Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Journal of Project Management » Antecedents of intention to use project management among educational institution: Empirical study in Jordan

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (96)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

JPM Volumes

    • Volume 1 (8)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (3)
    • Volume 2 (13)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (3)
      • Issue 3 (3)
      • Issue 4 (3)
    • Volume 3 (17)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • Volume 4 (24)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • Volume 5 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 6 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 7 (21)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 8 (21)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 9 (35)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • Volume 10 (68)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (21)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (19)
    • Volume 11 (24)
      • Issue 1 (24)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(111)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Financial performance(83)
Sustainability(82)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Artificial intelligence(77)
Knowledge Management(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2184)
Indonesia(1290)
India(788)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Journal of Project Management

ISSN 2371-8374 (Online) - ISSN 2371-8366 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 10 Issue 3 pp. 521-532 , 2025

Antecedents of intention to use project management among educational institution: Empirical study in Jordan Pages 521-532 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Raed Masadeh, Najwa Ashal, Naseem Mohammad Twaissi, Dmaithan Almajali, Maha Alkhaffaf, Bader Obeidat

DOI: 10.5267/j.jpm.2025.4.002

Keywords: Personal learning environment (PLE), Personal learning network (PLN), Personal learning profile (PLP), Student pressure, Artificial intelligence (AI), Project management

Abstract: The present study examined the perception of users towards the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in improving personal learning profile (PLP), personal learning network (PLN) and personal learning environment (PLE). Additionally, the impact of PLP, PLN and PLE on perceived ease of use, perceived effectiveness and perceived usefulness in improving the general attitude and satisfaction of users in their intention to use project management was examined. Results showed the impact of PLE on perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, significant impact of PLP on perceived effectiveness, and impact of student pressure on intention to use project management. Data were obtained from professionals and students with experience in the use of project management modules. Notably, the obtained data were fully based on the perceptions of the respondents, resulting in potential self-perception bias. Perceptions of users towards PLP, PLN and PLE were integrated into the technology acceptance model framework of this study, to understand their impact on the general attitude and satisfaction of learners. Using AI can enhance learner attitude and satisfaction while creating more engaging e-learning, proving the crucial role of AI in forming the right environment through learner profile match.

How to cite this paper
Masadeh, R., Ashal, N., Twaissi, N., Almajali, D., Alkhaffaf, M & Obeidat, B. (2025). Antecedents of intention to use project management among educational institution: Empirical study in Jordan.Journal of Project Management, 10(3), 521-532.

