Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » P2P lending and banking credit for MSMEs and Non-MSMEs after COVID-19 pandemic: Does it matter?

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (96)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

DSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
    • Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • Volume 15 (19)
      • Issue 1 (19)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(111)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Financial performance(83)
Sustainability(82)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Artificial intelligence(77)
Knowledge Management(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2184)
Indonesia(1290)
India(788)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Decision Science Letters

ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 13 Issue 1 pp. 225-236 , 2024

P2P lending and banking credit for MSMEs and Non-MSMEs after COVID-19 pandemic: Does it matter? Pages 225-236 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Cliff Kohardinata, Luky Patricia Widianingsih, Nicklaus Stanley, Yopy Junianto, Anastasia Filiana Ismawati, Evi Thelia Sari

DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2023.9.004

Keywords: P2P, MSME credit, non-MSME credit, Post COVID-19

Abstract: This paper proposes an original view to determine the effect of P2P loans on MSME and non-MSME bank loans after the COVID-19 pandemic as a whole and then focuses on the island of Java (more developed areas) and outside Java (areas which are still undeveloped). The approach used in this study uses panel data regression from 33 provinces in Indonesia during Jan-Dec 2022 after the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of this study confirm that P2P lending is not a disrupter for bank credit, the details of the results are: (1) P2P lending has a significant positive effect on overall MSME banking credit, but has no significant effect on overall non-MSME banking credit; (2) P2P lending has no significant effect on MSME banking credit in Java, but has a significant positive effect on non-MSME banking credit in Java after the COVID-19 pandemic; (3) P2P lending has a significant positive effect on MSME banking credit outside Java after the COVID-19 pandemic, but has no significant effect on non-MSME banking credit in Java post the COVID-19 pandemic.

How to cite this paper
Kohardinata, C., Widianingsih, L., Stanley, N., Junianto, Y., Ismawati, A & Sari, E. (2024). P2P lending and banking credit for MSMEs and Non-MSMEs after COVID-19 pandemic: Does it matter?.Decision Science Letters , 13(1), 225-236.

Refrences
Aaker, D., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252171
Abbasi, K., Alam, A., Brohi, N. A., Brohi, I. A., & Nasim, S. (2021). P2P lending Fintechs and SMEs’ access to finance. Economics Letters, 204, 109890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109890
Bollaert, H., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Schwienbacher, A. (2021). Fintech and access to finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 68(December 2020), 101941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101941
Cassar, G., Ittner, C. D., & Cavalluzzo, K. S. (2015). Alternative information sources and information asymmetry reduction: Evidence from small business debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 59(2–3), 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.003
Christensen, C. M. (1997). Innovator ’ s Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., & Palmer, J. E. (2018). Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12349
Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015). What Is Disruptive Innovation ? Harvard Business Review, December.
Dang, V. D. (2019). The effects of loan growth on bank performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Management Science Letters, 9, 899–910. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.2.012
Das, S. (2017). Banking on Disruption : Digitization, FinTech and the future of retail banking (Issue June).
Fu, J., & Mishra, M. (2022). Fintech in the time of COVID-19: Technological adoption during crises. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 50, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2021.100945
Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata Journal, 7(3), 281–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0700700301
Jagtiani, J., & John, K. (2018). Fintech: The Impact on Consumers and Regulatory Responses. Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.11.002
Jagtiani, J., & Lemieux, C. (2018). Do fintech lenders penetrate areas that are underserved by traditional banks ? Journal of Economics and Business, 100(March), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.03.001
Jiang, C., Xu, Q., Zhang, W., Li, M., & Yang, S. (2018). Does automatic bidding mechanism affect herding behavior ? Evidence from online P2P lending in China. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 20, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2018.07.001
Kohardinata, C., Soewarno, N., & Tjahjadi, B. (2020). Indonesian peer to peer lending (P2P) at entrant’s disruptive trajectory. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.11171
Kohardinata, C., Suhardianto, N., & Tjahjadi, B. (2020). Peer-to-peer lending platform: From substitution to complementary for rural banks. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.12606
Kolari, J., Berney, R., & Ou, C. (1996). Small Business Lending and Bank Profitability. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 5(1), 1–15.
Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A New Approach To Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1086/259131
Le, M. T. H. (2021). Examining factors that boost intention and loyalty to use Fintech post-COVID-19 lockdown as a new normal behavior. Heliyon, 7(8), e07821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07821
Levin, J., & Milgrom, P. (2004). Consumer theory. https://web.stanford.edu/~jdlevin/Econ 202/Consumer Theory.pdf
Murinde, V., Rizopoulos, E., & Zachariadis, M. (2022). The impact of the FinTech revolution on the future of banking: Opportunities and risks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81(December 2021), 102103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102103
Nugraha, D. P., Setiawan, B., Nathan, R. J., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2022). Fintech Adoption Drivers for Innovation for SMEs in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040208
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023). Statistik Fintech Lending Periode Desember 2022.
Phan, D. H. B., Narayan, P. K., Rahman, R. E., & Hutabarat, A. R. (2019). Do financial technology firms influence bank performance? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, November 2, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101210
Ramlall, I. (2018). FinTech and the Financial Stability Board. Understanding Financial Stability, 71–81. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-833-420181016
Shawtari, F. A. M. (2018). Ownership type, bank models, and bank performance: the case of the Yemeni banking sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(8), 1271–1289. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2018-0029
Sheth, J. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 on consumer behavior: Will the old habits return or die? Journal of Business Research, 117, 280–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.059
Soluk, J., Kammerlander, N., & De Massis, A. (2021). Exogenous shocks and the adaptive capacity of family firms: exploring behavioral changes and digital technologies in the COVID-19 pandemic. R and D Management, 51(4), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12471
Tang, H. (2019). Peer-to-Peer Lenders Versus Banks: Substitutes or Complements? Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1900–1938. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhy137
Tut, D. (2023). FinTech and the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from electronic payment systems. Emerging Markets Review, 54(January), 100999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2023.100999
Wu, M., & Hua, C. (2018). Effects of shadow banking on bank risks from the view of capital adequacy. International Review of Economics and Finance, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.09.004
Zhang, Z., Hu, W., & Chang, T. (2019). Nonlinear effects of P2P lending on bank loans in a Panel Smooth Transition Regression model. International Review of Economics and Finance, 59(August 2017), 468–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.10.010
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Decision Science Letters | Year: 2024 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 1 | Views: 1066 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Collaborative enhancement of non-MSME credit and optimization of banking id ...
  • The influence of some fintech service on the performance of Islamic bank in ...
  • The effect of financial technology on Islamic banks performance in Jordan: ...
  • Does economic policy uncertainty exacerbate the gap between firms’ words an ...
  • Determinant of net interest income of commercial banks in Indonesia

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com