Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » Multi-period efficiency evaluation of heterogeneous decision-making units: Assessing efficiency before, during, and after COVID-19

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (51)
  • SCI (51)

DSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (110)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (37)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(172)
Supply chain management(169)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(114)
Artificial intelligence(103)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(99)
SMEs(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Sustainability(93)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(85)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Job satisfaction(81)
Organizational performance(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Knowledge Management(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(69)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(42)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Decision Science Letters
ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 14 Issue 4 pp. 861-876, 2025

Multi-period efficiency evaluation of heterogeneous decision-making units: Assessing efficiency before, during, and after COVID-19 Pages 861-876 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Fariba Dastani, Ghasem Tohidi, Masoud Sanei, Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, Shabnam Razavyan

📋 Author Affiliations:
F. Dastani1, G. Tohidi ORCID 1, M. Sanei1, F.H. Lotfi2, S. Razavyan3
1 Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
doi 10.5267/j.dsl.2025.8.003
1 Source: Scopus
Crossref 1 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Data Envelopment Analysis, Efficiency, Decision-Making Units, Heterogeneity, Time Periods

Abstract: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is an effective method for evaluating and improving the performance of Decision-Making Units (DMUs). It utilizes mathematical programming models to compare homogeneous units based on their inputs and outputs. One of the major challenges in this field is assessing the efficiency of DMUs over different time periods, where heterogeneity, arises due to various factors, such as, scientific and technological advancements, political and economic changes, system management updates, etc. These changes may lead to the addition or elimination of outputs, making unit comparisons more complex and creating significant differences in efficiency. Traditional DEA methods often fail to account for these changes across time periods simultaneously. Therefore, there is a need for new approaches, as to assess the efficiency of DMUs under such conditions. This paper addresses these challenges and presents a novel approach for analyzing the efficiency of DMUs undergoing substantial changes over time. As a practical application, the results of an empirical study evaluating conferences throughout three time periods, namely, (before the COVID-19 outbreak, during the pandemic, and after the pandemic) have been presented. These findings demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed approach effectively and can significantly assist organizations in more accurate evaluations and the enhancement of performance, relative to the evolving units.

How to cite this paper
APA: Dastani, F., Tohidi, G., Sanei, M., Lotfi, F & Razavyan, S. (2025). Multi-period efficiency evaluation of heterogeneous decision-making units: Assessing efficiency before, during, and after COVID-19. Decision Science Letters, 14(4), 861-876.
Chicago/Turabian: Dastani, F., Tohidi, G., Sanei, M., Lotfi, F & Razavyan, S. 2025. "Multi-period efficiency evaluation of heterogeneous decision-making units: Assessing efficiency before, during, and after COVID-19." Decision Science Letters 14, no. 4 (2025): 861-876.
AMA: Dastani, F., Tohidi, G., Sanei, M., Lotfi, F & Razavyan, S. Multi-period efficiency evaluation of heterogeneous decision-making units: Assessing efficiency before, during, and after COVID-19. Decision Science Letters. 2025;14(4):861-876.

