A methodology for quantitatively managing the bug fixing process using Mahalanobis Taguchi system

Abstract: The controlling of bug fixing process during the system testing phase of software development life cycle is very important for fixing all the detected bugs within the scheduled time. The presence of open bugs often delays the release of the software or result in releasing the software with compromised functionalities. These can lead to customer dissatisfaction, cost overrun and eventually the loss of market share. In this paper, the authors propose a methodology to quantitatively manage the bug fixing process during system testing. The proposed methodology identifies the critical milestones in the system testing phase which differentiates the successful projects from the unsuccessful ones using Mahalanobis Taguchi system. Then a model is developed to predict whether a project is successful or not with the bug fix progress at critical milestones as control factors. Finally the model is used to control the bug fixing process. It is found that the performance of the proposed methodology using Mahalanobis Taguchi system is superior to the models developed using other multi-dimensional pattern recognition techniques. The proposed methodology also reduces the number of control points providing the managers with more options and flexibility to utilize the bug fixing resources across system testing phase. Moreover the methodology allows the mangers to carry out mid- course corrections to bring the bug fixing process back on track so that all the detected bugs can be fixed on time. The methodology is validated with eight new projects and the results are very encouraging.

How to cite this paper

 John, B & Kadadevarmath, R. (2015). A methodology for quantitatively managing the bug fixing process using Mahalanobis Taguchi system.Management Science Letters , 5(12), 1081-1090.

Refrences

Agrawal, M., & Chari, K. (2007). Software effort, quality, and cycle time: A study of CMM level 5 projects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 33(3), 145-156.

Akhyar, G., Che Haron, C. H., & Ghani, J. A. (2008). Application of Taguchi method in the optimization of turning parameters for surface roughness. International Journal of Science Engineering and Technology, l (3), 60 – 66.

Asada, M. (2001). Wafer yield prediction by the Mahalanobis-Taguchi system. IEEE International Workshop on Statistical Methodology, 6, 25-28.

Bachy, B., & Franke, J. (2015). Modeling and optimization of laser direct structuring process using artificial neural network and response surface methodology. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 6, 553 - 564.

Berkani, S., Yallese, M.A., Boulanouar, L., & Mabrouki, T. (2015). Statistical analysis of AISI304 austenitic stainless steel machining using Ti(C, N)/Al2O3/TiN CVD coated carbide tool. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 6, 539 - 552.

Box, G. E., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, S. J. (1978.) Statistics for Experiments: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. Wiley, New York.

Chowdhury, K. K., & John, Boby. (2003). Optimization of the Induction Hardening Operation using Robust Design. Journal of Quality Engineering Forum, 11(4), 70-76.

Cudney, E. A., Hong, J., Jugulum, R., Paryani, K., Ragsdell, K.M., & Taguchi, G. (2007). An Evaluation of Mahalanobis-Taguchi Systems and Neural Network for Multivariate Pattern Recognition. Journal of Industrial and System Engineering, 1(2), 139 – 150.

Cudney, E. A., Paryani, K., & Ragsdell, K. M. (2007). Applying the Mahalanobis-Taguchi system to vehicle ride. Journal of Industrial and System Engineering, 1(3), 251 – 259.

Fenton, N. E., & Pfleeger, S. L. (1996). Software Metrics, a rigours and practical approach. 2nd Edition, International Thomson Computer Press.

Fisher, R. A. (1974) The Design f Experiments. Hafner press, New York.

Fowlkes, W.Y., & Creveling, C.M. (1998). Engineering Methods for Robust Product Design –Using Taguchi Methods in Technology and Product Development. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

Harter, D. E., Krishnan, M. S., & Slaughter, S. A. (2000). Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software product development. Management Science, 46(4), 451-466.

Hayashi, S., Tanaka, Y., & Kodama, E. (2001). A new manufacturing control system using Mahalonobis distance for maximizing productivity. IEEE International Semiconductor Manufacturing Symposium, 15(4), 59 – 62.

Humphrey, W. S. (1988). Characterizing the software process: a maturity framework. IEEE Software, 5(2), 73-79.

