Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » A study on effect of performing quality management system on organizational productivity

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (805)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (562)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2648)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (43)
  • SCI (48)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 16 (11)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(169)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(84)
Financial performance(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (1)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (57)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (39)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 3 Issue 4 pp. 1063-1072 , 2013

A study on effect of performing quality management system on organizational productivity Pages 1063-1072 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: M. M. Movahedi, Minoo Teimourpour, Nahid Teimourpour

📋 Author Affiliations:
Movahedi M.M., Teimourpour M., Teimourpour N. (N/A)
doi 10.5267/j.msl.2013.03.022
Crossmark
8 Source: Scopus

🔑 Keywords: Quality Management, Change Management, System Productivity

Abstract: The main purpose of article is to survey the effect of Quality Management System (QMS) on organization efficiency based on the concept of change management. The role of top organization management for QMS implementation and change management solutions to eliminate organization resistance are investigated. In this study, fourteen Deming’s principles are independent variables, organization productivity is dependent variable and the study examines six different hypotheses. Cronbach Alpha coefficient is calculated as 87.62%, which validates research questionnaire. The proposed study of this paper uses t-student to examine all six hypotheses in a case study from a firm named Aria Sanaat factory. The results of this study confirm that there are some positive effects on organizational management variables & establishing training and explanation courses & meetings.

How to cite this paper
APA: Movahedi, M., Teimourpour, M & Teimourpour, N. (2013). A study on effect of performing quality management system on organizational productivity. Management Science Letters, 3(4), 1063-1072.
Chicago/Turabian: Movahedi, M., Teimourpour, M & Teimourpour, N. 2013. "A study on effect of performing quality management system on organizational productivity." Management Science Letters 3, no. 4 (2013): 1063-1072.
AMA: Movahedi, M., Teimourpour, M & Teimourpour, N. A study on effect of performing quality management system on organizational productivity. Management Science Letters. 2013;3(4):1063-1072.

References
Aggelogiannopoulos, D. R. O. S. I. N. O. S., Drosinos, E. H., & Athanasopoulos, P. (2007).
Implementation of a quality management system (QMS) according to the ISO 9000 family in a
Greek small-sized winery: a case study. Food control, 18(9), 1077-1085.

Defeo, J. A., & Juran, J. M. (2010). Juran & apos; s Quality Handbook: The Complete Guide to Performance
Excellence 6/e. McGraw-Hill Professional.

Dey, P. (2002). How to complement ISO 9001: 2000 with Six Sigma. iSixSigma LLC, available at
http://isixsigma. com/library/content/c020211a. asp.

Feng, J., Prajogo, D. I., Tan, K. C., & Sohal, A. S. (2006). The impact of TQM practices on
performance: A comparative study between Australian and Singaporean organizations. European
Journal of Innovation Management, 9(3), 269-278.

Gollop, F. M. (1979). Accounting for intermediate input: The link between sectoral and aggregate
measures of productivity growth. The Meaning and Interpretation of Productivity, 318-33.

Kemp, S. (2006). Quality management demystified. McGraw-Hill.

Kim, D. Y., Kumar, V., & Kumar, U. (2012). Relationship between quality management practices
and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 30(4), 295–315.

Kurosawa, K. (1975). An aggregate index for the analysis of productivity and
profitability. Omega, 3(2), 157-168.

Pfeifer, T. (2002). Quality management: Strategies, methods, techniques. Hanser, Munich and
Vienna.

Pfeifer, T., Reissiger, W., & Canales, C. (2004). Integrating six sigma with quality management
systems. The TQM Magazine, 16(4), 241-249.

Pineda, A. (1990). A Multiple Case Study Research to Determine and respond to Management
Information Need Using Total-Factor Productivity Measurement (TFPM). Virginia Polytechnic
Institute and State University.

Priede, J. (2012). Implementation of Quality Management System ISO 9001 in the World and Its
Strategic Necessity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1466-1475.

Prokopenko, J. (1987). Productivity management: A practical handbook. International Labour
Organisation.

Saari, S. (2006). Productivity. Theory and Measurement in Business. In Espoo, Finland: European
Productivity Conference.

Sadikoglu, E., & Zehir, C. (2010). Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance
on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An
empirical study of Turkish firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 127(1), 13-26.

Worrell, E., Laitner, J. A., Ruth, M., & Finman, H. (2003). Productivity benefits of industrial energy
efficiency measures. Energy, 28(11), 1081-1098.

T?pfer, A., & Günther, S. (2007). Six Sigma im Wirkungsverbund mit ISO 9000: 2000. Six Sigma,
335-351.

Zhang, D., Linderman, K., & Schroeder, R. G. (2012). The moderating role of contextual factors on
quality management practices. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1), 12-23.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2013 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 4 | Views: 6843 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Enhancing lean supply chain through traffic light quality management system
  • A study to measure the impact of organizational culture and organizational excellence
  • Design and explanation of organizational excellence model in home appliances industry
  • An empirical study on empowering private bank workers using EFQM
  • Factors affecting productivity and the role of customer relationship management: A case study of home appliance manufacturing

📝 Ready to share your research?

Management Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines


Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com