Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Management Science Letters » Prioritizing e-learning websites evaluation and selection criteria using fuzzy set theory

Journals

  • IJIEC (726)
  • MSL (2637)
  • DSL (649)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (26)
  • SCI (26)

MSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (70)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (25)
    • Volume 2 (365)
      • Issue 1 (51)
      • Issue 2 (32)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (44)
      • Issue 5 (42)
      • Issue 6 (52)
      • Issue 7 (53)
      • Issue 8 (51)
    • Volume 3 (426)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (47)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (27)
      • Issue 6 (50)
      • Issue 7 (51)
      • Issue 8 (30)
      • Issue 9 (24)
      • Issue 10 (25)
      • Issue 11 (25)
      • Issue 12 (27)
    • Volume 4 (387)
      • Issue 1 (34)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (34)
      • Issue 4 (42)
      • Issue 5 (33)
      • Issue 6 (43)
      • Issue 7 (42)
      • Issue 8 (40)
      • Issue 9 (39)
      • Issue 10 (20)
      • Issue 11 (18)
      • Issue 12 (12)
    • Volume 5 (129)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (14)
      • Issue 6 (14)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (8)
      • Issue 9 (11)
      • Issue 10 (8)
      • Issue 11 (9)
      • Issue 12 (10)
    • Volume 6 (74)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
      • Issue 5 (6)
      • Issue 6 (6)
      • Issue 7 (8)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (5)
      • Issue 10 (5)
      • Issue 11 (5)
      • Issue 12 (5)
    • Volume 7 (54)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (5)
      • Issue 6 (5)
      • Issue 7 (4)
      • Issue 8 (4)
      • Issue 9 (4)
      • Issue 10 (4)
      • Issue 11 (4)
      • Issue 12 (4)
    • Volume 8 (119)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
      • Issue 5 (22)
      • Issue 6 (20)
      • Issue 7 (6)
      • Issue 8 (6)
      • Issue 9 (8)
      • Issue 10 (10)
      • Issue 11 (11)
      • Issue 12 (16)
    • Volume 9 (208)
      • Issue 1 (16)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (11)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (12)
      • Issue 6 (16)
      • Issue 7 (16)
      • Issue 8 (16)
      • Issue 9 (16)
      • Issue 10 (16)
      • Issue 11 (19)
      • Issue 12 (20)
      • Issue 13 (24)
    • Volume 10 (448)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (25)
      • Issue 3 (24)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (26)
      • Issue 7 (25)
      • Issue 8 (27)
      • Issue 9 (27)
      • Issue 10 (30)
      • Issue 11 (33)
      • Issue 12 (30)
      • Issue 13 (30)
      • Issue 14 (30)
      • Issue 15 (30)
      • Issue 16 (36)
    • Volume 11 (251)
      • Issue 1 (36)
      • Issue 2 (39)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (40)
      • Issue 5 (29)
      • Issue 6 (27)
      • Issue 7 (20)
      • Issue 8 (12)
      • Issue 9 (8)
    • Volume 12 (33)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 13 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 14 (22)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 15 (24)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (9)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(108)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(85)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(81)
TOPSIS(80)
Job satisfaction(80)
Sustainability(79)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Artificial intelligence(76)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(61)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Sautma Ronni Basana(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2179)
Indonesia(1285)
Jordan(786)
India(785)
Vietnam(502)
Saudi Arabia(448)
Malaysia(439)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(184)
Thailand(151)
United States(110)
Ukraine(104)
Turkey(103)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Pakistan(85)
Peru(85)
Morocco(79)
United Kingdom(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Management Science Letters

ISSN 1923-9343 (Online) - ISSN 1923-9335 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 7 Issue 4 pp. 177-184 , 2017

Prioritizing e-learning websites evaluation and selection criteria using fuzzy set theory Pages 177-184 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Rakesh Garg, Dimpal Jain

DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2017.1.002

Keywords: Selection criteria, Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM), Fuzzy set theory (FST)

Abstract: E-learning websites evaluation and selection is extremely important for the establishment of ef-fective E-learning. The E-learning website selection has crucial importance for the educational sector. The selection of E-learning website problem is generally considered as a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) problem which mainly consists of both qualitative and quantitative criteria. The development of an E-learning website mainly depends on the success of the E-learning website selection along with various alternatives. So, for the effective evaluation and se-lection of E-learning websites, a set of selection criteria should be obtained. This paper consists of two steps, the first step is the identification of E-learning website selection criteria, second step provides the linguistic variables against the selection criteria and then fuzzy set theory (FST) is adopted for the calculation of the priority weights of each selection criteria. To show the rela-tive importance of each selection criteria, they ranked according to their global weights.

How to cite this paper
Garg, R & Jain, D. (2017). Prioritizing e-learning websites evaluation and selection criteria using fuzzy set theory.Management Science Letters , 7(4), 177-184.

Refrences
Alias, N., Zakariah, Z., Ismail, N. Z., & Aziz, M. N. A. (2012). E-Learning successful elements for higher learning institution in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 484-489.
Govindasamy, T. (2002). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The internet and higher education, 4(3), 287-299.
Jain, D., Garg, R., & Bansal, A. (2015). A Parameterized Selection and Evaluation of E-Learning Websites Using Topsis Method. International Journal of Research & Development in Technology and Management Science, 22(3), 12-26.
Jain, D., Garg, R., Bansal, A., & Saini, K. K. (2016). Selection and ranking of E-learning websites us-ing weighted distance-based approximation. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(2), 193-207.
Wands, M., & Le Blanc, A. (2001). Critical Success Factors: eLearning Solutions. The Official e-Newsletter of the Change and Learning Practice, Internet Time Group, Berkeley, California.
MacDonald, C. J., & Thompson, T. L. (2005). Structure, content, delivery, service, and outcomes: Quality e-learning in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distrib-uted Learning, 6(2).
Mehregan, M. R., Jamporazmey, M., Hosseinzadeh, M., & Mehrafrouz, M. (2011, September). Pro-posing an approach for evaluating e-learning by integrating critical success factor and fuzzy AHP. In International conference on innovation, management and service, Singapore.
Nokelainen, P. (2006). An empirical assessment of pedagogical usability criteria for digital learning material with elementary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 178-197.
Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009, October). Multi-dimensional evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: an empirical investigation of a computer literacy course. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 2009. FIE'09. 39th IEEE (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor mod-els. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396-413.
Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfac-tion. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202.
Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning sys-tems. Information & Management, 41(1), 75-86.
Zadeh L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Management Science Letters | Year: 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4 | Views: 1872 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • A study on FRAME model: Evidence from banking industry
  • Measuring the effects of electronic learning components using ANFIS method
  • Investigating challenges and outlook for implementation of information tech ...
  • An empirical study on research materials among colleague students
  • Measuring the impact of e-learning on increasing organization quality of se ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2025 GrowingScience.Com