Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » A portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Iranian pharmaceutical industry

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

IJIEC Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 17 (113)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (26)
      • Issue 4 (36)
    • ▼ Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (77)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 2 Issue 2 pp. 225-236, 2011

A portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Iranian pharmaceutical industry Pages 225-236 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Nader Ghaffari-Nasab, Solmaz Ghazanfar Ahari, Ahmad Makui

📋 Author Affiliations:
Solmaz Ghazanfar Ahari1, Nader Ghaffari-Nasab2, Ahmad Makui ORCID 1, Seyed Hassan Ghodsypour ORCID 1
1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
doi 10.5267/j.ijiec.2010.03.001
24 Source: Scopus
Crossref 8 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Decision Making, Finance, Fuzzy AHP, Nonlinear Programming, Portfolio Selection

Abstract: Portfolio selection is one of the important problems encountered by any investor. The purpose of this paper is to solve a real stock portfolio selection problem in Iran. According to the uncertain environments in which financial decisions are made, most of the recent works in this field use fuzzy sets theory in order to incorporate these uncertainties into their analysis. The problem is to determine how to allocate a limited fund among the stocks of some pharmaceutical companies in Tehran stock exchange. For this purpose we apply two fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) methods to this problem. Finally, the results obtained from the two methods are compared in terms of the solution quality.

How to cite this paper
APA: Ghaffari-Nasab, N., Ahari, S & Makui, A. (2011). A portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Iranian pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2(2), 225-236.
Chicago/Turabian: Ghaffari-Nasab, N., Ahari, S & Makui, A. 2011. "A portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Iranian pharmaceutical industry." International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 2, no. 2 (2011): 225-236.
AMA: Ghaffari-Nasab, N., Ahari, S & Makui, A. A portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Iranian pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2011;2(2):225-236.

References
Anagnostopoulos, K.P., & Mamanis, G. (2010). A portfolio optimization model with three objectives and discrete variables, Computers and Operations Research, 37(7), 1285-1297.

Buckley, J.J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 233–247.

Branke, J., Scheckenbach, B., Stein, M., Deb, K., & Schmeck, H. (2009). Portfolio optimization with an envelope-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, European Journal of Operational Research, 199 (3), 684-693.

Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649–655.

Enea, M., & Piazza, T. (2004). Project selection by constrained fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 3, 39–62.

Fortemps, F., & Roubens, M. (1996). Ranking and Defuzzification Methods Based on Area Compensation, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 82, 319–330.

Gao, J., & Chu, Z. (2010). A new particle swarm optimisation based on MATLAB for portfolio selection problem, International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 9(1-2), 206-211.

Giove, S., Funari, S., & Nardelli, C. (2006). An interval portfolio selection problem based on regret function, European Journal of Operational Research, 170(1), 253–264.

Grant, M., Boyd, S. (2009). www.stanford.edu/~boyd/cvxbook/.

Huang, J.-J., Tzeng, G.-H., & Ong, C.-S., (2006). A novel algorithm for uncertain portfolio selection, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 173(1), 350–359.

Lacagnina, V., & Pecorella, A. (2006). A stochastic soft constraints fuzzy model for a portfolio selection problem, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157(10), 1317–1327.

Inuiguchi, M & Ramik, J. (2000). Possibilistic linear programming: a brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 111(1), 3–28.

Inuiguchi, M., & T. Tanino, T. (2000). Portfolio selection under independent possibilistic information, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115(1), 83–92.

Kahraman, C. (Ed.). (2008). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, Springer, New York.

Klir, G. J. (1997). Fuzzy Arithmetic with Requisite Constraints, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 91, 165–175.

Markowitz, H. M. (1991). Foundations of portfolio theory, The Journal of Finance, 46(2), 469–477.

Mikhailov, L. (2000). A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process, Journal of Operational Research Society, 51, 341–349.

Ong, C.-S., Huang, J. J., & Tzeng, G.-T. (2005). A novel hybrid model for portfolio selection, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 169(2), 1195–1210.

Parra, M. A., Terol, A. B., & Uria, M. V. R. (2001). A fuzzy goal programming approach to portfolio selection, European Journal of Operational Research, 113(2), 287–297.

Ruoning, X., & Xiaoyan, Z. (1992). Extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Fuzzy Environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 52, 251–257.

Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Saaty, T.L., Rogers, P.C., & Bell, R. (1980). Portfolio selection through hierarchies, The Journal of Portfolio Management , 16–21.

Seçme, N.Y., Bayrakdaroǧlu, & A., Kahraman, C. (2009). Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish Banking Sector using Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11699-11709.

Tanaka, H., & Guo, P. (1999). Portfolio selection based on upper and lower exponential possibility distributions, European Journal of Operational Research, 114, 115–126.

Tanaka, H., Guo, P., & Türksen, I. B. (2000). Portfolio selection based on fuzzy probabilities and possibility distributions, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 111(3), 387–397.

Terol, A. B., Gladish, B. P., Parra, M. A., & Uria, M. V. R. (2006). Fuzzy compromise programming for portfolio selection, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 173 (1), 251–264.

Tiryaki, F., & Ahlatcioğlu, B. (2009). Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Information Science, 179, 53-69.

Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty’s Priority Theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229–241.

Wang, S., & Zhu, S. (2002). On fuzzy portfolio selection problems, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 1, 361–377.

Xia, Y., Liu, B., Wang, S., & Lai, K.K. (2000). A model for portfolio selection with order of expected returns, Computers and Operations Research, 27 (5), 409–422.

Yang, J. (2009). Integrative performance evaluation for supply chain system based on logarithm triangular fuzzy number-AHP method, Kybernetes, 38(10), 1760-1770.

Zhang, W.-G., Wang, Y.-L., Chen, Z.-P., & Nie, Z.-K. (2007). Possibilistic mean–variance models and efficient frontiers for portfolio selection problem, Information Sciences, 177(13), 2787–2801.
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | 📅 Year: 2011 | 📖 Volume: 2 | 📄 Issue: 2 | 👁️ Views: 3898 | 📊 Crossref: 8

Related Articles:
  • A fuzzy compromise programming approach for the Black-Litterman portfolio selection model
  • Portfolio optimization using a hybrid of fuzzy ANP, VIKOR and TOPSIS
  • Determination of the optimal investment portfolio using CAPM in Tehran Stock Exchange industries: A VAR-Multivariate GARCH approach
  • Multi-objective portfolio optimization of mutual funds under downside risk measure using fuzzy theory
  • A new IPSO-SA approach for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization

📝 Ready to share your research?

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com