Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » Feature-based decision rules for control charts pattern recognition: A comparison between CART and QUEST algorithm

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (805)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (562)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2648)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (43)
  • SCI (48)

IJIEC Volumes

    • Volume 17 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (27)
    • Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • Volume 3 (77)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(169)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(84)
Financial performance(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (1)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (57)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (39)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations

ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 3 Issue 2 pp. 199-210 , 2012

Feature-based decision rules for control charts pattern recognition: A comparison between CART and QUEST algorithm Pages 199-210 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Monark Bag, Susanta Kumar Gauri, Shankar Chakraborty

📋 Author Affiliations:
Monark Bag¹, Shankar Chakraborty¹, Susanta Kumar Gauri²
¹ Department of Production Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700 032, India
² SQC and OR unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata-7000108, 203, B. T. Road, India
doi 10.5267/j.ijiec.2011.09.002
Crossmark
11 Source: Scopus

🔑 Keywords: CART, Control chart pattern, Decision tree, Pattern recognition, QUEST, Shape feature

Abstract: Control chart pattern (CCP) recognition can act as a problem identification tool in any manufacturing organization. Feature-based rules in the form of decision trees have become quite popular in recent years for CCP recognition. This is because the practitioners can clearly understand how a particular pattern has been identified by the use of relevant shape features. Moreover, since the extracted features represent the main characteristics of the original data in a condensed form, it can also facilitate efficient pattern recognition. The reported feature-based decision trees can recognize eight types of CCPs using extracted values of seven shape features. In this paper, a different set of seven most useful features is presented that can recognize nine main CCPs, including mixture pattern. Based on these features, decision trees are developed using CART (classification and regression tree) and QUEST (quick unbiased efficient statistical tree) algorithms. The relative performance of the CART and QUEST-based decision trees are extensively studied using simulated pattern data. The results show that the CART-based decision trees result in better recognition performance but lesser consistency, whereas, the QUEST-based decision trees give better consistency but lesser recognition performance.

How to cite this paper
APA: Bag, M., Gauri, S & Chakraborty, S. (2012). Feature-based decision rules for control charts pattern recognition: A comparison between CART and QUEST algorithm. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 3(2), 199-210.
Chicago/Turabian: Bag, M., Gauri, S & Chakraborty, S. 2012. "Feature-based decision rules for control charts pattern recognition: A comparison between CART and QUEST algorithm." International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 3, no. 2 (2012): 199-210.
AMA: Bag, M., Gauri, S & Chakraborty, S. Feature-based decision rules for control charts pattern recognition: A comparison between CART and QUEST algorithm. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2012;3(2):199-210.

References
Bank, J. (1989). Principles of Quality Control. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.

Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., & Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth and Brooks.

Cheng, C.S. (1997). A neural network approach for the analysis of control chart patterns. International Journal of Production Research, 35, 667-697.

Evans, J.R., & Lindsay, W.M. (1988). A framework for expert system development in statistical quality control. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 14, 335-343.

Gauri, S.K., & Chakraborty, S. (2006). Feature-based recognition of control chart patterns. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 51, 726-742.

Gauri, S.K., & Chakraborty, S. (2009). Recognition of control chart patterns using improved selection of features. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 56, 1577-1588.

Guh, R.S., Zorriassatine, F., Tannock, J.D.T., & O’Brien, C. (1999). On-line control chart pattern detection and discrimination - A neural network approach. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 13, 413-425.

Guh, R.S., & Shiue, Y.R. (2005). On-line identification of control chart patterns using self-organizing approaches. International Journal of Production Research, 43, 1225-1254.

Hassan, A., Nabi Baksh, M.S., Shaharoun, A.M., & Jamaluddin, H. (2003). Improved SPC chart pattern recognition using statistical features. International Journal of Production Research, 41, 1587-1603.

Hwarng, H.B., & Hubele, N.F. (1993). Back-propagation pattern recognizers for control charts: Methodology and performance. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 24, 219-235.

Lim, T.S., Loh, W.Y., & Shih, Y.S. (1997). An empirical comparison of decision trees and other classification methods. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Department of Statistics, Technical Report 979.

Loh, W.Y., & Shih, Y.S. (1997). Split selection methods for classification trees. Statistica Sinica, 7, 815-840.

Montgomery, D.C., & Peck, E.A. (1982). Introduction to linear regression analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Montgomery, D.C. (2001). Introduction to statistical quality control. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Nelson, L.S. (1984). The Shewhart control chart - Test for special causes. Journal of Quality Technology, 16, 237-239.

Nelson, L.S. (1985). Interpreting Shewhart control chart. Journal of Quality Technology, 17, 114-117.

Pacella, M., Semeraro, Q., & Anglani, A. (2004). Manufacturing quality control by means of a fuzzy ART network trained on natural process data. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 17, 83-96.

Perry, M.B., Spoerre, J.K., & Velasco, T. (2001). Control chart pattern recognition using back propagation artificial neural networks. International Journal of Production Research, 39, 3399-3418.

Pham, D.T., & Wani, M.A. (1997). Feature-based control chart pattern recognition. International Journal of Production Research, 35, 1875-1890.

Pham, D.T., & Oztemel, E. (1992a). XPC: An on-line expert system for statistical process control. International Journal of Production Research, 30, 2857-2872.

Pham, D.T., & Oztemel, E. (1992b). Control chart pattern recognition using neural networks. Journal of System Engineering, 2, 256-262.

Swift, J.A., & Mize, J.H. (1995). Out-of-control pattern recognition and analysis for quality control charts using LISP-based systems. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 28, 81-91.

Western Electric (1958). Statistical Quality Control Handbook. Indianapolis: Western Electric Company.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | Year: 2012 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 2 | Views: 2868 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Prioritization and selection of parameters for control chart implementation based on technical criticality and cost criticality
  • Developing a univariate approach to phase-I monitoring of fuzzy quality profiles
  • A new approach for product cost estimation using data envelopment analysis
  • Rapid Ant based clustering-genetic algorithm (RAC-GA) with local search for clustering problem
  • The impact of Weibull data and autocorrelation on the performance of the Shewhart and exponentially weighted moving average control charts

📝 Ready to share your research?

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines


Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com