Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » A model for emergency supplies reserves with option contracts: Considering supplier loss aversion and government inequity aversion

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

IJIEC Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 17 (113)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (26)
      • Issue 4 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (77)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 17 Issue 3 pp. 999-1022, 2026

A model for emergency supplies reserves with option contracts: Considering supplier loss aversion and government inequity aversion Pages 999-1022 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Yang Liu, Lecheng Yin, Meiyan Li, Quanyao Cao

📋 Author Affiliations:
Y. Liu ORCID 1, L. Yin ORCID 2, M. Li ORCID 2, Q. Cao ORCID 2
1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China, Institute of Public Safety and Emergency Management, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China
2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China
doi 10.5267/j.ijiec.2026.5.003
Crossref 1 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Emergency Supplies Reserves, Joint Public-Private Model, Humanitarian Channel Coordination, Loss Aversion, Inequity Aversion

Abstract: Public-private cooperation is vital for emergency stocks, yet complex behavioral characteristics of governments and suppliers often affect system reliability. Existing research has mainly examined supplier loss aversion, with limited attention to government inequity aversion. This paper investigates how to strategically reserve and procure emergency supplies under the roles of supplier loss aversion and government inequity aversion. We develop an option contract-based emergency stockpiling model that incorporates a loss-averse supplier and an inequity-averse government. Moreover, comparisons between the decisions yield the boundary conditions for supplier understocking and overstocking. The conditions for humanitarian channel coordination under both disadvantageous and advantageous inequity aversion are derived, with some overlapping and others differing between both situations. A case study using laboratory simulations is conducted. The results indicate that higher loss aversion and optimism levels decrease the supplier's best reserve quantity; disadvantageous (advantageous) inequity aversion increases (reduces) the government's optimal purchase of physical options. The boundary conditions for supplier understocking and overstocking depend on the interaction between government inequity aversion and supplier loss aversion. Finally, some targeted managerial insights are proposed to coordinate the humanitarian supply chains, select appropriate suppliers, and evaluate the behavioral preferences of participating members.

How to cite this paper
APA: Liu, Y., Yin, L., Li, M & Cao, Q. (2026). A model for emergency supplies reserves with option contracts: Considering supplier loss aversion and government inequity aversion. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 17(3), 999-1022.
Chicago/Turabian: Liu, Y., Yin, L., Li, M & Cao, Q. 2026. "A model for emergency supplies reserves with option contracts: Considering supplier loss aversion and government inequity aversion." International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 17, no. 3 (2026): 999-1022.
AMA: Liu, Y., Yin, L., Li, M & Cao, Q. A model for emergency supplies reserves with option contracts: Considering supplier loss aversion and government inequity aversion. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2026;17(3):999-1022.

