Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • 📚 Journals
    • IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • AC - Accounting
    • DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • SCI - Scientometrica
    • ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • About Us
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention among Vietnamese students: A meta-analytic path analysis based on the theory of planned behaviour

📚 Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • Discrete Firefly
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2648)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (544)
  • USCM (1099)
  • ESM (428)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (323)
  • IJDS (992)
  • JFS (101)
  • HE (42)
  • SCI (41)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 16 (11)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(153)
Customer satisfaction(122)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Artificial intelligence(96)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Sustainability(91)
SMEs(91)
optimization(88)
Trust(84)
Financial performance(84)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Social media(79)
Genetic Algorithm(78)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (1)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (56)
9. Belarus (3)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (39)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 9 Issue 11 pp. 1847-1862 , 2019

Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention among Vietnamese students: A meta-analytic path analysis based on the theory of planned behaviour Pages 1847-1862 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Duong Cong Doanh, Tran Van Trang

doi 10.5267/j.msl.2019.6.007
Crossmark

Keywords: Entrepreneurial self-efficacy, Entrepreneurial intention, Theory of planned behaviour

Abstract: This study develops a mediated model to investigate the relationship between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention among Vietnamese students. This model also focuses on examining the role of subjective norms on shaping entrepreneurial intention. By using a meta-analytic path analysis with a sample of 2218 students at 14 universities in Vietnam and based on the theory of planned behaviour, authors find that subjective norms did not directly influence on entrepreneurial intention but it had strong indirect effect on entrepreneurial intention through entrepreneurial self-efficacy, attitude toward entrepreneurship and perceived behavioural control. Moreover, the relationship between self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention was also mediated by attitude towards entrepreneurship and perceived behavioural control. In terms of direct effect, the result illustrates that attitudes towards entrepreneurship had the strongest effect on entrepreneurial intention among Vietnamese students, followed by entrepreneurial self-efficacy. These findings also show that the theory of planned behaviour could be effectively applied in the context of transitional economics in Vietnam.

How to cite this paper

Doanh, D & Trang, T. (2019). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention among Vietnamese students: A meta-analytic path analysis based on the theory of planned behaviour.Management Science Letters , 9(11), 1847-1862.

