Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Engineering Solid Mechanics » Detection of crack in structure using dynamic analysis and artificial neural network

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

ESM Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 14 (30)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (32)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (39)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (35)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (36)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (28)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (32)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (25)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (16)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (4)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Engineering Solid Mechanics
ISSN 2291-8752 (Online) - ISSN 2291-8744 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 8 Issue 3 pp. 285-300, 2020

Detection of crack in structure using dynamic analysis and artificial neural network Pages 285-300 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Manisha Maurya, Jatin Sadarang, Isham Panigrahi

📋 Author Affiliations:
M. Maurya, J. Sadarang ORCID , I. Panigrahi ORCID
¹ School of Mechanical Engineering, KIIT deemed to be UNIVERSITY, Bhubaneswar, India
doi 10.5267/j.esm.2019.11.002
5 Source: Scopus
Crossref 6 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Crack detection, Vibration analysis, FEA, Artificial neural network

Abstract: Cracks are one of the main causes of structural failure and they develop in the structures due to various reasons such as fatigue, temperature variation, excessive load, cyclic load, environmental effects, impact loading etc. Thus, structural health monitoring is necessary to avoid risks, damages and failures. So, in order to avoid an extensive failure or accident, the early prognosis of crack in structures is necessary. Visual inspection and some non-destructive testing (NDT) methods for detection of crack are difficult as it requires time, expenses and are quite inefficient. So the alternative methods are motivated to be developed. In this study, vibration analysis, finite element analysis (FEA) and an alternative way which is artificial neural network (ANN) is used to predict, detect and identify the damages in structures. It is found that the theoretical, experimental, finite element analysis and artificial neural network have good accuracy in predicting the crack characteristics.

How to cite this paper
APA: Maurya, M., Sadarang, J & Panigrahi, I. (2020). Detection of crack in structure using dynamic analysis and artificial neural network. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 8(3), 285-300.
Chicago/Turabian: Maurya, M., Sadarang, J & Panigrahi, I. 2020. "Detection of crack in structure using dynamic analysis and artificial neural network." Engineering Solid Mechanics 8, no. 3 (2020): 285-300.
AMA: Maurya, M., Sadarang, J & Panigrahi, I. Detection of crack in structure using dynamic analysis and artificial neural network. Engineering Solid Mechanics. 2020;8(3):285-300.