Jacob, A.L., & Pillai, S.K. (2003). Statistical process control to improve coding and code review. IEEE Software, 20(3), 50 – 55.

Jain, A. K., Robert, P. W. D., & Jianchang, M. (2000). Statistical pattern recognition: A review. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22, 4-37.

Jalote, P. (2000). CMM in Practice: Process for Executing Software Projects at Infosys. Addison-Wesley.

Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., Hwang, H. G., Huang, J., & Hung, S. Y. (2004). An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance. Information & Management, 41(3), 279-288.

John, B., & Kadadevaramath, R. S. (2013). Optimization of the yield of a code review process. Proceedings of the International Conference on Quality, Reliability and Operations Research, 161 – 168, Excel India Publishers. ISBN: 978-93-82880-27-1.

John, B.., & Kadadevaramath, R. S. (2014). A methodology for achieving the design review defect density goals in software development process. International Journal of Manufacturing, Industrial & Management Engineering, 2(1), 181-191

John, B. (2014). Application of Mahalanobis-Taguchi system and design of experiments to reduce the field failures of splined shafts. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(6), 681-697.

John, B. (2015). A dual response surface optimization methodology for achieving uniform coating thickness in powder coating process. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 6, 469 – 480.

Jugulam, R., & Monplaisir, L. (2002). Comparison between Mahalanabis-Taguchi system and artificial neural networks. Journal of Quality Engineering Society, 10(1), 60-73.

Kacker, R.N. (1985). Off-line Quality Control, Parameter Design and Taguchi Method, Journal of Quality Technology. 17, 176 – 209.

Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936). On Generalised distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India, 2(1), 49–55.

Montgomery, D.C. (2001). Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Mishra, P.C., Das, D.K., Ukamanal, M., Routara, B.C., & Sahoo, A.K. (2015). Multi-response optimization of process parameters using Taguchi method and grey relational analysis during turning AA 7075/SiC composite in dry and spray cooling environments. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 6, 445 – 456.

Myatt, G. (2007). Making Sense of data: A Practical Guide to Exploratory Data Analysis and Data Mining, Vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Naik, K., & Tripathy, P (2008). Software Testing and Quality Assurance. John Wiley and Sons.

Perry, W. (1995). Effective Methods for Software Testing. John Wiley & Sons.

Phadke, M.S. (1989). Quality engineering using robust design. Prentice Hall, USA.

Raczynski, B., & Curtis, B. (2008). Software data violate SPC’s underlying assumptions. IEEE Software, 25(3), 49.

Rama Rao, S., & Padmanabhan., G (2012). Application of Taguchi methods and ANOVA in optimization of process parameters for metal removal rate in electrochemical machining of Al/5%SiC composites. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2(3), 192 – 197.

Rao, U. S., Kestur, S., & Pradhan, C. (2008). Stochastic optimization modeling and quantitative project management. IEEE Software, 25(3), 29-36.

Sahoo, A. K., Rout, A. K., & Das, D. K. (2015). Response surface and artificial neural network prediction model and optimization for surface roughness in machining. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 6, 229 – 240.

Taguchi, G., Chowdhury, S., & Wu, Y. (2001). The Mahalanobis-Taguchi System. McGraw Hill, New York.

Taguchi, G., & Rajesh, J. (2000). New Trends in Multivariate Diagnosis. Sankhya: Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B, 62(2), 233-248.

Taguchi, G. (1980). Introduction to Off-line Quality Control. Central Japan Quality Control Association, Japan

Tian, J. (2005). Software Quality Engineering. John Wiley and Sons.

Weller, E., & Card, D. (2008). Applying SPC to software development: where and why. IEEE Software, 25(3), 48-50.

Woodall, W. H., Koulelik, R., Ysui, K. L., Kim, S. B., Stoumbos, Z. G., & Carvounis, C. P. (2003). A review and analysis of the Mahalanobis - Taguchi System. Technometrics, 45(1), 1- 30.

Wu, Y. (2004). Pattern Recognition Using Mahalanobis Distance. Journal of Quality Engineering Forum, 12(5), 787-795.