Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » An integrated CRITIC–TOPSIS framework for evaluating IoT-based water quality management strategies in freshwater Prawn farming

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

DSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (110)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (37)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Decision Science Letters
ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 15 Issue 3 pp. 559-576, 2026

An integrated CRITIC–TOPSIS framework for evaluating IoT-based water quality management strategies in freshwater Prawn farming Pages 559-576 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Atchara Choompol, Ronnachai Sangmuenmao, Sarayut Gonwirat, Anucha Sriburum, Waraporn Warorot, Thaithat Sudsuansee, Paitoon Thipsanthia, Narong Wichapa

📋 Author Affiliations:
A. Choompol ORCID 1, R. Sangmuenmao1, S. Gonwirat ORCID 1, A. Sriburum2, W. Warorot2, T. Sudsuansee2, P. Thipsanthia3, N. Wichapa ORCID 2
1 Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology, Kalasin University, Kalasin, 46000, Thailand
2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology, Kalasin University, Kalasin, 46000, Thailand
3 Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Faculty of Science and Health Technology, Kalasin University, Kalasin, 46000, Thailand
doi 10.5267/j.dsl.2026.6.004
Crossref 1 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: CRITIC, TOPSIS, Giant freshwater prawn, Water quality management, IoT-based monitoring, Multi-criteria decision-making

Abstract: Water quality instability is a major constraint in giant freshwater prawn farming, particularly in land-based systems where fluctuations in environmental conditions can reduce survival and productivity. This study applied an integrated CRITIC–TOPSIS framework to evaluate alternative water quality management strategies for giant freshwater prawn farming under multiple operational and production criteria. Four alternatives, representing different levels of management sophistication from conventional monitoring to a full IoT-based real-time monitoring system, were assessed using five criteria: Cost, Labor, Energy, Survival, and Yield. The CRITIC method was used to determine objective criterion weights, while TOPSIS was employed to rank the alternatives according to their relative closeness to the ideal solution. The CRITIC results indicated that Cost (0.2523) and Energy (0.2506) were the most influential criteria, followed by Labor (0.1681), whereas Survival and Yield each received a weight of 0.1645. The TOPSIS results showed that Alternative 4 was the most suitable option, with the highest closeness coefficient (0.5534), followed by Alternative 3 (0.5084), Alternative 2 (0.4583), and Alternative 1 (0.4466). Alternative 4 also achieved the best production performance, with 93% survival, 4.65 kg yield, and the lowest labor requirement (17 h), although it required the highest cost (13,746 Baht) and energy consumption (35 kWh). Compared with the conventional strategy, Alternative 4 improved survival by 11 percentage points, increased yield by 0.55 kg, and reduced labor by 18 h. The findings demonstrate that the integrated CRITIC–TOPSIS framework can serve as an effective decision-support tool for selecting water quality management strategies in freshwater prawn farming by balancing resource requirements and production outcomes. Under the present evaluation framework, the IoT-based real-time monitoring strategy was identified as the most suitable alternative for land-based giant freshwater prawn farming.

How to cite this paper
APA: Choompol, A., Sangmuenmao, R., Gonwirat, S., Sriburum, A., Warorot, W., Sudsuansee, T., Thipsanthia, P & Wichapa, N. (2026). An integrated CRITIC–TOPSIS framework for evaluating IoT-based water quality management strategies in freshwater Prawn farming. Decision Science Letters, 15(3), 559-576.
Chicago/Turabian: Choompol, A., Sangmuenmao, R., Gonwirat, S., Sriburum, A., Warorot, W., Sudsuansee, T., Thipsanthia, P & Wichapa, N. 2026. "An integrated CRITIC–TOPSIS framework for evaluating IoT-based water quality management strategies in freshwater Prawn farming." Decision Science Letters 15, no. 3 (2026): 559-576.
AMA: Choompol, A., Sangmuenmao, R., Gonwirat, S., Sriburum, A., Warorot, W., Sudsuansee, T., Thipsanthia, P & Wichapa, N. An integrated CRITIC–TOPSIS framework for evaluating IoT-based water quality management strategies in freshwater Prawn farming. Decision Science Letters. 2026;15(3):559-576.

