Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Engineering Solid Mechanics » Fracture toughness evaluation of zeolite/polyurethane-filled woven panels

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (421)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (101)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

ESM Volumes

    • Volume 1 (16)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (4)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 3 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 4 (25)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 5 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 6 (32)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 7 (28)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 8 (36)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 9 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 10 (35)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 11 (39)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 12 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 13 (32)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 14 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
optimization(87)
Sustainability(86)
Artificial intelligence(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Genetic Algorithm(78)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2192)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(813)
India(793)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(478)
Malaysia(444)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(226)
Thailand(160)
United States(114)
Ukraine(110)
Turkey(110)
Egypt(106)
Peru(94)
Canada(93)
Morocco(86)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Engineering Solid Mechanics

ISSN 2291-8752 (Online) - ISSN 2291-8744 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 11 Issue 3 pp. 325-338 , 2023

Fracture toughness evaluation of zeolite/polyurethane-filled woven panels Pages 325-338 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Hamid Safari, Mehdi Karevan, Hassan Nahvi

DOI: 10.5267/j.esm.2023.1.005

Keywords: Fracture toughness, 3D woven fiberglass fabric, Composite sandwich panels, Single Edge Notched Bend, Energy of fracture, Crack

Abstract: Recently, due to their extraordinary strength-to-weight ratio and multi-functional applications, three-dimensional woven fiberglass sandwich structures have become a well-received topic by researchers and manufacturers. Nevertheless, using light and foam absorber materials as injected fillers within sandwich cores can improve their overall mechanical performance and, in particular, their fracture toughness behavior. This study evaluates the fracture toughness of three-dimensional woven fiberglass sandwich panels filled with natural nano-structured zeolite/polyurethane foams injected between their parallel panels. The Single-Edge Notched Bend test was carried out to understand the effect of the injected foam on the mode-I fracture toughness response. It is demonstrated that the polyurethane foam reinforced with natural nano-structured zeolite particles highly improved the fracture toughness of sandwich core panels. It was found that the presence of vertical glass yarns within the sandwich panel gallery resulted in a significantly higher toughness compared with typical sandwich panels of no reinforcing vertical columns confirmed by the crack propagation and observed failure mode. The SEM and EDX analyses were used to better understand the correlations amongst the specimen morphology, the cracks behavior, and the toughness exhibited by the fabricated specimens.

How to cite this paper
Safari, H., Karevan, M & Nahvi, H. (2023). Fracture toughness evaluation of zeolite/polyurethane-filled woven panels.Engineering Solid Mechanics, 11(3), 325-338.

