Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Engineering Solid Mechanics » Dual boundary element method for comparative studies on fatigue crack growth models

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (52)
  • SCI (52)

ESM Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 14 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (32)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (39)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (35)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (36)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (28)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (32)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (25)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (16)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (4)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Sustainability(93)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
Trust(85)
TOPSIS(85)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Engineering Solid Mechanics
ISSN 2291-8752 (Online) - ISSN 2291-8744 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 12 Issue 4 pp. 409-422, 2024

Dual boundary element method for comparative studies on fatigue crack growth models Pages 409-422 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Jairo A Mantilla, Manuel Martínez, Diego F Villegas, Oscar Bohorquez, Jorge G. Díaz

📋 Author Affiliations:
J.A. Mantilla ORCID 1, M. Martínez ORCID 2, D.F. Villegas2, O. Bohorquez ORCID 1, J.G. Díaz3
1 Grupo de investigación en diseño y manufactura (DIMA), Universidad industrial de Santander, Colombia
2 Grupo de investigación en energía y medio ambiente (GIEMA), Universidad industrial de Santander, Colombia
3 Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ciencias e Ingeniería, Guadalajara, 45138, Mexico
doi 10.5267/j.esm.2024.5.001
1 Source: Scopus
Crossref 2 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Fracture mechanics, Stress intensity factor, Boundary element method, Fatigue crack growth, Finite element method

Abstract: Fatigue crack growth studies require models that accurately predict component life with low uncertainty. Despite the large number of proposed models, there is no clarity on their applicability, which justifies a comparative analysis between some of them. The dual boundary element method (DBEM) was applied for cracked bodies, whereby the stress intensity factors (SIF), the growth rate, and the number of cycles were computed. Three crack increment models were studied under constant amplitude fatigue loads: the Paris, the Klesnil-Lucas, and the Forman models. Results were validated with experimental literature and through the finite element method, indicating that each model represents a specific zone of the crack growth curve. Klesnil-Lucas model reproduces the region near the fracture threshold, Paris fits the controlled crack growth zone, whereas Forman’s model recreates the unstable fracture zone, i.e., when the stress intensity factor approaches the material’s fracture toughness. The J-integral with stress field decomposition gave errors below 0.8% for mode I. Results were similar for the propagation path and the number of cycles to those obtained with the finite element method, with errors of about 3% considering different K-effective approaches. Klesnil-Lucas accurately predicts the number of cycles with an error margin below 3%, considering the curved region in the growth rate at the propagation onset, while the Paris model becomes very conservative, predicting values up to 50% lower than experimental data. The Klesnil-Lukas model is advised for simulating the entire crack propagation.


How to cite this paper
APA: Mantilla, J., Martínez, M., Villegas, D., Bohorquez, O & Díaz, J. (2024). Dual boundary element method for comparative studies on fatigue crack growth models. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 12(4), 409-422.
Chicago/Turabian: Mantilla, J., Martínez, M., Villegas, D., Bohorquez, O & Díaz, J. 2024. "Dual boundary element method for comparative studies on fatigue crack growth models." Engineering Solid Mechanics 12, no. 4 (2024): 409-422.
AMA: Mantilla, J., Martínez, M., Villegas, D., Bohorquez, O & Díaz, J. Dual boundary element method for comparative studies on fatigue crack growth models. Engineering Solid Mechanics. 2024;12(4):409-422.

