Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » Constructing model robust mixture designs via weighted G-optimality criterion

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (421)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (101)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

IJIEC Volumes

    • Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
    • Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • Volume 3 (76)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • Volume 17 (51)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)

Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
optimization(87)
Sustainability(86)
Artificial intelligence(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(78)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2192)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(813)
India(793)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(478)
Malaysia(444)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(226)
Thailand(160)
United States(114)
Ukraine(110)
Turkey(110)
Egypt(106)
Peru(94)
Canada(93)
Morocco(86)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations

ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 10 Issue 4 pp. 473-490 , 2019

Constructing model robust mixture designs via weighted G-optimality criterion Pages 473-490 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Wanida Limmun, Boonorm Chomtee, John Borkowski

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2019.4.004

Keywords: Genetic algorithm, Model-robust design, Mixture experiment, G-optimality

Abstract: We propose and develop a new G-optimality criterion using the concept of weighted optimality criteria and certain additional generalizations. The goal of the weighted G-optimality is to minimize a weighted average of the maximum scaled prediction variance in the design region over a set of reduced models. A genetic algorithm (GA) is used for generating the weighted G-optimal exact designs in an experimental region for mixtures. The performance of the proposed GA designs is evaluated and compared to the performance of the designs produced by our genetic algorithm and the PROC OPTEX exchange algorithm of SAS/QC. The evaluation demonstrates the advantages of GA designs over the designs generated using exchange algorithm, showing that the proposed GA designs have better model-robust properties and perform better than the designs generated by the PROC OPTEX exchange algorithm.

How to cite this paper
Limmun, W., Chomtee, B & Borkowski, J. (2019). Constructing model robust mixture designs via weighted G-optimality criterion.International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations , 10(4), 473-490.

