Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » The impact of the Weibull distribution on the performance of the single-factor ANOVA model

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2653)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (49)
  • SCI (50)

IJIEC Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 17 (77)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (26)
    • ▼ Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (77)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(84)
Financial performance(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 1 Issue 2 pp. 185-198, 2010

The impact of the Weibull distribution on the performance of the single-factor ANOVA model Pages 185-198 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Gray Black, Derek Ard, James Smith, Schibik Schibik

📋 Author Affiliations:
Gray Black1, Derek Ard2, James Smith3, Tim Schibik1
1 School of Business, University of Sothern Indiana, IN, United States, India
2 National Laboratories, Oak Ridge, TN, United States, N/A
3 Department of Industrial Engineering, Tennessee Technical University, TN, United States, N/A
doi 10.5267/j.ijiec.2010.02.007
8 Source: Scopus
Crossref 5 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: ANOVA robustness, Weibull, ANOVA normality assumption, Shape parameter, Scale parameter, Normality violation

Abstract: This paper conducts a simulation study of the effects of violating the ANOVA normality assumption in the presence of Weibull data. Twelve specific Weibull distributions, characterizing the life data of a variety of real-world products and systems, are investigated. Confidence intervals on test significance and power are generated and compared against intervals from normally distributed data. The ANOVA procedure is found to be robust in the majority of cases. Furthermore, a designed experiment is conducted to isolate the effects of the Weibull shape and scale parameters within the preceding study. The shape parameter is found to have a significant effect on significance and power, whereas the scale parameter does not have a significant effect at the target α = 0.05 test significance level.

How to cite this paper
APA: Black, G., Ard, D., Smith, J & Schibik, S. (2010). The impact of the Weibull distribution on the performance of the single-factor ANOVA model. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 1(2), 185-198.
Chicago/Turabian: Black, G., Ard, D., Smith, J & Schibik, S. 2010. "The impact of the Weibull distribution on the performance of the single-factor ANOVA model." International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 1, no. 2 (2010): 185-198.
AMA: Black, G., Ard, D., Smith, J & Schibik, S. The impact of the Weibull distribution on the performance of the single-factor ANOVA model. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2010;1(2):185-198.

References
Barringer and Associates, Inc. (2001). Weibull Reliability Database for failure data for various components. Computer database (http://www.barringer1.com/wdbase.htm).

Brown, M. B., & Forsythe, A. B. (1974). The small sample behavior of some statistics which test the equality of several means. Technometrics, 16, 385-389.

David, F.N., & N.L. Johnson. (1951). The effect of Non-normality on the Power Function of the F-Test the Analysis of Variance. Biometrika, 38, 43-57.

Donaldson, T. S. (1968). Robustness of the F-test to Errors of both kinds and the Correlation Between the Numerator and the Denominator of the F-Ratio. Journal of American Statistical Association (June), 660-676.

Driscoll, W. C. (1990). Bootstrapping: An Alternative to ANOVA. Computers & Industrial Engineering 19, 562-566.

Driscoll, W. C. (1996). Robustness of the ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer statistical tests. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 31, 265-268.

Games, P. A., & Lucas, P.A. (1966). Power of the Analysis of Variance of Independent Groups and Non-normal and Normally Transformed Data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 26(2), 311-327.

Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R. (1972). Consequences of Failure to meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and Covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42 (3), 237-288.

Harwell, M., Rubinstein, E., Hayes, W., & Olds, C. (1992). Summarizing Monte Carlo Results in Methodological Research: The One- and Two-Factor Fixed Effects ANOVA Cases. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17(4), 315-339.

James, G.S. (1951). The Comparison of Several Groups of Observations When the Ratios of the Population Variances are Unknown. Biometrika, 38, 324-329.

Kruskal, W. H. & Wallis, W. A. (1952) Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 583–621.

Li Li (2007). Monte Carlo Methods for Modified ANOVA. Thesis. Kaiserslautern University of Technology, Germany.

Lix, Lisa M., Keselman, J. C. & Keselman, H.J. (1996). Consequences of Assumption Violations Revisited: A Quantitative Review of Alternatives to the One-Way Analysis of Variance F-Test. Review of Educational Research (Winter), 579-620.

Mendes, M. (2007). The Effects of Non-Normality on Type III Error for Comparing Independent Means. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 2(4), 444-454.

Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Design and Analysis of Experiments (5th Edition). John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, NY. 684pp.

Montgomery, D. & George Runger (2010). Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers (5th Edition), John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, NY. 784pp.

Srivastava, A. B. L. (1959). Effect of Non-normality on the Power Function of the Analysis of Variance. Biometrika 46, 114-122.

Smith, J.R. (1966). The Robustness to Non-Normality of the Size and Power of the F-Test in the One-way Fixed Effects Analysis of Variance. M.S. Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute.

Welch, B. L. (1951). On the comparison of several mean values: An alternative approach. Biometrika, 38, 330-336.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | 📅 Year: 2010 | 📖 Volume: 1 | 📄 Issue: 2 | 👁️ Views: 3546 | 📊 Crossref: 5

Related Articles:
  • Modeling quality control data using mixture of parametrical distributions
  • An investigation on different factors influencing growth of banking deposits
  • A Semi parametric approach to dual modeling
  • Do MENA stock market returns follow a random walk process?
  • The impact of Weibull data and autocorrelation on the performance of the Shewhart and exponentially weighted moving average control charts

📝 Ready to share your research?

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com