Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » A dynamic optimization adjustment method for electricity purchase prices of small and medium-sized user agents considering price risk losses

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

IJIEC Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 17 (113)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (26)
      • Issue 4 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (77)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 17 Issue 3 pp. 887-902, 2026

A dynamic optimization adjustment method for electricity purchase prices of small and medium-sized user agents considering price risk losses Pages 887-902 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Taorong Gong, Songsong Chen, Haijing Zhang, Minjiang Xiang

📋 Author Affiliations:
Taorong Gong1, Songsong Chen ORCID 1, Haijing Zhang ORCID 2, Minjiang Xiang2
1 National Key Laboratory of Power Grid Safety (China Electric Power Research Institute), Beijing 100192, China
2 State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company Marketing Service Center (Metering Center), Jinan 250001, China
doi 10.5267/j.ijiec.2026.5.009
Crossref 1 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Agency power purchase, Dynamic electricity price optimization, Price risk loss, Small and medium-sized users

Abstract: With the deepening of power market reform, small and medium-sized users have gradually been included in the agency power purchase mechanism. The contradiction between price fluctuation risks, load uncertainty and cost control faced by these users has become increasingly prominent. These users are numerous, but their loads are scattered and their risk tolerance is weak. The traditional static electricity price model is difficult to adapt to the dynamic changes of the market and the differentiated demands of users. Therefore, this paper proposes a dynamic adjustment framework for the agency power purchase electricity prices of small and medium-sized users, which includes market perception, risk quantification, optimization decision-making, and execution feedback. This framework is based on the price risk quantification model, multi-objective optimization function, and improved dynamic weight algorithm, integrating historical price trend weighting, risk cost trade-off, and real-time load response feedback, to achieve the collaborative optimization of power purchase costs, risk losses, and user satisfaction. Experimental results show that this method performs well in three typical scenarios of stability, fluctuation, and extreme conditions: the price risk loss is reduced by 32.7% to 41.2%, the average power purchase cost is stable at 0.38 yuan/kWh to 0.42 yuan/kWh, user satisfaction reaches 92.3%, and the comprehensive performance is significantly superior to the traditional fixed electricity price method, single cost optimization method, and static risk control method. In scenarios of price sudden change and large load peak-valley difference, the risk loss is still lower than 8.5%, the response delay is controlled within 50 ms, demonstrating good robustness and real-time performance. This research provides an efficient and adaptive electricity price adjustment technical path for agency power purchase of small and medium-sized users, which can be applied to various types of power market environments, differentiated user groups, and dynamic load demands.

How to cite this paper
APA: Gong, T., Chen, S., Zhang, H & Xiang, M. (2026). A dynamic optimization adjustment method for electricity purchase prices of small and medium-sized user agents considering price risk losses. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 17(3), 887-902.
Chicago/Turabian: Gong, T., Chen, S., Zhang, H & Xiang, M. 2026. "A dynamic optimization adjustment method for electricity purchase prices of small and medium-sized user agents considering price risk losses." International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 17, no. 3 (2026): 887-902.
AMA: Gong, T., Chen, S., Zhang, H & Xiang, M. A dynamic optimization adjustment method for electricity purchase prices of small and medium-sized user agents considering price risk losses. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2026;17(3):887-902.

