Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Engineering Solid Mechanics » Fracture characterization of bonded composites: A comparative study

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (805)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (562)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2648)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (43)
  • SCI (48)

ESM Volumes

    • Volume 14 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 13 (32)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 12 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 11 (39)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 10 (35)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 9 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 8 (36)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 7 (28)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 6 (32)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 5 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 4 (25)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 3 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 1 (16)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (4)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(169)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(84)
Financial performance(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (1)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (57)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (39)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries

Engineering Solid Mechanics

ISSN 2291-8752 (Online) - ISSN 2291-8744 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 10 Issue 1 pp. 109-116 , 2022

Fracture characterization of bonded composites: A comparative study Pages 109-116 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Naghdali Choupani, Ahmet Refah Torun

📋 Author Affiliations:
N. Choupani¹, A.R. Torun²
¹ Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Adana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University, Adana, Turkey
² Department of Aerospace Engineering, Adana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University, Adana, Turkey
doi 10.5267/j.esm.2021.8.001
Crossmark
15 Source: Scopus

🔑 Keywords: Bonded composites, Fracture characterization, Interfacial, Interlaminar, Cohesive

Abstract: Bonded joints have important benefits over conventional joining techniques such as rivets, welding, bolts and nuts in structural applications, particularly for components prepared of composite or polymeric materials. Due to the involvement of many geometric, material and construction variables, and the complex fracture and mechanical modes offered in the bonded joints, a proper consideration of fracture behavior is required to fully achieve their benefits. The fractures in bonded joints are mainly of three types; interlaminar (delamination), adhesive (interfacial) and cohesive crack. For a particular defect, crack propagation may occur in the tensile (mode I), the shear (mode II), and the tear (mode III) and their combinations (mixed mode). This study deals with topics such as theories of bonded composite joints and repairs, finite element analysis and fracture-based analysis and tests of mixed-mode cohesive, interfacial and interlaminar fracture mechanics. By employing geometrical factors extracted from finite element analysis and experimental results obtained from a modified Arcan test fixture, the mixed-mode cohesive, interfacial, and interlaminar fracture toughness are determined and fracture surfaces obtained are discussed.


How to cite this paper
APA: Choupani, N & Torun, A. (2022). Fracture characterization of bonded composites: A comparative study. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 10(1), 109-116.
Chicago/Turabian: Choupani, N & Torun, A. 2022. "Fracture characterization of bonded composites: A comparative study." Engineering Solid Mechanics 10, no. 1 (2022): 109-116.
AMA: Choupani, N & Torun, A. Fracture characterization of bonded composites: A comparative study. Engineering Solid Mechanics. 2022;10(1):109-116.

