How to cite this paper
APA: Sommer, L. (2024). Project management approaches and their selection in the digital age: Overview, challenges and decision models. Journal of Project Management, 9(2), 131-148.
Chicago/Turabian: Sommer, L. 2024. "Project management approaches and their selection in the digital age: Overview, challenges and decision models." Journal of Project Management 9, no. 2 (2024): 131-148.
AMA: Sommer, L. Project management approaches and their selection in the digital age: Overview, challenges and decision models. Journal of Project Management. 2024;9(2):131-148.
References
actiTIME. (2023). 20 Most Useful Project Management Tools and Techniques. https://www.actitime.com/project-management/project-management-tools-and-techniques
Angermeier, G. (2023). Traditionelles Projektmanagement. https://www.projektmagazin.de/glossarterm/traditionelles-projektmanagement
Baez, M. M., & Schuster, E. (2017). Agiles Projektmanagement in der Luftfahrtentwicklung.
Bertschek, I., Erdsiek, D., Niebel, T., & Seifried, M. (2020). Schwerpunktstudie Digitalisierung und Energieeffizienz. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi). https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Digitale-Welt/schwerpunktstudie-digitalisierung-energieeffizienz.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1
Block, C. (2022). Council Post: 12 Reasons Your Digital Transformation Will Fail. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2022/03/16/12-reasons-your-digital-transformation-will-fail/
Bonaccorso, G. (2017). Machine Learning Algorithms. Packt Publishing Ltd.
Boonstra, A., & Reezigt, C. (2019). Complexity-Predictability Project Diagnosis model. Procedia Computer Science, 164, 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.191
Brecher, S. (2023). Top 20 project management methodologies. CIO. https://www.cio.com/article/244577/top-project-management-methodologies.html
Brooke, C. (2019). 20+ Effective Project Management Methodologies Explained. Business 2 Community. https://www.business2community.com/strategy/20-effective-project-management-methodologies-explained-02166494
Ciric, D., Delic, M., Lalic, B., Gracanin, D., & Lolic, T. (2021). Exploring the link between project management ap-proach and project success dimensions: A structural model approach. Advances in Production Engineering & Man-agement, 16(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2021.1.387
Ciric, D., Lalic, B., Delić, M., Gracanin, D., & Stefanovic, D. (2022). How project management approach impact project success? From traditional to agile. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15(3), 494–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2021-0108
Cooper, R., & Sommer, A. (2016). The Agile–Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: A Promising New Approach and a New Re-search Opportunity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12314
Copola Azenha, F., Aparecida Reis, D., & Leme Fleury, A. (2021). The Role and Characteristics of Hybrid Approaches to Project Management in the Development of Technology-Based Products and Services. Project Management Journal, 52(1), 90–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820956884
Critical-Chain-Projects.com. (2023). The Critical Chain Project Management method explained. https://www.critical-chain-projects.com/the-method
Daniels, R. (2017, September 19). What is the PRiSM Methodology? | Principles and Process of PRISM. Business Study Notes. https://www.businessstudynotes.com/finance/project-management/prism-methodology-principles-process-prism/
Dassault Systèmes. (2023). Digital Twin Technologie—Einsatz digitaler Zwillinge in der Praxis. Dassault Systèmes. https://www.3ds.com/de/virtual-twin/digital-twin
DET. (2023). Digital Energy Twin – DET. https://digitalenergytwin.eu/
Flex4Fact. (2023). FLEX4FACT project—Official website of the Horizon Europe project. Flex4fact. https://flex4fact.eu/
Follath, A., Bross, F., & Galka, S. (2022). Vorgehensmodell zur Erstellung Digitaler Zwillinge für Produktion und Logistik. Zeitschrift Für Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 117(10), 691–696. https://doi.org/10.1515/zwf-2022-1127
Franch, X., Palomares, C., Quer, C., Chatzipetrou, P., & Gorschek, T. (2023). The state-of-practice in requirements spec-ification: An extended interview study at 12 companies. Requirements Engineering, 28(3), 377–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-023-00399-7
Frerichs, G., & Hilmer, S. (2017, March 7). Earned-Value-Controlling für hybride Projekte. https://www.projektmagazin.de/artikel/earned-value-einheitliches-controlling-fuer-klassische-und-agile-projekte_1118116
