Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Journal of Project Management » Application of reinforcement learning for integrating project risk analysis and risk response planning: A case study on construction projects

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (51)
  • SCI (51)

JPM Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 11 (103)
      • Issue 1 (24)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (30)
      • Issue 4 (27)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (68)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (21)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (19)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (35)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (21)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (21)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (24)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (17)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (13)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (3)
      • Issue 3 (3)
      • Issue 4 (3)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (8)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (3)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(172)
Supply chain management(169)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(114)
Service quality(101)
Artificial intelligence(101)
Competitive advantage(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(94)
Sustainability(93)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(84)
Financial performance(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Organizational performance(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(68)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(41)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(32)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Journal of Project Management
ISSN 2371-8374 (Online) - ISSN 2371-8366 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 10 Issue 1 pp. 71-86, 2025

Application of reinforcement learning for integrating project risk analysis and risk response planning: A case study on construction projects Pages 71-86 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Sajad Soltan, Maryam Ashrafi

📋 Author Affiliations:
S. Soltan ORCID , M. Ashrafi ORCID
¹ Department of Industrial Engineering & Management systems, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
doi 10.5267/j.jpm.2024.11.001
1 Source: Scopus
Crossref Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Project management, Risk management, Risk response planning, Earned value management, Markov chain, Markov decision process

Abstract: Project Risk Management contains processes ranging from planning to control. It is applied to identify risks, analyze them, and design responses to change the occurrence rate and/or the effect of project risks. It is important for project managers to analyze the effects of the risks in projects and also consider project risks in their decisions. If project risks are not addressed during the risk management process, issues such as schedule delays, cost overruns, and even project failure may occur. This paper aims to introduce a Markov method to integrate project risk analysis and risk response planning. This method is applied to forecast the following status of the project when limited information about the project is available. Moreover, earned value management (EVM) methods were used to include various types of project risks through the project lifecycle. The model also offers the capability to choose the most effective risk response for managing project risks through the application of the Markov decision process (MDP). Eventually, we introduce a case study to demonstrate functionality and effectiveness of the presented approach. Solving the model allows for identifying the best set of risk response strategies tailored to each specific project state. The computational results illustrate that the current state of the project has a significant impact in the process of risk response planning. Since uncertainty is the inherent characteristic of projects, the use of the project’s current state is more reliable than the previous status of projects, and the Markov method is applied in this research because it uses the current state for its modelling. Using this method, managers can predict the future state of projects and find the best response in each status of projects.



How to cite this paper
APA: Soltan, S & Ashrafi, M. (2025). Application of reinforcement learning for integrating project risk analysis and risk response planning: A case study on construction projects. Journal of Project Management, 10(1), 71-86.
Chicago/Turabian: Soltan, S & Ashrafi, M. 2025. "Application of reinforcement learning for integrating project risk analysis and risk response planning: A case study on construction projects." Journal of Project Management 10, no. 1 (2025): 71-86.
AMA: Soltan, S & Ashrafi, M. Application of reinforcement learning for integrating project risk analysis and risk response planning: A case study on construction projects. Journal of Project Management. 2025;10(1):71-86.

