Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » International Journal of Data and Network Science » Government environmental regulation, corporate social responsibility, ecosystem innovation strategy and sustainable development of Vietnamese seafood enterprises

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (421)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (101)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

IJDS Volumes

    • Volume 1 (8)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (3)
    • Volume 2 (12)
      • Issue 1 (3)
      • Issue 2 (3)
      • Issue 3 (3)
      • Issue 4 (3)
    • Volume 3 (27)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 4 (37)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 5 (86)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (11)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (34)
    • Volume 6 (163)
      • Issue 1 (30)
      • Issue 2 (33)
      • Issue 3 (40)
      • Issue 4 (60)
    • Volume 7 (200)
      • Issue 1 (53)
      • Issue 2 (46)
      • Issue 3 (46)
      • Issue 4 (55)
    • Volume 8 (243)
      • Issue 1 (60)
      • Issue 2 (61)
      • Issue 3 (60)
      • Issue 4 (62)
    • Volume 9 (96)
      • Issue 1 (20)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (30)
      • Issue 4 (40)
    • Volume 10 (80)
      • Issue 1 (40)
      • Issue 2 (40)

Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
optimization(87)
Sustainability(86)
Artificial intelligence(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(78)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2192)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(813)
India(793)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(478)
Malaysia(444)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(226)
Thailand(160)
United States(114)
Ukraine(110)
Turkey(110)
Egypt(106)
Peru(94)
Canada(93)
Morocco(86)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

International Journal of Data and Network Science

ISSN 2561-8156 (Online) - ISSN 2561-8148 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 5 Issue 4 pp. 713-726 , 2021

Government environmental regulation, corporate social responsibility, ecosystem innovation strategy and sustainable development of Vietnamese seafood enterprises Pages 713-726 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Thi Minh Nguyet Hoang, Thi Thai Thuy Nguyen, Thi Thu Hien Phan

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.7.010

Keywords: Government environmental regulation, Corporate social responsibility, Enterprise sustainable business growth, Vietnam

Abstract: The objective of the article is to assess the influence of corporate social responsibility and Government environmental regulation on sustainable growth and development of Vietnamese seafood enterprises. Data was collected for 3 months with valid votes for analysis of 658 enterprises. The results show that both social responsibility, government environmental regulation, and ecosystem innovation strategies have a statistically significant positive impact on Enterprise sustainable business growth of Vietnamese seafood enterprises. At the same time, the ecosystem innovation strategies are fully mediating in the relationship between Government environmental regulation and Enterprise sustainable business growth.

How to cite this paper
Hoang, T., Nguyen, T & Phan, T. (2021). Government environmental regulation, corporate social responsibility, ecosystem innovation strategy and sustainable development of Vietnamese seafood enterprises.International Journal of Data and Network Science, 5(4), 713-726.

