Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Engineering Solid Mechanics » Free-body model for tolerance analysis of rigid parts with manufacturing signature and operating conditions

Journals

  • IJIEC (777)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (690)
  • CCL (528)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (421)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (293)
  • IJDS (952)
  • JFS (96)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

ESM Volumes

    • Volume 1 (16)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (4)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • Volume 2 (32)
      • Issue 1 (6)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 3 (27)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 4 (25)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 5 (25)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 6 (32)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 7 (28)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 8 (36)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 9 (36)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 10 (35)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 11 (39)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 12 (41)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (12)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 13 (32)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (7)
      • Issue 4 (6)
    • Volume 14 (17)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (8)

Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(165)
Vietnam(151)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(115)
Supply chain(112)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(97)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(89)
optimization(87)
Artificial intelligence(85)
Financial performance(84)
Sustainability(84)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Job satisfaction(81)
Factor analysis(78)
Genetic Algorithm(78)
Social media(78)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(66)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(37)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(28)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2190)
Indonesia(1311)
Jordan(813)
India(793)
Vietnam(510)
Saudi Arabia(477)
Malaysia(444)
China(231)
United Arab Emirates(226)
Thailand(160)
United States(114)
Ukraine(110)
Turkey(110)
Egypt(105)
Peru(94)
Canada(92)
Morocco(86)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Engineering Solid Mechanics

ISSN 2291-8752 (Online) - ISSN 2291-8744 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 7 Issue 4 pp. 279-290 , 2019

Free-body model for tolerance analysis of rigid parts with manufacturing signature and operating conditions Pages 279-290 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Wilma Polini, Andrea Corrado

DOI: 10.5267/j.esm.2019.8.001

Keywords: Free-body model, Manufacturing signature, Operating conditions, Tolerance analysis, Rigid bodies

Abstract: This work shows a free-body model for tolerance analysis, that uses the force free-body diagrams and the functional equations’ sensitivities, by simulating the geometrical tolerances together with the dimensional ones. The geometrical tolerances were related to the deviations due to the manufacturing process (i.e. the manufacturing signature). Moreover, weight and friction forces were simulated too. A sensitivity analysis on the developed free body model aimed to evaluate the number of points to discretize the circular bodies and how to calculate the point clouds barycentre in order to reduce the simulation time. A case study was used to exemplify the application of the proposed free-body method with and without considering the manufacturing signature. The results show that the free body model is able to solve assembly problems and the manufacturing signature significantly influences the values of the functional requirement on the product and, therefore, it is impossible to neglect it.

How to cite this paper
Polini, W & Corrado, A. (2019). Free-body model for tolerance analysis of rigid parts with manufacturing signature and operating conditions.Engineering Solid Mechanics, 7(4), 279-290.

Refrences
Ameta, G., Serge, S., & Giordano, M. (2011). Comparison of spatial math models for tolerance analysis: tolerance-maps, deviation domain, and TTRS. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 11(2), 021004.
Armillotta, A., & Semeraro, Q. (2013). Critical operating conditions for assemblies with parameter-dependent dimensions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 227(5), 735-744.
Armillotta, A. (2014). A static analogy for 2D tolerance analysis. Assembly Automation, 34(2), 182-191.
Armillotta, A. (2015). Force analysis as a support to computer-aided tolerancing of planar linkages. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 93, 11-25.
Bourdet, P., Mathieu, L., Lartigue, C., & Ballu, A. (1996). The Concept of the Small Displacement Torsor in Metrology. Series on Advances in Mathematics for Applied Sciences, 40, 110–122.
Charpentier, F., Ballu, A., & Pailhes, J. (2011). A scientific point of view of a simple industrial tolerancing process. Procedia Engineering, 1, 1-10.
Chase, K.W., Gao, J., Magleby, S.P., & Sorensen, C.D. (1996). Including geometric feature variations in tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies. IIE Transactions, 28, 795–807.
Corrado, A., & Polini, W. (2017). Manufacturing signature in variational and vector-loop models for tolerance analysis of rigid parts. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 88(5-8), 2153–2161.
Corrado, A., Polini, W., & Moroni, G. (2017). Manufacturing signature and operating conditions in a variational model for tolerance analysis of rigid assemblies. Research in Engineering Design, 28(4), 529-544.
Corrado, A., & Polini, W. (2017). Manufacturing signature in jacobian and torsor models for tolerance analysis of rigid parts. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 46, 15-24.
Davidson, J.K., Mujezinović, A., & Shah, J.J. (2002). A New Mathematical Model for Geometric Tolerances as Applied to Round Faces. Journal of Mechanical Design, 124(4), 1-10.
Desrochers, A., & Rivière, A.A. (1997). Matrix approach to the representation of tolerance zones and clearances. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 13(9), 630–36.
Desrochers, A.A. (2002). CAD/CAM representation model applied to tolerance transfer methods. Journal of Mechanical Design, 125(1), 1-10.
Gao, J., Chase, K.W., & Magleby, S.P. (1998). Generalized 3-D tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies with small Kinematic adjustments. IIE Transactions, 30(4), 367–77.
Ghie, W., Laperrière, L., & Desrochers, A.A. (2003). Unified Jacobian-Torsor Model for Analysis in Computer Aided Tolerancing. In G. Gogu, D. Coutellier, P. Chedmail, & P. Ray (eds.), Recent Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering (p. 63-72). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Giordano, M., Pairel, E., & Samper, S. (1999). Mathematical representation of tolerance zones. In F. van Houten, & H. Kals (Eds.), Global Consistency of Tolerances: Proceedings of the 6 Th CIRP International Seminar on Computer-Aided Tolerancing, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 22--24 March, 1999 (p. 177-186). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Gupta, S., & Turner, JU. (1993). Variational Solid Modeling for Tolerance Analysis. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 13(3), 64–74.
Laperrière, L., & Lafond, P. (1999). Tolerance Analysis And Synthesis Using Virtual Joints. In F. van Houten, & H. Hubert Kals (Eds.), Global Consistency of Tolerances (p. 405-414). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1999, pp. 405–14.
Moroni, G., & Pacella, M. (2008). An approach based on process signature modeling for roundness evaluation of manufactured items. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 8(2), 021003.
Polini, W. (2012). Taxonomy of models for tolerance analysis in assembling. International Journal of Production Research, 50(7), 2014-2029.
Polini, W., & Corrado, A. (2016). Geometric tolerance analysis through Jacobian model for rigid assemblies with translational deviations. Assembly Automation, 36(1), 72-79.
Prisco, U., & Giorleo, G. (2002). Overview of current CAT systems. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 9(4), 373-387.
Schleich, B., Anwer, N., Mathieu, L., & Wartzack, S. (2014). Skin model shapes: A new paradigm shift for geometric variations modelling in mechanical engineering. Computer-Aided Design, 50, 1-15.
.
  • 68
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Engineering Solid Mechanics | Year: 2019 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4 | Views: 1341 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Roundness error measurement using teaching learning based optimization algo ...
  • Hybridized genetic-immune based strategy to obtain optimal feasible assembl ...
  • An investigation on the effects of financial management skills, wealth and ...
  • Designing and manufacturing of a drop weight impact test machine
  • A scheme for functional tolerancing: A product family in 3D CAD system

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com