Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » From effort to evidence: What accelerates time to impact in high performance organization transformations?

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2653)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (49)
  • SCI (50)

MSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 16 (16)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Management Science Letters
ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 16 Issue 2 pp. 87-104, 2026

From effort to evidence: What accelerates time to impact in high performance organization transformations? Pages 87-104 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: André de Waal

📋 Author Affiliations:
André de Waal1
1 HPO Center, Netherlands
doi 10.5267/j.msl.2026.5.003
Crossref Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Time-to-impact, Impact, Quality improvement, Benefits realization, HPO transformation, High performance organization

Abstract: This study synthesizes what is known about time-to-impact in quality improvement (QI) and transformation initiatives and, drawing on a large body of High Performance Organization (HPO) transformation cases, identifies which factors delay or accelerate impact and which organizational practices shorten benefit lead-times. It combines a structured synthesis of academic studies addressing impact, time-to-impact, timing evidence, and associated factors/practices with a case-survey of 54 documented HPO transformation cases that were systematically coded using a common framework. Factors and practices are prioritized based on their recurrence across cases, after which the resulting empirical patterns are mapped back to literature-based categories to assess convergence and divergence. Across the HPO cases, the most recurrent sources of delay are weak change communication and dialogue, weak follow-up and accountability, inconsistent leadership attention, and limited transparency in performance measurement and reporting. The most recurrent accelerators are strong communication and knowledge sharing, a tight review cadence with closed feedback loops, transparent measurement and reporting, and cross-unit collaboration. The most frequently reported time-to-impact reduction practices include institutionalizing a recurring communication-and-review cadence, increasing measurement transparency, clarifying leadership roles and accountabilities, and creating structured dialogue channels supported by internal coaches or champions. Overall, the findings overlap substantially with the literature, but differ in emphasis, and the study positions time-to-impact as a distinct dimension of improvement effectiveness while offering an evidence-informed, prioritized set of practical levers grounded in both research and cross-case practice.

How to cite this paper
APA: Waal, A. (2026). From effort to evidence: What accelerates time to impact in high performance organization transformations?. Management Science Letters, 16(2), 87-104.
Chicago/Turabian: Waal, A. 2026. "From effort to evidence: What accelerates time to impact in high performance organization transformations?." Management Science Letters 16, no. 2 (2026): 87-104.
AMA: Waal, A. From effort to evidence: What accelerates time to impact in high performance organization transformations?. Management Science Letters. 2026;16(2):87-104.

