Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » Machine learning models for condition-based maintenance with regular truncated signals

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

DSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
    • Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • Volume 15 (19)
      • Issue 1 (19)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(110)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Sustainability(81)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Artificial intelligence(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2183)
Indonesia(1290)
India(787)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Decision Science Letters

ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 13 Issue 1 pp. 197-210 , 2024

Machine learning models for condition-based maintenance with regular truncated signals Pages 197-210 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Tyler Ward, Kouroush Jenab, Jorge Ortega-Moody

DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2023.9.006

Keywords: Condition monitoring, Machine learning, Maintenance Quality Function Deployment(MQFD)

Abstract: Condition-based maintenance (CBM) of industrial machines depends on the continuous, real-time monitoring of the machine’s operational condition via smart sensors attached to different components on the machine. The problem of regularly spaced missing data, which can occur due to a variety of hardware or software issues, is one that is often overlooked in the literature surrounding CBM in industrial machines. Such missing data can cause issues in interpreting the true operational state of the machine, which can reduce the effectiveness of CBM processes. In this paper, we examine the capabilities of five data imputation techniques for handling this regular missing data and examine the impact these techniques have on machine learning (ML) classification algorithms for machine fault diagnosis. We examine the following techniques: simple mean imputation, mean imputation with outliers removed, best and worst-case imputation, and previous day imputation. Each of these methods is configured with the specific parameters that they will only consider data from the previous 24 hours, to ensure that the data is recent, and adequately represents the current status of the machine. The efficacy of each method at accurately reconstructing the missing data and the impact they have on ML classification is recorded in the results. The models are evaluated on a real-world dataset and are evaluated on a variety of common performance metrics.

How to cite this paper
Ward, T., Jenab, K & Ortega-Moody, J. (2024). Machine learning models for condition-based maintenance with regular truncated signals.Decision Science Letters , 13(1), 197-210.