References
Abd-Elhady, A. (2013). Mixed mode I/II stress intensity factors through the thickness of disc type specimens. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 1(4), 119-128.
Akbardoost, J. (2014). Size and crack length effects on fracture toughness of polycrystalline graphite. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 2(3), 183-192.
Akbardoost, J., Ayatollahi, M. R., Aliha, M. R. M., Pavier, M. J., & Smith, D. J. (2014). Size-dependent fracture behavior of Guiting limestone under mixed mode loading. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 71, 369-380.
Aliha, M. R. M., & Gharehbaghi, H. (2017). The effect of combined mechanical load/welding residual stress on mixed mode fracture parameters of a thin aluminum cracked cylinder. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 180, 213-228.
Aliha, M. R. M., Berto, F., Bahmani, A., Akhondi, S., & Barnoush, A. (2016). Fracture assessment of polymethyl methacrylate using sharp notched disc bend specimens under mixed mode I+ III loading. Physical Mesomechanics, 19(4), 355-364.
Aliha, M. R. M., Heidari-Rarani, M., Shokrieh, M. M., & Ayatollahi, M. R. (2012). Experimental determination of tensile strength and K (IC) of polymer concretes using semi-circular bend(SCB) specimens. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 43(6), 823-833.
Aliha, M. R. M., Mahdavi, E., & Ayatollahi, M. R. (2017b). The influence of specimen type on tensile fracture toughness of rock materials. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 174(3), 1237-1253.
Aliha, M. R. M., Razmi, A., & Mansourian, A. (2017a). The influence of natural and synthetic fibers on low temperature mixed mode I+ II fracture behavior of warm mix asphalt (WMA) materials. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 182, 322-336.
Ayatollahi, M. R., & Aliha, M. R. M. (2011). On the use of an anti‐symmetric four‐point bend specimen for mode II fracture experiments. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 34(11), 898-907.
Carpinteri, A., & Ingraffea, A. R. (Eds.). (2012). Fracture mechanics of concrete: Material characterization and testing: Material Characterization and Testing (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
Dimarogonas, A. D. (1996). Vibration of cracked structures: a state of the art review. Engineering fracture mechanics, 55(5), 831-857.
Fayed, A. (2018). Numerical evaluation of mode I/II SIF of quasi-brittle materials using cracked semi-circular bend specimen. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 6(2), 175-186.
Frommherz, M., Scholz, A., Oechsner, M., Bakan, E., & Vaßen, R. (2016). Gadolinium zirconate/YSZ thermal barrier coatings: Mixed-mode interfacial fracture toughness and sintering behavior. Surface and coatings technology, 286, 119-128.
Ince, R. (2004). Prediction of fracture parameters of concrete by artificial neural networks. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 71(15), 2143-2159.
Li, H., He, C., Ji, J., Wang, H., & Hao, C. (2005). Crack damage detection in beam-like structures using RBF neural networks with experimental validation. International Journal of Innovative Computing Information and Control, 1(4), 625-634.
Mahdavi, E., Obara, Y., & Ayatollahi, M. (2015). Numerical investigation of stress intensity factor for semi-circular bend specimen with chevron notch. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 3(4), 235-244.
Mirsayar, M. M., Razmi, A., Aliha, M. R. M., & Berto, F. (2018). EMTSN criterion for evaluating mixed mode I/II crack propagation in rock materials. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 190, 186-197.
Mirsayar, M., Shi, X., & Zollinger, D. (2017). Evaluation of interfacial bond strength between Portland cement concrete and asphalt concrete layers using bi-material SCB test specimen. Engineering Solid Mechanics, 5(4), 293-306.
Nasiri, S., Khosravani, M. R., & Weinberg, K. (2017). Fracture mechanics and mechanical fault detection by artificial intelligence methods: A review. Engineering Failure Analysis, 81, 270-293.
Pan, D. G., Lei, S. S., & Wu, S. C. (2010, October). Two-stage damage detection method using the artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. In International Conference on Information Computing and Applications (pp. 325-332). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Park, J. H., Kim, J. T., Hong, D. S., Ho, D. D., & Yi, J. H. (2009). Sequential damage detection approaches for beams using time-modal features and artificial neural networks. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 323(1-2), 451-474.
Prabhakar, M. S. (2009). Vibration analysis of cracked beam (Doctoral dissertation, Master Thesis, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela).
Rosales, M. B., Filipich, C. P., & Buezas, F. S. (2009). Crack detection in beam-like structures. Engineering Structures, 31(10), 2257-2264.
Rossi, P., & Le Maou, F. (1989). New method for detecting cracks in concrete using fibre optics. Materials and structures, 22(6), 437-442.
Sahin, M., & Shenoi, R. A. (2003). Quantification and localisation of damage in beam-like structures by using artificial neural networks with experimental validation. Engineering Structures, 25(14), 1785-1802.
Satpute, D., Baviskar, P., Gandhi, P., Chavanke, M., & Aher, T. (2017). Crack detection in cantilever shaft beam using natural frequency. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(2), 1366-1374.
Scholey, J. J., Wilcox, P. D., Wisnom, M. R., Friswell, M. I., Pavier, M., & Aliha, M. R. (2009). A GENERIC TECHNIQUE FOR ACOUSTIC EMISSION SOURCE LOCATION. Journal of Acoustic Emission, 27.
Suresh, S., Omkar, S. N., Ganguli, R., & Mani, V. (2004). Identification of crack location and depth in a cantilever beam using a modular neural network approach. Smart Materials and Structures, 13(4), 907.
Sutar, M. K., Pattnaik, S., & Rana, J. (2015). Neural Based Controller for Smart Detection of Crack in Cracked Cantilever Beam. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2(4-5), 2648-2653.
Taheri-Behrooz, F., Aliha, M. R., Maroofi, M., & Hadizadeh, V. (2018). Residual stresses measurement in the butt joint welded metals using FSW and TIG methods. Steel and Composite Structures, 28(6), 759-766.
Tan, Z. X., Thambiratnam, D. P., Chan, T. H. T., & Razak, H. A. (2017). Detecting damage in steel beams using modal strain energy based damage index and Artificial Neural Network. Engineering Failure Analysis, 79, 253-262.
Teidj, S., Khamlichi, A., & Driouach, A. (2016). Identification of beam cracks by solution of an inverse problem. Procedia Technology, 22, 86-93.
Thatoi, D. N., Choudhury, S., Das, H. C., Jena, P. K., & Agrawal, G. (2014). CFBP Network–A Technique for Crack Detection. Procedia materials science, 6, 10-17.
Vakil-Baghmisheh, M. T., Peimani, M., Sadeghi, M. H., & Ettefagh, M. M. (2008). Crack detection in beam-like structures using genetic algorithms. Applied soft computing, 8(2), 1150-1160.
Wang, D., Zhang, H., Gong, B., & Deng, C. (2016). Residual stress effects on fatigue behaviour of welded T-joint: a finite fracture mechanics approach. Materials & Design, 91, 211-217.
Wang, Q., Liu, X., Wang, W., Yang, C., Xiong, X., & Fang, H. (2017). Mixed mode fatigue crack growth behavior of Ni-Cr-Mo-V high strength steel weldments. International Journal of Fatigue, 102, 79-91.

  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Engineering Solid Mechanics | 📅 Year: 2020 | 📖 Volume: 8 | 📄 Issue: 3 | 👁️ Views: 2127 | 📊 Crossref: 6

Related Articles:
  • Determination of fracture parameters for a bi-material center cracked plate subjected to biaxial loading using FEOD method
  • Numerical investigation of stress intensity factor for semi-circular bend specimen with chevron notch
  • A new mixed mode fracture test specimen covering positive and negative values of T-stress
  • Calculation of stress intensity factors for an interfacial notch of a bi-material joint using photoelasticity
  • Mixed mode I/II stress intensity factors through the thickness of disc type specimens

📝 Ready to share your research?

Engineering Solid Mechanics is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com