References
Alade, T.A., Bukoye, O.T., Roehrich, J.K., & Edelenbos, J. (2022). Cross-national collaboration in strategic transport projects: The impact on benefits realization. International Journal of Project Management, 40(4), 411-425. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.03.009.
Backhouse, A., & Ogunlayi, F. (2020). Quality improvement into practice. BMJ, 368, m865. doi:10.1136/bmj.m865.
Bader, M., Antony, J., Jayaraman, R., Swarnakar, V., Goonetilleke, R.S., Maalouf, M., Garza-Reyes, J.A., & Linderman, K. (2024). Why do process improvement projects fail in organizations? A review and future research agenda. Inter-national Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 15(3), 664-690. doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-07-2023-0126.
Carcary, M. (2020). The Research Audit Trail: Methodological Guidance for Application in Practice. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 18(2). doi.org/10.34190/JBRM.18.2.008.
Cash, P., Isaksson, O., Maier, A., & Summers, J. (2022). Sampling in design research: Eight key considerations. Design Studies, 78, 101077. doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101077.
Cresswell, K., Sheikh, A., Franklin, B.D., Hinder, S., Nguyen, H.T., Krasuska, M., Lane, W., Mozaffar, H., Mason, K., Eason, S., Potts, H.W.W., & Williams, R. (2022). Benefits realization management in the context of a national digi-tal transformation initiative in English provider organizations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Associ-ation, 29(3), 536-545. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocab283.
Delisle, J., Marnewick, C., & Romero-Torres, A. (2025). Exploring temporal dimensions of benefits realisation man-agement in agile IT environments. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 13(4), 1-17. doi.org/10.12821/ijispm130403.
de Waal, A., Ten Have-Schoonhoven, L., & Rutten, R. (2026). Balancing Flexibility and Discipline in High-Performance Organisation Initiatives: Empirical Insights from a Healthcare Context. under review.
Endalamaw, A., Khatri, R.B., Mengistu, T.S., Erku, D., Wolka, E., Zewdie, A., & Assefa, Y. (2024). A scoping review of continuous quality improvement in healthcare system: conceptualization, models and tools, barriers and facilitators, and impact. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 487. doi:10.1186/s12913-024-10828-0.
Franken, J.C.M., van Dun D.H., & Wilderom, P.M. (2024). Kaizen Event process factors for operational performance improvement: an archival study. Production Planning & Control, 6(10), 1315-1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2024.2358402 doi:10.1080/09537287.2024.2358402.
Hagl, C., Kanitz, R., Gonzalez, K., & Hoegl, M. (2024). Change management interventions: Taking stock and moving forward. Human Resource Management Review, 34(1), 101000. doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.101000.
Harris, D., Baker, E., Svacina, J., & Funderburk, L.A. (2023). Systematic Approach to Evidence-Based Design for Measurable Health and Wellness Outcomes: Curating and Translating Evidence to Practice. HERD: Health Envi-ronments Research & Design Journal, 17(1), 17-29. doi:10.1177/19375867231209335 .
Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R.L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao. H. (2021). Where Do Models for Change Management, Improvement and Implementation Meet? A Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 13, 85-108. doi:10.2147/JHL.S289176.
Holgeid, K.K., Jørgensen, M., Volden, G.H., & Berg, H. (2022). Realising benefits in public IT projects: A multiple case study. IET Software, 17(2). doi:10.1049/sfw2.12079.
Inal, T.C., Goruroglu Ozturk, O., Kibar, F., Cetiner, S., Matyar, S., Daglioglu, G., & Yaman, A. (2018). Lean six sigma methodologies improve clinical laboratory efficiency and reduce turnaround times. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 32(1), e22180. doi:10.1002/jcla.22180.
Isik, L., Nilsson, C., Magnusson, J., & Koutsikouri, D. (2024). Benefits realization in digital transformation: the transla-tion from policy to practice in health care. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(2), 303–317. doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2023-0177.
Jager, N.W., Newig, J., Challies, E., Kochskämper, E., & von Wehrden, H. (2022). Case study meta-analysis in the so-cial sciences. Insights on data quality and reliability from a large-N case survey. Research Synthesis Methods, 13(1), 12-27. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1514.
Joseph, J., Laureiro-Martinez, D., Nigam, A., Ocasio, W., & Rerup, C. (2024). Research frontiers on the attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Organization, 22(1), 6-17. doi.org/10.1177/14761270231223397.
Käss, S., Brosig, C., Westner, M., & Strahringer, S. (2024). Short and sweet: multiple mini case studies as a form of rig-orous case study research. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 22, 351-384. doi.org/10.1007/s10257-024-00674-2.
Laux, C., Johnson, M.E., & Cada, P. (2015). LSS Green Belt Projects Planned Versus Actual Duration. The Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering, 31(1), 2-18.
Meredith, J., & Zwikael, O. (2020), ”Achieving strategic benefits from project investments: appoint a project owner“, Business Horizons, 63, 61-71.
Mittal, A., Gupta, P., Kumar, V., Owad, A.A., Mahlawat, S., & Singh, S. (2023). The performance improvement analysis using Six Sigma DMAIC methodology: A case study on Indian manufacturing company. Heliyon, 9(3), e14625. doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14625.
