Analysis of temporomandibular joint prosthesis using finite element method and a patient specific design

Omidi, A.; Jeannin, C.; Nazari, M.; Panahi, M.

Growing Science » Engineering Solid Mechanics » Analysis of temporomandibular joint prosthesis using finite element method and a patient specific design

Journals

ESM Volumes

Volume 1 (16)
- Issue 1 (4)
- Issue 2 (4)
- Issue 3 (4)
- Issue 4 (4)

Volume 2 (32)
- Issue 1 (6)
- Issue 2 (8)
- Issue 3 (10)
- Issue 4 (8)

Volume 3 (27)
- Issue 1 (7)
- Issue 2 (7)
- Issue 3 (6)
- Issue 4 (7)

Volume 4 (25)
- Issue 1 (5)
- Issue 2 (7)
- Issue 3 (7)
- Issue 4 (6)

Volume 5 (25)
- Issue 1 (7)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (6)
- Issue 4 (6)

Volume 6 (32)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (8)
- Issue 3 (8)
- Issue 4 (8)

Volume 7 (28)
- Issue 1 (7)
- Issue 2 (6)
- Issue 3 (7)
- Issue 4 (8)

Volume 8 (36)
- Issue 1 (8)
- Issue 2 (10)
- Issue 3 (9)
- Issue 4 (9)

Volume 9 (36)
- Issue 1 (9)
- Issue 2 (9)
- Issue 3 (9)
- Issue 4 (9)

Volume 10 (35)
- Issue 1 (9)
- Issue 2 (8)
- Issue 3 (10)
- Issue 4 (8)

Volume 11 (39)
- Issue 1 (10)
- Issue 2 (10)
- Issue 3 (9)
- Issue 4 (10)

Volume 12 (41)
- Issue 1 (10)
- Issue 2 (9)
- Issue 3 (12)
- Issue 4 (10)

Countries

Engineering Solid Mechanics

ISSN 2291-8752 (Online) - ISSN 2291-8744 (Print) Quarterly Publication Volume 7 Issue 1 pp. 83-92 , 2019

Analysis of temporomandibular joint prosthesis using finite element method and a patient specific design Pages 83-92 Download PDF

Authors: Alireza Omidi, Christophe Jeannin, Mohammad Ali Nazari, Masoud Shariat Panahi

DOI: 10.5267/j.esm.2018.10.001

Keywords: Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ), FEM, TMJ prosthesis, Muscle Mechanics

Abstract: In this study, a 3D finite element model of an intact mandible was used for the simulation of the movement of the lower jaw and analysis of the effects of TemporoMandibular Joint (TMJ) prosthesis replacement on the jaw movement. Seven bundles of muscle fibers were inserted in their appropriate positions following anatomical data. Digastric, geniohyoid and lateral pterygoid muscles were considered for opening the mouth while medial pterygoid, superficial masseter, deep masseter and temporalis muscles were used for closing the mouth. Then, the TMJ was replaced by two different types of TMJ prostheses in the same way as in a surgery operation. One of the prostheses was designed based on anatomical shape of the ramus and condyle of the mandible while the other one was taken similar to the commercial TMJ prostheses. Eventually, all three models underwent an opening jaw simulation and produced an identical range of motion while were mismatched in other parameters. The results show that since the anatomical TMJ prosthesis resembles the shape and structure of an intact mandible; therefore, it is more capable of simulating the motion of mandible compared to the commercial TMJ prosthesis. Furthermore, better contact between the anatomical TMJ prosthesis and the mandible leads to lower stress distribution in comparison with the commercial TMJ implant. Finally, as the amount of muscle forces and strain in anatomical TMJ prosthesis replacement are less than the commercial one, the patient needs to make less effort to move the mandible and open the mouth.

How to cite this paper

 Omidi, A., Jeannin, C., Nazari, M & Panahi, M. (2019). Analysis of temporomandibular joint prosthesis using finite element method and a patient specific design.Engineering Solid Mechanics, 7(1), 83-92.