References
Aliabadi, M. H. (1997). Boundary Element Formulations in Fracture Mechanics. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 50(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3101690
Amsterdam, E., Willem E. Wiegman, J., Nawijn, M., & De Hosson, J. T. M. (2023). On the strain energy release rate and fatigue crack growth rate in metallic alloys. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 286, 109292. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2023.109292
ASTM. (2023). Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates, E647 - 23. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0647-23A
Balderrama, R., Cisilino, A. P., & Martinez, M. (2006). Boundary Element Method Analysis of Three-Dimensional Thermoelastic Fracture Problems Using the Energy Domain Integral. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 73(6), 959–969. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2173287
Bassindale, C., Wang, X., Tyson, W. R., & Xu, S. (2018). Numerical verification of stress intensity factor solution for clamped single edge notched tension (SENT) specimens. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 41(2), 494–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/FFE.12700
Boljanović, S., & Maksimović, S. (2011). Analysis of the crack growth propagation process under mixed-mode loading. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 78(8), 1565–1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2011.02.003
Cheng, A., & Chen, N. Z. (2017). Fatigue crack growth modelling for pipeline carbon steels under gaseous hydrogen conditions. International Journal of Fatigue, 96, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2016.11.029
Citarella, R., Giannella, V., Vivo, E., & Mazzeo, M. (2016). FEM-DBEM approach for crack propagation in a low pressure aeroengine turbine vane segment. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 86, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TAFMEC.2016.05.004
Díaz, J. G., & Freire, J. L. de F. (2022). LEFM crack path models evaluation under proportional and non-proportional load in low carbon steels using digital image correlation data. International Journal of Fatigue, 156, 106687. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2021.106687
Forman, R. G., Kearney, V. E., & Engle, R. M. (1967). Numerical Analysis of Crack Propagation in Cyclic-Loaded Structures. Journal of Basic Engineering, 89(3), 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3609637
Gdoutos, E. E. (1990). Linear elastic stress field in cracked bodies. Fracture Mechanics Criteria and Applications, 15–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1956-3_2
Gómez, E., Díaz, J., Mantilla, J., Bohorquez, O., & Martínez, M. (2024). Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of Equivalent Stress Intensity Factor Models under Mixed-Mode (I+II) Loading. Infrastructures 2024, Vol. 9, Page 45, 9(3), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/INFRASTRUCTURES9030045
Kats, B. A., & Katz, D. B. (2019). Cauchy–Hadamard integral with applications. Monatshefte Für Mathematik 2019 189:4, 189(4), 683–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00605-019-01263-Z
Klesnil, M., & Lukáš, P. (1972). Influence of strength and stress history on growth and stabilisation of fatigue cracks. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 4(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(72)90078-1
Koko, A., Earp, P., Wigger, T., Tong, J., & Marrow, T. J. (2020). J-integral analysis: An EDXD and DIC comparative study for a fatigue crack. International Journal of Fatigue, 134, 105474. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2020.105474
Krscanski, S., & Brnic, J. (2020). Prediction of fatigue crack growth in metallic specimens under constant amplitude loading using virtual crack closure and forman model. Metals, 10(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/MET10070977
Lardner, R. W. (1968). A dislocation model for fatigue crack growth in metals. The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics, 17(145), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786436808218181
Leite, P. G. P., & Gomes, G. (2019). Numerical simulation of fatigue crack propagation in mixed-mode (I+II) using the program BemCracker2D. International Journal of Structural Integrity, 10(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-04-2018-0022
Liu, C., Li, B., Cai, Y., & Chen, X. (2020). Fatigue crack propagation behaviour of pressurised elbow pipes under cyclic bending. Thin-Walled Structures, 154, 106882. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TWS.2020.106882
Machniewicz, T. (2013). Fatigue crack growth prediction models for metallic materials. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 36(4), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1460-2695.2012.01721.X
Malíková, L., Veselý, V., & Seitl, S. (2016). Crack propagation direction in a mixed mode geometry estimated via multi-parameter fracture criteria. International Journal of Fatigue, 89, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2016.01.010
Mantilla, J., Poveda, D., & Martínez, M. (2021). Estimation of the Stress Intensity Factor in a Wedge Splitting Test Under Static Load Using the Finite Elements Method. Respuestas, 26(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.22463/0122820X.1934
Moore, P., & Pisarski, H. (2017). SENT testing standard BS 8571 and its ongoing development. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 156, 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPVP.2017.05.011
Mukherjee, A., Ghosh, M., Mondal, K., Venkitanarayanan, P., Moon, A. P., & Varshney, A. (2015). Study of mechanical properties, microstructures and corrosion behavior of al 7075 t651 alloy with varying strain rate. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 75(1), 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/75/1/012031
Newman, J. C., Anagnostou, E. L., & Rusk, D. (2014). Fatigue and crack-growth analyses on 7075-T651 aluminum alloy coupons under constant- and variable-amplitude loading. International Journal of Fatigue, 62, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2013.04.020
Paris, P., & Erdogan, F. (1963). A Critical Analysis of Crack Propagation Laws. Journal of Basic Engineering, 85(4), 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3656900
