Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » Efficient priority rules for dynamic sequencing with sequence-dependent setups

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (51)
  • SCI (51)

IJIEC Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 17 (113)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (26)
      • Issue 4 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (77)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Sustainability(93)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
Trust(85)
TOPSIS(85)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 7 Issue 3 pp. 367-384, 2016

Efficient priority rules for dynamic sequencing with sequence-dependent setups Pages 367-384 PDF Download PDF

Authors: A. S. Xanthopoulos, D. E. Koulouriotis, A. Gasteratos, S. Ioannidis

📋 Author Affiliations:
A.S. Xanthopoulos ORCID 1, D.E. Koulouriotis ORCID 2, A. Gasteratos ORCID 1, S. Ioannidis1
1 Department of Production and Management Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, V. Sofias 12, Xanthi, 67100, Greece
2 School of Production Engineering and Management, Technical University of Crete, TUC University Campus, Chania, 73100, Greece
doi 10.5267/j.ijiec.2016.2.002
21 Source: Scopus
Crossref 9 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Discrete event simulation, Dispatching rules, Dynamic sequencing, Sequence-dependent setups

Abstract: This article addresses the problem of dynamic sequencing on n identical parallel machines with stochastic arrivals, processing times, due dates and sequence-dependent setups. The system operates under a completely reactive scheduling policy and the sequence of jobs is determined with the use of dispatching rules. Seventeen existing dispatching rules are considered including standard and setup-oriented rules. The performance of the system is evaluated by four metrics. An experimental study of the system is conducted where the effect of categorical and continuous system parameters on the objective functions is examined. In light of the results from the simulation experiments, a parameterized priority rule is introduced and tested. The simulation output is analyzed using rigorous statistical methods and the proposed rule is found to produce significantly better results regarding the metrics of mean cycle time and mean tardiness in single machine cases. In respect to three machine cases, the proposed rule matches the performance of the best rule from the set of existing rules which were studied in this research for three metrics.

How to cite this paper
APA: Xanthopoulos, A., Koulouriotis, D., Gasteratos, A & Ioannidis, S. (2016). Efficient priority rules for dynamic sequencing with sequence-dependent setups. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 7(3), 367-384.
Chicago/Turabian: Xanthopoulos, A., Koulouriotis, D., Gasteratos, A & Ioannidis, S. 2016. "Efficient priority rules for dynamic sequencing with sequence-dependent setups." International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 7, no. 3 (2016): 367-384.
AMA: Xanthopoulos, A., Koulouriotis, D., Gasteratos, A & Ioannidis, S. Efficient priority rules for dynamic sequencing with sequence-dependent setups. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2016;7(3):367-384.

References
Adibi, M. A., Zandieh, M., & Amiri, M. (2010). Multi-objective scheduling of dynamic job shop using variable neighborhood search. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 282-287.

Allahverdi, A., Ng, C. T., Cheng, T. C. E., & Kovalyov, M. Y. (2008). A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 985-1032.

Ang, A. T. H., Sivakumar, A. I., & Qi, C. (2009). Criteria selection and analysis for single machine dynamic on-line scheduling with multiple objectives and sequence-dependent setups. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(4), 1223-1231.

Arzi, Y., Raviv, D. (1998). Dispatching in a workstation belonging to a re-entrant production line under sequence dependent set-up times. Production Planning & Control, 9(7), 690–699.

Chan, F. T. S., Wong, T. C., & Chan, L. Y. (2006). Flexible job-shop scheduling problem under resource constraints. International Journal of Production Research, 44(11), 2071–89.

Chiang, T.C., Fu, L.C. (2009). Using a family of critical ratio-based approaches to minimize the number of tardy jobs in the job shop with sequence dependent setup times. European Journal of Operational Research, 196 (1), 78–92.

Dominic, P. D. D., Kaliyamoorthy, S.M., & Kumar, S. (2004). Efficient dispatching rules for dynamic job shop scheduling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 24(1-2), 70-75.

Frazier, G.V. (1996). An evaluation of group scheduling heuristics in a flow-line manufacturing cell. International Journal of Production Research, 34(4), 959–976.

Gavett, J.W. (1965). Three heuristic rules for sequencing jobs to a single production facility. Management Science, 11(8), B166–B176.

Huq, F., Cutright, K., & Bhutta, M. K. S. (2009). The analysis of scheduling rules for non-zero setup costs. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 9(2), 126-147.

Jacobs, F.R., Bragg, D.J. (1988). Repetitive lots: Flow-time reductions through sequencing and dynamic batch sizing. Decision Sciences, 19(2), 281–294.

Kim, S.C., Bobrowski, P.M. (1994). Impact of sequence-dependent setup time on job shop scheduling performance.International Journal of Production Research, 32(7), 1503–1520.

Kim, S.C., Bobrowski, P.M. (1997). Scheduling jobs with uncertain setup times and sequence dependency. Omega, 25(4), 437-44.

Korytkowski, P., Wi?niewski, T., & Rymaszewski, S. (2013). An evolutionary simulation-based optimization approach for dispatching scheduling. Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory, 35, 69-85.

Lee, Y.H., Bhaskaran, K., & Pinedo, M. (1997). A heuristic to minimize the total weighted tardiness with sequence-dependent setups. IIE Transactions, 29(1), 45–52.

Mahmoodi, F., Dooley, K.J. (1991). A comparison of exhaustive and non-exhaustive group scheduling heuristics in a manufacturing cell. International Journal of Production Research, 29(9), 1923–1939.

Milliken, G. A., Johnson, D. E. (1992). Analysis of Messy Data, Volume 1: Designed Experiments, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.

Nomden, G., van der Zee, D.J., & Slomp, J. (2008). Family-based dispatching: anticipating future jobs. International Journal of Production Research, 46(1), 73–97.

Pickardt, C. W., Branke, J., (2012). Setup-oriented dispatching rules – a survey, International Journal of Production Research, 50(20), 5823-5842.

Rajendran, C., Holthaus, O., (1999). A comparative study of dispatching rules in dynamic flowshops and jobshops. European Journal of Operational Research, 116(1), 156-170.

Vinod, V., Sridharan, R., (2008). Scheduling a dynamic job shop production system with sequence-dependent setups: An experimental study. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 24(3), 435-449.

Wemmerlov, U., (1992). Fundamental insights into part family scheduling: the single machine case. Decision Sciences, 23(3), 565–595.

Wilbrecht, J.K., Prescott, W.B., (1969). The influence of setup time on job shop performance. Management Science, 16(4), B274–B280.

Xanthopoulos, A. S., Koulouriotis, D. E., Tourassis, V. D., & Emiris, D. M., (2013) Intelligent controllers for bi-objective dynamic scheduling on asingle machine with sequence-dependent setups. Applied Soft Computing, 13(12), 4704-4717.

Zhu, X., Wilhelm, W. E., (2006). Scheduling and lot-sizing with sequence-dependent setup: A literature review. IIE Transactions, 38(11), 987-1007.
  • 68
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | 📅 Year: 2016 | 📖 Volume: 7 | 📄 Issue: 3 | 👁️ Views: 2772 | 📊 Crossref: 9

Related Articles:
  • Solving group scheduling problem in no-wait flexible flowshop with random machine breakdown
  • A new effective heuristic method for the no-wait flowshop with sequence-dependent setup times problem
  • Minimizing total weighted tardiness for the single machine scheduling problem with dependent setup time and precedence constraints
  • A two-phase fuzzy programming model for a complex bi-objective no-wait flow shop scheduling
  • Heuristics for production scheduling problem with machining and assembly operations

📝 Ready to share your research?

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com