Refrences
Alsaadi, M., Erkliğ, A., & Bulut, M. (2018). Mixed-mode I/III fracture toughness of polymer matrix composites toughened with waste particles. Science and Engineering of Composite Materials, 25(4), 679-687.
Alsaadi, M., & Erkliğ, A. (2017). A comparative study on mode I and mode II interlaminar behavior of borax and SiC particles toughened S-glass fabric/epoxy composite. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 42(11), 4759-4769.
Anderson, T. L. (2005), Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications, New York: CRC press.
ASTM, E. (1991). Standard test method for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials. Annual book of ASTM standards, pp. 506-536.
ASTM, I. (2007). Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. ASTM D790-07.
ASTM, I. (2007). Standard test methods for plane-strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials. ASTM D5045-99.
Byun, J. H., Gillespie Jr, J. W., & Chou, T. W. (1990). Mode I delamination of a three-dimensional fabric composite. Journal of Composite Materials, 24(5), 497-518.
Callus, P. J., Mouritz, A. P., Bannister, M. K., & Leong, K. H. (1999). Tensile properties and failure mechanisms of 3D woven GRP composites. Composites Part A: applied science and manufacturing, 30(11), 1277-1287.
Carolan, D., Kinloch, A. J., Ivankovic, A., Sprenger, S., & Taylor, A. C. (2016). Mechanical and fracture performance of carbon fibre reinforced composites with nanoparticle modified matrices. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2, 96-103.
Cholake, S. T., Moran, G., Joe, B., Bai, Y., Raman, R. S., Zhao, X. L., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2016). Improved Mode I fracture resistance of CFRP composites by reinforcing epoxy matrix with recycled short milled carbon fibre. Construction and Building Materials, 111, 399-407.
Danielsson, M. (1996). Toughened rigid foam core material for use in sandwich constructions. Cellular polymers, 15(6), 417-435.
De Souza, J. M., Yoshimura, H. N., Peres, F. M., & Schön, C. G. (2012). Effect of sample pre-cracking method and notch geometry in plane strain fracture toughness tests as applied to a PMMA resin. Polymer Testing, 31(6), 834-840.
Dransfield, K., Baillie, C., & Mai, Y. W. (1994). Improving the delamination resistance of CFRP by stitching—a review. Composites Science and Technology, 50(3), 305-317.
Fishpool, D. T., Rezai, A., Baker, D., Ogin, S. L., & Smith, P. A. (2013). Interlaminar toughness characterisation of 3D woven carbon fibre composites. Plastics, rubber and composites, 42(3), 108-114.
Göktaş, D., Kennon, W. R., & Potluri, P. (2017). Improvement of Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of stitched glass/epoxy composites. Applied Composite Materials, 24(2), 351-375.
Gouda, P. S., Kudari, S. K., Prabhuswamy, S., & Jawali, D. (2011). Fracture toughness of glass-carbon (0/90) s fiber-reinforced polymer composite–an experimental and numerical study. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 10(8), 671.
Greenhalgh, E. (2009). Failure analysis and fractography of polymer composites. Cambridge: 1st ed, Woodhead Publishing.
Guénon, V. A., Chou, T. W., & Gillespie, J. W. (1989). Toughness properties of a three-dimensional carbon-epoxy composite. Journal of materials science, 24(11), 4168-4175.
Ji, A. H., Lu, M., Zha, M., Dong, B. Z., Gao, L. H., & Dai, Z. D. (2014). Model I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Carbon Fiber-reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites. Advanced Materials Research, 887, 81-85.
Karevan, M. (2022). Elastic response of Carbon Black reinforced polyester based composites using micromechanical models: Role of interphase. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part N: Journal of Nanomaterials, Nanoengineering and Nanosystems, 236 (3-4), 87-100.
Lo, J., Zhang, R., Shalchi-Amirkhiz, B., Walsh, D., Bolduc, M., Lin, S., & Bielawski, M. (2015). Improving Fracture Toughness of Alumina with Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube and Alumina Fiber Reinforcements. Ceramic engineering and science proceedings. Advances in Ceramic Armor XI, 36(4), 137.
Mouritz, A. P., Baini, C., & Herszberg, I. (1999). Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness properties of advanced textile fibreglass composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 30(7), 859-870.
Mouritz, A. P., & Cox, B. N. (2000). A mechanistic approach to the properties of stitched laminates. Composites part A: applied science and manufacturing, 31(1), 1-27.
Nakayama, J., Abe, H., & Bradt, R. C. (1981). Crack stability in the work‐of‐fracture test: refractory applications. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 64(11), 671-675.
Nizami, A. S., Ouda, O. K. M., Rehan, M., El-Maghraby, A. M. O., Gardy, J., Hassanpour, A. & Ismail, I. M. I. (2016). The potential of Saudi Arabian natural zeolites in energy recovery technologies. Energy, 108, 162-171.
Pabst, R. F. (1974). Determination of K Ic-Factors with Diamond-Saw-Cuts in Ceramic Materials. In Fracture mechanics of ceramics, Boston: Springer, pp. 555-565.
Peret, C. M., & Rodrigues, J. A. (2008). Stability of crack propagation during bending tests on brittle materials. Ceramica, 54, 382-387.
Rao, M. P., Sankar, B. V., & Subhash, G. (2009). Effect of Z-yarns on the stiffness and strength of three-dimensional woven composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 40(6), 540-551.
Sharma, S. K., & Sankar, B. V. (1997). Effect of stitching on impact and interlaminar properties of graphite/epoxy laminates. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 10(3), 241-253.
Shivakumar Gouda, P. S., G Kodancha, K., & Jawali, D. (2013). Experimental and numerical investigations on fracture behavior of high silica glass/satin textile fiber-reinforced hybrid polymer composites. Advanced Materials Letters, 4(11), 827-835.
Solaimurugan, S., & Velmurugan, R. (2008). Influence of in-plane fibre orientation on mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of stitched glass/polyester composites. Composites Science and Technology, 68(7-8), 1742-1752.
Sreekala, M. S., George, J., Kumaran, M. G., & Thomas, S. (2002). The mechanical performance of hybrid phenol-formaldehyde-based composites reinforced with glass and oil palm fibres. Composites science and technology, 62(3), 339-353.
Srivastava, V. K., Gries, T., Veit, D., Quadflieg, T., Mohr, B., & Kolloch, M. (2017). Effect of nanomaterial on mode I and mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of woven carbon fabric reinforced polymer composites. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 180, 73-86.
Stewart, J. K., Mahfuz, H., & Carlsson, L. A. (2010). Enhancing mechanical and fracture properties of sandwich composites using nanoparticle reinforcement. Journal of materials science, 45(13), 3490-3496.
Sudheer, M., Pradyoth, K. R., & Somayaji, S. (2015). Analytical and numerical validation of epoxy/glass structural composites for elastic models. American Journal of Materials Science, 5(3C), 162-168.
Tan, K. T., Watanabe, N., Sano, M., Iwahori, Y., & Hoshi, H. (2010). Interlaminar fracture toughness of vectran-stitched composites-experimental and computational analysis. Journal of composite materials, 44(26), 3203-3229.
Tan, P., Tong, L., & Steven, G. P. (2000). Behavior of 3D orthogonal woven CFRP composites. Part II. FEA and analytical modeling approaches. Composites Part A: Applied science and manufacturing, 31(3), 273-281.
Tan, P., Tong, L., Steven, G. P., & Ishikawa, T. (2000). Behavior of 3D orthogonal woven CFRP composites. Part I. Experimental investigation. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 31(3), 259-271.
Tarfaoui, M., & Hamitouche, L. (2012). Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of through-thickness reinforced laminated structures. Advanced Materials Research, 423, 154-165.
Tong, L., Mouritz, A. P., & Bannister, M. K. (2002). 3D fibre reinforced polymer composites. Elsevier.
Williams, J. G., Pavan, A., & Blackman, B. (Eds.). (2003). Fracture of Polymers, Composites and Adhesives II: 3rd ESIS TC4 Conference. Elsevier.
Yee, A. F., & Pearson, R. A. (1986). Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies. Journal of materials science, 21(7), 2462-2474.
Zimmermann, E. A., Launey, M. E., & Ritchie, R. O. (2010). The significance of crack-resistance curves to the mixed-mode fracture toughness of human cortical bone. Biomaterials, 31(20), 5297-5305
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Engineering Solid Mechanics | Year: 2023 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 3 | Views: 1091 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Fracture characterization of bonded composites: A comparative study
  • Analysis of mechanical properties of jute fiber strengthened epoxy/polyeste ...
  • Experimental study of a woven fiberglass composite delamination under impac ...
  • Investigation of delamination and damage due to free edge effects in compos ...
  • Impact response of glass/epoxy laminate interleaved with nanofibrous mats

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com