References
Acebes, F., Pajares, J., Galán, J. M., & López-Paredes, A. (2013). Beyond earned value management: A graphical framework for integrated cost, schedule and risk monitoring. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 74, 181-189.
Acebes, F., Pajares, J., Galán, J. M., & López-Paredes, A. (2014). A new approach for project control under uncertainty. Going back to the basics. International Journal of Project Management, 32(3), 423-434.
Alhawari, S., Karadsheh, L., Talet, A. N., & Mansour, E. (2012). Knowledge-based risk management framework for in-formation technology project. International Journal of Information Management, 32(1), 50-65.
Aljohani, A., Ahiaga-Dagbui, D., & Moore, D. (2017). Construction projects cost overrun: What does the literature tell us?. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 8(2), 137.
Arena, M., Azzone, G., Cagno, E., Ferretti, G., Prunotto, E., Silvestri, A., & Trucco, P. (2013). Integrated risk manage-ment through dynamic capabilities within project-based organizations: the company dynamic response map. Risk Management, 15(1), 50-77.
Bartlett, J. (2004). Project risk analysis and management guide. APM publishing limited.
Barghi, B. (2020). Qualitative and quantitative project risk assessment using a hybrid PMBOK model developed under uncertainty conditions. Heliyon, 6(1).
Batselier, J., & Vanhoucke, M. (2015). Construction and evaluation framework for a real-life project data-base. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 697-710.
Batselier, J., & Vanhoucke, M. (2015). Evaluation of deterministic state-of-the-art forecasting approaches for project duration based on earned value management. International Journal of Project Management, 33(7), 1588-1596.
Batselier, J., & Vanhoucke, M. (2017). Improving project forecast accuracy by integrating earned value management with exponential smoothing and reference class forecasting. International journal of project management, 35(1), 28-43.
Bonilla, C. A., Vergara, M., & Watt, R. (2022). Changes in risk and entrepreneurship. Risk Management, 24(4), 367-385.
Brookfield, D., Fischbacher-Smith, D., Mohd-Rahim, F., & Boussabaine, H. (2014). Conceptualising and responding to risk in IT projects. Risk Management, 16, 195-230.
Cagno, E., Caron, F., & Mancini, M. (2007). A multi-dimensional analysis of major risks in complex projects. Risk Management, 9, 1-18.
Chen, Y. S., Chuang, H. M., Sangaiah, A. K., Lin, C. K., & Huang, W. B. (2019). A study for project risk management using an advanced MCDM-based DEMATEL-ANP approach. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Com-puting, 10, 2669-2681.
Colin, J., & Vanhoucke, M. (2016). Empirical perspective on activity durations for project-management simulation studies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(1), 04015047.
Fan, Z. P., Li, Y. H., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Generating project risk response strategies based on CBR: A case study. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 2870-2883.
Fang, C., & Marle, F. (2012). A simulation-based risk network model for decision support in project risk manage-ment. Decision Support Systems, 52(3), 635-644.
Ford, D. N., & Lander, D. M. (2011). Real option perceptions among project managers. Risk management, 13, 122-146.
Gładysz, B., Skorupka, D., Kuchta, D., & Duchaczek, A. (2015). Project risk time management–a proposed model and a case study in the construction industry. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 24-31.
Gupta, V. K., & Thakkar, J. J. (2018). A quantitative risk assessment methodology for construction pro-ject. Sādhanā, 43(7), 116.
Han, Q., Zhu, Y., Ke, G. Y., & Hipel, K. W. (2019). Public private partnership in brownfield remediation projects in China: Identification and structure analysis of risks. Land Use Policy, 84, 87-104.
Hu, Q., & Yue, W. (2007). Markov decision processes with their applications (Vol. 14). Springer Science & Business Media.
IEEE Standards Association. (2001). IEEE 1540-2001. IEEE standard for software life cycle processes-Risk manage-ment. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
International Organization for Standardization, (2002). Risk management-vocabulary-guidelines for use in standards. ISO.
International Organization for Standardization. (2017). Quality management — Guidelines for quality management in projects. ISO.
Jensen, J. L., Ponsaing, C. D., & Thrane, S. (2012). Risk, resources and structures: Experimental evidence of a new cost of risk component–The structural risk component and implications for enterprise risk management. Risk manage-ment, 14, 152-175.
Khodeir, L. M., & Nabawy, M. (2019). Identifying key risks in infrastructure projects–Case study of Cairo Festival City project in Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 10(3), 613-621.
Kumar, C., & Yadav, D. K. (2015). A probabilistic software risk assessment and estimation model for software pro-jects. Procedia Computer Science, 54, 353-361.
Kwak, Y. H., & Ingall, L. (2007). Exploring Monte Carlo simulation applications for project management. Risk man-agement, 9, 44-57.
Leu, S. S., & Lin, Y. C. (2008). Project performance evaluation based on statistical process control techniques. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(10), 813-819.
Lipke, W. (2002). A study of the normality of earned value management indicators. The Measurable News, 4(1), 6.
