Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Engineering Solid Mechanics » Prediction of tensile strength of fused deposition modeling (FDM) printed PLA using classic laminate theory

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2653)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (49)
  • SCI (50)

ESM Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 14 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (32)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (39)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (35)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (36)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (28)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (32)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (25)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (16)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (4)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(84)
Financial performance(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Engineering Solid Mechanics
ISSN 2291-8752 (Online) - ISSN 2291-8744 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 10 Issue 1 pp. 13-24, 2022

Prediction of tensile strength of fused deposition modeling (FDM) printed PLA using classic laminate theory Pages 13-24 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Shilpesh R. Rajpurohit, Harshit K. Dave, Kamlakar P. Rajurkar

📋 Author Affiliations:
S.R. Rajpurohit ORCID 1, H.K. Dave ORCID 1, K.P. Rajurkar2
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, 395007, India
2 Department of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, 68588-0454, United States
doi 10.5267/j.esm.2021.12.002
13 Source: Scopus
Crossref 15 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Fused deposition Modeling, Classic laminate theory, Raster angle, Layer height, Raster width, Tensile strength

Abstract: The application of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is restricted due to limited information about the mechanical properties of printed parts. Therefore, it is required to determine the mechanical properties of the FDM properties to avail the full benefit of the FDM process. In the present study, Classic Laminate Theory (CLT) has been employed at the different configurations of layer thickness and raster width. The required elastic constant of material for CLT has been experimentally obtained through FDM printed Polylactic Acid (PLA) unidirectional specimens at 0°, 45° and 90° for different combinations of layer height and raster width. For these different combinations of layer height and raster width, constitutive models were developed to predict the tensile properties of the PLA parts. Tensile strength of the FDM printed bi-directional specimens has been experimentally obtained to validate the proposed CLT model results. The experimental tensile strength data is in good agreement with the data predicted by the proposed CLT model. Higher tensile strength and modulus were achieved with 0° raster angle compared to 90° raster angle. In the case of a bi-directional printed specimen, higher tensile strength was obtained with 45°/-45° raster angle followed by 30°/-60° and 0°/90° raster angle.

How to cite this paper
APA: Rajpurohit, S., Dave, H & Rajurkar, K. (2022). Prediction of tensile strength of fused deposition modeling (FDM) printed PLA using classic laminate theory. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 10(1), 13-24.
Chicago/Turabian: Rajpurohit, S., Dave, H & Rajurkar, K. 2022. "Prediction of tensile strength of fused deposition modeling (FDM) printed PLA using classic laminate theory." Engineering Solid Mechanics 10, no. 1 (2022): 13-24.
AMA: Rajpurohit, S., Dave, H & Rajurkar, K. Prediction of tensile strength of fused deposition modeling (FDM) printed PLA using classic laminate theory. Engineering Solid Mechanics. 2022;10(1):13-24.