References
Aghajani, M., Torabi, S. A., & Heydari, J. (2020). A novel option contract integrated with supplier selection and inventory prepositioning for humanitarian relief supply chains. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 71, Article 100780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.100780
Ai, Y., Tian, J., & Feng, G. (2024). Pre-positioning and procurement strategy for relief supplies with the critical raw material participation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 187, Article 109780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109780
Bai, T., Feng, G., & Wu, M. (2025). A newsvendor model with multiple reference points: Target-setting for aspirational newsvendors. European Journal of Operational Research, 320(3), 655–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.09.015
Bai, T., Kirshner, S. N., & Wu, M. (2021). Managing overconfident newsvendors: A target‐setting approach. Production and Operations Management, 30(11), 3967–3986. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13490
Bai, T., Wu, M., & Zhu, S. (2019). Pricing and ordering by a loss averse newsvendor with reference dependence. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 131, 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.10.003
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. The American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.166
Chanta, S., Mayorga, M. E., Kurz, M. E., & McLay, L. A. (2011). The minimum p-envy location problem: A new model for equitable distribution of emergency resources. IIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering, 1(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2011.609522
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 817–869. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302760193904
Chen, X., Hao, G., & Li, L. (2014). Channel coordination with a loss-averse retailer and option contracts. International Journal of Production Economics, 150, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.004
Cheng, J., Feng, X., & Bai, X. (2021). Modeling equitable and effective distribution problem in humanitarian relief logistics by robust goal programming. International Journal of Production Economics, 155, Article 107183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107183
Cui, T. H., Raju, J. S., & Zhang, Z. (2007). Fairness and channel coordination. Management Science, 53(8), 1303–1314. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0697
Đula, I., & Größler, A. (2021). Inequity aversion in dynamically complex supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(1), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.038
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151
Feng, T., Keller, L. R., & Zheng, X. (2011). Decision making in the newsvendor problem: A cross-national laboratory study. Omega, 39(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.02.003
Gao, X., & Tian, J. (2018). Multi-period incentive contract design in the agent emergency supplies reservation strategy with asymmetric information. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 120, 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.030
Ghavamifar, A., Torabi, S. A., & Moshtari, M. (2022). A hybrid relief procurement contract for humanitarian logistics. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 167, Article 102916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102916
Gutjahr, W. J., & Fischer, S. (2018). Equity and deprivation costs in humanitarian logistics. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(1), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.03.019
Hu, B., Meng, C., Xu, D., & Son, Y. J. (2016). Three-echelon supply chain coordination with a loss-averse retailer and revenue sharing contracts. International Journal of Production Economics, 179, 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.001
Hu, S., & Dong, Z. S. (2019). Supplier selection and pre-positioning strategy in humanitarian relief. Omega, 83, 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.10.011
Hu, Z., Tian, J., & Feng, G. (2019). A relief supplies purchasing model based on a put option contract. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.015
Huang, H., Wu, D., & Xu, H. (2025). Signaling or not? The pricing strategy under fairness concerns and cost information asymmetry. European Journal of Operational Research, 321(3), 789–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.10.006
Huang, M., Smilowitz, K., & Balcik, B. (2012). Models for relief routing: Equity, efficiency and efficacy. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.004
Jian, J., Li, B., Zhang, N., & Su, J. (2021). Decision-making and coordination of green closed-loop supply chain with fairness concern. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, Article 126779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126779
John, L., & Gurumurthy, A. (2022). Are quantity flexibility contracts with discounts in the presence of spot market procurement relevant for the humanitarian supply chain? An exploration. Annals of Operations Research, 315, 1775–1802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04058-4
John, L., Gurumurthy, A., Mateen, A., & Narayanamurthy, G. (2022). Improving the coordination in the humanitarian supply chain: exploring the role of options contract. Annals of Operations Research, 319, 15–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03778-3
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kirshner, S. N., & Ovchinnikov, A. (2019). Heterogeneity of reference effects in the competitive newsvendor problem. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 21(3), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2018.0708
Kirshner, S. N., & Shao, L. (2019). The overconfident and optimistic price-setting newsvendor. European Journal of Operational Research, 277(1), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.023
Koszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1133–1165. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/121.4.1133
Liang, L., Wang, X., & Gao, J. (2012). An option contract pricing model of relief material supply chain. Omega, 40(5), 594–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.11.004
Liu, Y., Tian, J., & Feng, G. (2022). Pre-positioning strategies for relief supplies in a relief supply chain. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(7), 1457–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1920343
Liu, Y., Tian, J., Feng, G., & Ma, S. (2019). A relief supplies purchasing model via option contracts. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, Article 106009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106009
Liu, Y., Tian, J., & Yu, N. (2025). Prepositioning of emergency supplies and channel coordination: Considering a loss-averse supplier and government penalty. International Journal of Production Economics, 282, Article 109536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109536