Fuller, A., Fan, Z., Day, C., & Barlow, C. (2020). Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research. IEEE Access, 8, 108952–108971. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358
Gemino, A., Horner Reich, B., & Serrador, P. M. (2021). Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice? Project Management Journal, 52(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820973082
Ghnaimat, T. M., & Hudaib, A. (2022). Hybrid software process model: V-SCRUM. 2022 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Computing and Engineering Applications (ETCEA), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCEA57049.2022.10009846
Göckel, N., & Müller, P. (2020). Entwicklung und Betrieb Digitaler Zwillinge. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 115(s1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.3139/104.112321
Gya, R., Petit, J.-P., Bacry, J., Bronson, B., & Capone, A. (2022). Digitale Zwillinge sind von zentraler Bedeutung für Unternehmen auf dem Weg zur nachhaltigeren Produktion. Capgemini Germany. https://www.capgemini.com/de-de/news/pressemitteilung/studie-digitale-zwillinge-nachhaltige-produktion/
Huber, W. (2018). Industrie 4.0 kompakt – Wie Technologien unsere Wirtschaft und unsere Unternehmen verändern. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20799-1
Hussy, W., Schreier, M., & Echterhoff, G. (2010). Qualitative Forschungsmethoden. In W. Hussy, M. Schreier, & G. Echterhoff (Eds.), Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften für Bachelor (pp. 183–212). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-95936-6_5
Kanjilal, J. (2023, February 7). Overview of the Adaptive Project Framework. Developer.Com. https://www.developer.com/project-management/adaptive-project-framework/
KDnuggets. (2023). Decision Tree Algorithm, Explained. KDnuggets. https://www.kdnuggets.com/decision-tree-algorithm-explained.html
Laudan, T., & Mauritz, A. (2006). Integrated Project Control Loop Concept: Surviving in the Jungle of Complex Pro-jects with an Advanced Project Management Decision Basis. INCOSE International Symposium, 16(1), 1733–1748. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2006.tb02847.x
Lynn, R. (2023). What is FDD in Agile? Planview. https://www.planview.com/resources/articles/fdd-agile/
Mahdi, M. N., Mohamed Zabil, M. H., Ahmad, A. R., Ismail, R., Yusoff, Y., Cheng, L. K., Azmi, M. S. B. M., Natiq, H., & Happala Naidu, H. (2021). Software Project Management Using Machine Learning Technique—A Review. Ap-plied Sciences, 11(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115183
Matthew, M. (2023, August 12). Spiral Model: When to Use? Advantages and Disadvantages. https://www.guru99.com/what-is-spiral-model-when-to-use-advantages-disadvantages.html
Microsoft. (2023). Rapid Application Development (RAD) Tool | Microsoft Power Apps. https://powerapps.microsoft.com/en-us/rapid-application-development-rad/
Miranda, D., & Hardy, A. (2023). Project Management Methodologies All PMs Should Know – Forbes Advisor. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/project-management-methodologies/
Moyne, J., Qamsane, Y., Balta, E. C., Kovalenko, I., Faris, J., Barton, K., & Tilbury, D. M. (2020). A Requirements Driv-en Digital Twin Framework: Specification and Opportunities. IEEE Access, 8, 107781–107801. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000437
Nordhausen, T., & Hirt, J. (2022). RefHunter im neuen Webformat: Eine Plattform zur systematischen Literaturrecherche: RefHunter in the new web format: A platform for systematic literature search. GMS Medizin-Bibliothek-Information, 22(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3205/mbi000549
Null, G., Cross, J. A., & Brandon, C. (2020). Effects of Lean Six Sigma in program management. Journal of Manufac-turing Technology Management, 31(3), 572–598. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2019-0139
Pinegar, G. (2023). 13 Efficient Project Management Methodologies to Simplify Tasks. https://learn.g2.com/project-management-methodologies
PRINCE2 Agile. (2023). PRINCE2 Agile® Foundation (Deutsch) | DE. https://www.prince2.com/de/prince2-agile-german/foundation
RapidMiner. (2023). Decision Tree—RapidMiner Documentation. https://docs.rapidminer.com/9.10/studio/operators/modeling/predictive/trees/parallel_decision_tree.html
Reiff, J., & Schlegel, D. (2022). Hybrid project management – a systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 10(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm100203
Reinhart, J., Hoisl, B., & Baumgartl, D. J. (2019). Digital Twin Grundlagen, Anwendungsfelder und Umsetzungsstrategien.
