Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations » Handling equipment Selection in open pit mines by using an integrated model based on group decision making

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1099)
  • ESM (421)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (101)
  • HE (37)
  • SCI (36)

IJIEC Volumes

    • Volume 1 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
    • Volume 2 (68)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (20)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (16)
    • Volume 3 (76)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (12)
      • Issue 5 (20)
    • Volume 4 (50)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • Volume 5 (47)
      • Issue 1 (13)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 6 (39)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 7 (47)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (14)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 8 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 9 (32)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 10 (34)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 11 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 12 (29)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 13 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 14 (50)
      • Issue 1 (11)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • Volume 15 (55)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 16 (75)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (29)
    • Volume 17 (51)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (30)

Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
optimization(87)
Sustainability(87)
Artificial intelligence(86)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(79)
Social media(78)
Factor analysis(78)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2198)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(815)
India(798)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(478)
Malaysia(446)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(226)
Thailand(160)
United States(115)
Turkey(112)
Ukraine(110)
Egypt(106)
Peru(94)
Canada(93)
Morocco(86)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations

ISSN 1923-2934 (Online) - ISSN 1923-2926 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 3 Issue 5 pp. 907-924 , 2012

Handling equipment Selection in open pit mines by using an integrated model based on group decision making Pages 907-924 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Abdolreza Yazdani-Chamzini, Siamak Haji Yakhchali

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2012.04.003

Keywords: FAHP, FTOPSIS, Group decision making, Handling Equipment selection

Abstract: Process of handling equipment selection is one of the most important and basic parts in the project planning, particularly mining projects due to holding a high charge of the total project & apos; s cost. Different criteria impact on the handling equipment selection, while these criteria often are in conflicting with each other. Therefore, the process of handling equipment selection is a complex and multi criteria decision making problem. There are a variety of methods for selecting the most appropriate equipment among a set of alternatives. Likewise, according to the sophisticated structure of the problem, imprecise data, less of information, and inherent uncertainty, the usage of the fuzzy sets can be useful. In this study a new integrated model based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS) is proposed, which uses group decision making to reduce individual errors. In order to calculate the weights of the evaluation criteria, FAHP is utilized in the process of handling equipment selection, and then these weights are inserted to the FTOPSIS computations to select the most appropriate handling system among a pool of alternatives. The results of this study demonstrate the potential application and effectiveness of the proposed model, which can be applied to different types of sophisticated problems in real problems.

How to cite this paper
Yazdani-Chamzini, A & Yakhchali, S. (2012). Handling equipment Selection in open pit mines by using an integrated model based on group decision making.International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations , 3(5), 907-924.

Refrences
Ahari, S.Gh., Ghaffari-Nasab, N., Makui, A., Ghodsypour, S.H., (2011). A portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, A case study of Iranian pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 2, 225–236.

Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S., Omrani, H., Panahi, A., (2011). A hybrid approach based on SERVQUAL and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating transportation service quality. Computers & Industrial Engineering 61(3), 637-646.

Aydogan, E.K., (2011). Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 3992-3998.

Bao, Q., Ruan, D., Shen, Y., Hermans, E, Janssens, D., (2012). Improved hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS for road safety performance evaluation. Knowledge-Based Systems, in Press.

Boender, C.G.E., de Grann, J.G., Lootsma, F.A., (1989). Multicriteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 29, 133-143.

Buckley, J.J., (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17, 233-247.

Chang, D.Y., (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research 95, 649-655.

Fouladgar, M.M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Lashgari, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., (2012a).
Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment. International journal of strategic property management 16(1), 85-104.

Fouladgar, M.M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Za vadskas, E.K., (2011). An integrated model for prioritizing strategies of the Iranian mining sector. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17, 459-483.

Fouladgar, M.M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Zavadskas, E.K., (2012b). Risk Evaluation of Tunneling Projects. Archives of civil and mechanical engineering, in press. doi,10.1016/j.acme.2012.03.008
Fouladgar, M.M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Moini, S.H.H., (2012c). A new hybrid model for evaluating the working strategies, Case study of Construction Company. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(1), 165-191.

Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K., (1981). Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Berlin, Springer.

Kaya, T., Kahraman, C., (2011). Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Systems with Applications 38(6), 6577-6585.

Kulak, O., Durmusoglu, B., Kahraman, C., (2005). Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 169, pp. 337–345.

Lai, H.L., Chen, T.Y., (2011). A fuzzy risk-assessment method using a TOPSIS approach based on interval-valued fuzzy numbers. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers 28(6), 467-484.

Lashgari, A., Fouladgar, M.M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Skibniewski, M.J., (2011). Using an integrated model for shaft sinking method selection. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 17, 569-580.

Liao, Ch.N., Kao, H.P., (2011). An integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP approach to supplier selection in supply chain management. Expert Systems with Applications 38(9), 10803-10811.

Monjezi, M., Bahrami, A., Varjani, A.Y., Sayadi, A.R., 2011. Prediction and controlling of flyrock in blasting operation using artificial neural network. Arab J Geosci 4, 421-425.

Moradi, J.S., Rafeierad, D., Ahari, A.N., (2011). A fuzzy TOPSIS method to rank effective fuel reduction factors, A case study of aviation companies. Management Science Letters 1 (2011) 493–502.

Naghizadeh, A., Mahvi, A.H., Jabbari, H., Derakhshani, E., Amini, H., 2011. Exposure Assessment to Dust and Free Silica for Workers of Sangan Iron Ore Mine in Khaf, Iran. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol.

Parsaei, S., Keramati, M.A., Zorriassatine, F., Feylizadeh, M.R., (2012). An order acceptance using FAHP and TOPSIS methods, A case study of Iranian vehicle belt production industry. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 3, 211-224.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process. New York, McGraw-Hill. 28.

Sayadi, A. R., Lashgari, A., Paraszczak, J., (2012). Hard-rock LHD cost estimation using single and multiple regressions based on principal component analysis. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 27(1), 133-141.

Sule, D.R. (1994). Manufacturing facilities, Location, planning and design (2nd ed.). Boston, PWS Publishing Company.

Sun, Ch.Ch., Lin, G.T.R., (2009). Using fuzzy TOPSIS method for evaluating the competitive advantages of shopping websites. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 11764–11771.

Torlak, G., Sevkli, M., Sanal, M., Zaim, S., (2011). Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method, An example of Turkish domestic airline industry. Expert Systems with Applications 38(4), 3396-3406.

Van Laarhoven, P.J.M., Pedrycz, W., (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11, 229-241.

Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Yakhchali, S.H., (2012). Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) selection using fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, in press. doi,10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.021.

Yu, V.F., Hu, K.J., (2010). An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria approach for the performance evaluation of multiple manufacturing plants. Computers & Industrial Engineering 58, 269-277.

Yu, X., Guo, Sh., Guo, J., Huang, X., (2011). Rank B2C e-commerce websites in e-alliance based on AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (4), 3550-3557.

Zadeh, L.A., (1965). Fuzzy sets, Information and Control 8 (1965) 338–353.

Zouggari, A., Benyoucef, L., (2012). Simulation based fuzzy TOPSIS approach for group multi-criteria supplier selection problem. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 25(3), 507-519.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations | Year: 2012 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 5 | Views: 2707 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process using preference ratio: A case study for ...
  • An application of TOPSIS for ranking internet web browsers
  • Which product would be chosen? A fuzzy VIKOR method for evaluation and sele ...
  • Measuring the relative performance of stock market using TOPSIS
  • An application of multiple criteria decision-making techniques for ranking ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com