Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Evaluation of performance factors of FMS by combined decision making methods as AHP, CMBA and ELECTRE methodology

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 16 (6)
      • Issue 1 (6)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(110)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Sustainability(81)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Artificial intelligence(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2183)
Indonesia(1290)
India(787)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 9 Issue 4 pp. 519-534 , 2019

Evaluation of performance factors of FMS by combined decision making methods as AHP, CMBA and ELECTRE methodology Pages 519-534 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Vineet Jain, Puneeta Ajmera

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.1.010

Keywords: FMS, Decision making, Combinatorial mathematics, AHP, CMBA, ELECTRE

Abstract: Present research is aimed to analyze the performance factors of flexible manufacturing systems by combined decision-making methodologies like analytical hierarchy process (AHP), combinatorial mathematics-based approach (CMBA) and improved ELECTRE. Six variables affecting the three factors of performance of flexible manufacturing systems viz. productivity, flexibility and quality are considered for the evaluation of performance factors. The weights of the attributes are calculated with AHP and the index score is calculated with CMBA methodology. CMBA methodology is the fusion of AHP and GTMA. ELECTRE approach has been used for the outranking of factors. The results show that productivity had the maximum impact on the performance of manufacturing systems. A high Spearman’s rank correlation also exists among the methods used.

How to cite this paper
Jain, V & Ajmera, P. (2019). Evaluation of performance factors of FMS by combined decision making methods as AHP, CMBA and ELECTRE methodology.Management Science Letters , 9(4), 519-534.

