Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » Pricing and emission reduction decisions for remanufacturing supply chain based on consumer preferences and blockchain technology

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (562)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2648)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (47)
  • SCI (50)

IJIEC Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 17 (77)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (26)
    • ▼ Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (77)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Knowledge Management(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (1)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (57)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 17 Issue 2 pp. 455-478, 2026

Pricing and emission reduction decisions for remanufacturing supply chain based on consumer preferences and blockchain technology Pages 455-478 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Yanhua Feng, Lei Wan

📋 Author Affiliations:
Yanhua Feng1, Lei Wang ORCID 2
1 School of Intelligent Manufacturing, Jianghan University, Wuhan, 430056, China
2 Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Equipment and Control Technology of Ministry of Education, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430081, China
doi 10.5267/j.ijiec.2026.3.007
Crossref 1 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Remanufacturing supply chain, Consumer sensitivity, Emission reduction, Blockchain, Cost sharing

Abstract: The present study constructs a remanufacturing supply chain framework that encompasses both manufacturer and retailer. We conduct an in-depth investigation into the influence exerted by blockchain platforms in the supply chain, in response to carbon reduction challenges initiated by manufacturers. By introducing parameters such as the proportion of joint emission reduction investment costs and blockchain unit verification fees, we perform a comprehensive analysis of the effects produced by consumer sensitivity and blockchain platforms on sales prices, recycling prices, carbon emission reduction, market demand, amount of recycled, and profits under different emission reduction modes. Research has revealed that irrespective of whether the manufacturer adopts blockchain platforms, wholesale prices, retail prices, carbon emission reduction, market demand, manufacturer's profit in the joint emission reduction model are always higher than those in individual emission reduction model, while recycling prices and amount of recycled remain unchanged. With retailer's share of the carbon reduction investment cost kept within an appropriate range, both profits of retailer and supply chain increase under joint emission reduction model. When a manufacturer introduces blockchain technology platforms, unit verification fees only affect wholesale prices and have no impact on retail prices, recycling prices, carbon emission reduction, and profits.

How to cite this paper
APA: Feng, Y & Wan, L. (2026). Pricing and emission reduction decisions for remanufacturing supply chain based on consumer preferences and blockchain technology. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 17(2), 455-478.
Chicago/Turabian: Feng, Y & Wan, L. 2026. "Pricing and emission reduction decisions for remanufacturing supply chain based on consumer preferences and blockchain technology." International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 17, no. 2 (2026): 455-478.
AMA: Feng, Y & Wan, L. Pricing and emission reduction decisions for remanufacturing supply chain based on consumer preferences and blockchain technology. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2026;17(2):455-478.

