Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Journal of Future Sustainability » Ambidextrous logistics in uncertain environments: A mediated moderation analysis of resilience and sustainability in domestic vs. international middle eastern firms

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (562)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2648)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (48)
  • SCI (50)

JFS Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 6 (15)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (21)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (5)
      • Issue 1 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (1)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (57)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Journal of Future Sustainability
ISSN 2816-8151 (Online) - ISSN 2816-8143 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 6 Issue 2 pp. 97-108, 2026

Ambidextrous logistics in uncertain environments: A mediated moderation analysis of resilience and sustainability in domestic vs. international middle eastern firms Pages 97-108 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Hamed Hamidi, Reza Saedi

📋 Author Affiliations:
Hamed Hamidi, Reza Saedi
¹ Department of Management Studies and Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Iran
doi 10.5267/j.jfs.2026.3.003
Crossref Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Supply Chain Ambidexterity, Supply Chain Resilience, Sustainable Logistics, Environmental Uncertainty, Logistics Firms, Middle East

Abstract: Tribal heritage in Jharkhand holds immense potential not just as a cultural asset but as a foundation for sustainable, community-led entrepreneurship. This paper examines the major issues that can help the tribal societies transform their cultural heritage into legitimate business enterprises. Based on the domain, the study makes use of the Best-Worst Method (BWM) to rank significant enablers. It applies Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) and MICMAC analysis to discover the structural relationship between them. It is indicated that although the availability of natural resources, indigenous knowledge, and governmental support serve as the foundations of tribal enterprise, psychological preparedness and market access are the key factors in the long-term development. Interestingly, cultural values and education are also discovered as highly ingrained factors that determine an entrepreneurial intent and sustainability. The paper illuminates the multifaceted nature of the problems tribal entrepreneurs have to encounter, such as geographical remoteness and the changing demands of consumers, but also shows the opportunity to interfere by making specific changes. Through mapping of these enablers and their linkage, this study will provide a practical framework to be used by policymakers, NGOs, and local stakeholders to enable and expand tribal entrepreneurship in Jharkhand. Finally, it promotes the model of development in which cultural pride and economic empowerment must go hand in hand.

How to cite this paper
APA: Hamidi, H & Saedi, R. (2026). Ambidextrous logistics in uncertain environments: A mediated moderation analysis of resilience and sustainability in domestic vs. international middle eastern firms. Journal of Future Sustainability, 6(2), 97-108.
Chicago/Turabian: Hamidi, H & Saedi, R. 2026. "Ambidextrous logistics in uncertain environments: A mediated moderation analysis of resilience and sustainability in domestic vs. international middle eastern firms." Journal of Future Sustainability 6, no. 2 (2026): 97-108.
AMA: Hamidi, H & Saedi, R. Ambidextrous logistics in uncertain environments: A mediated moderation analysis of resilience and sustainability in domestic vs. international middle eastern firms. Journal of Future Sustainability. 2026;6(2):97-108.