San Cristóbal, J. R., Carral, L., Diaz, E., Fraguela, J. A., & Iglesias, G. (2018). Complexity and Project Management: A General Overview. Complexity, 2018, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4891286
Scheiner, M. (2022). Project Management Methodologies Comparison (11 PM Methods). CRM.Org. https://crm.org/news/project-management-methodologies
Schwartz, M., Abel-Koch, J., & Brüggemann, A. (2022b). Hohe Energiekosten durch den Krieg in der Ukraine—In der Breite des Mittelstands (noch) tragbar. https://www.kfw.de/PDF/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-Fokus-Volkswirtschaft/Fokus-2022/Fokus-Nr.-403-September-2022-Energiekosten-Mittelstand.pdf
Schwartz, M., Brüggemann, A., & Schwarz, M. (2022a). Energiekosten im Mittelstand steigen: Unternehmen geben Preiserhöhungen weiter und ergreifen Maßnahmen zur Energieeinsparung. https://www.kfw.de/PDF/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-Fokus-Volkswirtschaft/Fokus-2022/Fokus-Nr.-384-Mai-2022-Energiekosten-Mittelstand.pdf
Scikit-Learn.org. (2023). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python—Scikit-learn 1.3.0 documentation. https://scikit-learn.org
Siemens. (2023). Digital Twin [Mobility-story_detail]. Siemens Deutschland. https://new.siemens.com/de/de/unternehmen/stories/forschung-technologien/digitaler-zwilling/digital-twin.html
Silva, A. R. da. (2014). Quality of Requirements Specifications—A Framework for Automatic Validation of Require-ments. 2, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.5220/0004951900960107
Singh, M., Fuenmayor, E., Hinchy, E. P., Qiao, Y., Murray, N., & Devine, D. (2021). Digital Twin: Origin to Future. Ap-plied System Innovation, 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4020036
Smartsheet. (2023). Top 12 Project Management Methodologies | Smartsheet. https://www.smartsheet.com/project-management-guide/methodologies
Sommer, L. (2023a). How Artificial Intelligence can be used in International Human Resources Management: A Case Study. GATR Global Journal of Business Social Sciences Review, 11(1), 09–17. https://doi.org/10.35609/gjbssr.2023.11.1(2)
Sommer, L. (2023b). The digital talent trap of the SME sector: A make-or-buy solution approach. Intelektinė Ekonomi-ka, 17(1), 8–29.
Špundak, M. (2014). Mixed Agile/Traditional Project Management Methodology – Reality or Illusion? Procedia - So-cial and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.105
Steyn, J. M. N., Herman. (2020). Project Management for Engineering, Business and Technology (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429297588
Stojanovic, L., Usländer, T., Volz, F., Weißenbacher, C., Müller, J., Jacoby, M., & Bischoff, T. (2021). Methodology and Tools for Digital Twin Management—The FA3ST Approach. IoT, 2(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot2040036
Strasser, J., & Pauels, A. (2023, February 9). 9 Projektmanagement-Trends in 2023 – wohin geht die Reise? TPG Blog - Projektmanagement mit Microsoft Technologie. https://www.theprojectgroup.com/blog/projektmanagement-trends/
Strasser, J., & Schmidt-Sibeth, A. (2023). 8 Tipps für erfolgreiches Programmmanagement (Update 2023). TPG Blog - Projektmanagement mit Microsoft Technologie. https://www.theprojectgroup.com/blog/programmmanagement/
Tao, F., Sui, F., Liu, A., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Song, B., Guo, Z., Lu, S. C.-Y., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin-driven product design framework. International Journal of Production Research, 57(12), 3935–3953. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1443229
Thesing, T., Feldmann, C., & Burchardt, M. (2021). Agile versus Waterfall Project Management: Decision Model for Selecting the Appropriate Approach to a Project. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.227
tuleap. (2023). 10 project management tools and methods • Tuleap. Tuleap. https://www.tuleap.org/project-management/10-project-management-tools-and-methods
Wachs, D., & Tiefenbeck, F. (2022). Der digitale Projektzwilling. https://www.bearingpoint.com/de-de/insights-events/insights/digital-project-twin/
Waqar, A., Othman, I., Almujibah, H., Khan, M. B., Alotaibi, S., & Elhassan, A. A. M. (2023). Factors Influencing Adop-tion of Digital Twin Advanced Technologies for Smart City Development: Evidence from Malaysia. Buildings, 13(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030775
Wawak, S., & Woźniak, K. (2020). Evolution of project management studies in the XXI century. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(4), 867–888. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-01-2020-0002
Wohlfeld, D. (2019). Digitaler Zwilling für die Produktion von Übermorgen: Große Fortschritte auf dem Forschungscampus ARENA2036. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 114(1–2), 65–67. https://doi.org/10.3139/104.112008
Yu, W., Patros, P., Young, B., Klinac, E., & Walmsley, T. G. (2022). Energy digital twin technology for industrial energy management: Classification, challenges and future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112407
Angermeier, G. (2023). Traditionelles Projektmanagement. https://www.projektmagazin.de/glossarterm/traditionelles-projektmanagement
Baez, M. M., & Schuster, E. (2017). Agiles Projektmanagement in der Luftfahrtentwicklung.