Lipke, W., Zwikael, O., Henderson, K., & Anbari, F. (2009). Prediction of project outcome: The application of statistical methods to earned value management and earned schedule performance indexes. International journal of project management, 27(4), 400-407.
Liu, L., Wei, F., & Zhou, S. (2019). Major project risk assessment method based on BP neural network. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems-S, 12(4&5), 1053-1064.
Luko, S. N. (2013). Risk management principles and guidelines. Quality Engineering, 25(4), 451-454.
Magni, P., Quaglini, S., Marchetti, M., & Barosi, G. (2000). Deciding when to intervene: a Markov decision process ap-proach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 60(3), 237-253.
Marc, M., Arena, M., & Peljhan, D. (2023). The role of interactive style of use in improving risk management effective-ness. Risk Management, 25(2), 9.
Martens, A., & Vanhoucke, M. (2018). An empirical validation of the performance of project control tolerance lim-its. Automation in Construction, 89, 71-85.
Mojtahedi, S. M. H., Mousavi, S. M., & Makui, A. (2010). Project risk identification and assessment simultaneously us-ing multi-attribute group decision making technique. Safety science, 48(4), 499-507.
Mousavi, S. (2015). An application of stochastic processes for analysing risks in highway projects. Advanced Computa-tional Techniques in Electromagnetics, 15(1), 17-25.
Muriana, C., & Vizzini, G. (2017). Project risk management: A deterministic quantitative technique for assessment and mitigation. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 320-340.
Obare, D. M., & Muraya, M. M. (2019). Analyzing the Risks in Highway Projects Using the Markov Chain Ap-proach. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 7(2), 59-64.
OR-AS. (2020, November 13). Retrieved from Online consultation of the real-life project database Website, URL: http://www.projectmanagement.ugent.be/research/data/realdata
Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). Newtown Square, Pa: Project Management Institute.
Puterman, M. L. (2014). Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming. John Wiley & Sons.
Rolik, Y. (2017). Risk management in implementing wind energy project. Procedia Engineering, 178, 278-288.
Ross, S. M. (2014). Introduction to probability models. Academic press.
Sigaud, O., & Buffet, O. (Eds.). (2013). Markov decision processes in artificial intelligence. John Wiley & Sons.
Smith, N. J., Merna, T., & Jobling, P. (2014). Managing risk in construction projects. John Wiley & Sons.
Soltan, S., & Ashrafi, M. (2020). Predicting project duration and cost, and selecting the best action plan using statistical methods for earned value management. Journal of Project Management, 5(3), 157-166.
Sujiao, Z. (2009, July). Risk analysis of construction projects based on markov chain. In 2009 Asia-Pacific Conference on Information Processing (Vol. 1, pp. 514-517). IEEE.
Tamak, J., & Bindal, D. (2013). An Empirical Study of Risk Management & Control. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 3(12), 4.
Wu, D., Dai, Q., & Zhu, X. (2016). Measuring the effect of project risks based on Shapley value for project risk re-sponse. Procedia computer science, 91, 774-778.
Wu, D., Li, J., Xia, T., Bao, C., Zhao, Y., & Dai, Q. (2018). A multiobjective optimization method considering process risk correlation for project risk response planning. Information Sciences, 467, 282-295.
Yan, H., Gao, C., Elzarka, H., Mostafa, K., & Tang, W. (2019). Risk assessment for construction of urban rail transit projects. Safety science, 118, 583-594.
Zhang, Y. (2016). Selecting risk response strategies considering project risk interdependence. International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), 819-830.
Zhang, Y., & Fan, Z. P. (2014). An optimization method for selecting project risk response strategies. International journal of project management, 32(3), 412-422.
Zhang, Y., Luan, H., Shao, W., & Xu, Y. (2016). Managerial risk preference and its influencing factors: analysis of large state-owned enterprises management personnel in China. Risk Management, 18, 135-158.
Zhang, Y., Zuo, F., & Guan, X. (2020). Integrating case-based analysis and fuzzy optimization for selecting project risk response actions. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 545, 123578.
Zhao, X., Hwang, B. G., & Gao, Y. (2016). A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for risk assessment: a case of Singa-pore's green projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 203-213.
Zuo, F., & Zhang, K. (2018). Selection of risk response actions with consideration of secondary risks. International Journal of Project Management, 36(2), 241-254.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Journal of Project Management | 📅 Year: 2025 | 📖 Volume: 10 | 📄 Issue: 1 | 👁️ Views: 980 | 📊 Crossref:

Related Articles:
  • A risk management model for large projects in the construction phase in Egypt
  • Risk and its impacts on time and cost in construction projects
  • Predicting project duration and cost, and selecting the best action plan using statistical methods for earned value management
  • The advantage of project risk management tools
  • An empirical study for ranking risk factors using linear assignment: A case study of road construction

📝 Ready to share your research?

Journal of Project Management is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com