Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Product development strategy with quality function deployment approach: A case study in automotive battery

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (26)
  • SCI (26)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 16 (6)
      • Issue 1 (6)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(110)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Trust(83)
Financial performance(83)
Sustainability(81)
TOPSIS(81)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Genetic Algorithm(77)
Knowledge Management(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(62)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2181)
Indonesia(1289)
Jordan(786)
India(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(452)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(110)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 7 Issue 12 pp. 601-610 , 2017

Product development strategy with quality function deployment approach: A case study in automotive battery Pages 601-610 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Heru Darmawan, Humiras Hardi Purba, Rahmad Rezeki, Nurwahid Hidayat, Aghib Ritaldi Siregar, Fitri Retna, Aisyah Aisyah

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2017.8.005

Keywords: Customer satisfaction, Quality function deployment, Automotive, Battery

Abstract: Customer satisfaction is one of the main factors in determining the competitiveness of every industry. Along with the technological advances, it will impact on the increasingly intense competition in the business of providing great opportunities to the consumer to find a quality product at competi-tive rates. The purpose of this study is to develop the quality of automotive battery products that meet consumer needs by using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method. The application is then analyzed and its results produced a proposal for product development according to the weight and priority development on product attributes that are considered important by customers. There are two main priorities that are most desired by customers, among others for improving the quality of products maintenance free battery in automotive battery industry with quality function deployment according to consumers. Consumers need a car battery with a good durability and great performance, low price, and environment friendly features, which can be achieved by using absorbent glass mat and expanded machine technology. Based on relative weight in House of Quality, Ab-sorbent Glass Mat receives the highest percentage of technical priority that is equal to 31% whereas technology expanded gets the second highest percentage of technical priority that is equal to 19%. It means that both technologies are more important to develop this product. Therefore, the maintenance free battery products are expected to be attractive for consumers and extensive marketing.

How to cite this paper
Darmawan, H., Purba, H., Rezeki, R., Hidayat, N., Siregar, A., Retna, F & Aisyah, A. (2017). Product development strategy with quality function deployment approach: A case study in automotive battery.Management Science Letters , 7(12), 601-610.

Refrences
Benner, M., Linnemann, A. R., Jongen, W. M. F., & Folstar, P. (2003). Quality Function Deployment (QFD)—can it be used to develop food products? Food Quality and Preference, 14 (4), 327-339.
Boonyanuwat, N., Suthummanon, S., Memongkol, N., & Chaiprapat, S. (2008). Application of quality function deployment for designing and developing a curriculum for Industrial Engineering at Prince of Songkla University. Songklanakarin Journal of Science & Technology, 30(3), 349-353
Bui, N., Mattesco, P., Simon P., Steinmetz, J., & Rocca, E. (1997).The Tin effect in Lead-Calcium alloy. Journal of Power Sources, 67(1-2), 61-67
Chan, L. K., & Wu, M. L. (2002). Quality function deployment: A literature review. European journal of operational research, 143(3), 463-497.
Carnevalli, J. A., & Miguel, P. C. (2008). Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD—Types of research, difficulties and benefits. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 737-754.
Catherino, H. A., Feres, F. F., & Trinidad, F. (2004). Sulfation in lead–acid batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 129(1), 113-120.
Delgado, D. J., & Aspinwall, E. M. (2003, May). QFD methodology and practical applications-a review. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Postgraduate Research Symposium, School of Engineering, The University of Birmingham (pp. 1-5).
Dost, P., & Sourkounis, C. Nov. 2012. General Realisation Issues of a Battery Management System. In Cyprus: 1st Conference on Power Options for the Eastern Mediterranean Region (POEM) (pp. 147-152).
Endoh, H. (1996). Separators for automotive lead/acid batteries: selection of suitable types for different climate zones. Journal of power sources, 59(1), 51-55.
Fouache, S., Chabrol, A., Fossati, G., Bassini, M., Sainz, M. J., & Atkins, L. (1999). Effect of calcium, tin and silver contents in the positive grids of automotive batteries with respect to the grid manufac-turing process. Journal of power sources, 78(1), 12-22.
Govers, C. P. (2001). QFD not just a tool but a way of quality management. International Journal of Production Economics, 69(2), 151-159.
Hamidullah, R., Akbar, S., Noor, W. (2010). QFD as a tool for improvement of car dashboard. Journal of Quality and Technology Management, 6(1), 1-22.
Islam, R. (2005). Prioritization of ideas in an affinity diagram by the AHP: An example of k-economy. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management, 13(1), 17-18.
Israr,,M., & Gangele, A. (2014). A quality function development methodology for product develop-ment. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 2(11), 52-63.
Kasim, M.D., Zuhair, A.A., & Amer, A.M. (2009). An intelligent quality function deployment (IQFD) for manufacturing process environment. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 3(1), 23-30.
Kerley, R., Hyun, J. H., & Ha, D. S. (2015, November). Automotive lead-acid battery state-of-health monitoring system. In Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2015-41st Annual Conference of the IEEE (pp. 003934-003938). IEEE.
Natter, M., Mild, A., Feurstein, M., Dorffner, G., & Taudes, A. (2001). The effect of incentive schemes and organizational arrangements on the new product development process. Management Sci-ence, 47(8), 1029-1045.
Puviyarasu, S.A (2016). An application of quality function development techniques on developing ex-isting product. International Journal of Engineering Trend and Technology, 40(4), 230-235.
Shen, X. X., Tan, K. C., & Xie, M. (2001). The implementation of quality function deployment based on linguistic data. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 12(1), 65-75.
Homkhiew C, Ratanawilai T, Pochana K, 2012. Application of a quality function deployment technique to design and develop furniture products. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 34(6), 663-668.
Partovi, F. Y., & Corredoira, R. A. (2002). Quality function deployment for the good of soc-cer. European journal of operational research, 137(3), 642-656.
Dimitrov, M., & Pavlov, D. (2001). Influence of grid alloy and fast charge on battery cycle life and structure of the positive active mass of lead acid batteries. Journal of power sources, 93(1), 234-257.
Pinta, A. (2002). The improvement of product by using quality function deployment (QFD) technique: a case study of an educational wood toy factory. Master Thesis, King Mongkut Institute of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok, pp. 68.
Scrosati, B., & Garche, J. (2010). Lithium batteries: Status, prospects and future. Journal of Power Sources, 195(9), 2419-2430.
Stauss, B. (1993). Service problem deployment: transformation of problem information into problem prevention activities. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 4(2), 41-62.
Thele, M., Karden, E., Surewaard, E., & Sauer, D. U. (2006). Impedance-based overcharging and gas-sing model for VRLA/AGM batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 158(2), 953-963.
Vairaktarakis, G. L. (1999). Optimization tools for design and marketing of new/improved products us-ing the house of quality. Journal of Operations Management, 17(6), 645-663.
Yamaguchi, Y., Shiota, M., Nakayama, Y., Hirai, N., & Hara, S. (2000). In situ analysis of electrochem-ical reactions at a lead surface in sulfuric acid solution. Journal of Power Sources, 85(1), 22-28.
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 12 | Views: 5793 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • A fuzzy- rough set approach to determine weights in maintenance quality fun ...
  • A comprehensive approach to handle the dynamics of customer’s needs in Qual ...
  • An empirical survey to investigate quality of men's clothing market using ...
  • Utilizing QFD model to determine quality characteristics of the products an ...
  • Applying fuzzy analytic network process in quality function deployment mode ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com