Bertschek, I., Erdsiek, D., Niebel, T., & Seifried, M. (2020). Schwerpunktstudie Digitalisierung und Energieeffizienz. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi). https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Digitale-Welt/schwerpunktstudie-digitalisierung-energieeffizienz.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1
Block, C. (2022). Council Post: 12 Reasons Your Digital Transformation Will Fail. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2022/03/16/12-reasons-your-digital-transformation-will-fail/
Bonaccorso, G. (2017). Machine Learning Algorithms. Packt Publishing Ltd.
Boonstra, A., & Reezigt, C. (2019). Complexity-Predictability Project Diagnosis model. Procedia Computer Science, 164, 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.191
Brecher, S. (2023). Top 20 project management methodologies. CIO. https://www.cio.com/article/244577/top-project-management-methodologies.html
Brooke, C. (2019). 20+ Effective Project Management Methodologies Explained. Business 2 Community. https://www.business2community.com/strategy/20-effective-project-management-methodologies-explained-02166494
Ciric, D., Delic, M., Lalic, B., Gracanin, D., & Lolic, T. (2021). Exploring the link between project management ap-proach and project success dimensions: A structural model approach. Advances in Production Engineering & Man-agement, 16(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2021.1.387
Ciric, D., Lalic, B., Delić, M., Gracanin, D., & Stefanovic, D. (2022). How project management approach impact project success? From traditional to agile. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15(3), 494–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2021-0108
Cooper, R., & Sommer, A. (2016). The Agile–Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: A Promising New Approach and a New Re-search Opportunity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12314
Copola Azenha, F., Aparecida Reis, D., & Leme Fleury, A. (2021). The Role and Characteristics of Hybrid Approaches to Project Management in the Development of Technology-Based Products and Services. Project Management Journal, 52(1), 90–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820956884
Critical-Chain-Projects.com. (2023). The Critical Chain Project Management method explained. https://www.critical-chain-projects.com/the-method
Daniels, R. (2017, September 19). What is the PRiSM Methodology? | Principles and Process of PRISM. Business Study Notes. https://www.businessstudynotes.com/finance/project-management/prism-methodology-principles-process-prism/
Dassault Systèmes. (2023). Digital Twin Technologie—Einsatz digitaler Zwillinge in der Praxis. Dassault Systèmes. https://www.3ds.com/de/virtual-twin/digital-twin
DET. (2023). Digital Energy Twin – DET. https://digitalenergytwin.eu/
Flex4Fact. (2023). FLEX4FACT project—Official website of the Horizon Europe project. Flex4fact. https://flex4fact.eu/
Follath, A., Bross, F., & Galka, S. (2022). Vorgehensmodell zur Erstellung Digitaler Zwillinge für Produktion und Logistik. Zeitschrift Für Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 117(10), 691–696. https://doi.org/10.1515/zwf-2022-1127
Franch, X., Palomares, C., Quer, C., Chatzipetrou, P., & Gorschek, T. (2023). The state-of-practice in requirements spec-ification: An extended interview study at 12 companies. Requirements Engineering, 28(3), 377–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-023-00399-7
Frerichs, G., & Hilmer, S. (2017, March 7). Earned-Value-Controlling für hybride Projekte. https://www.projektmagazin.de/artikel/earned-value-einheitliches-controlling-fuer-klassische-und-agile-projekte_1118116
Fuller, A., Fan, Z., Day, C., & Barlow, C. (2020). Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research. IEEE Access, 8, 108952–108971. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358
Gemino, A., Horner Reich, B., & Serrador, P. M. (2021). Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice? Project Management Journal, 52(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820973082
