Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » Response surface and artificial neural network prediction model and optimization for surface roughness in machining

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (562)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2648)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (47)
  • SCI (50)

IJIEC Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 17 (77)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)
      • Issue 3 (26)
    • ▼ Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • ▼ Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (77)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Knowledge Management(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (1)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (57)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 6 Issue 2 pp. 229-240, 2015

Response surface and artificial neural network prediction model and optimization for surface roughness in machining Pages 229-240 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Ashok Kumar Sahoo, Arun Kumar Rout, Dipti Kanta Das

📋 Author Affiliations:
Ashok Kumar Sahoo, Arun Kumar Rout, Dipti Kanta Das
¹ School of Mechanical Engineering, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar-24, Odisha, India
doi 10.5267/j.ijiec.2014.11.001
44 Source: Scopus
Crossref 15 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: ANN, Factorial design, Machining, Optimization, Response surface model

Abstract: The present paper deals with the development of prediction model using response surface methodology and artificial neural network and optimizes the process parameter using 3D surface plot. The experiment has been conducted using coated carbide insert in machining AISI 1040 steel under dry environment. The coefficient of determination value for RSM model is found to be high (R2 = 0.99 close to unity). It indicates the goodness of fit for the model and high significance of the model. The percentage of error for RSM model is found to be only from -2.63 to 2.47. The maximum error between ANN model and experimental lies between -1.27 and 0.02 %, which is significantly less than the RSM model. Hence, both the proposed RSM and ANN prediction model sufficiently predict the surface roughness, accurately. However, ANN prediction model seems to be better compared with RSM model. From the 3D surface plots, the optimal parametric combination for the lowest surface roughness is d1-f1-v3 i.e. depth of cut of 0.1 mm, feed of 0.04 mm/rev and cutting speed of 260 m/min respectively.

How to cite this paper
APA: Sahoo, A., Rout, A & Das, D. (2015). Response surface and artificial neural network prediction model and optimization for surface roughness in machining. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 6(2), 229-240.
Chicago/Turabian: Sahoo, A., Rout, A & Das, D. 2015. "Response surface and artificial neural network prediction model and optimization for surface roughness in machining." International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 6, no. 2 (2015): 229-240.
AMA: Sahoo, A., Rout, A & Das, D. Response surface and artificial neural network prediction model and optimization for surface roughness in machining. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations. 2015;6(2):229-240.

References
Bagci, E., & I??k, B. (2006). Investigation of surface roughness in turning unidirectional GFRP composites by using RS methodology and ANN. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 31(1-2), 10-17.

Che Haron, C. H., Ghani, J. A., & Ibrahim, G. A. (2007). Surface integrity of AISI D2 when turned using coated and uncoated carbide tools. International Journal of Precision Technology, 1(1), 106-114.

Dabnun, M. A., Hashmi, M. S. J., & El-Baradie, M. A. (2005). Surface roughness prediction model by design of experiments for turning machinable glass–ceramic (Macor). Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 164, 1289-1293.

Davim, J. P., Gaitonde, V. N., & Karnik, S. R. (2008). Investigations into the effect of cutting conditions on surface roughness in turning of free machining steel by ANN models. Journal of materials processing technology, 205(1), 16-23.

Feng, C. X. (2001). An experimental study of the impact of turning parameters on surface roughness. In Proceedings of the Industrial Engineering Research Conference (No. 2036, pp. 1-7).

Gillibrand, D., Sarwar, M., & Pierce, C. T. (1996). The economic benefit of finish turning with coated carbide. Surface and Coatings Technology, 86, 809-813.

G?kkaya, H., & Nalbant, M. (2007a). The effects of cutting tool coating on the surface roughness of AISI 1015 steel depending on cutting parameters. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 30(5), 307-316.

G?kkaya, H., & Nalbant, M. (2007b). The effects of cutting tool geometry and processing parameters on the surface roughness of AISI 1030 steel. Materials & design, 28(2), 717-721.

Horng, J. T., Liu, N. M., & Chiang, K. T. (2008). Investigating the machinability evaluation of Hadfield steel in the hard turning with Al2O3TiC mixed ceramic tool based on the response surface methodology. Journal of materials processing technology, 208(1), 532-541.

Karayel, D. (2009). Prediction and control of surface roughness in CNC lathe using artificial neural network. Journal of materials processing technology,209(7), 3125-3137.

Lalwani, D. I., Mehta, N. K., & Jain, P. K. (2008). Experimental investigations of cutting parameters influence on cutting forces and surface roughness in finish hard turning of MDN250 steel. Journal of materials processing technology, 206(1), 167-179.

