Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Assessment of management efficiency and infrastructure development of Ukraine

📚 Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • Discrete Firefly
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1099)
  • ESM (428)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (101)
  • HE (37)
  • SCI (41)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 16 (6)
      • Issue 1 (6)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
Sustainability(88)
Artificial intelligence(88)
optimization(87)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(79)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

Iran(2198)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(815)
India(798)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(479)
Malaysia(449)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(229)
Thailand(160)
United States(116)
Turkey(114)
Ukraine(110)
Egypt(106)
Peru(94)
Canada(93)
Morocco(87)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 10 Issue 13 pp. 3071-3080 , 2020

Assessment of management efficiency and infrastructure development of Ukraine Pages 3071-3080 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Iryna Lesik, Nadia Bobrovska, Oleksandr Bilichenko, Liubov Dranus, Vadim Lykhach, Valentyn Dranus, Oleksandra Stoian, Alena Kolevatova, Inna Nazarenko

doi 10.5267/j.msl.2020.5.016
Crossmark

Keywords: Infrastructure, Management, Development, Efficiency, Data envelopment analysis, Comparative analyses, Ukraine

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to make an assessment on infrastructure development efficiency based on Data envelopment analysis (DEA) method. The proposed method allows assessing the level of current infrastructure conditions which provides production and social dimension of its stable development. The article substantiates the necessity of conducting an analytical assessment of infrastructure development level which identifies its weaknesses and determines potential of improving its performance indicators. An integral assessment of transport infrastructure efficiency is proposed. To assess the problems of infrastructure development provision, a comparative analyses and ordering the objects according to growth or decrease of the indicators is performed. The results of the research allow discovering the causes of harmful phenomena in the system of management and development, and identifies major trends and prospects of development.


How to cite this paper

Lesik, I., Bobrovska, N., Bilichenko, O., Dranus, L., Lykhach, V., Dranus, V., Stoian, O., Kolevatova, A & Nazarenko, I. (2020). Assessment of management efficiency and infrastructure development of Ukraine.Management Science Letters , 10(13), 3071-3080.

References
Caliński, T., & Harabasz, J. (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics-theory and Methods, 3(1), 1-27.
Cantarelli, C. C., Flyvbjerg, B., van Wee, B., & Molin, E. J. E. (2010). Lock-in and its Influence on the Project Perfor-mance of Large-Scale Transportation Infrastructure Projects: Investigating the Way in Which Lock¬in Can Emerge and Affect Cost Overruns. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(5), 792-807. https://doi.org/10.1068/b36017.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
Coelli, T. (1996). A guide to DEAP version 2.1: a data envelopment analysis (computer) program. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, Australia, 96(08).
Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., & Battese, G. E. (1998). An introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis in Malaysian Commercial Banks. Multimedia Working Papers.
Cooper, W. W., Deng, H., Huang, Z., & Li, S. X. (2002). Chance constrained programming approaches to technical effi-ciencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Socie-ty, 53(12), 1347-1356.
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2004). Data envelopment analysis. In Handbook on data envelopment analy-sis (pp. 1-39). Springer, Boston, MA.
Debreu, G. (1951). The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 19(3), 273-292.
Dovgal, O. V., Kravchenko, M. V., Demchuk, N. I., Odnoshevnaya, O. A., Novikov, O.Y., Lesik, I. M., Andrusiv, U. Y., Popadynets, I. R. (2017). Methods of competitiveness assessment of agricultural enterprise in Eastern Europe. Region-al Science Inquiry, 9(2), 231-242.
EP, C. (2013). Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Un-ion guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU. Official Journal of the European Union, 1-128.
Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1985). A nonparametric cost approach to scale efficiency. The Scandinavian Journal of Eco-nomics, 87(4), 594-604.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Gen-eral), 120(3), 253-281.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2007). Policy and Planning for Large-Infrastructure Projects: Problems, Causes, Cures. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design, 34(4), 578-597. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32111.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2013). Quality control and due diligence in project management: Getting decisions right by taking the out-side view. International Journal of Project Management, 31(5), 760-774.
Fraley, C., Raftery, A. E. (1998). How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analy-sis. The Computer Journal, 41(8), 578-588, https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/4L8.578.
Hua, Z., & Bian, Y. (2007). DEA with undesirable factors. In Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis (pp. 103-121). Springer, Boston, MA.
Karnouskos, S. (2014). U.S. Patent No. 8,909,358. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Koopmans, T. C. (1951). An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. Activity analysis of produc-tion and allocation.
Kumari, A., & Sharma, A. K. (2017). Infrastructure financing and development: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 16, 49-65.
Lemer, A. C., Chong, K. P., & Tumay, M. T. (1995). Research As A Means For Improving Infrastructure. Journal of Infra-structure Systems, 7(1), 6-15.
Masli, A., Richardson, V. J., Watson, M. W., & Zmud, R. W. (2016). Senior executives' IT management responsibilities: Serious IT-related deficiencies and CEO/CFO turnover. MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 687-708.
Nijkamp, P. (1986). Infrastructure and regional development: A multidimensional policy analysis. Empirical Economics, 11(1), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01978142.
Oyedele, O. (2015). Infrastructure Maintenance for Sustainable Development of Third World Cities. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2280.3688.
Oyedele, O. (2016). Infrastructure problems of developing nations and sustainable development. International Public Pro-curement Conference, IPPC7, Bali, Indonesia., At http://www.ippc7.com/page/107-conference- programme.
Paul, S. (2003). Effects of public infrastructure on cost structure and productivity in the private sector. Economic Record, 79(247), 446-461.
Rojas Ramírez, L., & Molina Vargas, A. (2018). Public infrastructure and its importance for economic growth: the case of Oaxaca (Mexico). Ecos De Economía: A Latin American Journal of Applied Economics, 22(46), 4-27.
Romesburg, C. (2004). Cluster analysis for researchers. Lulu. com.
Schaffer, A., & Siegele, J. (2009). Efficient Use of Regional Transport Infrastructure, Communication Networks, and Human Capital. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 15(4), 263–272.
Scott, A. J., & Knott, M. (1974). A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 30(3), 507-512.
Soltanifar, M., & Farhadi, F. (2014). An application of data envelopment analysis for measuring the relative efficiency in banking industry. Management Science Letters, 4(5), 1021-1026
State Statistics Committee of Ukraine. 2019. Transport and Communication of Ukraine - 2018. Kyiv: State Statistics Ser-vice of Ukraine.
Ugwu, O. O., & Haupt, T. C. (2007). Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainabil-ity—a South African construction industry perspective. Building and Environment, 42(2), 665-680.
Ukraine's national debt (2019) Ministries of Finance of Ukraine. https://index.minfin.com.ua/finance/debtgov/.
Zhang, Y., Yang, A., Xiong, C., Wang, T., & Zhang, Z. (2014). Feature selection using data envelopment analy-sis. Knowledge-based Systems, 64, 70-80.
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2020 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 13 | Views: 2283 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • An economic management system for sustainable development in black sea region
  • Experience and prospects of innovation development venture capital financing
  • Aspects of the formation and development of innovation infrastructure in Ukraine
  • A new approach to evaluate railways efficiency considering safety measures
  • Performance measurement of insurance firms using a two-stage DEA method

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com