Ghnaimat, T. M., & Hudaib, A. (2022). Hybrid software process model: V-SCRUM. 2022 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Computing and Engineering Applications (ETCEA), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCEA57049.2022.10009846
Göckel, N., & Müller, P. (2020). Entwicklung und Betrieb Digitaler Zwillinge. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 115(s1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.3139/104.112321
Gya, R., Petit, J.-P., Bacry, J., Bronson, B., & Capone, A. (2022). Digitale Zwillinge sind von zentraler Bedeutung für Unternehmen auf dem Weg zur nachhaltigeren Produktion. Capgemini Germany. https://www.capgemini.com/de-de/news/pressemitteilung/studie-digitale-zwillinge-nachhaltige-produktion/
Huber, W. (2018). Industrie 4.0 kompakt – Wie Technologien unsere Wirtschaft und unsere Unternehmen verändern. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20799-1
Hussy, W., Schreier, M., & Echterhoff, G. (2010). Qualitative Forschungsmethoden. In W. Hussy, M. Schreier, & G. Echterhoff (Eds.), Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften für Bachelor (pp. 183–212). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-95936-6_5
Kanjilal, J. (2023, February 7). Overview of the Adaptive Project Framework. Developer.Com. https://www.developer.com/project-management/adaptive-project-framework/
KDnuggets. (2023). Decision Tree Algorithm, Explained. KDnuggets. https://www.kdnuggets.com/decision-tree-algorithm-explained.html
Laudan, T., & Mauritz, A. (2006). Integrated Project Control Loop Concept: Surviving in the Jungle of Complex Pro-jects with an Advanced Project Management Decision Basis. INCOSE International Symposium, 16(1), 1733–1748. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2006.tb02847.x
Lynn, R. (2023). What is FDD in Agile? Planview. https://www.planview.com/resources/articles/fdd-agile/
Mahdi, M. N., Mohamed Zabil, M. H., Ahmad, A. R., Ismail, R., Yusoff, Y., Cheng, L. K., Azmi, M. S. B. M., Natiq, H., & Happala Naidu, H. (2021). Software Project Management Using Machine Learning Technique—A Review. Ap-plied Sciences, 11(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115183
Matthew, M. (2023, August 12). Spiral Model: When to Use? Advantages and Disadvantages. https://www.guru99.com/what-is-spiral-model-when-to-use-advantages-disadvantages.html
Microsoft. (2023). Rapid Application Development (RAD) Tool | Microsoft Power Apps. https://powerapps.microsoft.com/en-us/rapid-application-development-rad/
Miranda, D., & Hardy, A. (2023). Project Management Methodologies All PMs Should Know – Forbes Advisor. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/project-management-methodologies/
Moyne, J., Qamsane, Y., Balta, E. C., Kovalenko, I., Faris, J., Barton, K., & Tilbury, D. M. (2020). A Requirements Driv-en Digital Twin Framework: Specification and Opportunities. IEEE Access, 8, 107781–107801. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000437
Nordhausen, T., & Hirt, J. (2022). RefHunter im neuen Webformat: Eine Plattform zur systematischen Literaturrecherche: RefHunter in the new web format: A platform for systematic literature search. GMS Medizin-Bibliothek-Information, 22(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3205/mbi000549
Null, G., Cross, J. A., & Brandon, C. (2020). Effects of Lean Six Sigma in program management. Journal of Manufac-turing Technology Management, 31(3), 572–598. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2019-0139
Pinegar, G. (2023). 13 Efficient Project Management Methodologies to Simplify Tasks. https://learn.g2.com/project-management-methodologies
PRINCE2 Agile. (2023). PRINCE2 Agile® Foundation (Deutsch) | DE. https://www.prince2.com/de/prince2-agile-german/foundation
RapidMiner. (2023). Decision Tree—RapidMiner Documentation. https://docs.rapidminer.com/9.10/studio/operators/modeling/predictive/trees/parallel_decision_tree.html
Reiff, J., & Schlegel, D. (2022). Hybrid project management – a systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 10(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm100203
Reinhart, J., Hoisl, B., & Baumgartl, D. J. (2019). Digital Twin Grundlagen, Anwendungsfelder und Umsetzungsstrategien.