Refrences
Accorsi, R., Manzini, R., Pascarella, P., Patella, M., & Sassi, S. (2017). Data Mining and machine learning for condition-based maintenance. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1153–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.239
Adriana Mercioni, M., & Holban, S. (2022). Prediction of machine temperature system failure using a novel activation function. 2022 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC). https://doi.org/10.1109/isetc56213.2022.10010046
Akouemo, H. N., & Povinelli, R. J. (2017). Data improving in time series using ARX and Ann Models. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32(5), 3352–3359. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2656939
Alabadla, M., Sidi, F., Ishak, I., Ibrahim, H., Affendey, L. S., Che Ani, Z., Jabar, M. A., Bukar, U. A., Devaraj, N. K., Muda, A. S., Tharek, A., Omar, N., & Jaya, M. I. (2022). Systematic review of using machine learning in imputing missing values. IEEE Access, 10, 44483–44502. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3160841
Alwan, W., Ngadiman, N. H. A., & Hassan, A. (2022). Ensemble classifier with missing data in control chart patterns. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.46254/au01.20220420
Appoh, F., & Yunusa-Kaltungo, A. (2021). Risk-informed support vector machine regression model for component replacement—a case study of Railway Flange Lubricator. IEEE Access, 9, 85418–85430. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3088586
Barnes, S. A., Larsen, M. D., Schroeder, D., Hanson, A., & Decker, P. A. (2010). Missing data assumptions and methods in a smoking cessation study. Addiction, 105(3), 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02809.x
Çınar, Z. M., Abdussalam Nuhu, A., Zeeshan, Q., Korhan, O., Asmael, M., & Safaei, B. (2020). Machine learning in predictive maintenance towards Sustainable Smart Manufacturing in industry 4.0. Sustainability, 12(19), 8211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198211
Du, J., Hu, M., & Zhang, W. (2020). Missing data problem in the monitoring system: A Review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 20(23), 13984–13998. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2020.3009265
Emir, Ş. (2023). An investigation of anomaly detection methods in machine learning for high dimensional datasets. Global Studies on Management Information Systems, 227–254. https://doi.org/10.26650/b/ss28et06.2023.006.10
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. Nature, 585, 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
Hartini, E. (2017). Implementation of missing values handling method for evaluating the System/Component Maintenance Historical Data. Journal of Nuclear Reactor Technology, 19(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.17146/tdm.2017.19.1.3159
Hey, J., Malloy, A. C., Martinez-Botas, R., & Lamperth, M. (2016). Online monitoring of electromagnetic losses in an electric motor indirectly through temperature measurement. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 31(4), 1347–1355. https://doi.org/10.1109/tec.2016.2562029
Jha, S., Cui, S., Xu, T., Enos, J., Showerman, M., Dalton, M., Kalbarczyk, Z. T., Kramer, W. T., & Iyer, R. K. (2019). Live Forensics for Distributed Storage Systems. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10203
Jakobsen, J. C., Gluud, C., Wetterslev, J., & Winkel, P. (2017). When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – A practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1
Lavin, A., & Ahmad, S. (2015). Evaluating real-time anomaly detection algorithms - the Numenta Anomaly Benchmark. 2015 IEEE 14th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). https://doi.org/10.1109/icmla.2015.141
Li, Z., & He, Q. (2015). Prediction of railcar remaining useful life by multiple data source fusion. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(4), 2226–2235. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2015.2400424
Loukopoulos, P., Sampath, S., Pilidis, P., Zolkiewski, G., Bennett, I., Duan, F., & Mba, D. (2016). Dealing with missing data for prognostic purposes. 2016 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Chengdu). https://doi.org/10.1109/phm.2016.7819934
Martins, A. B., Fonseca, I., Farinha, J. T., Reis, J., & Marques Cardoso, A. J. (2022). Prediction maintenance based on vibration analysis and deep learning – A case study of a drying press supported on a hidden Markov model. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4194601
McKinney, W. (2010). Data Structures for Statistical Computing in python. Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference. https://doi.org/10.25080/majora-92bf1922-00a
Merkt, O. (2019). On the use of predictive models for improving the quality of Industrial Maintenance: An analytical literature review of Maintenance Strategies. Proceedings of the 2019 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.15439/2019f101
Osman, M. S., Abu-Mahfouz, A. M., & Page, P. R. (2018). A survey on data imputation techniques: Water distribution system as a use case. IEEE Access, 6, 63279–63291. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2877269
Pedersen, A., Mikkelsen, E., Cronin-Fenton, D., Kristensen, N., Pham, T. M., Pedersen, L., & Petersen, I. (2017). Missing data and multiple imputation in clinical epidemiological research. Clinical Epidemiology, 9, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s129785
Rafsunjani, S., Safa, R. S., Imran, A. A., Rahim, S., & Nandi, D. (2019). An empirical comparison of missing value imputation techniques on APS Failure Prediction. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 11(2), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2019.02.03
Schmidt, F. (2020). Anomaly Detection in Cloud Computing Environments. https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-10393
Song, C., Zheng, Z., & Liu, K. (2022). Building local models for flexible degradation modeling and Prognostics. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 19(4), 3483–3495. https://doi.org/10.1109/tase.2021.3124144
Song, I., Yang, Y., Im, J., Tong, T., Ceylan, H., & Cho, I. H. (2020). Impacts of fractional hot-deck imputation on learning and prediction of Engineering Data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 32(12), 2363–2373. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2019.2922638
Srimedha, B. C., Naveen Raj, R., & Mayya, V. (2022). A comprehensive machine learning based pipeline for an accurate early prediction of sepsis in ICU. IEEE Access, 10, 105120–105132. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3210575
The Pandas Development Team. (2020). pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas (Version 2.1.1) [Computer software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3509134
Wang, M., Yang, C., Zhao, F., Min, F., & Wang, X. (2023). Cost-sensitive active learning for incomplete data. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53(1), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2022.3182122
Zhang, Z.-W., Tian, H.-P., Yan, L.-Z., Martin, A., & Zhou, K. (2022). Learning a credal classifier with optimized and adaptive multiestimation for missing data imputation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 52(7), 4092–4104. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2021.3090210
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Decision Science Letters | Year: 2024 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 1 | Views: 788 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • A machine learning technique for Android malicious attacks detection based ...
  • Using machine learning algorithms with improved accuracy to analyze and pre ...
  • An improved genetic algorithm for multi-AGV dispatching problem with unload ...
  • Machine learning approach to uncover customer plastic bag usage patterns in ...
  • Effects of hybrid non-linear feature extraction method on different data sa ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com