References
ABAQUS (2001), Hibbit, H. D., Karlsson, B. I., & Sorensen, K. (2001). ABAQUS user’s and theory manuals, version 6.2. Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorensen Inc., Pawtucket, RI.
Alfonso, L., Badulescu, C., & Carrere, N. (2018). Use of the modified Arcan fixture to study the strength of bonded assemblies for automotive applications. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 80, 104-114.
Aliha, M. R. M., Kucheki, H. G., & Mirsayar, M. (2021). Mixed Mode I/II Fracture Analysis of Bi-Material Adhesive Bonded Joints Using a Novel Short Beam Specimen. Applied Sciences, 11(11), 5232.
Arcan, M., Hashin, Z. A., & Voloshin, A. (1978). A method to produce uniform plane-stress states with applications to fiber-reinforced materials. Experimental mechanics, 18(4), 141-146.
Baker, A. (1999). Bonded composite repair of fatigue-cracked primary aircraft structure. Composite structures, 47(1-4), 431-443.
Baldan, A. (2004). Adhesively-bonded joints in metallic alloys, polymers and composite materials: Mechanical and environmental durability performance. Journal of Materials Science, 39(15), 4729-4797.
Choupani, N. (2008a). Experimental and numerical investigation of the mixed-mode delamination in Arcan laminated specimens. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 478(1-2), 229-242.
Choupani, N. (2008b). Interfacial mixed-mode fracture characterization of adhesively bonded joints. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 28(6), 267-282.
Choupani, N. (2008c). Mixed-mode cohesive fracture of adhesive joints: Experimental and numerical studies. Engineering fracture mechanics, 75(15), 4363-4382.
Cognard, J. Y., Créac’hcadec, R., Sohier, L., & Davies, P. (2008). Analysis of the nonlinear behavior of adhesives in bonded assemblies—Comparison of TAST and Arcan tests. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 28(8), 393-404.
Ducept, F. D. P. G. D., Davies, P., & Gamby, D. (2000). Mixed mode failure criteria for a glass/epoxy composite and an adhesively bonded composite/composite joint. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 20(3), 233-244.
El-Hajjar, R., & Haj-Ali, R. (2004). In-plane shear testing of thick-section pultruded FRP composites using a modified Arcan fixture. Composites Part B: Engineering, 35(5), 421-428.
Galińska, A., & Galiński, C. (2020). Mechanical Joining of Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites to Metals—A Review. Part II: Riveting, Clinching, Non-Adhesive Form-Locked Joints, Pin and Loop Joining. Polymers, 12(8), 1681.
Higgins, A. (2000). Adhesive bonding of aircraft structures. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 20(5), 367-376.
Hossein Abadi, R., Refah Torun, A., Mohammadali Zadeh Fard, A., & Choupani, N. (2020). Fracture characteristics of mixed-mode toughness of dissimilar adherends (cohesive and interfacial fracture). Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 34(6), 599-615.
Katanchi, B., Choupani, N., Khalil-Allafi, J., Tavangar, R., & Baghani, M. (2018). Mixed-mode fracture of a superelastic NiTi alloy: Experimental and numerical investigations. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 190, 273-287.
Khajedezfouli, M., Choupani, N., Torun, A. R., & Yengejeh, E. A. (2020). Fracture assessment of pipeline girth weld at low temperature. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 42(12), 1-11.
Kinloch, A. J. (1987). Adhesion and adhesives: science and technology. Chapman and Hall.
Mirsayar, M. M., Aliha, M. R. M., & Samaei, A. T. (2014). On fracture initiation angle near bi-material notches–Effects of first non-singular stress term. Engineering fracture mechanics, 119, 124-131.
Oskui, A. E. H., Choupani, N., & Shameli, M. (2016). 3D characterization of mixed-mode fracture toughness of materials using a new loading device. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 13, 1464-1482. Haddadi, E., Choupani, N., & Abbasi, F. (2016). Experimental investigation on the mixed-mode fracture of rubber-toughened PMMA using essential work of fracture method. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 162, 112-120.
Rahmani, A., & Choupani, N. (2019). Experimental and numerical analysis of fracture parameters of adhesively bonded joints at low temperatures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 207, 222-236.
Santos, M. A. S., & Campilho, R. D. S. G. (2017). Mixed-mode fracture analysis of composite bonded joints considering adhesives of different ductility. International Journal of Fracture, 207(1), 55-71.
Shameli, M., & Choupani, N. (2016). Fracture criterion of woven glass-epoxy composite using a new modified mixed-mode loading fixture. International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 8(02), 1650015.
Sutton, M. A., Deng, X., Ma, F., Newman Jr, J. C., & James, M. (2000). Development and application of a crack tip opening displacement-based mixed mode fracture criterion. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 37(26), 3591-3618.
Tserpes, K. (2020). Adhesive bonding of aircraft structures. Revolutionizing Aircraft Materials and Processes, 337-357.
Tsokanas, P., Loutas, T., & Nijhuis, P. (2020). Interfacial Fracture Toughness Assessment of a New Titanium–CFRP Adhesive Joint: An Experimental Comparative Study. Metals, 10(5), 699.
Yengejeh, E. A., Torun, A. R., Khajedezfouli, M., & Choupani, N. (2020). Fracture Toughness Assessment of Longitudinally Seam-Welded Gas Pipelines at Low Temperatures. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 11(4), 04020049.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Engineering Solid Mechanics | Year: 2022 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 1 | Views: 1290 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Determination of fracture parameters for a bi-material center cracked plate subjected to biaxial loading using FEOD method
  • A modified maximum tangential stress criterion for determination of the fracture toughness in bi-material notches – Part 1: Theory
  • Application of maximum tangential stress criterion in determination of fracture initiation angles of silicon/ glass anodic bonds
  • A new mixed mode fracture test specimen covering positive and negative values of T-stress
  • Calculation of stress intensity factors for an interfacial notch of a bi-material joint using photoelasticity

📝 Ready to share your research?

Engineering Solid Mechanics is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines


Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com