References
Ahn, Y.-H., & Min, H. (2014). Evaluating the multi-period operating efficiency of international airports using data envelopment analysis and the Malmquist productivity index. Journal of Air Transport Management, 39, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.03.005
Asadi, F., Kordrostami, S., Amirteimoori, A., & Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M. (2023). An inverse multi-period FDH model with undesirable outputs. Croatian Operational Research Review, 14(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.17535/crorr.2023.0010
Atici, K. B., & Podinovski, V. V. (2015). Using data envelopment analysis for the assessment of technical efficiency of units with different specialisations: An application to agriculture. Omega, 54, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.015
Barat, M., Tohidi, G., & Sanei, M. (2019). DEA for heterogeneous mixed networks. Asia Pacific Management Review, 24(2), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.02.003
Barat, M., Tohidi, G., Sanei, M., & Razavyan, S. (2019). Data envelopment analysis for decision making unit with heterogeneous internal structures: An application to the banking industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(5), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1457483
Castelli, L., Pesenti, R., & Ukovich, W. (2004). DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00182-6
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444.
Chen, M., Ang, S., Yang, F., & Jiang, L. (2021). Efficiency evaluation of non-homogeneous DMUs with inconsistent input quality. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 158, 107418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107418
Cook, W. D., Harrison, J., Imanirad, R., Rouse, P., & Zhu, J. (2013). Data envelopment analysis with heterogeneous dmus. Operations Research, 61(3), 666–676. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2013.1173
Cook, W. D., Harrison, J., Rouse, P., & Zhu, J. (2012). Relative efficiency measurement: The problem of a missing output in a subset of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.022
Du, J., Chen, Y., & Huo, J. (2015). DEA for non-homogenous parallel networks. Omega, 56, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.001
Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1
Günaydın, Y., Correia, A., & Kozak, M. (2022). Comparing efficiency in all-inclusive and bed and breakfast hotel businesses: A multi-period data envelopment analysis in Turkey. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 31(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-11-2021-0308
Haas, D. A., & Murphy, F. H. (2003). Compensating for non-homogeneity in decision-making units in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(3), 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00139-X
Huang, C., Tu, C., Luo, Z., Chiu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2015). Using the heterogeneous frontier two‐stage DEA model to assess the efficiencies of expense utilization and operation of the Taiwanese hotel industry. International Transactions in Operational Research, 23(6), 1067–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12180
Kao, C., & Liu, S.-T. (2014). Multi-period efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis: The case of Taiwanese commercial banks. Omega, 47, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.001
Kyrgiakos, L. S., Kleftodimos, G., Vlontzos, G., & Pardalos, P. M. (2023). A systematic literature review of data envelopment analysis implementation in agriculture under the prism of sustainability. Operational Research, 23(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-023-00741-5
Li, Y., Lei, X., & Morton, A. (2019). Performance evaluation of heterogeneous hospitals: The case of Hong Kong hospitals. Health Care Management Science, 22(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-018-9433-y
Li, W., Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2016). DEA models for non-homogeneous DMUs with different input configurations. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(3), 946–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.063
Lin, S., Rouse, P., Wang, Y.-M., Lin, L., & Zheng, Z.-Q. (2023). Performance measurement of heterogeneous Hong Kong hospitals using directional distance functions. Health Care Management Science, 26(2), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-022-09625-0
Moghaddas, Z., Oukil, A., & Vaez-Ghasemi, M. (2022). Global multi-period performance evaluation – New model and productivity index. RAIRO - Operations Research, 56(3), 1503–1521. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2022065
Panwar, A., Olfati, M., Pant, M., & Snasel, V. (2022). A review on the 40 years of existence of data envelopment analysis models: Historic development and current trends. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29(7), 5397–5426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09770-3
Razavi Hajiagha, S. H., Hashemi, S. S., Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., & Azaddel, J. (2015). Multi-period data envelopment analysis based on Chebyshev inequality bounds. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(21), 7759–7767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.008
Saen, R. F., Memariani, A., & Lotfi, F. H. (2005). Determining relative efficiency of slightly non-homogeneous decision making units by data envelopment analysis: A case study in IROST. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 165(2), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.04.050
Singh, S., & Ranjan, P. (2018). Efficiency analysis of Heterogeneous parallel sub-unit systems for the performance measurement of higher education. Annals of Operations Research, 269, 641-666.
Xu, Y., Zhang, H., Cheng, K., Zhang, Z., & Chen, Y. (2021). Efficiency measurement in multi-period network DEA model with feedback. Expert Systems with Applications, 175, 114815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114815
Yan, Q., Zhao, F., Wang, X., Yang, G., Baležentis, T., & Streimikiene, D. (2019). The network data envelopment analysis models for non-homogenous decision making units based on the sun network structure. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 27(4), 1221–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0560-9
Zha, Y., Song, A., Xu, C., & Yang, H. (2013). Dealing with missing data based on data envelopment analysis and halo effect. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(9), 6135–6145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.11.015
Zhu, W., Yu, Y., & Sun, P. (2018). Data envelopment analysis cross-like efficiency model for non-homogeneous decision-making units: The case of United States companies’ low-carbon investment to attain corporate sustainability. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.007
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Decision Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2025 | 📖 Volume: 14 | 📄 Issue: 4 | 👁️ Views: 470 | 📊 Crossref: 1

Related Articles:
  • A fair-biased allocation of investment between economic sectors using social accounting matrix multiplier analysis
  • Measuring the relative efficiencies of automated telling machines and point of sales
  • Integrated AHP and network DEA for assessing the efficiency of Iranian handmade carpet industry
  • Ranking CCR-efficient units based on the indicator with limited resources
  • The superiority of DEAGP in ranking decision making units over DEA-AHP method: Utilizing relative closeness to ideal decision making units

📝 Ready to share your research?

Decision Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com