Peixoto, R. G., Borges, B., Fonseca, F., & Guerra Peixoto, R. (2023). Direct evaluation of J-Integrals by Gauss-Legendre quadrature in the Dual Boundary Element Method. https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-3168091/V1
Portela, A., Aliabadi, M. H., & Rooke, D. P. (1993). Dual boundary element incremental analysis of crack propagation. Computers & Structures, 46(2), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(93)90189-K
Price, R. J., & Trevelyan, J. (2014a). Boundary element simulation of fatigue crack growth in multi-site damage. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 43, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGANABOUND.2014.03.002
Price, R. J., & Trevelyan, J. (2014b). Boundary element simulation of fatigue crack growth in multi-site damage. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 43, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGANABOUND.2014.03.002
Rice, J. R. (1968). A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 35(2), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3601206
Sajith, S., Murthy, K. S. R. K., & Robi, P. S. (2019). Mixed mode fatigue crack growth studies of crack emanating from circular hole. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2200(1), 020041. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5141211
Sajith, S., Shukla, S. S., Murthy, K. S. R. K., & Robi, P. S. (2020). Mixed mode fatigue crack growth studies in AISI 316 stainless steel. European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 80, 103898. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EUROMECHSOL.2019.103898
Sajuri, Z., Alang, N. A., Razak, N. A., & Aziman, M. A. (2011). Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of Rail Track Material. Key Engineering Materials, 462–463, 1109–1114. https://doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/KEM.462-463.1109
Santana, E., & Portela, A. (2016a). Dual boundary element analysis of fatigue crack growth, interaction and linkup. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 64, 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGANABOUND.2015.12.002
Santana, E., & Portela, A. (2016b). Dual boundary element analysis of fatigue crack growth, interaction and linkup. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 64, 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGANABOUND.2015.12.002
Sedmak, A. (2018). Computational fracture mechanics: An overview from early efforts to recent achievements. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 41(12), 2438–2474. https://doi.org/10.1111/FFE.12912
Shen, G., Gianetto, J., & Tyson, W. (2009). Measurement of J-R Curves Using Single-Specimen Technique On Clamped SE(T) Specimens. The Nineteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference.
Shlyannikov, V., Yarullin, R., Yakovlev, M., Giannella, V., & Citarella, R. (2021). Mixed-mode crack growth simulation in aviation engine compressor disk. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 246, 107617. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2021.107617
Shukla, S. S., & Murthy, K. S. R. K. (2023). A study on the effect of different Paris constants in mixed mode (I/II) fatigue life prediction in Al 7075-T6 alloy. International Journal of Fatigue, 176, 107895. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2023.107895
Singh, A., Tang, L., Dao, M., Lu, L., & Suresh, S. (2011). Fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth characteristics of nanotwinned copper. Acta Materialia, 59(6), 2437–2446. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2010.12.043
Tanaka, K. (1974). Fatigue crack propagation from a crack inclined to the cyclic tensile axis. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 6(3), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(74)90007-1
Tanaka, K. (1983). The cyclic J-integral as a criterion for fatigue crack growth. International Journal of Fracture, 22(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00942715/METRICS
Vaidya, W. V., Horstmann, M., Angamuthu, K., & Koçak, M. (2010). Utilising CODmax as an indirect fatigue crack length measurement parameter for M(T) specimens of an airframe aluminium alloy AA6056. Materialpruefung/Materials Testing, 52(11–12), 771–777. https://doi.org/10.3139/120.110185
Wang, C., Pereira, K., Wang, D., Zinovev, A., Terentyev, D., & Abdel Wahab, M. (2023). Fretting fatigue crack propagation under out-of-phase loading conditions using extended maximum tangential stress criterion. Tribology International, 187, 108738. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRIBOINT.2023.108738
Wen, P., & Aliabadi, M. (2012). Dual Boundary Element Method for Modelling Curved Crack Paths. International Journal of Fracture , 176, 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-012-9719-x
Xu, M., Liu, Y., & Yuan, H. (2022). Characterization of crack-tip fields for elastoplastic fatigue crack growth Part I: Analysis of the ΔJ-integral. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 275, 108847. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2022.108847
Zhao, T., Zhang, J., & Jiang, Y. (2008). A study of fatigue crack growth of 7075-T651 aluminum alloy. International Journal of Fatigue, 30(7), 1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2007.09.006
Zhu, X. K. (2017). Full-range stress intensity factor solutions for clamped SENT specimens. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 149, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPVP.2016.11.004
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Engineering Solid Mechanics | 📅 Year: 2024 | 📖 Volume: 12 | 📄 Issue: 4 | 👁️ Views: 1824 | 📊 Crossref: 2

Related Articles:
  • Numerical study of fatigue behavior of the aluminum 7075-T6 cantilever beam with angular cracks in different stress ratios
  • Fatigue life and reliability assessment of metal structures
  • Fracture analysis of a corner crack in a pinhole of a solid cylinder under torsion loading
  • Determination of crack growth direction for multiple offset edge cracks of a finite plate
  • Mixed mode I/II stress intensity factors through the thickness of disc type specimens

📝 Ready to share your research?

Engineering Solid Mechanics is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com