Liu, Y., Tian, J., & Yu, N. (2023). Emergency supplies prepositioning via a government-led supply chain with a loss-averse supplier with anchoring. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 182, Article 109362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109362
Liu, Y., Tian, J., Yu, N., & Feng, G. (2024). A cost-effective model for emergency supplies prepositioning and procurement pricing via option contracts. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 194, Article 110369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110369
Lodree, E. J., & Taskin, S. (2008). An insurance risk management framework for disaster relief and supply chain disruption inventory planning. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(5), 674–680. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602377
Loewenstein, G. F., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 426–441.
Long, X., & Nasiry, J. (2015). Prospect theory explains newsvendor behavior: The role of reference points. Management Science, 61(12), 3009–3012. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2050
Long, Y., Sun, P., & Xu, G. (2024). Dynamic heterogeneous resource allocation in post-disaster relief operation considering fairness. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 62, Article 102858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102858
Mandal, P., Kaul, R., & Jain, T. (2018). Stocking and pricing decisions under endogenous demand and reference point effects. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(1), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.053
Meng, Q., Kao, Z., Guo, Y., & Wu, Z. (2023). An emergency supplies procurement strategy based on a bidirectional option contract. *Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 87*, Article 101515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101515
Nagarajan, M., & Shechter, S. (2014). Prospect theory and the newsvendor problem. Management Science, 60(4), 1057–1062. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1804
Nikkhoo, F., Bozorgi, A. A., & Heydari, J. (2018). Coordination of relief items procurement in humanitarian logistic based on quantity flexibility contract. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.024
Patra, T. D. P., & Jha, J. K. (2022). Bidirectional option contract for prepositioning of relief supplies under demand uncertainty. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 163, Article 107861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107861
Pavlov, V., Katok, E., & Zhang, W. (2022). Optimal contract under asymmetric information about fairness. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 24(1), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0945
Pournader, M., Narayanan, A., Keblis, M. F., & Fahimnia, B. (2024). Decision bias and bullwhip effect in multiechelon supply chains: Risk preference models. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 9229–9243. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3292348
Qiu, R., Yu, Y., & Sun, M. (2021). Joint pricing and stocking decisions for a newsvendor problem with loss aversion and reference point effect. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42(2), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3233
Rabbani, M., Arani, H. V., & Rafiei, H. (2015). Option contract application in emergency supply chains. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 20(4), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2015.068523
Riley, C., Summers, B., & Duxbury, D. (2020). Capital gains overhang with a dynamic reference point. Management Science, 66(10), 4726–4745. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3404
Sharma, A., Dwivedi, G., & Singh, A. (2019). Game-theoretic analysis of a two-echelon supply chain with option contract under fairness concerns. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, Article 106096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106096
Sphere Project. (2011). Sphere handbook: Humanitarian charter and minimum standards in disaster response. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4ed8ae592.html
Uppari, B., & Hasija, S. (2019). Modeling newsvendor behavior: A prospect theory approach. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 21(3), 479–711. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0701
Wan, N. (2024). Option contracts in managing a humanitarian relief supply chain: Double vs. bidirectional. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 11(1), Article 2317260. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2024.2317260
Wang, X., Li, F., Liang, L., Huang, Z., & Ashley, A. (2015). Pre-purchasing with option contract and coordination in a relief supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.031
Wang, X., Fan, Y., Liang, L., de Leeuw, S., & van Wassenhove, L. N. (2019). Augmenting fixed framework agreements in humanitarian logistics with a bonus contract. Production & Operations Management, 28(8), 1921–1938. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13024
Wang, Z., Leng, L., Ding, J., & Wu, S. (2023). Study on location-allocation problem and algorithm for emergency supplies considering timeliness and fairness. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 177, Article 109078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109078
Wei, L., Chen, M., Du, S., & Liu, Y. (2022). By-state fairness in selling to the newsvendor. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 159, Article 102634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102634
Wu, M., Bai, T., & Zhu, S. X. (2018). A loss averse competitive newsvendor problem with anchoring. Omega, 81, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.10.003
Yu, N., Tian, J., Feng, G., & Liu, Y. (2025). Managing production capacity reserves for emergency supplies: A public-private option contract model with a loss-averse supplier. *Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 98*, Article 102164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102164
Zhang, W., Shi, X., Huang, A., Hua, G., & Teunter, R. H. (2023). Optimal stock and capital reserve policies for emergency medical supplies against epidemic outbreaks. European Journal of Operational Research, 304(1), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.026
Zhu, L., Gong, Y., Xu, Y., & Gu, J. (2019). Emergency relief routing models for injured victims considering equity and priority. Annals of Operations Research, 283, 1573–1606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3089-3
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | 📅 Year: 2026 | 📖 Volume: 17 | 📄 Issue: 3 | 👁️ Views: 206 | 📊 Crossref: 1

Related Articles:
  • The impacts of supply chain practices on the sustainability performance of small and medium enterprises
  • A survey of the methods, aspects and trends of life insurance efficiency papers
  • Unlocking project SDGs in furniture manufacturing: The mediating role of green innovation resilience
  • Inventory control of deteriorating items: A review
  • A brief review on industrial remanufacturing of structural and functional components: Wire-Arc Additive Manufacturing Technique

📝 Ready to share your research?

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com