 1241–1262. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2018-0442
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Scientometrica | 📅 Year: 2027 | 📖 Volume: 3 | 📄 Issue: 2 | 👁️ Views: 152 | 📊 Crossref: 1

Related Articles:
  • The impacts of supply chain practices on the sustainability performance of small and medium enterprises
  • Unlocking project SDGs in furniture manufacturing: The mediating role of green innovation resilience
  • The influence of social media and big data utilization in improving networking and its implications on the quality of civil service decisions in Surabaya city
  • A brief review on industrial remanufacturing of structural and functional components: Wire-Arc Additive Manufacturing Technique
  • Macroeconomic effect on stock price: Evidence from Indonesia

📝 Ready to share your research?

Scientometrica is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com