Refrences
Al-Rawashdeh, S.A.A. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence systems in combating cybercrime: A field study in Jordan. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, 21(1), 121-141. AlSokkar, A. A., Al-Gasawneh, J. A., Alamro, A., Binkhamis, M., AlGhizzawi, M., & Hmeidan, T. A. (2025). The Effectiveness of E-Marketing on Marketing Performance in Jordanian Telecommunications Companies: Exploring the Mediating Role of the Competitive Environment. SN Computer Science, 6(1), 1-15.‏ Arbaugh, J.B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 1(24), 32-54. Arbaugh, J.B. (2002). Managing the online classroom: A study of technological and behavioral characteristics of web-based MBA courses. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2(13), 203-223. Arbaugh, J.B., & Duray, R. (2002). Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses– An exploratory study of two online MBA programs. Management Learning, pp. 331-347. Armenteros, M., Liaw, S.S., Fernandez, M., Dıaz, R.F., & Sanchez, R.A. (2013). Surveying FIFA instructors’ behavioral intention toward the multimedia teaching materials. Computers and Education, 61(1), 91-104. ASTD (2010). E-learning, available at: http://www.astd.org/LC/glossary.htm. Attwell, G. (2007). E-Portfolios the DNA of the personal learning environment?. Journal eLearning Knowledge Society, 3(2), 39-61. Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural evaluation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. Bates, A. (2005). Technology, E-Learning and Distance Education. Routledge Falmer. Baumgartner, P. (2012). Eine Taxonomie for E-Portfolios, Department of Interactive Media and Educational Technologies. Danube University Krems. Beck, J., Stern, M., & Haugsjaa, E. (1996). Applications of A.I. in education. The ACM Magazine for Students, 3(1), 11-15. Bekele, T.A. (2010). Motivation and satisfaction in internet-supported learning environments: A review. Educational Technology and Society, 2(13), 116-127. Berns, M. (2009). English as lingua franca and English in Europe. World Englishes, 28(2), 192-199. ‏ Byrne, S.M., Allen, K.L., Lampard, A.M., Dove, E.R., & Fursland, A. (2010). The factor structure of the eating disorder examination in clinical and community samples. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43(3), 260-265. Carlson, P.A., & Berry, F.C. (2003). Calibrated peer review and assessing learning outcomes. Frontiers in Education Conference, STIPES, 2, F3E-1. Chan, A.Y., Chow, K.O., & Jia, W. (2003). A framework for evaluation of learning effectiveness in online courses. In The International Conference on Web-Based Learning, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 383-395. Charlier, B., Henri, F., Peraya, D., Gillet, D., & Barcelona (2010). From personal environment to personal learning environment. In the 5th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. Chong, S. (2008). Success in electronic commerce implementation: A cross-country study of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21(5), 468-492. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). Assessment and pedagogy in the era of machine-mediated learning. Education as social construction: contributions to theory, research, and practice, 350-374. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2019). Education 2.0: Artificial intelligence and the end of the test. Beijing International Review of Education, 1(2-3), 528-543. Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Crossley, S., Paquette, L., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D.S., & Baker, R.S. (2016). Combining click stream data with NLP tools to better understand MOOC completion. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 6-14. D’Alessandro, M. (2011). Connecting your radiology learning to your clinical practice: Using personal learning environments, learning portfolios and communities of practice. Pediatric Radiology, 41(1), 245. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. Daunert, A.L., & Price, L. (2014). E-portfolio: A practical tool for self-directed, reflective, and collaborative professional learning. Discourses on Professional Learning, Springer, Dordrecht, 231-251. Davis, F.D. (1989). Usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 3(13), 319-340. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132. Esterhuyse, M. (2016). Intention to use and satisfaction of e-learning for training in the corporate context. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, 11, 347-365. Esterhuyse, M., Scholtz, B., & Venter, D. (2016). Intention to use and satisfaction of e-learning for training in the corporate context. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 11, 347-365. Fiedler, S., & Väljataga, T. (2013). Personal learning environments: A conceptual landscape revisited. E-Learning Papers, 35, 1-16. Gooren-Sieber, S., & Henrich, A. (2012). Systems for Personalised Learning: Personal Learning Environment vs. E-Portfolio?. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Fong, J., Kwok, LF., Li, K., Kwan, R. (eds) Hybrid Learning. ICHL 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7411. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32018-7_28 Gualandris, J., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2014). Customer pressure and innovativeness: Their role in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 20(2), 92-103. Gurzick, D., & White, K.F. (2013). Online personal networks of knowledge workers in computer supported collaborative learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning at the Workplace, Springer, Boston, MA, 225-239. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed., New Jersey: PrenticeHall. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed., New Jersey: PrenticeHall. Harman, W.W. (1976). An incomplete guide to the future. San Francisco Book Company. Hasani, T., Bojei, J., & Dehghantanha, A. (2017). Investigating the antecedents to the adoption of SCRM technologies by start-up companies. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 655-675. Huprich, J. (2016). Perceived Effectiveness of E-Learning for Technology Instruction in Public Library Staff Development Programs: A Survey Based on the Technology Acceptance Model. Master of Science in Information Technology Theses, Kennesaw State University. Ijazdar, R., & Hu, Y. (2004). How Banks Manage CRM: A B2B Perspective. Lulea University of Technology. Jacques, P.H., Garger, J., Brown, C.A., & Deale, C.S. (2009). Personality and virtual reality team candidates: The roles of personality traits, technology anxiety and trust as predictors of perceptions of virtual reality teams. Journal of Business Management, 15(2), 143. Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 395-408. Kim, Y., Soyata, T., & Behnagh, R.F. (2018). Towards emotionally aware A.I. smart classroom: Current issues and directions for engineering and education. IEEE Access, 6, 5308-5331. Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford. Lee, M.K., Cheung, C.M., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), 1095-1104. Leone, S. (2013). Characterisation of a Personal Learning Environment as a Lifelong Learning Tool. Springer, Ancona. Liaw, S.S. (2002). An Internet survey for perceptions of computer and World Wide Web: Relationship, prediction, and difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(1), 17-35. Liaw, S.S. (2007). Understanding computers and the internet as a work assisted too. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 399-414. Liaw, S.S., & Huang, H.M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers and Education, 60(1), 14-24. Liu, S.H., Liao, H.L., & Pratt, J.A. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers and Education, 52(3), 599-607. Lorenzo, G., & Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. Educause Learning Initiative, 1(1), 1-27. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L.B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for A.I. In Education. Pearson, London. Maddux, C., & Johnson, D. (2001). The Web in Higher Education: Assessing the Impact and Fulfilling the Potential. The Haworth Press, New York, NY. Maduku, D.K., Mpinganjira, M., & Duh, H. (2016). Understanding mobile marketing adoption intention by South African SMEs: A multi-perspective framework. International Journal of Information Management, 36(5), 711-723. Mangula, I. (2017). A meta-analysis of IT innovation adoption factors: the moderating effect of product and process innovations diffusion of SaaS adoption view project. In the Pacific Asia Conference on Information System. Masa’deh, R., Albalawneh, D., Warrad, L., Thurasamy, R., & Almajali, D. (2025). The impact of information technology application on project performance: The mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Project Management, 10(2), 221-228. Meyer, J. (2011). Workforce age and technology adoption in small and medium sized service firms. Small Business Economics, 37(3), 305-324. Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359-374. Montebello, M. (2017). A.I. Injected E-Learning: The Future of Online Education. Springer, Berlin. Montebello, M. (2019). The Ambient Intelligent Classroom: Beyond the Indispensable Educator. Springer, Vol. 840. Noesgaard, S., & Ørngreen, R. (2015). The effectiveness of e-learning: An explorative and integrative review of the definitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-learning effectiveness. Electronic Journal eLearning, 13(4), 278-290. Nye, B. (2015). Intelligent tutoring systems by and for the developing world: A review of trends and approaches for educational technology in a global context. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 25(2), 177-20. O’Reilly, T. (2013). What is web 2.0 design patterns and business models for the next generation of software, available at: http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html. Oke, A., & Takeda, S. (2022). The role of IT in supply chain process innovation. International Journal of Production Research, 60(14), 4519-4535. Paulsen, M.F. (1993). The hexagon of cooperative freedom: A distance education theory attuned to computer conferencing. DEOS News, 3(1e9). Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. Pratt, R.P. (1999). Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco. Qatawneh, A.M., Al-Lozi, E.M., & Al-Lozi, N.M. (2024). Internet of things "IoT" and the quality of decision-making during the Covid-19 pandemic: A perspective of accounting managers within the Jordanian industrial sector. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, 20(2), 291-308. Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effect. Information & Management, 44(1), 90-103. Sclater, N. (2008). Web 2.0, personal learning environments and the future of learning management systems. Research Bulletin, 13, Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, 2008, available fromhttp://www.educause.edu/ecar Shee, D., & Wang, Y. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers and Education, 50(3), 894-905. Shute, V., & Ventura, M. (2013). Stealth Assessment: Measuring and Supporting Learning in Video Games. The MIT Press, 102. Stone, M., & Hirsh, H. (2005). Artificial intelligence: the next twenty-five years. AI Magazine, 26(4), 85. Teo, T. (2014). Preservice teachers’ satisfaction with e-learning. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(1), 3-6. Tsai, P.C., Yen, Y., Huang, L., & Huang, I. (2007). A study on motivating employees’ learning commitment in the post-downsizing era: Job satisfaction perspective. Journal of World Business, 42(2), 157-169. Ueki, Y. (2016). Customer pressure, customer-manufacturer-supplier relationships, and quality control performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2233-2238. Uskov, V.L., Bakken, J.P., & Pandey, A. (2015). The Ontology of Next Generation Smart Classrooms. Smart Education and Smart E-Learning, Springer, Cham, 3-14. VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221. Vargas-Vera, M., & Lytras, M. (2008). Exploiting semantic web and ontologies for personalised learning services: Towards semantic web-enabled learning portals for real learning experiences. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 4(1), 1-17. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M.G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24, 115-139. Wang, Y.S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management, 41(1), 75-86. Wang, Y.S., Lin, H.H., & Liao, Y.W. (2010). Investigating the individual difference antecedents of perceived enjoyment in the acceptance of blogging. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 67(1), 1014-1023. West, S.G., Finch, J.F., & Curran, P.J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In: Hoyle, R.H., Ed., Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 56-75. Zhai, C., & Massung, S. (2016). Text data management and analysis: A practical introduction to information retrieval and text mining. Association for Computing Machinery and Morgan and Claypool, 12.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Journal of Project Management | Year: 2025 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 3 | Views: 306 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Factors affecting social networks acceptance: An extension to the technolog ...
  • Examination of students’ acceptance and intention to use a New LMS during C ...
  • COVID-19 fears and e-learning platforms acceptance among Jordanian universi ...
  • Prioritizing e-learning websites evaluation and selection criteria using fu ...
  • Measuring the effects of electronic learning components using ANFIS method

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com