References
Ahmed, F., Bijoy, M. H. I., Hemal, H. R., & Noori, S. R. H. (2024). Smart aquaculture analytics: Enhancing shrimp farming in Bangladesh through real-time IoT monitoring and predictive machine learning analysis. Heliyon, 10(17), e37310.
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015). Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(4), 2347-2376.
Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787-2805.
Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770.
Du, L., Niu, Z., Zhang, R., Zhang, J., Jia, L., & Wang, L. (2024). Evaluation of water resource carrying potential and barrier factors in Gansu Province based on game theory combined weighting and improved TOPSIS model. Ecological Indicators, 166, 112438.
Flores-Iwasaki, M., Guadalupe, G. A., Pachas-Caycho, M., Chapa-Gonza, S., Mori-Zabarburú, R. C., & Guerrero-Abad, J. C. (2025). Internet of Things (IoT) sensors for water quality monitoring in aquaculture systems: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. AgriEngineering, 7(3), e78.
Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645-1660.
Hargreaves, J. A. (2013). Biofloc production systems for aquaculture. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center Publication, 4503, 1-12.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Li, Z., Yang, T., Huang, C. S., Xu, C. Y., Shao, Q., Shi, P., Wang, X., & Cui, T. (2018). An improved approach for water quality evaluation: TOPSIS-based informative weighting and ranking (TIWR) approach. Ecological Indicators, 89, 356-364.
Lv, B., Liu, C., Xie, Y., Li, S., Li, X., Yang, Y., Meng, F., Hou, R., Shi, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Evaluation of the water resource carrying capacity in Heilongjiang, eastern China, based on the improved TOPSIS model. Ecological Indicators, 150, 110208.
Moreno Rocha, C. M., & Arenas Buelvas, D. (2024). Evaluation of renewable energy technologies in Colombia: Comparative evaluation using TOPSIS and TOPSIS fuzzy metaheuristic models. Energy Informatics, 7, 62.
Nasawat, P., Talangkun, S., Arunyanart, S., & Wichapa, N. (2021). Hybrid cross-efficiency approach based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal points and the CRITIC method for ranking decision-making units: A case study on ranking the methods of rice weevil disinfestation. Decision Science Letters, 10, 375-392.
New, M. B. (2002). Farming freshwater prawns: A manual for the culture of the giant river prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
New, M. B., Valenti, W. C., Tidwell, J. H., D’Abramo, L. R., & Kutty, M. N. (2009). Freshwater prawns: Biology and farming. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Orozco-Lugo, A. G., McLernon, D. C., Lara, M., Zaidi, S. A. R., González, B. J., Illescas, O., Pérez-Macías, C. I., Nájera-Bello, V., Balderas, J. A., & Pizano-Escalante, J. L. (2022). Monitoring of water quality in a shrimp farm using a FANET. Internet of Things, 18, 100170.
Ray, P. P. (2018). A survey on Internet of Things architectures. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 30(3), 291-319.
Shete, R. P., Shekhar C, A., Mahajan, Y. V., Bongale, A. M., & Dharrao, D. (2025). IoT-driven ensemble machine learning model for accurate dissolved oxygen prediction in aquaculture. Discover Internet of Things, 5(1), 94.
Soon, C. F., Jamia’an, M., Mohamed Sunar, N., Arifin, S. N. H., Tay, K. G., Heng, C., See, C. H., Mat Nayan, N. H., & Tee, K. S. (2025). Smart sensing and anomaly detection for microalgae culture based on LoRaWAN sensors and LSTM autoencoder. Aquaculture International, 33, e438.
Sriburum, A., Wichapa, N., & Khanthirat, W. (2023). A novel TOPSIS linear programming model based on the Taguchi method for solving the multi-response optimization problems: A case study of a fish scale scraping machine. Engineered Science, 23, 882.
Tidwell, J. H., Coyle, S. D., Dasgupta, S., Bright, L. A., & Yasharian, D. K. (2004). Impact of different management technologies on the production, population structure, and economics of freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii culture in temperate climates. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 35(4), 498-505.
Thongmual, N., Laoha, C., & Wichapa, N. (2024). An optimistic-pessimistic game cross-efficiency method based on a Gibbs entropy model for ranking decision making units. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 13(2), 1411-1423.
Ubina, N. A., Lan, H.-Y., Cheng, S.-C., Chang, C.-C., Lin, S.-S., Zhang, K.-X., Lu, H.-Y., Cheng, C.-Y., & Hsieh, Y.-Z. (2023). Digital twin-based intelligent fish farming with Artificial Intelligence Internet of Things (AIoT). Smart Agricultural Technology, 5, 100285.
Wei, G., Lei, F., Lin, R., Wang, R., Wei, Y., Wu, J., & Wei, C. (2020). Algorithms for probabilistic uncertain linguistic multiple attribute group decision making based on the GRA and CRITIC method: Application to location planning of electric vehicle charging stations. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 828-846.
Wichapa, N., Choompol, A., & Sangmuenmao, R. (2025). A novel Full Multiplicative Data Envelopment Analysis model for solving multi-attribute decision-making problems. Decision Analytics Journal, 14, 100549.
Yusoff, F. M., Umi, W. A. D., Ramli, N. M., & Harun, R. (2024). Water quality management in aquaculture. Cambridge Prisms: Water, 2, e8.
Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1), 22-32.
Zhang, H., & Wei, G. (2023). Location selection of electric vehicles charging stations by using the spherical fuzzy CPT-CoCoSo and D-CRITIC method. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 42, 60.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Decision Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2026 | 📖 Volume: 15 | 📄 Issue: 3 | 👁️ Views: 258 | 📊 Crossref: 1

Related Articles:
  • Digital twins in healthcare: A scientometric analysis of virtual patient models, personalized medicine, and surgical applications based on highly cited publications (2000–2025)
  • A survey of the methods, aspects and trends of life insurance efficiency papers
  • Unlocking project SDGs in furniture manufacturing: The mediating role of green innovation resilience
  • Inventory control of deteriorating items: A review
  • A review on green remediation techniques for hydrocarbons and heavy metals contaminated soil

📝 Ready to share your research?

Decision Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com