Refrences
Atkinson, A. C., Donev A. N., & Tobias, R. D. (2007). Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS. Oxford University Press Inc.
Anderson-Cook, C. M., Borror, C. M., & Jones, B. (2009). Graphical tool for assessing the sensitivity of response designs to model misspecification. Technometrics, 51(1), 75-87.
Borkowski, J. J. (2003). Using genetic algorithm to generate small exact response surface designs. Journal of Probability and Statistical Science, 1(1), 65-88.
Borkowski, J. J., Chomtee, B., & Turk, P. (2010). Using Weak and Strong Heredity to Generate Weighted Design Optimality Criteria for Response Surface Designs. Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, 10(2), 163-192.
Borkowski, J. J., & Piepel, G. F. (2009). Uniform designs for highly constrained mixture experiments. Journal of Quality Technology, 41(1), 1-13.
Chipman, H. A. (1996) Bayesian variable selection with related predictors. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 24(1), 17-36.
Chung, P. J., Goldfarb, H., & Montgomery, D. C. (2007). Optimal designs for mixture-process experiments with control and noise variables. Journal of Quality Technology, 39(3), 179-190.
Cornell, J. A. (2002) Experiments with Mixtures : Designs, Models, and the Analysis of Mixture Data. (3rd edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Drain, D., Carlyle, W. M., Montgomery, D. C., Borror, C., & Anderson-Cook, C. (2004). A genetic algorithm hybrid for constructing optimal response surface designs. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 20(7), 637-650.
DuMouchel, W., & Jones, B. (1994). A simple Bayesian modification of D-optimal design to reduce dependence on an assumed model. Technometrics, 36(1), 37-47.
Emmett, M., Goos, P., & Stillman. E. C. (2011). A weighted prediction-based selection criterion for response surface designs. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 27(5), 719–729.
Engelbrecht, A.P. (2002). Computational Intelligence: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989) Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley.
Goldfarb, H. B., Anderson-Cook, C. M., Borror, C. M., & Montgomery, D. C. (2004). Fraction of design space plots for assessing mixture and mixture-process designs. Journal of Quality Technology , 36(2), 169-179.
Goldfarb, H. B., Borro, C. M., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2005). Using genetic algorithms to generate mixture-process experimental designs involving control and noise variables. Journal of Quality Technology, 37(1), 60-74.
Haupt, R. L., & Haupt, S. E. (2004). Practical Genetic Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Heredia-Langner, A., Carlyle, W. M., Montgomery, D. C., Borror, C. M., & Runger, G. C. (2003). Genetic algorithms for the construction of D-optimal designs. Journal of Quality Technology, 35(1), 28-46.
Heredia-Langner, A., Montgomery, D. C., Carlyle, W. M., & Borror, C. M. (2004). Model-robust optimal designs: a genetic algorithm approach. Journal of Quality Technology, 36(3), 263-279.
Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. MIT Press.
Kiefer, J. (1959). Optimum experimental designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 21(2), 272-304.
Kiefer, J., & Wolfowitz, J. (1959). Optimum design in regression problems. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30(2), 271-294.
Kiefer, J., & Wolfowitz, J. (1960). The equivalence of two extremum problems. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 12(3), 363-366.
Kinnear, K. E. (1994). Advances in Genetic Programming. MIT Press.
Li, W., & Nachtsheim, C. J. (2000). Model-robust factorial designs. Technometrics, 42(4), 345-352.
Limmun, W., Borkowski, J. J., & Chomtee, B. (2013). Using a Genetic Algorithm to Generate D-optimal Designs for Mixture Experiments. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 29(7), 1055-1068.
The MathWorks. (2016). Matlab high performance numeric computation software. The MathWorks, Inc.
Michalewicz, Z. (1992). Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Springer-Verlag.
Morgan, J. P., & Wang, X. (2010). Weighted Optimality in Designed Experimentation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(492), 1566-1580.
Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2009). Response Surface Methodology : Process AND Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. (3rd edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ozol-Godfrey, A., Anderson-Cook, C.M., & Montgomery, D.C. (2005). Fraction of design space plots for examining model robustness. Journal of Quality Technology, 37(3), 223-235.
Park, Y., Montgomery, D. C., Fowler, J. W., & Borror, C. M. (2006). Cost-constrained G-efficient response surface designs for cuboidal regions. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22(2), 121-139.
Rodriguez, M., Montgomery, D.C., & Borror, C. M. (2009). Generating Experimental Designs Involving Control and Noise Variables using Genetic Algorithms. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 25(8), 1045-1065.
SAS Institute. (2012). SAS QC 14.1 user’s guide, Version 9. SAS Institute Inc.
Smith, W. F. (2005). Experimental Design for Formulation. The American Statistical Association and the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Smucker, B. J., Del Castillo, E., & Rosenberger, J. L. (2011). Exchange Algorithms for Constructing Model-Robust Experimental Designs. Journal of Quality Technology, 43(1), 1-15.
Snee, R. D. (1979). Experimental design for mixture systems with multicomponent constraints. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 8(4), 303-326.
Snee, R. D., & Rayner, A. A. (1982). Assessing the accuracy of mixture model regression calculations. Journal of Quality Technology , 14(2), 67-79.
Stallings, J. W. & Morgan, J. P. (2015). General weighted optimality of designed experiments. Biometrika, 102(4), 925-935.
Wheeler, R. E. (1972). Efficient experimental design. Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, Canada, August, 1972.
Zaharn, A., Anderson-Cook, C. M., & Myers, R. M. (2003). Faction of design space to assess prediction capability of response surface designs. Journal of Quality Technology, 35(4), 377-386.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | Year: 2019 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 4 | Views: 2245 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Optimization and prediction of sintering process parameters for magnetic ab ...
  • Quality-productivity decision making when turning of Inconel 718 aerospace ...
  • Optimization of multi-response dynamic systems using multiple regression-ba ...
  • A Semi parametric approach to dual modeling
  • A robust moving average iterative weighting method to analyze the effect of ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com