Refrences

Arabshahi, Z., Kashani, J., Kadir, M. R. A., & Azari, A. (2011). Influence of thickness and contact surface geometry of condylar stem of TMJ implant on its stability. Physics Procedia, 22, 414-419.
Arabshahi, Z., Kashani, J., Koloor, S. S. R., Kadir, M. R. A., & Azari, A. (2012). Design analysis of TMJ implant under physiological loading condition. Advanced Materials Research, 488, 996-1000.
Chowdhury, A. R., Kashi, A., & Saha, S. (2011). A comparison of stress distributions for different surgical procedures, screw dimensions and orientations for a temporomandibular joint implant. Journal of Biomechanics, 44(14), 2584-2587.
Hsu, J. T., Huang, H. L., Tu, M. G., & Fuh, L. J. (2010). Effect of bone quality on the artificial temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 109(6), e1-e5.
Hsu, J. T., Huang, H. L., Tsai, M. T., Fuh, L. J., & Tu, M. G. (2011). Effect of screw fixation on temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 69(5), 1320-1328.
Huang, H. L., Su, K. C., Fuh, L. J., Chen, M. Y., Wu, J., Tsai, M. T., & Hsu, J. T. (2015). Biomechanical analysis of a temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis during various clenching tasks. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 43(7), 1194-1201.
Ingawale, S., & Goswami, T. (2009). Temporomandibular joint: disorders, treatments, and biomechanics. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 37(5), 976-996.
Koolstra, J. H., & Van Eijden, T. M. G. J. (1997). The jaw open-close movements predicted by biomechanical modelling. Journal of Biomechanics, 30(9), 943-950.
May, B., Saha, S., & Saltzman, M. (2001). A three-dimensional mathematical model of temporomandibular joint loading. Clinical Biomechanics, 16(6), 489-495.
McFarland, D. H. (2014). Netter's Atlas of Anatomy for Speech, Swallowing, and Hearing-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences, pp 144-149.
Nazari, M. A., Perrier, P., Chabanas, M., & Payan, Y. (2010). Simulation of dynamic orofacial movements using a constitutive law varying with muscle activation. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 13(4), 469-482.
Omidi, A., Nazari, M. A., & Jeannine, C. (2017, November). A 3D Finite Element Model of Mastication Muscles to Study the Jaw Movement for TMJ Prosthesis Performance Evaluation. In 2017 24th National and 2nd International Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Pal, S. (2014). Design of the Total Artificial Heart. In Design of Artificial Human Joints & Organs (pp. 261-280). Springer, Boston, MA.
Ramos, A., Completo, A., Relvas, C., Mesnard, M., & Simões, J. A. (2011). Straight, semi-anatomic and anatomic TMJ implants: the influence of condylar geometry and bone fixation screws. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 39(5), 343-350.
Ramos, A., Mesnard, M., Relvas, C., Completo, A., & Simões, J. A. (2014). Theoretical assessment of an intramedullary condylar component versus screw fixation for the condylar component of a hemiarthroplasty alloplastic TMJ replacement system. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 42(2), 169-174.
Ramos, A., Duarte, R. J., & Mesnard, M. (2015). Prediction at long-term condyle screw fixation of temporomandibular joint implant: A numerical study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 43(4), 469-474.
Raustia, A. M., Oikarinen, K. S., & Pyhtinen, J. (1998). Densities and sizes of main masticatory muscles in patients with internal derangements of temporomandibular joint obtained by computed tomography. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 25(1), 59-63.
Sanovich, R., Mehta, U., Abramowicz, S., Widmer, C., & Dolwick, M. F. (2014). Total alloplastic temporomandibular joint reconstruction using Biomet stock prostheses: the University of Florida experience. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 43(9), 1091-1095.
Van Eijden, T. M. G. J., Korfage, J. A. M., & Brugman, P. (1997). Architecture of the human jaw‐closing and jaw‐opening muscles. The Anatomical Record: An Official Publication of the American Association of Anatomists, 248(3), 464-474.
van Loon, J. P., de Bont, L. G., & Boering, G. (1995). Evaluation of temporomandibular joint prostheses: review of the literature from 1946 to 1994 and implications for future prosthesis designs. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 53(9), 984-996.