Moon, S.E.J., Hogden, A., & Eljiz, K. (2022). Sustaining improvement of hospital-wide initiative for patient safety and quality: a systematic scoping review. BMJ Open Quality, 11, e002057. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002057.
Mortimer, F., Isherwood, J., Pearce, M., Kenward, C., & Vaux, E. (2018). Sustainability in quality improvement: meas-uring impact. Future Healthcare Journal, 5(2), 94-97. doi:10.7861/futurehosp.5-2-94.
Naughton, E., Moran, R., Kharub, M., Sa, J.C., & McDermott, O. (2024). A structured model for continuous improve-ment methodology deployment and sustainment: A case study. Heliyon, 10(21), e40034. doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40034.
Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for report-ing systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
Patón-Romero, J.D., Ngereja, B.J., Hannay, J.O., & Jørgensen, M. (2025). Actual Practices from Practitioners in Bene-fits Management in Digitalization Projects. EASE '25: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Evalua-tion and Assessment in Software Engineering), 874 - 886. doi.org/10.1145/3756681.3757055.
Pereira, L, May, E., Gonçalves, R., Dias, Á and Lopes da Costa, R. (2022). Benefits realisation management: from prob-lem solving to value delivery. International Journal of Revenue Management, 13(1-2), 19-49. doi.org/10.1504/IJRM.2022.126729.
Proctor, E.K., Bunger, A.C., Lengnick-Hall, R. et al. (2023). Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review. Implementation Science, 18, article 31. doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z.
Proudfoot, K. (2022). Inductive/Deductive Hybrid Thematic Analysis in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 308-326. doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816.
Robinson, O.C., & Bailey-Rodriguez, D. (2025). Deductive qualitative research: an integrative approach to designing studies. Qualitative Research in Psychology), 1-16. doi:10.1080/14780887.2025.2604773.
Rojon, C., Okupe, A., & McDowall, A. (2021). Utilization and development of systematic reviews in management re-search: What do we know and where do we go from here?. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23, 191-223. doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12245 .
Rousseau, D.M. (2020). The Realist Rationality Of Evidence-Based Management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(3), 415-424. doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0050 .
Songkajorn, Y., Aujirapongpan, S., Jiraphanumes, K., & Pattanasing, K. (2022). Organizational strategic intuition for high performance: The role of knowledge based dynamic capabilities and digital transformation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 1-19. .oi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030117
Vissing, K.N., Knoll, M.H., & Hertzum, M. (2025). Benefits slippage: The yearlong process of implementing electronic document management in a Danish municipality. Government Information Quarterly, 42(3), 102051. doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102051.
Williams, T., Vo, H., Bourne, M., Bourne, P., Cooke-Davies, T., Kirkham, R., Masterton, G., Quattrone, P., & Valette, J. (2019). A cross-national comparison of public project benefits management practices - the effectiveness of benefits management frameworks in application. Production Planning & Control, 31(8), 644-659. doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1668980.
Williams, T., Vo, H., Bourne, M., Bourne, P., Kirkham, R., Masterton, G., Quattrone, P., & Toczycka , C. (2025). Bene-fits realisation: case studies in public major project delivery with recommendations for practice. Production Plan-ning & Control, 36(1), 127-147. doi:10.1080/09537287.2023.2256287.
Zamboni, K., Baker, U., Tyagi, M., Schellenberg, J., Hill, Z., & Hanson, C. (2020). How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review. Implemention Science, 15(1), 27. doi:10.1186/s13012-020-0978-z.
Zheng, Z., & Zwikael, O. (2025). From outputs to outcomes: Meeting a threshold of short-term project management success as a necessary condition for achieving long-term impact. International Journal of Project Management, 43(8), 102789. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102789.
Zurynski, Y., Ludlow, K., Testa, L. et al. (2023). Built to last? Barriers and facilitators of healthcare program sustaina-bility: a systematic integrative review. Implementation Science, 18, article 62. doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01315-x .
Zwikael, O., & Huemann, M. (2023). Project benefits management: Making an impact on organizations and society through projects and programs. International Journal of Project Management, 41(8), 102538. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102538.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Management Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2026 | 📖 Volume: 16 | 📄 Issue: 2 | 👁️ Views: 267 | 📊 Crossref:

Related Articles:
  • Unlocking project SDGs in furniture manufacturing: The mediating role of green innovation resilience
  • The influence of social media and big data utilization in improving networking and its implications on the quality of civil service decisions in Surabaya city
  • A mediated moderated analysis of knowledge management and stakeholder relationships between open innovation and performance of entrepreneurial firms
  • A brief review on industrial remanufacturing of structural and functional components: Wire-Arc Additive Manufacturing Technique
  • Supply chain collaboration: A state-of-the-art literature review

📝 Ready to share your research?

Management Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com