Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Data and Network Science » Evaluating e-learning systems success in the new normal

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (421)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (101)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

IJDS Volumes

    • Volume 1 (8)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (3)
    • Volume 2 (12)
      • Issue 1 (3)
      • Issue 2 (3)
      • Issue 3 (3)
      • Issue 4 (3)
    • Volume 3 (27)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 4 (37)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 5 (86)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (11)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (34)
    • Volume 6 (163)
      • Issue 1 (30)
      • Issue 2 (33)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (60)
    • Volume 7 (200)
      • Issue 1 (53)
      • Issue 2 (46)
      • Issue 3 (46)
      • Issue 4 (55)
    • Volume 8 (243)
      • Issue 1 (60)
      • Issue 2 (61)
      • Issue 3 (60)
      • Issue 4 (62)
    • Volume 9 (96)
      • Issue 1 (20)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (30)
      • Issue 4 (40)
    • Volume 10 (80)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (40)

Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
optimization(87)
Sustainability(86)
Artificial intelligence(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(78)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2192)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(813)
India(793)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(478)
Malaysia(444)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(226)
Thailand(160)
United States(114)
Ukraine(110)
Turkey(110)
Egypt(106)
Peru(94)
Canada(93)
Morocco(86)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

International Journal of Data and Network Science

ISSN 2561-8156 (Online) - ISSN 2561-8148 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 6 Issue 4 pp. 1033-1042 , 2022

Evaluating e-learning systems success in the new normal Pages 1033-1042 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Raed Masadeh, Dmaithan Abdelkarim Almajali, Thaer Majali, Ahmad Hanandeh, Ahmad Al-Radaideh

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.8.006

Keywords: E-learning, IS success Model, New normal, E-learning satisfaction

Abstract: The goal of this study is to develop and verify a model for successful e-Learning based on the experiences of students in the "new normal". From Jordanian universities, 550 students who have taken any e-Learning course were randomly selected. Data were collected via a survey questionnaire, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to test the proposed study model. The findings indicate that contactless learning and high-quality e-learning systems have a beneficial impact on student satisfaction. In addition, e-Learning cognitive involvement was found to solidify e-Learning satisfaction. Furthermore, the results show a positive and significant impact of e-Learning cognitive involvement and e-Learning satisfaction on e-Learning achievement. Also, e-Learning system quality positively affects e-Learning cognitive involvement, besides a direct impact of contactless learning quality on e-Learning cognitive involvement.

How to cite this paper
Masadeh, R., Almajali, D., Majali, T., Hanandeh, A & Al-Radaideh, A. (2022). Evaluating e-learning systems success in the new normal.International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(4), 1033-1042.

