Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » A TOPSIS method based on intuitionistic fuzzy values: a case study of North African airports

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

MSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 16 (21)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Management Science Letters
ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 7 Issue 7 pp. 351-358, 2017

A TOPSIS method based on intuitionistic fuzzy values: a case study of North African airports Pages 351-358 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Houssine Tlig, Abdelwaheb Rebai

📋 Author Affiliations:
H. Tlig1, A. Rebai2
1 Department of Quantitativ Methods, ISG, Gabes University, 6029, Tunisia
2 Department of Quantitativ Methods, FSEG, Sfax University, 3029, Tunisia
doi 10.5267/j.msl.2017.4.002
20 Source: Scopus
Crossref 19 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: TOPSIS, Multi criteria decision making, Intuitionistic fuzzy value, Airports

Abstract: In this paper we develop a fuzzy TOPSIS method based on intuitionistic fuzzy values to solve multiple criteria decision making problems in which the performance rating of alternatives values and the weights of criteria are given by linguistic terms. Arithmetic operations between intuition-istic fuzzy values are used for normalizing imprecise ratings and weights of criteria. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the suggested method, we propose a case study aiming to evalu-ate and compare the service quality of five major airports in North Africa. The suggested method helps manager of airports know the needs of passengers and the priority of enhancing service items.

How to cite this paper
APA: Tlig, H & Rebai, A. (2017). A TOPSIS method based on intuitionistic fuzzy values: a case study of North African airports. Management Science Letters, 7(7), 351-358.
Chicago/Turabian: Tlig, H & Rebai, A. 2017. "A TOPSIS method based on intuitionistic fuzzy values: a case study of North African airports." Management Science Letters 7, no. 7 (2017): 351-358.
AMA: Tlig, H & Rebai, A. A TOPSIS method based on intuitionistic fuzzy values: a case study of North African airports. Management Science Letters. 2017;7(7):351-358.

References
Aloini, D., Dulmin, R. & Mininno, V. (2014), A peer IF-TOPSIS based decision support system for packaging machine selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 2157- 2165.
Atanassov, K. (1986), Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy sets and system, 20, 87-96.
Atanassov, K. (2000). Two theorems for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 110, 267–269.
Boran, F.E., Gen, S., Kurt, M. & Akay, D. (2009), A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 11363-11368.
Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1–9.
Chen, C. T., Lin, C. T., & Huang, S. F. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supplier chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289–301.
Chen, M. F., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40,1473–1490.
Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Berlin: Springer.
Hwang, C., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and application. New York: Springer.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., & Izadikhah, M. (2006). Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 181, 1544–1551.
Joshi, D. & Kumar, S. (2014), Intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and distance measure based TOPSIS meth-od for multi criteria decision making. Egyptian informatics Journal, 15, 97-104.
Kuo, M. S., Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, W. C. (2007). Group decision-making based on concepts of ideal and anti-ideal points in a fuzzy environment. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45, 324–339.
Kuo, M. S., Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, W. C. (2007). Group decision-making based on concepts of ideal and anti-ideal points in a fuzzy environment. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45, 324–339.
Liang, G. S. (1999). Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and anti-ideal concepts. European Journal of Op-erational Research, 112, 682–691.
Tan, C. & Chen, X. (2010), Intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator for multi-criteria decision making, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 149–157.
Wang, T. C., & Chang, T. H. (2007). Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft un-der a fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 33, 870–880.
Wang, Y. J., & Lee, H. S. (2007). Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 53, 1762–1772.
Wang, Y. M., & Elhag, T. M. S. (2006). On the normalization of interval and fuzzy weights. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157, 2456–2471.
Wei, G., Zhao, X. & Lin, R. (2013), Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications in multiple attribute decision making, Knowledge- Based Systems, 46, 45-53.
Xu, Z.S. (2007), Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making. Control and Decision, 2, 22, 215-219.
Yeh, C. H., & Deng, H. (2004). A practical approach to fuzzy utilities comparison in fuzzy multicrite-ria analysis. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 35, 179–194.
Yeh, C. H., Deng, H., & Chang, Y. H. (2000). Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 126, 459–473.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.
Zhang, H. & Liying, Y. (2012), MADM method based on cross-entropy and extended TOPSIS with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Knowledge-Based Systems, 30, 115-120.
  • 85
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Management Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2017 | 📖 Volume: 7 | 📄 Issue: 7 | 👁️ Views: 3046 | 📊 Crossref: 19

Related Articles:
  • Extended TOPSIS model for solving multi-attribute decision making problems in engineering
  • An IF-DEMATEL-AHP based on Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers (TIFNs)
  • Ranking important factors influencing organizational strategy in selecting distribution channels with the approach of FMCDM
  • A multiple criteria decision making for raking alternatives using preference relation matrix based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets
  • A goal programming method for deriving fuzzy priorities of criteria from inconsistent fuzzy comparison matrices

📝 Ready to share your research?

Management Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com