Montgomery, D.C. (1997). Design and Analysis of Experiments. 4th ed. Wiley, New York.

Nalbant, M., G?kkaya, H., & Sur, G. (2007). Application of Taguchi method in the optimization of cutting parameters for surface roughness in turning.Materials & design, 28(4), 1379-1385.

Nalbant, M., Gokkaya, H., & Toktas, I. (2007). Comparison of regression and artificial neural network models for surface roughness prediction with the cutting parameters in CNC turning. Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, 2007(2), 3.

Noordin, M. Y., Venkatesh, V. C., Chan, C. L., & Abdullah, A. (2001). Performance evaluation of cemented carbide tools in turning AISI 1010 steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 116(1), 16-21.

Noordin, M. Y., Venkatesh, V. C., Sharif, S., Elting, S., & Abdullah, A. (2004). Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 145(1), 46-58.

?zel, T., Karpat, Y., Figueira, L., & Davim, J. P. (2007). Modelling of surface finish and tool flank wear in turning of AISI D2 steel with ceramic wiper inserts. Journal of materials processing technology, 189(1), 192-198.

?zel, T., & Karpat, Y. (2005). Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 45(4), 467-479.

Park, Y. W. (2002). Tool material dependence of hard turning on the surface quality. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 3(1), 76-82.

Pal, S. K., & Chakraborty, D. (2005). Surface roughness prediction in turning using artificial neural network. Neural Computing & Applications, 14(4), 319-324.

Quiza, R., Figueira, L., & Davim, J. P. (2008). Comparing statistical models and artificial neural networks on predicting the tool wear in hard machining D2 AISI steel. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,37(7-8), 641-648.

Risbood, K. A., Dixit, U. S., & Sahasrabudhe, A. D. (2003). Prediction of surface roughness and dimensional deviation by measuring cutting forces and vibrations in turning process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology,132(1), 203-214.

Sahin, Y., & Motorcu, A. R. (2008). Surface roughness model in machining hardened steel with cubic boron nitride cutting tool. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 26(2), 84-90.

Sahoo, A. K., & Sahoo, B. (2011). Surface roughness model and parametric optimization in finish turning using coated carbide insert: Response surface methodology and Taguchi approach. International journal of industrial engineering computations, 2(4), 819-830.

Sahoo, A., Orra, K., & Routra, B. (2013). Application of response surface methodology on investigating flank wear in machining hardened steel using PVD TiN coated mixed ceramic insert. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 4(4), 469-478.

Sahoo, A., & Mohanty, T. (2013). Optimization of multiple performance characteristics in turning using Taguchi’s quality loss function: An experimental investigation. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 4(3), 325-336.

Sahoo, A. (2014). Application of Taguchi and regression analysis on surface roughness in machining hardened AISI D2 steel. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 5(2), 295-304.

Sehgal, A.K., (2013) Application of artificial neural network and response surface methodology for achieving desired surface roughness in end milling process of ductile iron grade 80-55-06, International Journal of Computational Engineering & Management, 16 (3), 2230-7893.

Suresh, P. V. S., Venkateswara Rao, P., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2002). A genetic algorithmic approach for optimization of surface roughness prediction model. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42(6), 675-680.

Tsao, C. C., & Hocheng, H. (2008). Evaluation of thrust force and surface roughness in drilling composite material using Taguchi analysis and neural network. Journal of materials processing technology, 203(1), 342-348.

T?g?t, R., Findik, F., & Cel?k, E. (2009). Performance of multilayer coated carbide tools when turning cast iron. Turkish Journal of Engineering & Environmental Sciences, 33(3), 147 – 157.

Sharma, V. S., Dhiman, S., Sehgal, R., & Sharma, S. K. (2008). Estimation of cutting forces and surface roughness for hard turning using neural networks. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(4), 473-483.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | 📅 Year: 2015 | 📖 Volume: 6 | 📄 Issue: 2 | 👁️ Views: 3567 | 📊 Crossref: 15

Related Articles:
  • A response surface methodology and desirability approach for predictive modeling and optimization of cutting temperature in machining hardened steel
  • Application of Taguchi and regression analysis on surface roughness in machining hardened AISI D2 steel
  • Experimental investigation on flank wear and tool life, cost analysis and mathematical model in turning hardened steel using coated carbide inserts
  • Application of response surface methodology on investigating flank wear in machining hardened steel using PVD TiN coated mixed ceramic insert
  • Effect of machining conditions on MRR and surface roughness during CNC Turning of different Materials Using TiN Coated Cutting Tools – A Taguchi approach

📝 Ready to share your research?

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com