Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Explainable AI for predictive maintenance: A review and standardized evaluation framework

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 16 (6)
      • Issue 1 (6)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(110)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Sustainability(81)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Artificial intelligence(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2183)
Indonesia(1290)
India(787)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 16 Issue 1 pp. 15-36 , 2026

Explainable AI for predictive maintenance: A review and standardized evaluation framework Pages 15-36 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Leila Zemmouchi-Ghomari

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2025.11.001

Keywords: Explainable Artificial Intelligence, XAI, Predictive Maintenance, PdM, Transparency, Trust, Reliability, Human-AI collaboration

Abstract: This research paper investigates the integration of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) into Predictive Maintenance (PdM) systems, aiming to enhance transparency, interpretability, and reliability in industrial applications. The primary contribution is the introduction of the Explainability Parameters (XPA) framework, which offers a structured methodology for evaluating and applying XAI in PdM. The study systematically reviews recent advancements and challenges in the literature, categorising explanations into pre-modelling, in-modelling, and post-modelling processes. It presents and analyses significant case studies across various industrial sectors to illustrate the practical implications and hurdles of XAI methodologies. Key findings indicate that while XAI significantly improves the effectiveness and trustworthiness of PdM by clarifying model predictions, its implementation is hindered by the complexity of industrial data and the absence of standardised evaluation methods. The XPA framework addresses these challenges by providing tailored metrics for specific applications and advocating for a multi-phase approach to convert technical outputs into actionable maintenance recommendations. The originality of this paper lies in its comprehensive review and the establishment of rigorous standards for assessing XAI methodologies, thereby bridging the gap between theoretical frameworks and practical applications. By promoting adaptable XAI frameworks that cater to real-world industrial needs, this study fosters trust in automated decision-making processes. It enhances the overall understanding of XAI's role in PdM.

How to cite this paper
Zemmouchi-Ghomari, L. (2026). Explainable AI for predictive maintenance: A review and standardized evaluation framework.Management Science Letters , 16(1), 15-36.