Refrences
Al-Ahmari, A. M. A. (2008). A methodology for selection and evaluation of advanced manufacturing technologies. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 21(7), 778-789.
Bayazit, O. (2005). Use of AHP in decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16(7), 808-819.
Dağdeviren, M. (2008). Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(4), 397-406.
Gothwal, S., & Raj, T. (2016). Analyzing the factors affecting the flexibility in FMS using weighted interpretive structural modeling (WISM) approach. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 8(2), 1-15.
Gunasekaram, A., Goyal, S. K., MArtikainen, T., & Yli-Olli, P. (1998). Total quality management: a new perspective for improving quality and productivity. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 15(8/9), 947-968.
Jain, V. (2018). Application of combined MADM methods as MOORA and PSI for ranking of FMS performance factors. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(6), 1903-1920.
Jain, V., & Ajmera, P. (2018). Quantifying the variables affecting Indian medical tourism sector by graph theory and matrix approach. Management Science Letters, 8(4), 225-240.
Jain, V., & Raj, T. (2013a). Evaluating the Variables Affecting Flexibility in FMS by Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 14(4), 181-193.
Jain, V., & Raj, T. (2013b). Evaluation of flexibility in FMS using SAW and WPM. Decision Science Letters, 2(4), 223-230.
Jain, V., & Raj, T. (2013c). Ranking of Flexibility in Flexible Manufacturing System by Using a Combined Multiple Attribute Decision Making Method. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 14(3), 125-141.
Jain, V., & Raj, T. (2014a). Evaluation of flexibility in FMS by VIKOR methodology. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 18(4), 483-498.
Jain, V., & Raj, T. (2014b). Modelling and analysis of FMS productivity variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 9(3), 218-232.
Jain, V., & Raj, T. (2015a). Evaluating the intensity of variables affecting flexibility in FMS by graph theory and matrix approach. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 19(2), 137-154.
Jain, V., & Raj, T. (2015b). A hybrid approach using ISM and modified TOPSIS for the evaluation of flexibility in FMS. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 19(3), 389–406.
Jain, V., & Raj, T. (2015c). Modeling and analysis of FMS flexibility factors by TISM and fuzzy MICMAC. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 6(3), 350-371.
Jain, V., & Raj, T. (2016). Modeling and analysis of FMS performance variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 171(1), 84-96.
Jain, V., & Raj, T. (2017). Tool life management of unmanned production system based on surface roughness by ANFIS. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 8(2), 458–467.
Jain, V., & Soni, V. K. (2018). Modeling and analysis of FMS performance variables by fuzzy TISM. Journal of Modelling in Management.doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-03-2018-0036
Khanchanapong, T., Prajogo, D., Sohal, A. S., Cooper, B. K., Yeung, A. C., & Cheng, T. (2014). The unique and complementary effects of manufacturing technologies and lean practices on manufacturing operational performance. International journal of production economics, 153, 191-203.
Khandan, M., Maghsoudipour, M., & Vosoughi, S. (2011). Ranking of working shift groups in an Iranian petrochemical company using ELECTRE method based on safety climate assessment results. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 28(7), 537-542.
Leyva-Lopez, J. C., & Fernandez-Gonzalez, E. (2003). A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology. European journal of operational research, 148(1), 14-27.
Liu, C.-M., Hsu, H.-S., Wang, S.-T., & Lee, H.-K. (2005). A performance evaluation model based on AHP and DEA. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 22(3), 243-251.
Luggen, W. W. (1991). Flexible manufacturing cells and systems. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Maleki, R. A. (1991). Flexible manufacturing systems: The technology and management. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Montazer, G. A., Saremi, H. Q., & Ramezani, M. (2009). Design a new mixed expert decision aiding system using fuzzy ELECTRE III method for vendor selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 10837-10847.
Pun, K. F., Chin, K. S., & Yiu, M. Y. R. (2010). An AHP approach to assess new product development performance: An exploratory study. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 5(3), 210-218.
Raj, T., Attri, R., & Jain, V. (2012). Modelling the factors affecting flexibility in FMS. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 11(4), 350-374.
Rao, R. V. (2013). Decision Making in Manufacturing Environment Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods (Vol. 2). London: Springer-Verlag.
Ravikumar, M., Marimuthu, K., & Parthiban, P. (2015). Evaluating lean implementation performance in Indian MSMEs using ISM and AHP models. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 22(1), 21-39.
Rehman, A.-U., & Subash Babu, A. (2009). The evaluation of manufacturing systems using concordance and disconcordance properties. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 5(3), 326-349.
Roy, B. (1991). The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and decision, 31(1), 49-73.
Ruiz, M. C., Cazorla, D., Cuartero, F., & Macia, H. (2009). Improving performance in flexible manufacturing systems. The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 78(4), 260-273.
Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process (Vol. 4922). Pittsburgh,PA: RWS publications
Saaty, T. L. (2000). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process (Vol. 6). Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. L., & Tran, L. T. (2007). On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7), 962-975.
Sevkli, M. (2010). An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Research, 48(12), 3393-3405.
Shanian, A., Milani, A., Carson, C., & Abeyaratne, R. (2008). A new application of ELECTRE III and revised Simos’ procedure for group material selection under weighting uncertainty. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21(7), 709-720.
Shanian, A., & Savadogo, O. (2009). A methodological concept for material selection of highly sensitive components based on multiple criteria decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1362-1370.
Singh, R. K., & Sharma, M. K. (2014). Selecting competitive supply chain using fuzzy AHP and extent analysis. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 31(8), 524-538. doi: 10.1080/21681015.2014.999723
Taha, Z., & Rostam, S. (2012). A hybrid fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE decision support system for machine tool selection in flexible manufacturing cell. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(6), 2137-2149.
Triantaphyllou, E. (2013). Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.
Umar, U. A., Ariffin, M., Ismail, N., & Tang, S. (2015). Hybrid multiobjective genetic algorithms for integrated dynamic scheduling and routing of jobs and automated-guided vehicle (AGV) in flexible manufacturing systems (FMS) environment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81(9-12), 2123-2141.
Yang, C.-C., & Chen, B.-S. (2004). Key quality performance evaluation using fuzzy AHP. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 21(6), 543-550.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2019 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 4 | Views: 2048 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Application of MADM methods as MOORA and WEDBA for ranking of FMS flexibili ...
  • Quantifying the variables affecting Indian medical tourism sector by graph ...
  • TOPSIS with statistical distances: A new approach to MADM
  • Evaluation of flexibility in FMS using SAW and WPM
  • Risk mitigation in the implementation of AMTs: A guiding framework for futu ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com