Refrences
Adedoyin, O.B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportuni-ties. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13.
Aggelidis, V.P., & Chatzoglou, P.D. (2012). Hospital information systems: measuring end user computing satisfaction (EUCS). Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 45(3), 566-579.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psy-chological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918.
Al-Bashayreh, M., Almajali, D., Altamimi, A., Masa’deh, R., & Al-Okaily, M. (2022). An empirical investigation of rea-sons influencing student acceptance and rejection of mobile learning apps usage. Sustainability, 14(7), 4325.‏
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: an empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86.
Alhumaid, K., Ali, S., Waheed, A., Zahid, E., & Habes, M. (2020). COVID-19 & e-Learning: perceptions & attitudes of teachers towards e-Learning acceptance in the developing countries. Multicultural Education, 6(2), 100-115.
Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the Course: Online Education in the United States, 2008, Sloan Consortium, Newburyport, MA.
Almaiah, M.A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the e-Learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5261-5280.
Almajali, D., Al-Okaily, M., Barakat, S., Al-Zegaier, H., & Dahalin, Z.M. (2022). Students’ perceptions of the sustainabil-ity of distance learning systems in the post-COVID-19: a qualitative perspective. Sustainability, 14(12), 7353.
Anderson, T. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca University Press, Athabasca.
Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). An e-Learning theoretical framework. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 19(1), 292-307.
Arbaugh, J.B., & Duray, R. (2002). Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses: an exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs. Management Learning, 33(3), 331-347.
Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic re-view of research and applications. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 133-149.
Bates, A.W., & Bates, T. (2005). Technology, E-Learning and Distance Education. Psychology Press, London.
Beldona, S., Morrison, A.M., & O’Leary, J. (2005). Online shopping motivations and pleasure travel products: a corre-spondence analysis. Tourism Management, 26(4), 561-570.
Belleflamme, P., & Jacqmin, J. (2016). An economic appraisal of MOOC platforms: business models and impacts on higher education. CESifo Economic Studies, 62(1), 148-169.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.
Biggs, J.B. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does, McGraw Hill Education, Buck-ingham.
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R.C. (2020). Education in normal, new normal, and next normal: observations from the past, in-sights from the present and projections for the future. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2).
Brox, C., Painho, M., Bação, F., & Kuhn, W. (2004). International exchange of e-Learning courses. Proceedings of EU-GISES, Austria, 2-5 September, Villach, 1-7.
Bruhn, M., Georgi, D., & Hadwich, K. (2008). Customer equity management as formative second-order construct. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1292-1301.
Byrne, M., & Flood, B. (2003). Assessing the teaching quality of accounting programmes: an evaluation of the course ex-perience questionnaire. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 135-145.
Chen, R.-S., & Liu, I.-F. (2013). Research on the effectiveness of information technology in reducing the rural–urban knowledge divide. Computers and Education, 63, 437-445.
Cheng, Y.-M. (2012). Effects of quality antecedents on e-learning acceptance. Internet Research, 22(3), 361-390.
Chiu, S.F., & Chen, H.L. (2005). Relationship between job characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior: the mediational role of job satisfaction. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 33(6), 523-540.
Contini, D., Cugnata, F., & Scagni, A. (2018). Social selection in higher education: enrolment, dropout and timely degree attainment in Italy. Higher Education, 75(5), 785-808.
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Delone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year up-date. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. ELearn, 2005(10), 1.
Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2022). Informal Learning in Digital Contexts. Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Educa-tion, 1-17.
Dwyer, K.K., Bingham, S.G., Carlson, R.E., Prisbell, M., Cruz, A.M., & Fus, D.A. (2004). Communication and connected-ness in the classroom: development of the connected classroom climate inventory. Communication Research Reports, 21(3), 264-272.
Ebner, M. (2007, April). E-Learning 2.0= e-Learning 1.0+ Web 2.0?. In The Second International Conference on Availa-bility, Reliability and Security (ARES'07) (pp. 1235-1239). IEEE.
Elhaty, I.A., Elhadary, T., Elgamil, R., & Kilic, H. (2020). Teaching university practical courses online during COVID-19 crisis: a challenge for eLearning. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(8), 1-10.
Elnaj, S. (2021). Council post: the ‘new normal’ and the future of technology after the covid-19 pandemic, available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2021/01/25/the-newnormal-and-the-future-of-technology-after-the-covid-19-pandemic/ (accessed 5 January, 2022).
Farhan, W., Razmak, J., Demers, S., & Laflamme, S. (2019). E-learning systems versus instructional communication tools: developing and testing a new e-learning user interface from the perspectives of teachers and stu-dents. Technology in Society, 59, 101192.
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Buttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29, 1-9.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measure-ment Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Freeze, R.D., Alshare, K.A., Lane, P.L., & Wen, H.J. (2019). IS success model in e-learning context based on students’ perceptions. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 173-184.
Gorla, N., Somers, T.M., & Wong, B. (2010). Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 207-228.
Gu, L., & Wang, J. (2015). A task technology fit model on e-learning. Issues in Information Systems, 16(1), 163-169.
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 1-12.
Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V.G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
Hamid, A.A. (2001). e-Learning: Is it the “e” or the learning that matters?. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3-4), 311-316.
Heo, H., Bonk, C., & Doo, M. (2022). Influences of depression, self-efficacy, and resource management on learning en-gagement in blended learning during COVID-19. The Internet and Higher Education 54, 100856.
Hill, F.M. (1995). Managing service quality in higher education: the role of the student as primary consumer. Quality As-surance in Education, 3(3), 10-21.
Ho, L.-A., Kuo, T.-H., & Lin, B. (2010). Influence of online learning skills in cyberspace. Internet Research, 20(1), 55-71.
Horton, W. (2001). Evaluating e-learning. American Society for Training and Development.
Huang, Y.-R., & Chang, S.-M. (2004). Academic and cocurricular involvement: their relationship and the best combina-tions for student growth. Journal of College Student Development, 45(4), 391-406.