References
Azzi, R., Chamoun, R. K., & Sokhn, M. (2019). The power of a blockchain-based supply chain. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 135, 582-592.
Biswas, D., Jalali, H., Ansaripoor, A. H., & Giovanni, P. D. (2023). Traceability vs. sustainability in supply chains: the implications of blockchain. European Journal of Operational Research, 305(1), 128-147.
Casino, F., Kanakaris, V., & Dasajlis, T. K. (2021). Blockchain-based food supply chain traceability: a case study in the dairy sector. International Journal of Production Research, 59(19), 1-13.
Centobelli, P., Oropallo, E., Cerchione, R., Vecchio, P., & Secundo, G. (2021). Blockchain technology for bridging trust traceability and transparency in circular supply chain. Information & Management, 103508.
Chen, W. D., & Chen, C. (2021). Production decision of remanufacturing firms with carbon quota repurchase financing. Journal of Systems & Management, 30(5), 916-925.
Chen, W. D., & Xing, J. (2024). Pricing and coordination of construction machinery remanufacturing supply chain based on carbon quota repurchase financing. Operations Research and Management Science, 33(7), 8-15.
Cheng, Y. H., Yao, T., Pan, J. X., & Zhang,Y. F. (2025). Selling strategies for remanufactured products considering asymmetric retailers and corporate social responsibility. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 31(4), 1461-1475.
Choi, T. M., & Luo, S. Y. (2019). Data quality challenges for sustainable fashion supply chain operations in emerging markets: Roles of blockchain, government sponsors and environment taxes. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 131(11), 139-152.
D'Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. The American Economic Review, 78(5), 1133-1137.
Dong, J. F., Gao, S., Gao, G, C., & Yang, R. Y. (2021). Pricing decision of closed-loop supply chain under uncertainty of customer perceived value and recovery quality. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 27(8), 2476-2490.
Feng, Y. H. (2024). Pricing decision for recycling and remanufacturing supply chain considering consumer online consumption preferences and recycled products’quality. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 15, 931-950.
Handa, N., Singh, S. R., & Katariya, C. (2024). Sustainability in a reverse logistics inventory model with carbon emission, reliability and credit financing policy. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 8(4), 1269-1293.
Hu, Y. S., Li, S., Guo, H. S., & Zhang, L. Y. (2025). Dynamic pricing for perishable product in the presence of low-carbon preference. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 42(1), 88-101.
Li, C. J., & Li, F. (2024). Research on the effects of carbon reduction on the decisions of original/remanufacturers with carbon tax policy. Operations Research and Fuzziology, 14(1), 782-794.
Li, D., Cruz, J. M., & Ke, K. (2025). Closed-loop supply chain network model with recycling, re-manufacturing, refurbishing, and corporate social responsibility. Annals of Operations Research, 345, 247-275.
Li, J., Yi, L., & Xiao, Y. (2021). Research on information sharing mechanism of emission reduction in supply chain based on blockchain under information asymmetry. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 29(10), 131-139.
Li, P. H., Wang, W., & Xia, X. Q. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of carbon cap-and-trade and hybrid subsidy policies: The perspective of production, environment, and consumer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 468, 143074.
Li, Y. J., & Chen, T. (2021). Blockchain empowers supply chain: challenge, implementation path and prospect. Nankai Business Review, 24(5), 192-201.
Liang, X., Su, Y. T., Hu, X., & Yang, Q. (2025). Green closed-loop supply chain pricing and recycling channel selection considering blockchain and subsidies. Systems Engineering.
Liu, C. Y., Zhu, S. F., Gong, B. G., & Liu, Z. (2024). Pricing decision and smart contract of remanufacturing supply chain based on blockchain. Journal of Systems Engineering, 6, 868-884.
Liu, Y., Wang, P. S., Zhang, B.Y., & Jia, L.Y. (2025). Optimal remanufacturing mode selection and blockchain platform joining strategy of supply chain considering brand advantage. Computer Integrated Manufacturing System, 31(3), 1085-1101.
Lu, Z. Y., Jiang, Z. Z., & Zheng,T. X. (2025). Pricing decision of service-oriented manufacturing with customer perceived valueand remanufacturing capability. Journal of Systems & Management, 34(4), 928-940.
Michaud, C., Lierena, D., & Joly, I. (2013). Willingness to pay for environmental attributes of non-food agricultural products: A real choice experiment. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40(2), 313-329.
Niu, B., Shen, Z., & Xie, F. (2021). The value of blockchain and agricultural supply chain parties’ participation confronting random bacteria pollution. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, 128579.
Pazoki, M., & Zaccour, G. (2019). Extended producer responsibility: Regulation design and responsibility sharing policies for a supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236(1), 117516.
Saberri, S., Kouhzadeh, M., & Sarkis, J. (2018). Blockchain technology: a panacea or pariah for resources conservation and recycling?. Resources conservation & recycling, 130, 80-81.
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis,J., & Shen, L. J. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117-2135.
Shi, P., Han, K., & Hou, R. (2024). Co-op advertising and carbon emission reduction cost-sharing contracts in coor-dinating supply chain with reciprocal behavior under cap-and-trade regulation. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 27(12), 57-81.
Wang, Y. L., Zhu, Q. H., & Xia, X. Q. (2017). Supply chain upstream and downstream joint coordination contract game model based on consumer preference. Journal of Systems Engineering, 32(2),188-198.
Wen, X., & Siqin, T. (2020). How do product quality uncertainties affect the sharing economy platforms with risk considerations: A meanvariance analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 224, 107544.
Xie, X. F., Xu, X., Zhang, C., & Zhang, F. Y. (2025). Enhancing a triple capital-constrained supply chain performance: Alliance financing, profit distribution, and information structure. International Journal of Production Economics, 281, 109515.
Xu, Y. Y., & Wang, Y. (2022). Research on blockchain in cloud manufacturing resource allocation. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology,16(10), 2298-2309.
Yu, Y., Luo, Y., & Shi, Y. (2022). Adoption of blockchain technology in a two-stage supply chain: spillover effect on workforce. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 161,102685.
Zhang, H. C., & Han, X. Y. (2024). Optimization strategies of remanufacturing system considering consumers' environmental awareness under carbon tax policy. Operations Research and Management Science, 33(4), 63-69.
Zhang, H. Y., & Chen, J. (2022). Decision-making analysis of low carbon supply chain subsidies under different cooperation modes. Logistics Engineering and Management, 44(6), 53-58.
Zhang, Y. L., Cheng, Y. P., Xia, X. Q. & Zhang, J. R. (2025). Impact of blockchain technology on remanufacturing mode selection under carbon tax policies. Industrial Engineering Journal, 28(1), 133-146.
Zhang, Z. Y., & Yu, L. Y. (2025). Differential game study on strategies of low-carbon closed-loop supply chain altruistic information and government subsidy. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 5(39), 161-178.
Zhao, X. M., & Meng, X. X. (2021). Evolutionary game decision between manufacturer and remanufacturer in the authorization mode. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 29(2), 129-136.
Zhu, C., Ma, J., & Zhang, J. X. (2024). CER and coordination of new/remanufactured product in supply chain considering low-carbon and carbon tax preference under capacity constraints. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 30(2), 717-729.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | 📅 Year: 2026 | 📖 Volume: 17 | 📄 Issue: 2 | 👁️ Views: 542 | 📊 Crossref: 1

Related Articles:
  • Research on collaborative R&D decision making of photovoltaic industry supply chain considering green preference under carbon target regulation
  • Research on the decision-making of remanufacturing transformation considering the standardization of recycler under carbon tax policy
  • Blockchain technology adoption decision and coordination contract in green supply chain
  • Collaborative decision making of photovoltaic industry chain considering carbon quota sharing contract
  • Pricing and coordination of remanufacturing supply chain considering remanufacturing capacity and preferences under government mechanisms

📝 Ready to share your research?

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com