Refrences
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138–52160. Aghababaeyan, Z., Abdellatif, M., Briand, L., Ramesh, S., & Bagherzadeh, M. (2023). Black-box testing of deep neural networks through test case diversity. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 49(5), 3182–3204. Amin, O., Brown, B., Stephen, B., & McArthur, S. (2022, June). A case-study-led investigation of explainable AI (XAI) to support the deployment of prognostics in industry. In Proceedings of the European Conference Of The PHM Soci-ety 2022 (pp. 9–20). Angelov, P. P., Soares, E. A., Jiang, R., Arnold, N. I., & Atkinson, P. M. (2021). Explainable artificial intelligence: an analytical review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 11(5), e1424. Arsenault, P. D., Wang, S., & Patenaude, J. M. (2025). A survey of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in financial time series forecasting. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(10), 1–37. Awotunde, J. B., Jimoh, R. G., Adeniyi, A. E., Ayo, E. F., Ajamu, G. J., & Aremu, D. R. (2023). Application of Interpret-able Artificial Intelligence Enabled Cognitive Internet of Things for COVID-19 Pandemics. In Explainable Machine Learning for Multimedia-Based Healthcare Applications (pp. 191–213). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Ayeni, O. (2025). Integration of Artificial Intelligence in predictive maintenance for mechanical and industrial engi-neering. International Research Journal of Modernisation in Engineering Technology and Science, 7(3), 1-23. Bach, S., Binder, A., Montavon, G., Klauschen, F., Müller, K. R., & Samek, W. (2015). On pixel-wise explanations for non-linear classifier decisions by layer-wise relevance propagation. PloS one, 10(7), e0130140. Belle, V., & Papantonis, I. (2020). Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learning. arXiv:2009.11698. Bobek, S., Kuk, M., Szelążek, M., & Nalepa, G. J. (2022). Enhancing cluster analysis with explainable AI and multidi-mensional cluster prototypes. IEEE Access, 10, 101556–101574. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3208957. Bobek, S., Nowaczyk, S., Gama, J., Pashami, S., Ribeiro, R. P., Taghiyarrenani, Z., ... & Nalepa, G. J. (2023). Why In-dustry 5.0 Needs XAI 2.0? non Bothra, R., Arun, V., Godfrey, B., Narayan, A., & Saeed, A. (2024, November). Lightweight Automated Reasoning for Network Architectures. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (pp. 237–245). Burkart, N., & Huber, M. F. (2021). A survey on the explainability of supervised machine learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 70, 245–317. Cerquitelli, T., Nikolakis, N., Morra, L., Bellagarda, A., Orlando, M., Salokangas, R., ... & Macii, E. (2021). Data-driven predictive maintenance: A methodology primer. In Predictive Maintenance in Smart Factories: Architectures, Methodologies, and Use-cases (pp. 39–73). Singapore: Springer Singapore. Chamola, V., Hassija, V., Sulthana, A. R., Ghosh, D., Dhingra, D., & Sikdar, B. (2023). A review of trustworthy and ex-plainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access. Djeddi, A. (2024). Maintenance and Reliability. Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Iii, H. D., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64, 86–92. Gilpin, L. H., Bau, D., Yuan, B. Z., Bajwa, A., Spectre, M., & Kagal, L. (2018). Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning. In 2018, IEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) (pp. 80–89). doi:10.1109/DSAA. 2018.00018. Hajgató, G., Wéber, R., Szilágyi, B., Tóthpál, B., Gyires-Tóth, B., & Hős, C. (2022). Predmax: Predictive maintenance with explainable deep convolutional autoencoders. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 54, 101778. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034622002361. doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101778. Haque, A. K. M. (2025). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): making AI understandable for end users. Hart, S. (1989). Shapley value. In Game Theory (pp. 210–216). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Mahapatra, A., Singal, A., Goel, D., Huang, K., ... & Hussain, A. (2024). Interpreting black-box models: a review on explainable artificial intelligence. Cognitive Computation, 16(1), 45–74. Hitchcock, L. (2006, July). ISO standards for condition monitoring. In Engineering Asset Management: Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM) 11–14 July 2006 (pp. 606–613). London: Springer London. Holzinger, A., Langs, G., Denk, H., Zatloukal, K., & Muller, H. (2019). Causality and explainability of artificial intelli-gence in medicine. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov., 9, 1 – 13. Hrnjica, B., & Softic, S. (2020, August). Explainable AI in manufacturing: a predictive maintenance case study. In IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems (pp. 66–73). Cham: Springer Internation-al Publishing. Infant, S. S., Vickram, A. S., Saravanan, A., Muthu, C. M., & Yuarajan, D. (2025). Explainable artificial intelligence for sustainable urban water systems engineering. Results in Engineering, 104349. Kaufmann, L., & Rousseeuw, P. (1987). Clustering using Medoids. Data Analysis based on the L1-Norm and Related Methods, (pp. 405–416). Kaur, K., Selway, M., Grossmann, G., Stumptner, M., & Johnston, A. (2018, October). Towards an open-standards-based framework for achieving condition-based predictive maintenance. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Internet of Things (pp. 1–8). Kim, B., Khanna, R., & Koyejo, O. O. (2016). Examples are not enough; learn to criticise! Criticism for interpretability. In D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, U. Luxburg, I. Guyon, & R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys-tems. Curran Associates, Inc., volume 29. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2016/file/5680522b8e2bb01943234bce7bf84534-Paper.pdf. Kisten, M., Ezugwu, A. E., & Olusanya, M. S. (2024). Explainable Artificial Intelligence Model for Predictive Mainte-nance in Smart Agricultural Facilities. IEEE Access. Krishnamurthy, V., Nezafati, K., Stayton, E., & Singh, V. (2020). Explainable AI framework for imaging-based predic-tive maintenance for automotive applications and beyond. Data-Enabled Discovery and Applications, 4(1), 7. Kuk, M., Bobek, S., Veloso, B., Rajaoarisoa, L., & Nalepa, G. J. (2023, June). Feature importance as a tool for root-cause analysis of time-series events. In International Conference on Computational Science (pp. 408–416). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H.Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, & R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Pro-cessing Systems 30 (pp. 4765–4774). Curran Associates, Inc. Mahale, Y., Kolhar, S., & More, A. S. (2025). A comprehensive review on artificial intelligence-driven predictive maintenance in vehicles: technologies, challenges and future research directions. Discover Applied Sciences, 7(4), 243. Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial intelligence, 267, 1–38. Moraffah, R., Karami, M., Guo, R., Raglin, A. J., & Liu, H. (2020). Causal interpretability for machine learning - prob-lems, methods, and evaluation. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 22, 18 –33. Nor, A. K. M., Pedapati, S. R., Muhammad, M., & Leiva, V. (2022). Abnormality detection and failure prediction using explainable Bayesian deep learning: Methodology and case study with industrial data: Mathematics, 10(4), 554. Pashami, S., Nowaczyk, S., Fan, Y., Jakubowski, J., Paiva, N., Davari, N., ... & Gama, J. (2023). Explainable predictive maintenance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05120. Rajaoarisoa, L., Randrianandraina, R., Nalepa, G. J., & Gama, J. (2025). Improving decision-making systems based on explainable artificial intelligence approaches for predictive maintenance. Engineering Applications of Artificial In-telligence, 139, 109601. Rane, J., Mallick, S. K., Kaya, O., & Rane, N. L. (2024). Enhancing black-box models: advances in explainable artificial intelligence for ethical decision-making. Future Research Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0 and 5.2. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why should I trust you?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining KDD’16 (p. 1135–1144). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778. Rojas, L., Peña, Á., & Garcia, J. (2025). AI-driven predictive maintenance in mining: a systematic literature review on fault detection, digital twins, and intelligent asset management. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 3337. Shukla, B., Fan, I. S., & Jennions, I. (2020, July). Opportunities for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Aerospace Pre-dictive Maintenance. In PHM Society European Conference (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 11–11). Verma, S., Lahiri, A., Dickerson, J. P., & Lee, S. I. (2021). Pitfalls of explainable ML: an industry perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.07758. Vogl, G. W., Weiss, B. A., & Donmez, M. A. (2014). Standards for prognostics and health management (PHM) tech-niques within manufacturing operations. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2017). Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Auto-mated decisions and the GDPR. Harv. JL & Tech., 31, 841. Wang, Y. (2024). A comparative analysis of model agnostic techniques for explainable artificial intelligence. Research Reports on Computer Science, 25–33. XAI's current state-of-the-art pitfalls: Zeldam, S. G. (2018). Automated failure diagnosis in aviation maintenance using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) (Master's thesis, University of Twente). Zemmouchi-Ghomari, L. (2023, April). Ontology and machine learning: a two-way street to improved knowledge repre-sentation and algorithm accuracy. In International Conference on Paradigms of Communication, Computing and Da-ta Analytics (pp. 181–189). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. Zeng, Z., Cheng, Q., & Si, Y. (2023). Logical Rule-Based Knowledge Graph Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey. Ma-thematics, 11(21), 4486. Zhang, X., Fujiwara, T., Chandrasegaran, S., Brundage, M. P., Sexton, T., Dima, A., & Ma, K.-L. (2021). A visual ana-lytics approach for diagnosing heterogeneous and multidimensional machine maintenance data. In 2021, IEEE 14th Pacific Visualisation Symposium (PacificVis) (pp.196–205). doi:10.1109/PacificVis52677.2021.00033.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2026 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Views: 98 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • A comparative analysis of a machine learning pipeline for network intrusion ...
  • Artificial intelligence towards a smart automotive supply chain performance ...
  • Using artificial intelligence techniques and econometrics model for crypto- ...
  • Impact of intelligent tutoring on emotion and academic performance of syste ...
  • Using artificial intelligence techniques and econometrics model for crypto- ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com