Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » An exploration study to detect different factors influencing on inefficiency of office automation systems

Journals

  • IJIEC (726)
  • MSL (2637)
  • DSL (649)
  • CCL (495)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (404)
  • AC (557)
  • JPM (247)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (21)
  • SCI (11)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)

Keywords

Supply chain management(163)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(148)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(108)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Competitive advantage(93)
SMEs(86)
optimization(84)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(81)
TOPSIS(80)
Job satisfaction(79)
Sustainability(79)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Genetic Algorithm(76)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(59)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Dmaithan Almajali(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sautma Ronni Basana(27)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2168)
Indonesia(1276)
Jordan(783)
India(780)
Vietnam(500)
Saudi Arabia(438)
Malaysia(438)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(181)
Thailand(151)
United States(109)
Turkey(102)
Ukraine(99)
Egypt(95)
Canada(91)
Pakistan(84)
Peru(83)
United Kingdom(78)
Nigeria(77)
Morocco(73)


» Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 3 Issue 6 pp. 1689-1696 , 2013

An exploration study to detect different factors influencing on inefficiency of office automation systems Pages 1689-1696 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Azam Roostaee, Jamshid Salehi Sadaghiani

Keywords: Efficiency, Ministry of Science Research and Technology, Office automation system

Abstract: Office automation systems play important role on increasing productivity and efficiency of organizations. An automated system is capable of improving required communications, speed up the process of tasks and removes unnecessary activities. This paper presents an empirical investigation to detect important factors influencing on inefficiency of office automation systems in ministry of science, research and technology of Iran. The proposed study of this paper designs a questionnaire and distributes it among management team who work for this organization. The results of our investigation indicate that two factors, lack of necessary infrastructure for participating in office automation activities as well as lack of management support, play important role on reaching desirable results. In addition, educational background and work experience also influence office automation systems’ applicability.

How to cite this paper
Roostaee, A & Sadaghiani, J. (2013). An exploration study to detect different factors influencing on inefficiency of office automation systems.Management Science Letters , 3(6), 1689-1696.

Refrences
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.
European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1996). Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management
System. Harvard Bussiness Review (January.February). 74(1), 75-85.

Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (2000). The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard
companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Bussiness School Press.

Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible
outcomes. Boston, MD: Harvard Bussiness School Press.

Khaki, A., Sadjadi, S., Azadeh, M & Najafi, E. (2012). Ranking CCR-efficient units based on the
indicator with limited resources. Decision Science Letters , 1(2), 87-95.

Mozaffari, A., Karkehabadi, H., Kheyrkhahan, M & Karami, M. (2012). A development in balanced
scorecard by designing a fuzzy and nonlinear Algorithm (case study: Islamic Azad university of
Semnan). Management Science Letters, 2(5), 1819-1838.

Roghanian, E & Foroughi, A. (2010). An empirical study of Iranian regional airports using robust
data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 1(1),
65-72.

Zhou, Q., Huang, W., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Identifying critical success factors in emergency
management using a fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 49(2), 243-259.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2013 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 6 | Views: 1975 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Strategic planning and performance measurement using balanced scorecard: A ...
  • Ranking critical success factor in chaos management using BSC and AHP metho ...
  • A cause and effect two-stage BSC-DEA method for measuring the relative effi ...
  • A hybrid TOPSIS-BSC method for strategic planning
  • An empirical study based on BSC-DEA to measure the relative efficiencies of ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2025 GrowingScience.Com