References
Ahn, S. H., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., & Wright, P. K. (2002). Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 8, 248-257.
Akhoundi, B., & Behravesh, A. H. (2019). Effect of filling pattern on the tensile and flexural mechanical properties of FDM 3D printed products. Experimental Mechanics, 59(6), 883-897.
Alaimo, G., Marconi, S., Costato, L., & Auricchio, F. (2017). Influence of meso-structure and chemical composition on FDM 3D-printed parts. Composites Part B: Engineering, 113, 371-380.
Ameri, B., Taheri-Behrooz, F., & Aliha, M. R. M. (2020). Fracture loads prediction of the modified 3D-printed ABS specimens under mixed-mode I/II loading. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 235, 107181.
Ameri, B., Taheri-Behrooz, F., & Aliha, M. R. M. (2021). Evaluation of the Geometrical Discontinuity effect on Mixed-Mode I/II Fracture Load of FDM 3D-Printed Parts. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 113, 102953.
Bellini, A., & Güçeri, S. (2003). Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 9, 252-264
Casavola, C., Cazzato, A., Moramarco, V., & Pappalettere, C. (2016). Orthotropic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling parts described by classical laminate theory. Materials & Design, 90, 453-458.
Croccolo, D., De Agostinis, M., & Olmi, G. (2013). Experimental characterization and analytical modelling of the mechanical behaviour of fused deposition processed parts made of ABS-M30. Computational Materials Science, 79, 506-518.
Dave, H. K., Patadiya, N. H., Prajapati, A. R., & Rajpurohit, S. R. (2021). Effect of infill pattern and infill density at varying part orientation on tensile properties of fused deposition modeling-printed poly-lactic acid part. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 235(10), 1811-1827.
Durgun, I., & Ertan, R. (2014). Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 20, 228-235.
Garg, A., & Bhattacharya, A. (2017). An insight to the failure of FDM parts under tensile loading: finite element analysis and experimental study. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 120, 225-236.
Garg, A., Bhattacharya, A., & Batish, A. (2017). Failure investigation of fused deposition modelling parts fabricated at different raster angles under tensile and flexural loading. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 231(11), 2031-2039.
Huang, B., & Singamneni, S. (2015). Raster angle mechanics in fused deposition modelling. Journal of Composite Materials, 49(3), 363-383.
Jones, R.M., (2014). Mechanics of composite materials. CRC Press.
Kaw, A.K., (2005). Mechanics of composite materials. CRC Press.
Khosravani, M. R., Berto, F., Ayatollahi, M. R., & Reinicke, T. (2020). Fracture behavior of additively manufactured components: A review. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 109, 102763.
Kulkarni, P., & Dutta, D. (1999). Deposition strategies and resulting part stiffnesses in fused deposition modeling, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 121, 93-103
Li, L., Sun, Q., Bellehumeur, C., & Gu, P. (2002). Composite modeling and analysis for fabrication of FDM prototypes with locally controlled properties. Journal of manufacturing processes, 4(2), 129-141.
Rajpurohit, S. R., & Dave, H. K. (2018). Flexural strength of fused filament fabricated (FFF) PLA parts on an open-source 3D printer. Advances in Manufacturing, 6(4), 430-441.
Rajpurohit, S. R., & Dave, H. K. (2019). Analysis of tensile strength of a fused filament fabricated PLA part using an open-source 3D printer. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 101(5), 1525-1536.
Rankouhi, B., Javadpour, S., Delfanian, F., & Letcher, T. (2016). Failure analysis and mechanical characterization of 3D printed ABS with respect to layer thickness and orientation. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 16(3), 467-481.
Rodríguez, J. F., Thomas, J. P., & Renaud, J. E. (2001). Mechanical behavior of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) fused deposition materials. Experimental investigation. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 7, 148-158.
Rodríguez, J. F., Thomas, J. P., & Renaud, J. E. (2003). Mechanical behavior of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene fused deposition materials modeling. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 9, 219-230.
Shanmugam, V., Das, O., Babu, K., Marimuthu, U., Veerasimman, A., Johnson, D. J., Neisiany, R.E., Hedenqvist, M.S., Ramakrishna, S, & Berto, F. (2021). Fatigue behaviour of FDM-3D printed polymers, polymeric composites and architected cellular materials. International Journal of Fatigue, 143, 106007.
Somireddy, M., & Czekanski, A. (2017). Mechanical characterization of additively manufactured parts by FE modeling of mesostructure. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 1(2), 18.
Somireddy, M., Singh, C. V., & Czekanski, A. (2019). Analysis of the material behavior of 3D printed laminates via FFF. Experimental Mechanics, 59(6), 871-881.
Song, Y., Li, Y., Song, W., Yee, K., Lee, K. Y., & Tagarielli, V. L. (2017). Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3D-printed PLA. Materials & Design, 123, 154-164.
Sood, A. K., Ohdar, R. K., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2010). Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Materials & Design, 31(1), 287-295.
Sugavaneswaran, M., & Arumaikkannu, G. (2018). Additive manufactured multi-material structure with directional specific mechanical properties based upon classical lamination theory. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 24, 1212-1220.
Xia, Y., Xu, K., Zheng, G., Zou, R., Li, B., & Hu, P. (2019). Investigation on the elasto-plastic constitutive equation of parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 25, 592-601.
Zhou, Y. G., Su, B., & Turng, L. S. (2017). Deposition-induced effects of isotactic polypropylene and polycarbonate composites during fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 23, 869-880.
Zhou, Y. G., Zou, J. R., Wu, H. H., & Xu, B. P. (2020). Balance between bonding and deposition during fused deposition modeling of polycarbonate and acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene composites. Polymer Composites, 41(1), 60-72.
Zou, R., Xia, Y., Liu, S., Hu, P., Hou, W., Hu, Q., & Shan, C. (2016). Isotropic and anisotropic elasticity and yielding of 3D printed material. Composites Part B: Engineering, 99, 506-513.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Engineering Solid Mechanics | 📅 Year: 2022 | 📖 Volume: 10 | 📄 Issue: 1 | 👁️ Views: 1635 | 📊 Crossref: 15

Related Articles:
  • Material modelling of FDM printed PLA part
  • Use of additive technologies for metal injection molding
  • Effect of fiber volume fraction in the tensile properties of renewable Diss fiber /polyester composite
  • A new approach for investigation of damage zone properties in orthotropic materials
  • Experimental study of a woven fiberglass composite delamination under impact shock

📝 Ready to share your research?

Engineering Solid Mechanics is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com