Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Engineering Solid Mechanics » Conceptual design vulnerability assessment of the housing light roofs to strong winds

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2653)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (49)
  • SCI (50)

ESM Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 14 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (32)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (39)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (35)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (36)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (28)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (32)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (25)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (16)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (4)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(84)
Financial performance(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Engineering Solid Mechanics
ISSN 2291-8752 (Online) - ISSN 2291-8744 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 12 Issue 2 pp. 133-140, 2024

Conceptual design vulnerability assessment of the housing light roofs to strong winds Pages 133-140 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Anabel Reyes-Ramírez, Roberto Andrés Estrada-Cingualbres, Libys Martha Zúñiga-Igarza, Roberto Pérez-Rodríguez, Leandro L. Lorente-Leyva

📋 Author Affiliations:
A. Reyes-Ramírez1, R.A. Estrada-Cingualbres1, L.M. Zúñiga-Igarza1, R. Pérez-Rodríguez ORCID 1, L.L. Lorente-Leyva2
1 CAD/CAM Study Centre, University of Holguin, Av. XX Aniversario s/n, Piedra Blanca, Holguin, 80100, Cuba
2 SDAS Research Group, Ben Guerir, 43150, Morocco, Universidad UTE, Rumipamba s/n y Bourgeois, Quito, 170147, Ecuador, Morocco
doi 10.5267/j.esm.2023.10.004
Crossref 1 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Conceptual design, Vulnerability, Strong winds, Light roofs, Indicators of financial security

Abstract: Hurricanes are one of the most significant causes of human and material losses in the Caribbean region. These events have demonstrated their devastating impact on housing and infrastructure. The assessment of the vulnerability of buildings with light roofs, at the initial design stage, is considered to be a fundamental step in the mitigation of these damages and losses. This paper presents the introduction of an indicator-based vulnerability assessment in an effort to mitigate these damages in advance. This indicator facilitates the design team's decision to select the appropriate light roof alternative subject to strong winds at the conceptual stage of the process. The indicators that contribute to the conceptual assessment of vulnerability were identified based on a comprehensive review of the literature and numerical simulations of the risk scenarios using CFD/FEM software’s. The ranking of indicator weights was determined by the Kano method according to experts' opinions. A desktop application has been developed for the assessment of the vulnerability of light roof variants for buildings at the conceptual design stage. The results reported in a case study demonstrate the viability of the desktop application based on the vulnerability indicator to assist decision making in the conceptual design stage.

How to cite this paper
APA: Reyes-Ramírez, A., Estrada-Cingualbres, R., Zúñiga-Igarza, L., Pérez-Rodríguez, R & Lorente-Leyva, L. (2024). Conceptual design vulnerability assessment of the housing light roofs to strong winds. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 12(2), 133-140.
Chicago/Turabian: Reyes-Ramírez, A., Estrada-Cingualbres, R., Zúñiga-Igarza, L., Pérez-Rodríguez, R & Lorente-Leyva, L. 2024. "Conceptual design vulnerability assessment of the housing light roofs to strong winds." Engineering Solid Mechanics 12, no. 2 (2024): 133-140.
AMA: Reyes-Ramírez, A., Estrada-Cingualbres, R., Zúñiga-Igarza, L., Pérez-Rodríguez, R & Lorente-Leyva, L. Conceptual design vulnerability assessment of the housing light roofs to strong winds. Engineering Solid Mechanics. 2024;12(2):133-140.

References
Alarcón Borges, R. Y., Pérez Montero, O., Tejera, R. G., Silveira, M. T. D., Montoya, J. C., Hernández Mestre, D., Vazquez, J. M., Mestanza-Ramon, C., Hernandez-Guzmán, D., & Milanes, C. B. (2023). Legal Risk in the Management of Forest Cover in a River Basin San Juan, Cuba. Land, 12 (4), 842. doi: 10.3390/land12040842.
Arrayago, I., Rasmussen, K. J. R., & Zhang, H. (2022). System-based reliability analysis of stainless steel frames subjected to gravity and wind loads. Struct. Saf., 97, 102211. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102211.
Bhardwaj, J., Yadav, A., Chauhan, M. S., & Chauhan, A. S. (2021). Kano model analysis for enhancing customer satisfaction of an automotive product for Indian market. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 10996-11001. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.093.
Habte, F., Asghari Mooneghi, M., Gan Chowdhury, A., & Irwin, P. (2015). Full-scale testing to evaluate the performance of standing seam metal roofs under simulated wind loading. Eng. Struct., 105, 231-248. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.006.
Kwan, K., & Kopp, G. A. (2021). The effects of edge radius on wind tunnel tests of low-rise buildings. J. Wind Eng. Ind., 214, 104668. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104668.
Papathoma-Köhle, M., Gems, B., Sturm, M., & Fuchs, S. (2017). Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows. Earth Sci. Rev., 171, 272-288. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007.
Papathoma-Köhle, M., Ghazanfari, A., Mariacher, R., Huber, W., Lücksmann, T., & Fuchs, S. (2023). Vulnerability of Buildings to Meteorological Hazards: A Web-Based Application Using an Indicator-Based Approach. Appl. Sci., 13 (10), 6253. doi: 10.3390/app13106253.
Pereira, C. I., Botero, C. M., Ricaurte-Villota, C., Coca, O., Morales, D., Cuker, B., & Milanes, C. B. (2022). Grounding the SHIELD Model for Tropical Coastal Environments. Sustainability, 14 (19), 12317. doi: 10.3390/su141912317.
Qin, H., & Stewart, M. G. (2020). Construction defects and wind fragility assessment for metal roof failure: A Bayesian approach. Reliab. Eng., 197, 106777. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106777.
Reyes Ramírez, A., Estrada Cingualbres, R. A., de la Rosa Melián, J. E., & Pérez Rodríguez, R. (2022). Procedure for the simulation of extreme wind loads on light metal roofs, (in Spanish). Ingeniería Mecánica, 25 (2), e643.
Shin, J.-G., Heo, I.-S., Yae, J.-H., & Kim, S.-H. (2022). Kano model of autonomous driving user acceptance according to driver characteristics: A survey study. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav., 91, 73-86. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2022.10.002.
Singhal, A., & Jha, S. K. (2021). Can the approach of vulnerability assessment facilitate identification of suitable adaptation models for risk reduction?. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 63, 102469. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102469.
Stevenson, S. A., El Ansary, A. M., & Kopp, G.A. (2019). A practical modelling technique to assess the performance of wood-frame roofs under extreme wind loads. Eng. Struct., 191, 640-648, 2019, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.058.
Wang, J., & Kopp, G. A. (2021). Comparisons of Aerodynamic Data with the Main Wind Force–Resisting System Provisions of ASCE 7-16. I: Low-Rise Buildings. J. Struct. Eng., 147, (3), 04020347. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002925.
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Engineering Solid Mechanics | 📅 Year: 2024 | 📖 Volume: 12 | 📄 Issue: 2 | 👁️ Views: 911 | 📊 Crossref: 1

Related Articles:
  • Increasing safety in residential construction through a simplified earthquake- and typhoon-resistant guidelines
  • The analysis of numerical self-compacting concrete wall panel models with variations of shear reinforcement
  • The behavior of self compacting concrete exterior beam-column joints with a variation of shear reinforcement against cyclic lateral loads
  • Classification and prediction of rural socio-economic vulnerability (IRSV) integrated with social-ecological system (SES)
  • Optimization of steel buildings by changing structural system and using lightweight materials

📝 Ready to share your research?

Engineering Solid Mechanics is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com