San Cristóbal, J. R., Carral, L., Diaz, E., Fraguela, J. A., & Iglesias, G. (2018). Complexity and Project Management: A General Overview. Complexity, 2018, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4891286
Scheiner, M. (2022). Project Management Methodologies Comparison (11 PM Methods). CRM.Org. https://crm.org/news/project-management-methodologies
Schwartz, M., Abel-Koch, J., & Brüggemann, A. (2022b). Hohe Energiekosten durch den Krieg in der Ukraine—In der Breite des Mittelstands (noch) tragbar. https://www.kfw.de/PDF/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-Fokus-Volkswirtschaft/Fokus-2022/Fokus-Nr.-403-September-2022-Energiekosten-Mittelstand.pdf
Schwartz, M., Brüggemann, A., & Schwarz, M. (2022a). Energiekosten im Mittelstand steigen: Unternehmen geben Preiserhöhungen weiter und ergreifen Maßnahmen zur Energieeinsparung. https://www.kfw.de/PDF/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-Fokus-Volkswirtschaft/Fokus-2022/Fokus-Nr.-384-Mai-2022-Energiekosten-Mittelstand.pdf
Scikit-Learn.org. (2023). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python—Scikit-learn 1.3.0 documentation. https://scikit-learn.org
Siemens. (2023). Digital Twin [Mobility-story_detail]. Siemens Deutschland. https://new.siemens.com/de/de/unternehmen/stories/forschung-technologien/digitaler-zwilling/digital-twin.html
Silva, A. R. da. (2014). Quality of Requirements Specifications—A Framework for Automatic Validation of Require-ments. 2, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.5220/0004951900960107
Singh, M., Fuenmayor, E., Hinchy, E. P., Qiao, Y., Murray, N., & Devine, D. (2021). Digital Twin: Origin to Future. Ap-plied System Innovation, 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4020036
Smartsheet. (2023). Top 12 Project Management Methodologies | Smartsheet. https://www.smartsheet.com/project-management-guide/methodologies
Sommer, L. (2023a). How Artificial Intelligence can be used in International Human Resources Management: A Case Study. GATR Global Journal of Business Social Sciences Review, 11(1), 09–17. https://doi.org/10.35609/gjbssr.2023.11.1(2)
Sommer, L. (2023b). The digital talent trap of the SME sector: A make-or-buy solution approach. Intelektinė Ekonomi-ka, 17(1), 8–29.
Špundak, M. (2014). Mixed Agile/Traditional Project Management Methodology – Reality or Illusion? Procedia - So-cial and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.105
Steyn, J. M. N., Herman. (2020). Project Management for Engineering, Business and Technology (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429297588
Stojanovic, L., Usländer, T., Volz, F., Weißenbacher, C., Müller, J., Jacoby, M., & Bischoff, T. (2021). Methodology and Tools for Digital Twin Management—The FA3ST Approach. IoT, 2(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot2040036
Strasser, J., & Pauels, A. (2023, February 9). 9 Projektmanagement-Trends in 2023 – wohin geht die Reise? TPG Blog - Projektmanagement mit Microsoft Technologie. https://www.theprojectgroup.com/blog/projektmanagement-trends/
Strasser, J., & Schmidt-Sibeth, A. (2023). 8 Tipps für erfolgreiches Programmmanagement (Update 2023). TPG Blog - Projektmanagement mit Microsoft Technologie. https://www.theprojectgroup.com/blog/programmmanagement/
Tao, F., Sui, F., Liu, A., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Song, B., Guo, Z., Lu, S. C.-Y., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin-driven product design framework. International Journal of Production Research, 57(12), 3935–3953. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1443229
Thesing, T., Feldmann, C., & Burchardt, M. (2021). Agile versus Waterfall Project Management: Decision Model for Selecting the Appropriate Approach to a Project. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.227
tuleap. (2023). 10 project management tools and methods • Tuleap. Tuleap. https://www.tuleap.org/project-management/10-project-management-tools-and-methods
Wachs, D., & Tiefenbeck, F. (2022). Der digitale Projektzwilling. https://www.bearingpoint.com/de-de/insights-events/insights/digital-project-twin/
Waqar, A., Othman, I., Almujibah, H., Khan, M. B., Alotaibi, S., & Elhassan, A. A. M. (2023). Factors Influencing Adop-tion of Digital Twin Advanced Technologies for Smart City Development: Evidence from Malaysia. Buildings, 13(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030775
Wawak, S., & Woźniak, K. (2020). Evolution of project management studies in the XXI century. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(4), 867–888. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-01-2020-0002
Wohlfeld, D. (2019). Digitaler Zwilling für die Produktion von Übermorgen: Große Fortschritte auf dem Forschungscampus ARENA2036. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 114(1–2), 65–67. https://doi.org/10.3139/104.112008
Yu, W., Patros, P., Young, B., Klinac, E., & Walmsley, T. G. (2022). Energy digital twin technology for industrial energy management: Classification, challenges and future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112407