References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human
Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Ajzen, I., & Cote, N.G. (2008). Attitudes and the prediction of behaviour. In: Crano, W.D., Prislin, R., editors. Attitudes and Attitude Change. New York: Psychology Press. 289-311.
Al-Rafee, S., & Cronan, T.P. (2006). Digital piracy: Factors that influence attitude toward behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(3), 237-259.
Autio, E., H. Keeley, R., Klofsten, M., Parker, G. C., & Hay, M. (2001). Entrepreneurial intent among students in Scandinavia and in the USA. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2, 145–160.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. (1980). Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Theory and Research, 4(1), 39–66.
Bandura, A. (1986). The Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
Baron, R. A., & Markman, G. D. (1999). Cognitive mechanisms: Potential differences between entre-preneurs and non-entrepreneurs. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 19.
Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292–303.
Baughn, C. C., Cao, J.S.R., LE, L.T.M, Lim, V. A. & Neupert, K.E (2006). Normative, Social and Cognitive predictors of entrepreneurial interest in China, Vietnam and the Philippines. Journal of Development Entreprenurship, 11(1), 57-77.
Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Academy of management Review, 13(3), 442-453.
Chen, C. C., P. G. Greene & A. Crick (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepre-neurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 295-316.
Chen, G., Gully, M. S., & Eden, D. (2004). General self-efficacy and self-esteem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self-evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25, 375-395.
Cole, A.H. (1965). An approach to the study of entrepreneurship, in Aitken, H.G. (ed.),
Explorations in enterprise, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp. 30-
44.
Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., & Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: a new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(9), 701–720.
Hair, J.F.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Kettinger, W. J., & Lee, C. C. (1995). Exploring a “gap” model of information services quali-ty. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 8(3), 5-17.
Krueger, N. F. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurship exposure on perception of new venture fea-sibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 5–21.
Krueger, N. F. (2000). The cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(3), 5–23.
Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 411-432.
Krueger, N. F., Jr., & Brazeal, D. V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. En-trepreneurship Theory & Practice, 18, 91–104.
Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K., Barbosa, S. D. & Whitcanack, L. (2009). Intuition versus analysis? Testing differential models of cognitive style on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and the new venture creation process, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 33(2), 439-453.
Kolvereid, L. (1996a). Organizational employment versus self-employment: Reasons for career inten-tions. Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, 23(3), 23-31.
Kolvereid, L. (1996b). Prediction of employment status choice intentions, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 21(1), 47-57.
Kolvereid, L., & Isaksen, E. (2006). New business start-up and subsequent entry into self-employment. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 866–885.
Reynolds, R.W., N.A. Rayner, T.M. Smith, D.C. Stokes and W. Wang (2002). An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. Journal of Climate, 15, 1609-1625.
Lee, L., Wong, P., Foo, M., & Leung, A. (2011). Entrepreneurial intentions: the influence of organiza-tional and individual factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(1), 124–136.
Liñán, F. (2008). Skill and value perceptions: How do they affect entrepreneurial intentions? Interna-tional Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(3), 257- 272.
Liñán, F., Santos, F. J. & Fernández, J. (2011). The influence of perceptions on potential entrepreneurs, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(3), 373-390.
Liñán, F., Nabi, G. & Kueger, N. (2013). British and Spanish entrepreneurial intentions: A comparative study, La intención emprendedora en reino unido y españa: Un estudio comparativo, 33(1), 73-103.
Liñán, F. & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and Cross-Cultural Application of a Specific Instrument to Measure Entrepreneurial Intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617.
Liñán, F. & Chen, Y. W. (2006). Testing the Entrepreneurial Intention Model on a Two-Country
Sample. Departament d'Economia de l'Empresa.
Lopez, S. J., & Snyder C. R. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Markman, G. D., Balkin, D. B., & Baron, R. A. (2002). Inventors and new venture formation: the ef-fects of general self-efficacy and regretful thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 27(2), 149–166.
Miranda, F. J., Chamorro-Mera, A., Rubio, S. (2017). Academic entrepreneurship in Spanish university: An analysis of determinants of entrepreneurial intention. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23, 113-222.
Neto, R., Rodrigues, V., Steward, D, Xiao, A. & Snyder, J. (2018). The influence of self-efficacy on entrepreneurial behaviour among K-12 teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 44-53.
Nwanzu, C. L. & Babalola, S.S. (2019). Examining psychological capital of optimism, self-efficacy and selfmonitoring as predictors of attitude towards organizational change. International Journal of En-gineering Business Management, 11, 1-12.
Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2010). Entrepreneurial
intention as developmental outcome. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 77(1),
63–72.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and compar-ing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behaviour Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
Saraih, U., Aris. A., Mutalib, S., Ahmad, T., Abdullah, S. & Amlus, M. (2018). The influence of Self-efficacy on Entrepreneurial Intention among Engineering Students. MUCET (Conference), https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005051.
Schlaegel, C., & Koenig, M. (2014). Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: A metaanalytic test and in-tegration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 38(2), 291–332.
Segal, G., Borgia, D., & Schoenfeld, J. (2005). The motivation to become an entrepreneur. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 11(1), 42–57.
Shinnar, R. S., Hsu, D. K. & Powell, B. C. (2014). Self-efficacy, entrepreneurial intentions, and gender: Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education longitudinally. The International Journal of Management Education, 12, 561-570.
Silveira-Pérez, Y., Cabeza-Pullés, D., & Fernández-Pérez, V. (2016). Emprendimiento:
perspectiva cubana en la creación de empresas familiares. European Research on
Management and Business Economics, 22(2), 70–77.
Solesvik, M. Z., Westhead, P., Kolvereid, L. & Matlay, H. (2012). Student intentions to become self-employed: The Ukrainian context, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19(3), 441-460.
Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance struc-ture models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 159-186). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tavousi, M., Hidarnia, A. R., Montazeri, A., Hajizadeh, E., Taremian, F., & Ghofranipour, F. (2009). Are perceived behavioural control and self-efficacy distinct constructs? European Journal of Scien-tific Research, 30(1), 146–152.
Tran, V.T. (2011). La perception de la carrière entrepreneuriale des étudiants, le cas du Vietnam. Jour-nal of Social Management (Zeitschrift für Sozialmanagement, ISSN 1612-8389), 9, Special Issue: En-trepreneurship.
Tsai, K. H., Chang, H.C. Peng, C.Y. (2014). Extending the link between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention: A moderated mediation model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12, 445-463.
Utamin, C. W. (2017). Attitude, subjective norms, perceived behaviour, entrepreneurship education and self-efficacy towards entrepreneurial intention university student in Indonesia. European Research Studies Journal, 20(24), 475-495.
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2019 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 11 | Views: 1696 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • The role of structural support in predicting entrepreneurial intention: Insights from Vietnam
  • The effect of perceived barriers on social entrepreneurship intention in Malaysian universities: The moderating role of education
  • Moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation on the relationship between entrepreneurial skills, environmental factors and entrepreneurial intention: A PLS approach
  • Exploring the effects of entrepreneurial marketing factors on SMEs
  • Investigating the effects of personal entrepreneurial characteristics

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com