References
Abishu, H.N., Seid, A.M., Márquez-Sánchez, S., Fernandez, J.H., Corchado, J.M., & Erbad, A. (2024). Multi-Agent DRL-based Multi-Objective Demand Response Optimization for Real-Time Energy Management in Smart Homes. 2024 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), Ayia Napa, Cyprus, 1210-1217.
Algarvio, H., & Lopes, F. (2023). Bilateral contracting and price-based demand response in multi-agent electricity markets: A study on time-of-use tariffs. Energies, 16(2), 645.
Ali, G.G., El-adaway, I.H., Sims, C., Holladay, J.S., & Chen, C. (2022). Studying dynamic pricing in electrical power markets with distributed generation: Agent-based modeling and reinforcement-learning approach. Journal of Energy Engineering, 148(5), 04022030.
Amanbek, Y., Kalakova, A., Zhakiyeva, S., Kayisli, K., Zhakiyev, N., & Friedrich, D. (2022). Distribution locational marginal price based transactive energy management in distribution systems with smart prosumers-A multi-agent approach. Energies, 15(7), 2404.
Amer, A.A., Shaban, K., & Massoud, A.M. (2022). DRL-HEMS: Deep reinforcement learning agent for demand response in home energy management systems considering customers and operators perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 14(1), 239-250.
Aranha, A.S., Street, A., Fernandes, C., & Granville, S. (2022). Risk-constrained optimal dynamic trading strategies under short-and long-term uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 38(2), 1474-1486.
Cheng, L., Huang, P., Zhang, M., Yang, R., & Wang, Y. (2025). Optimizing electricity markets through game-theoretical methods: Strategic and policy implications for power purchasing and generation enterprises. Mathematics, 13(3), 373.
Cheng, L., Wei, X., Li, M., Tan, C., Yin, M., Shen, T., & Zou, T. (2024). Integrating Evolutionary Game-Theoretical Methods and Deep Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Strategy Optimization in User-Side Electricity Markets: A Comprehensive Review. Mathematics, 12(20), 3241.
Du, Y., Mendes, N., Rasouli, S., Mohammadi, J., & Moura, P. (2024). Federated learning assisted distributed energy optimization. IET Renewable Power Generation, 18(14), 2524-2538.
Fang, D., & Wang, P. (2023). Optimal real-time pricing and electricity package by retail electric providers based on social learning. Energy Economics, 117, 106442.
Hashemnezhad, M., Delkhosh, H., & Moghaddam, M.P. (2025). Aggregator pricing strategy for community energy management based on multi-agent reinforcement learning considering customer loss or gain. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 41, 101607.
Izmirlioglu, Y., Pham, L., Son, T.C., & Pontelli, E. (2024). A survey of multi-agent systems for smartgrids. Energies, 17(15), 3620.
Jakobsson, M. (2025). Adaptive Pricing in Online Markets through Hybrid Reinforcement Learning: A Modular Framework for Transitioning from Static to Dynamic Strategies under Data Constraints.
Jia, S., Peng, K., Zhang, X., Li, Y., & Xing, L. (2022). Dynamic pricing strategy and regional energy consumption optimization based on different stakeholders. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 141, 108199.
Liu, J., Hu, H., Yu, S.S., & Trinh, H. (2023). Electricity pricing and its role in modern smart energy system design: A review. Designs, 7(3), 76.
Long, L., Li, K., Zhu, Y., Ma, J., Ji, C., & Yong, W. (2023). Data Governance Method and Application for Agency Power Purchase Business. 2023 6th International Conference on Power and Energy Applications (ICPEA), IEEE, 291-296.
Parandeh, K., Bagheri, A., & Jadid, S. (2023). Optimal day-ahead dynamic pricing of grid-connected residential renewable energy resources under different metering mechanisms. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 11(1), 168-178.
Rezazadeh, A., Li, Z., Lou, A., Zhao, Y., Wei, W., & Bao, Y. (2025). Collaborative Memory: Multi-User Memory Sharing in LLM Agents with Dynamic Access Control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18279.
Saini, V.K., Elshamy, A.R., Al-Sumaiti, A.S., & Kumar, R. (2025). Community-Oriented Energy Trading Strategy in Multiagent Cloud Energy Storage Framework. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 21(11), 8407-8418.
Salazar, E.J., Samper, M.E., & Patiño, H.D. (2023). Dynamic customer demand management: A reinforcement learning model based on real-time pricing and incentives. Renewable Energy Focus, 46, 39-56.
Shayan, M.E., Najafi, G., Ghobadian, B., Gorjian, S., Mamat, R., & Ghazali, M.F. (2022). Multi-microgrid optimization and energy management under boost voltage converter with Markov prediction chain and dynamic decision algorithm. Renewable Energy, 201, 179-189.
Shuai, W. (2022). Pricing game of smart charging services for risk-averse users in the smart grid. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, 31(17), 2350052.
Timilsina, A., & Silvestri, S. (2022). Prospect theory-inspired automated p2p energy trading with q-learning-based dynamic pricing. GLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 4836-4841.
Wang, H., Wang, C., Sun, W., & Khan, M.Q. (2022b). Energy pricing and management for the integrated energy service provider: a stochastic stackelberg game approach. Energies, 15(19), 7326.
Wang, J., Wu, J., & Shi, Y. (2022a). A Novel Energy Management Optimization Method for Commercial Users Based on Hybrid Simulation of Electricity Market Bidding. Energies, 15(12), 4207.
Wang, P., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Lan, Y., Huang, Z., Tang, D., & Liang, Y. (2025). Market malicious bidding user detection based on multi-agent reinforcement learning. Frontiers in Computer Science, 7, 1670238.
Yarar, N., Bahceci, S., Yoldas, Y., & Onen, A. (2025). A Three-Level A Stackelberg Game with Virtual Power Plant Clusters Multi-Agent Trading Strategy. 2025 7th International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (ICHORA), IEEE, 1-7.
Zareein, M., Sahebkar, F.J., Nikoofard, A., & Amraee, T. (2022). Optimizing energy management in microgrids based on different load types in smart buildings. Energies, 16(1), 73.
Zeng, Y., Xu, Y., Shen, X., & Sun, H. (2022). Optimal time-of-use pricing for renewable energy-powered microgrids: A multi-agent evolutionary game theory-based approach. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 10(1), 162-174.
Zhan, W., Wang, Z., Deng, J., Liu, P., & Cui, D. (2024). Integrating system dynamics and agent-based modeling: A data-driven framework for predicting electric vehicle market penetration and GHG emissions reduction under various incentives scenarios. Applied Energy, 372, 123749.
Zhou, K., & Wen, L. (2022). Residential Electricity Pricing Based on Multi-Agent Simulation. In: Smart Energy Management. Springer, Singapore, 183-202.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | 📅 Year: 2026 | 📖 Volume: 17 | 📄 Issue: 3 | 👁️ Views: 328 | 📊 Crossref: 1

Related Articles:
  • Federated learning for healthcare: A bibliometric analysis of privacy-preserving machine learning applications in medical imaging, electronic health records, and clinical diagnostics based on 200 highly cited publications (20 ...
  • A survey of the methods, aspects and trends of life insurance efficiency papers
  • Unlocking project SDGs in furniture manufacturing: The mediating role of green innovation resilience
  • Inventory control of deteriorating items: A review
  • Supply chain collaboration: A state-of-the-art literature review

📝 Ready to share your research?

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com