References
Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329–341.
Ali, A., Labib, A., Afonso, P., & Mahfouz, A. (2024). Developing dynamic supply chain resilience capabilities: a study of Irish firms' response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Production, 34, e20230076.
Ali, A., Mahfouz, A., & Arisha, A. (2017). Analysing supply chain resilience: integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(1), 16–39.
Ambulkar, S., Ralston, P. M., Polyviou, M., & Sanders, N. (2023). Frequent supply chain disruptions and firm perfor-mance: the moderating role of exploitation, exploration and supply chain ambidexterity. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 53(10), 1261–1285.
Aslam, H., Khan, A. Q., Rashid, K., & Rehman, S. U. (2020). Achieving supply chain resilience: the role of supply chain ambidexterity and supply chain agility. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(6), 1185–1204.
Aslam, H., Khan, A. Q., Rashid, K., & Rehman, S.-u. (2020). Achieving supply chain resilience: the role of supply chain ambidexterity and supply chain agility. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(6), 1185–1204.
Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Machado, V. C. (2011). The influence of green practices on supply chain performance: A case study approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 850–871.
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Manage-ment Journal, 26(3), 197–218.
Brandon‐Jones, E., Squire, B., Autry, C. W., & Petersen, K. J. (2014). A contingent resource‐based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 55–73.
Bui, T.-D., Tsai, F. M., Tseng, M.-L., Tan, R. R., Yu, K. D. S., & Lim, M. K. (2021). Sustainable supply chain manage-ment towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: A data driven analysis. Sustainable Production and Con-sumption, 26, 373–410.
Carissimi, M. C., Creazza, A., & Colicchia, C. (2023). Crossing the chasm: Investigating the relationship between sus-tainability and resilience in supply chain management. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 7, 100098.
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theo-ry. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emo-tion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217.
Choksy, U. S., Ayaz, M., Al-Tabbaa, O., & Parast, M. (2022). Supplier resilience under the COVID-19 crisis in apparel global value chain (GVC): The role of GVC governance and supplier’s upgrading. Journal of Business Research, 150, 249–267.
Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain.
Elkington, J., & Rowlands, I. H. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century busi-ness. Alternatives Journal, 25(4), 42.
Gadde, L. E., & Wynstra, F. (2018). Purchasing management and the role of uncertainty. IMP Journal, 12(1), 127–147.
Gold, S., Seuring, S., & Beske, P. (2010). Sustainable supply chain management and inter‐organizational resources: a literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(4), 230–245.
Henseler, J., & Fassott, G. (2010). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: An illustration of available proce-dures. In Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 713–735). Springer.
Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak. International Journal of Production Re-search, 58(10), 2904–2915.
Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312.
Khan, A., Chen, C. C., Lu, K. H., Wibowo, A., Chen, S. C., & Ruangkanjanases, A. (2021). Supply chain ambidexterity and green SCM: moderating role of network capabilities. Sustainability, 13(11), 5974.
Khan, M. (2024). Enhancing supply chain resilience: The role of SC-ambidexterity and SC-agility. Journal of Future Sustainability, 4(4), 189–214.
Kholaif, M. M. N. H. K., Ming, X., & Getele, G. K. (2023). Post COVID-19's opportunities for customer-centric green supply chain management and customers' resilience; the moderate effect of corporate social responsibil-ity. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(6), 1397–1424.
Klein, C. (2021). Companies must focus on resiliency, profitability and sustainability. World Economic Forum.
Kreye, M. E. (2017). Can you put too much on your plate? Uncertainty exposure in servitized triads. International Jour-nal of Operations & Production Management, 37(12), 1722–1740.
Kristal, M. M., Huang, X., & Roth, A. V. (2010). The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 415–429.
Luo, F. (2024). Study on the Impact Mechanism of Supply Chain Integration on Supply Chain Resilience. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, (8), 398–407.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
Ojha, D., Acharya, C., & Cooper, D. (2018). Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity: Mediating role of supply chain organizational learning and moderating role of uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 215–231.
Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply man-agement and organizational sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 19–37.
Ponis, S. T., & Koronis, E. (2012). Supply Chain Resilience? Definition of concept and its formative elements. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 28(5), 921–935.
Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143.
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.
Sarkis, J., Cohen, M. J., Dewick, P., & Schröder, P. (2020). A brave new world: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for transitioning to sustainable supply and production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 159, 104894.
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2014). Measuring and managing sustainability performance of supply chains: Review and sustainability supply chain management framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 232–241.
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain man-agement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710.
Sharma, V., Raut, R. D., Mangla, S. K., Narkhede, B. E., Luthra, S., & Gokhale, R. (2021). A systematic literature re-view to integrate lean, agile, resilient, green and sustainable paradigms in the supply chain management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1191–1212.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise per-formance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
Tukamuhabwa, B. R., Stevenson, M., Busby, J., & Zorzini, M. (2015). Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study. International Journal of Production Research, 53(18), 5592–5623.
Wilhelm, H., Schloemer, M., & Maurer, I. (2015). How dynamic capabilities affect the effectiveness and efficiency of operating routines under high and low levels of environmental dynamism. British Journal of Management, 26(2), 327–345.
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Manage-ment, 22(3), 265–289.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Journal of Future Sustainability | 📅 Year: 2026 | 📖 Volume: 6 | 📄 Issue: 2 | 👁️ Views: 182 | 📊 Crossref:

Related Articles:
  • Supply chain ambidexterity, business performance and mediating role of lean and agile supply chain strategies
  • The effect of supply chain risk management on supply chain resilience: The intervening part of Internet-of-Things
  • A survey on Australian supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic and key resilience strategies
  • The effect of supplier integration, manager transformational leadership on supply chain performance
  • Resilience and sustainability of supply chain management in the Indian automobile industry

📝 Ready to share your research?

Journal of Future Sustainability is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com