Islam, A.N. (2016). E-learning system use and its outcomes: moderating role of perceived compatibility. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 48-55.
James, L., Mulaik, S., & Brett, J. (1982). Causal Analysis: Assumptions, Models, and Data. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
Jiang, Z., Chan, J., Tan, B.C., & Chua, W.S. (2010). Effects of interactivity on website involvement and purchase inten-tion. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(1), 34-59.
Jin, S.H. (2005). Analyzing student-student and student-instructor interaction through multiple communication tools in web-based learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(1), 59-68.
Kim, S., Lee, J., Yoon, S.H., & Kim, H.W. (2022). How can we achieve better e-learning success in the new nor-mal?. Internet Research, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-05-2021-0310
Kim, Y.J., Garrity, E.J., & Sanders, G.L. (2003). Success measures of information systems. Encyclopedia of Information Systems, 4, 299-313.
Laurillard, D. (2004). E-learning in higher education. Changing higher education. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(3), 71-84.
Lederman, D. (2019). Why MOOCs didn’t work, in 3 data points, available at: https://www. insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2019/01/16/study-offers-data-show-moocs-didntachieve-their-goals (accessed 5 January, 2022).
Lee, J.-K., & Lee, W.-K. (2008). The relationship of e-Learner’s self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e-learning en-vironmental quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), 32-47.
Lee, M.K., Cheung, C.M., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and in-trinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), 1095-1104.
Martınez-Torres, M.R., Toral Marın, S.L., Garcia, F.B., Vazquez, S.G., Oliva, M.A., & Torres, T. (2008). A technological acceptance of e-learning tools used in practical and laboratory teaching, according to the European higher education area. Behaviour and Information Technology, 27(6), 495-505.
Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: an integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359-374.
Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: the role of dig-ital literacy. Computers and Education, 82, 11-25.
Muller, A.M., Goh, C., Lim, L.Z., & Gao, X. (2021). COVID-19 emergency e-learning and beyond: experiences and per-spectives of university educators. Education Sciences, 11(1), 1-15.
Naddeo, A., Califano, R., & Fiorillo, I. (2021). Identifying factors that influenced wellbeing and learning effectiveness during the sudden transition into eLearning due to the COVID-19 lockdown. Work, 68(1), 45-67.
Nagy, A. (2005). The impact of e-learning. In E-Content (pp. 79-96). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Nicholson, P. (2007). A history of e-learning. In Computers and education (pp. 1-11). Springer, Dordrecht.
Novak, T.P., & Hoffman, D.L. (1997). New metrics for new media: toward the development of web measurement stand-ards. World Wide Web Journal, 2(1), 213-246.
O’Hara, M.T., Watson, R.T., & Kavan, C.B. (1999). Managing the three levels of change. Information Systems Manage-ment, 16, 63-70.
Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2003). Exploring technology-mediated learning from a pedagogical perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 11(2), 111-126.
Owlia, M.S., & Aspinwall, E.M. (1996). A framework for the dimensions of quality in higher education. Quality Assur-ance in Education, 4(2), 12-20.
Packham, G., Jones, P., Miller, C., & Thomas, B. (2004). E-learning and retention: key factors influencing student with-drawal. Education + Training, 46 (6-7), 335-342.
Pham, H.-H., & Ho, T.-T.-H. (2020). Toward a ‘new normal’ with e-learning in Vietnamese higher education during the post COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Research and Development, 39(7), 1327-1331.
Phuthong, T. (2021). Antecedents influencing the adoption of collaborative learning social-media platforms among Thai university students during the covid-19 ‘new normal’ era. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learn-ing, 16(13), 108-127.
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: a research framework and a prelimi-nary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426.
Praetorius, A.-K., Klieme, E., Herbert, B., & Pinger, P. (2018). Generic dimensions of teaching quality: the German framework of three basic dimensions. ZDM, 50(3), 407-426.
Rai, A., Lang, S.S., & Welker, R.B. (2002). Assessing the validity of IS success models: an empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50-69.
Rashid, S., & Yadav, S.S. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on higher education and research. Indian Journal of Hu-man Development, 14(2), 340-343.
Seta, H.B., Wati, T., Muliawati, A., & Hidayanto, A.N. (2018). E-learning success model: an extension of DeLone & McLean IS’ success model. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 6(3), 281-291.
Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A.Y., Hussain, A., & Lodhi, R.N. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 in e-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Quality and Quantity, 55(3), 805-826.
Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 102-120.
Subaeki, B., Manaf, K., Pitoyo, D., Setiawan, H., Sugiri, T., & Effendi, A. (2020). New normal concept in e-learning con-text: an application of the DeLone and McLean information system model, 2020 14th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Services, and Applications, Indonesia, 18-19 November, Bandung, 1-6.
Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R.J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? an empirical inves-tigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1183-1202.
Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Tirziu, A.M., & Vrabie, C. (2015). Education 2.0: E-learning methods. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 376-380.
Tria, J.Z. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of education in the Philippines: the new normal. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), 2-4.
Wang, Y.-S., Wang, H.-Y., & Shee, D.Y. (2007). Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: scale development and validation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1792-1808.
Weaver, R., Salamonson, Y., Koch, J., & Jackson, D. (2013). Nursing on television: student perceptions of television’s role in public image, recruitment and education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(12), 2635-2643.
Wixom, B.H., & Todd, P.A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85-102.
Wu, J., Tsai, R.J., Chen, C.C., & Wu, Y. (2006). An integrative model to predict the continuance use of electronic learning systems: hints for teaching. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(2), 287-302.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: International Journal of Data and Network Science | Year: 2022 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 4 | Views: 2097 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • COVID-19 fears and e-learning platforms acceptance among Jordanian universi ...
  • Achievement of student graduates: The role of e-readiness, e-learning and e ...
  • The effect of e-learning in developing high thinking skills
  • Prioritizing e-learning websites evaluation and selection criteria using fu ...
  • Measuring the effects of electronic learning components using ANFIS method

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com