Refrences
Amara, D. B., & Chen, H. (2021). Evidence for the Mediating Effects of Eco-Innovation and the Impact of Driving Factors on Sustainable Business Growth of Agribusiness. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 1-16.
Andrews, D. W. (2003). End‐of‐sample instability tests. Econometrica, 71(6), 1661-1694.
Ar, I. M. (2012). The impact of green product innovation on firm performance and competitive capability: the moderating role of managerial environmental concern. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 854-864.
Becker, T. E. (2005). Development and validation of a situational judgment test of employee integrity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(3), 225-232.
Bini, L., & Bellucci, M. (2020). Business model disclosure in sustainability reporting: two case studies. In Integrated Sus-tainability Reporting (pp. 117-150). Springer, Cham.
Cai, W., & Li, G. (2018). The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 110-118.
Cabezas-Rabadán, C., Rodilla, M., Pardo-Pascual, J. E., & Herrera-Racionero, P. (2019). Assessing users’ expectations and perceptions on different beach types and the need for diverse management frameworks along the Western Mediter-ranean. Land Use Policy, 81, 219-231.
Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Improving firm environmental performance and reputation: The role of employee green teams. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 735-749.
Fairfield, K., Harmon, J., & Behson, S. (2011). Implementing sustainability strategies: an integrative model. Organization Management Journal, 8(1), 4-20.
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston, MA: Pitman Publishing.
Freeman, I., & Hasnaoui, A. (2011). The Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Vision of Four Nations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 419-443.
Gladwin, T.N. (1993), The global environmental crisis and management education. Environmental Quality Management, 3, 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310030111.
Gooijer, J.D. (2000). Designing a knowledge management performance framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(4), 303–310.
Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 66-77
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: in deed a silver bullet, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-151.
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Mod-eling (PLS-SEM), Sage Publications Ltd, London.
Hair, J.F., Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D., Ketchen, D., GTM, H., & Calantone, R. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares: comments on Rönkkö and Evermann, Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182-209.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd Ed., Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Harrison, J.S., Bosse, D.A. & Phillips, R.A. (2010), Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competi-tive advantage. Strat. Mgmt. J., 31: 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.801
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sinkovics, R.R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing, in Sinkovics, R.R. and Ghauri, P.N. (Eds), New Challenges to International Marketing, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Hojnik, J., & Ruzzier, M. (2016). What drives eco-innovation? A review of an emerging literature. Environmental Innova-tion and Societal Transitions, 19, 31-41.
Hojnik, J., Ruzzier, M., & Manolova, T. S. (2018). Internationalization and economic performance: The mediating role of eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1312-1323.
Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112-122.
Jaffe, A., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study. The Review of Economics and Statis-tics, 79(4), 610-619. Retrieved July 15, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2951413
Jové‐Llopis, E., & Segarra‐Blasco, A. (2018). Eco‐innovation strategies: A panel data analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1209-1220.
Krajnc, D., & Glavič, P. (2003). Indicators of sustainable production. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 5(3-4), 279-288.
Le The Gioi, Nguyen Truong Son, & Nguyen Thi Tram Anh (2010). Building a multi-dimensional analysis framework and index system to evaluate the sustainable development of the fisheries sector - the case of Khanh Hoa seafood industry. Journal of Science and Technology, University of Danang, 5(40). 86-93.
Le, T., Nguyen, T., Phan, T., Tran, M., Phung, X., Tran, T., & Giao, K. (2019). Impact of corporate social responsibility on supply chain management and financial performance in Vietnamese garment and textile firms. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 7(4), 679-690.
Santos, D. F. L., Rezende, M. D. V., & Basso, L. F. C. (2019). Eco-innovation and business performance in emerging and developed economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117674.
Ma, L., & Jiayu, H. (2018) An analysis of the eco-innovation mechanism and policies in the pulp and paper industry based on coupled game theory and system dynamics. Sustainability 10, 3482
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127. doi:10.2307/259398
Melander, L. (2018). Customer and supplier collaboration in green product innovation: External and internal capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(6), 677-693.
Melander, L. (2020). Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation. In Innovation Strategies in En-vironmental Science (pp. 33-67). Elsevier.
Nguyen, T., Pham, T., Phan, T., Than, T & Nguyen, T. (2020). Impact of green supply chain practices on financial and non-financial performance of Vietnam's tourism enterprises. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(3), 481-494.
Panda, T. K., Kumar, A., Jakhar, S., Luthra, S., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kazancoglu, I., & Nayak, S. S. (2020). Social and envi-ronmental sustainability model on consumers’ altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. Journal of Cleaner production, 243, 118575.
Phan, T., Doan, X., & Nguyen, T. (2020a). The impact of supply chain practices on performance through supply chain in-tegration in textile and garment industry of Vietnam. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(1), 175-186.
Phan, T. T. H., Tran, H. X., Le, T. T., Nguyen, N., Pervan, S., & Tran, M. D. (2020b). The Relationship between Sustaina-ble Development Practices and Financial Performance: A Case Study of Textile Firms in Vietnam. Sustainability, 12(15), 5930.
Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
Pujari, D., Wright, G., & Peattie, K. (2003). Green and competitive: Influences on environmental new product develop-ment performance. Journal of business Research, 56(8), 657-671.
Ramanathan, R., He, Q., Black, A., Ghobadian, A., & Gallear, D. (2017). Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 79-92.
Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319-332.
Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M., & Verdolini, E. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, 83, 288-300.
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profita-bility. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
Stucki, T. (2019). Which firms benefit from investments in green energy technologies?–The effect of energy costs. Re-search Policy, 48(3), 546-555.
Sarkar, A. N. (2013). Promoting eco-innovations to leverage sustainable development of eco-industry and green growth. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(1), 171-171.
Saudi, M. H. M., Obsatar Sinaga, G., & Zainudin, Z. (2019). The effect of green innovation in influencing sustainable per-formance: Moderating role of managerial environmental concern. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(1), 303.
Tariq, A., Badir, Y., & Chonglerttham, S. (2019). Green innovation and performance: moderation analyses from Thailand. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22, 446–467
Tang, M., Walsh, G., Lerner, D., Fitza, M. A., & Li, Q. (2018). Green innovation, managerial concern and firm perfor-mance: An empirical study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1), 39-51.
Tseng, M. L., Wang, R., Chiu, A. S., Geng, Y., & Lin, Y. H. (2013). Improving performance of green innovation practices under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 71-82.
United nation (2015), the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, http://www.un.org
Valentin, A., & Spangenberg, J. (2000). A guide to community sustainability indicators. Environmental Impact Assess-ment Review, 20, 381-392.
Veleva, V., & Ellenbecker, M. (2001). Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(6), 519-549
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future, Oxford University Press.
Xing, X., Liu, T., Wang, J., Shen, L., & Zhu, Y. (2019). Environmental regulation, environmental commitment, sustaina-bility exploration/exploitation innovation, and firm sustainable development. Sustainability, 11(21), 6001.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: International Journal of Data and Network Science | Year: 2021 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 4 | Views: 1413 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Supply chain risk, integration, risk resilience and firm performance in glo ...
  • The impact of supply chain quality integration on green supply chain manage ...
  • Factors influencing the consumer’s intention to buy fashion products made b ...
  • The impact of global green supply chain management practices on performance ...
  • Impact of green supply chain practices on financial and non-financial perfo ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com